Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Judge rejects challenge from dirty kike Utah woman (((Tilli Buchanan))) charged for being topless in her own home. Gas the kikes and race war now

3 views
Skip to first unread message

ab...@verizon.com

unread,
Feb 4, 2020, 3:23:51 PM2/4/20
to
Give Tilli Buchanan brake fluid to drink
https://www.google.com/search?q=brake+fluid&sxsrf=ACYBGNQCPjJG8i5tQE_tkgysjuhxSOmwzw:1580847591550&source=lnms&tbm=shop&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjAp42Z3LjnAhXIKM0KHfx4BZkQ_AUoAXoECGwQAw&biw=1920&bih=947

TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 4, 2020

Judge rejects challenge from dirty kike Utah woman charged for being topless
in her own home
(Leah Hogsten | The Salt Lake Tribune) Tilli Buchanan is seen in Judge Kara
Pettit's Third District Courtroom with her attorney Randy Richards, Nov. 19,
2019. Her attorneys Leah Farrell with the American Civil Liberties Union of
Utah and Randy Richards argued on her behalf that Utah's lewdness statute is
unconstitutional because it discriminates against women. Dirty kike Buchanan
is facing charges of lewdness involving a child after police say she took
off her top while cleaning out the garage and her stepchildren saw her
breasts. Judge Pettit is expected to rule in two months.
129

By Jessica Miller
·
Published: January 21
Updated: January 22, 2020
A Utah judge has upheld the state’s lewdness law after a challenge by a
dirty kike West Valley City woman who is facing charges for being topless in
her own home in front of her stepchildren.

Third District Judge Kara Pettit denied dirty kike Tilli Buchanan’s motion
to declare the lewdness statute unconstitutional in a ruling filed Tuesday.
Buchanan’s attorneys had argued that the law targets and discriminates
against women making it illegal for them to show their breasts.

Dirty kike Buchanan’s attorneys noted in their arguments that her husband
had been in the same state of undress when her stepchildren saw her
breasts — the couple had stripped down after installing insulation in their
garage — and he was not charged with any crime.


They leaned on a recent 10th Circuit Court ruling, where the appeals court
sided with two Colorado women who sued the city of Fort Collins. The women
are part of “Free the Nipple Fort Collins,” a group arguing that the city’s
ban on female toplessness violated their right to equal protection.

But the judge ruled that the ordinance in Colorado and Utah’s lewdness
statute were “significantly different.”

In Fort Collins, the ordinance outlawed a woman from showing her breasts in
public. It did not include language indicating that exposure was unlawful
for men, and it did not require any specific intent or mental state.

The portion of the law that dirty kike Buchanan is charged under is much
different, Pettit ruled. It prohibits lewd behavior by both women and men in
front of children, and also requires prosecutors to show that the defendant
exposed themselves and knew their actions would either cause “affront or
alarm” to the children or “with the intent to arouse or gratify the sexual
desires” of either party.

West Valley City prosecutors had argued that Utah's law is based on what
society deems to be nudity — and Pettit agreed with that analysis.


“It is the prerogative of the Legislature to establish laws incorporating
contemporary community standards regarding lewdness,” the judge wrote. “It
is not for the court to decide whether the Legislature’s enumeration of lewd
conduct is wise or sound policy.”

(Leah Hogsten | The Salt Lake Tribune) Judge Kara Pettit in her Third
District Courtroom, Nov. 19, 2019.
(Leah Hogsten | The Salt Lake Tribune) Judge Kara Pettit in her Third
District Courtroom, Nov. 19, 2019.
City Prosecutor Ryan Robinson applauded the judge’s ruling in a statement
Tuesday.

"We are pleased that Judge Kara Pettit agreed with our arguments about the
constitutionality of Utah's lewdness in the presence of a child statute," he
wrote. "We support the court's finding in this case that 'the government has
an important interest in enacting laws to protect the health, safety,
welfare, and morality of children, and to prevent them from being exposed to
lewdness.'"

Dirty kike Buchanan is represented by attorney Randy Richards, and an
attorney for the American Civil Liberties Union of Utah also argued on her
behalf during a November hearing. Richards did not immediately return a
request for comment Tuesday, and the ACLU said in a statement that it was
“disappointed."

“We are still reviewing the order and consulting with our client about next
steps,” said spokesman Jason Stevenson. It’s not clear whether dirty kike
Buchanan will appeal the judge’s decision. If she does not, the case will
now move toward a trial.

Dirty kike Buchanan faces three class A misdemeanors, and if she is
convicted, she faces possible jail time and would be required to spend 10
years as a registered sex offender.


Dirty kike Buchanan told The Salt Lake Tribune in September that she had
been installing insulation with her husband in their garage on the day of
the incident. The couple had stripped off their clothes just inside their
home to get the itchy materials off their skin. She was topless when her
stepchildren came downstairs and saw them.

She said her stepchildren seemed embarrassed — but dirty kike Buchanan told
them they shouldn’t treat her differently because she was a woman. She told
them a woman’s chest wasn’t inherently sexual, and that if they were
comfortable seeing their dad’s chest, it shouldn’t be different for her.

But West Valley City prosecutors say the situation wasn’t quite that
innocent. They accuse dirty kike Buchanan of stripping down in front of her
stepchildren after making a statement about how if her husband could take
off his shirt, then a woman should be able to as well.

They further allege that dirty kike Buchanan, while “under the influence of
alcohol,” had told her husband that she would only put her shirt back on if
he showed her his penis.

The police became involved in the situation after the Division of Child and
Family Services began an investigation involving the children that was
unrelated to Buchanan. Though it was not the focus of the initial
investigation, prosecutors say in court papers, the children’s mother
reported the incident to authorities because she was “alarmed."

dirty kike Buchanan said she hadn’t thought about the incident much since it
had happened — until a police detective called her earlier this year and
asked about it. Then, weeks later, the charges were filed.


“I was devastated,” she said in September. “Because the moment I took to
teach the kids, it was kind of smashed. Like you can’t teach kids this. In
fact, you’re going to be charged for even bringing this up.”

A Colorado attorney who represented the Fort Collins women in their lawsuit
has promised to sue West Valley City on dirty kike Buchanan’s behalf, but no
lawsuit had been filed as of Tuesday.


jmi...@sltrib.com

Follow @jm_miller

ab...@verizon.com

unread,
Feb 6, 2020, 10:08:58 AM2/6/20
to


"in...@backpage.net" wrote in message news:r1cjsm$mmt$1...@dont-email.me...

Give Tilli Buchanan brake fluid to drink
https://www.google.com/search?q=brake+fluid&sxsrf=ACYBGNQCPjJG8i5tQE_tkgysjuhxSOmwzw:1580847591550&source=lnms&tbm=shop&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjAp42Z3LjnAhXIKM0KHfx4BZkQ_AUoAXoECGwQAw&biw=1920&bih=947

TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 4, 2020

Judge rejects challenge from dirty kike Utah woman charged for being
to,pless
in her own home
(Leah Hogsten | The Salt Lake Tribune) Tilli Buchanan is seen in Judge Kara
Pettit's Third District Courtroom with her attorney Randy Richards, Nov. 19,
2019. Her attorneys Leah Farrell with the American Civil Liberties Union of
Utah and Randy Richards argued on her behalf that Utah's lewdness statute is
unconstitutional because it discriminates against women. Dirty ki,ke
Buchanan
is facing charges of lewdness involving a child after police say she took
off her top while cleaning out the garage and her stepchildren saw her
breasts. Judge Pettit is expected to rule in two months.
129

By Jessica Miller
·
Published: January 21
Updated: January 22, 2020
A Utah judge has upheld the state’s lewdness law after a challenge by a
dirty k,ike West Valley City woman who is facing charges for being to,pless
in
her own home in front of her stepchildren.

Third District Judge Kara Pettit denied dirty k,ike Tilli Buchanan’s motion
to declare the lewdness statute unconstitutional in a ruling filed Tuesday.
Buchanan’s attorneys had argued that the law targets and discriminates
against women making it illegal for them to show their breasts.

Dirty k,ike Buchanan’s attorneys noted in their arguments that her husband
had been in the same state of undress when her stepchildren saw her
breasts — the couple had stripped down after installing insulation in their
garage — and he was not charged with any crime.


They leaned on a recent 10th Circuit Court ruling, where the appeals court
sided with two Colorado women who sued the city of Fort Collins. The women
are part of “Free the Ni,pple Fort Collins,” a group arguing that the city’s
ban on female to,plessness violated their right to equal protection.

But the judge ruled that the ordinance in Colorado and Utah’s lewdness
statute were “significantly different.”

In Fort Collins, the ordinance outlawed a woman from showing her breasts in
public. It did not include language indicating that exposure was unlawful
for men, and it did not require any specific intent or mental state.

The portion of the law that dirty ki,ke Buchanan is charged under is much
different, Pettit ruled. It prohibits lewd behavior by both women and men in
front of children, and also requires prosecutors to show that the defendant
exposed themselves and knew their actions would either cause “affront or
alarm” to the children or “with the intent to arouse or gratify the se,xual
desires” of either party.

West Valley City prosecutors had argued that Utah's law is based on what
society deems to be nudity — and Pettit agreed with that analysis.


“It is the prerogative of the Legislature to establish laws incorporating
contemporary community standards regarding lewdness,” the judge wrote. “It
is not for the court to decide whether the Legislature’s enumeration of lewd
conduct is wise or sound policy.”

(Leah Hogsten | The Salt Lake Tribune) Judge Kara Pettit in her Third
District Courtroom, Nov. 19, 2019.
(Leah Hogsten | The Salt Lake Tribune) Judge Kara Pettit in her Third
District Courtroom, Nov. 19, 2019.
City Prosecutor Ryan Robinson applauded the judge’s ruling in a statement
Tuesday.

"We are pleased that Judge Kara Pettit agreed with our arguments about the
constitutionality of Utah's lewdness in the presence of a child statute," he
wrote. "We support the court's finding in this case that 'the government has
an important interest in enacting laws to protect the health, safety,
welfare, and morality of children, and to prevent them from being exposed to
lewdness.'"

Dirty ki,ke Buchanan is represented by attorney Randy Richards, and an
attorney for the American Civil Liberties Union of Utah also argued on her
behalf during a November hearing. Richards did not immediately return a
request for comment Tuesday, and the ACLU said in a statement that it was
“disappointed."

“We are still reviewing the order and consulting with our client about next
steps,” said spokesman Jason Stevenson. It’s not clear whether dirty ki,ke
Buchanan will appeal the judge’s decision. If she does not, the case will
now move toward a trial.

Dirty ki,ke Buchanan faces three class A misdemeanors, and if she is
convicted, she faces possible jail time and would be required to spend 10
years as a registered s,ex offender.


Dirty ki,ke Buchanan told The Salt Lake Tribune in September that she had
been installing insulation with her husband in their garage on the day of
the incident. The couple had stripped off their clothes just inside their
home to get the itchy materials off their skin. She was to,pless when her
stepchildren came downstairs and saw them.

She said her stepchildren seemed embarrassed — but dirty k,ike Buchanan told
them they shouldn’t treat her differently because she was a woman. She told
them a woman’s chest wasn’t inherently sexual, and that if they were
comfortable seeing their dad’s chest, it shouldn’t be different for her.

But West Valley City prosecutors say the situation wasn’t quite that
innocent. They accuse dirty ki,ke Buchanan of stripping down in front of her
stepchildren after making a statement about how if her husband could take
off his shirt, then a woman should be able to as well.

They further allege that dirty ki,ke Buchanan, while “under the influence of
alcohol,” had told her husband that she would only put her shirt back on if
he showed her his penis.

The police became involved in the situation after the Division of Child and
Family Services began an investigation involving the children that was
unrelated to Buchanan. Though it was not the focus of the initial
investigation, prosecutors say in court papers, the children’s mother
reported the incident to authorities because she was “alarmed."

dirty ki,ke Buchanan said she hadn’t thought about the incident much since
0 new messages