! Jim morrison was gay ???
Charos
(claims that he DID expose his genitals on stage) but I don't see anything
saying he's gay...
*+_Charos_+*
monst...@yahoo.com wrote in message
<7bgslr$8j0$1...@news4.muc.eurocyber.net>...
>http://home.az-online.net/~superstarstribute/index.htm
>
>
porsc...@webtv.net
he wasn't bi. Jim was Jim, which may have just confused some people.
Mrmojo1635
way too far fetched to be true. He was about as straight as you can be.
( I agree with the guy that said that he confused people. It seems to me that
he liked to fuck around with people's heads- play weird mind games)
mrmojo1635
mrmoj...@aol.com
PButler111
I don't think (or write) that he was gay, or even bi-sexual. I'm not even sure
why people feel such a desperate need to categorize people in those ways to
begin with. But it wasn't a secret that Jim had some homosexual experiences.
Lots of folks did in the sixties. Lots of folks do now. I don't know why
people -- especially men -- find that so threatening. Jim experimented with
everything. Why would sex be any exception?
Samantha.Grundy
>
> You may have gotten that idea from Patricia Butler's book, but to me it seems
> way too far fetched to be true.
not too sure about that - people can be gay and try to cover it up by
sleeping with many women, being especially promiscuous (which was
certainly J.M) if I saw him today I'd think he was way too pretty to be
straight....(I am that pessimistic)
his upbringing was of the kind that would certainly make him want to
repress it if he was homosexual - but you can put forwards arguments
such as this ad nauseam, even the most blatantly hetero person could be
said to be gay...
Samantha
DawnsHwy03
>why people feel such a desperate need to categorize people in those ways to
>begin with.
*applauds*
> Jim experimented with
>everything. Why would sex be any exception?
*really applaudin*....from what i can get, he did experiement....and well...i
don't know of any forward attempts he made to hide or disclose that he
experimented............
my opinion is that he was too close to being a openly truthful person, no
matter the consiquences, to hide that he had opened himself up to different
possiblities...= )
Cecrle
>I don't think (or write) that he was gay, or even bi-sexual. I'm not even sure
>why people feel such a desperate need to categorize people in those ways to
>begin with. But it wasn't a secret that Jim had some homosexual >experiences.
Any specific incidents that have gone on record?
-FC
LtMyFire67
>straight....(I am that pessimistic)
too pretty to be staight? Nah...he was hot, with that beard ,no not to
pretty...
Dawn : )
PButler111
Samantha.Grundy
>
> >I'm not even sure
> >why people feel such a desperate need to categorize people in those ways to
> >begin with.
>
categorisation in itself isn't useful - but sometimes if you know a
person is gay/bisexual/repressed gay - it can help you understand their
actions better, like I had a friend who chased this girl for two years
with no positive response, it turned out he was *very* gay but had
wanted something to hide it from his parents, and also that he still
wanted to get married and have kids and thought she'd have made a good
wife...
Think about the modern day interpretation of Casanova...
>
> > Jim experimented with
> >everything. Why would sex be any exception?
plenty of people do drugs (because they are unknown) but don't
experiment with sex much because they are sure what they want..>
Samantha
Cecrle
>>sure
>>>why people feel such a desperate need to categorize people in those ways to
>>>experiences.
>>
>>Any specific incidents that have gone on record?
>>
>>
>>-FC
>
>Are you kidding?
I just mean how is it known, what is known? Did he say, "Yeah, I had sex
with a guy once..." or what?
-FC
DawnsHwy03
>person is gay/bisexual/repressed gay - it can help you understand their
>actions better
people catagorize themselves alot more than what they like to
acknowledge...what does a persons sexual orientation have to do with what kind
of person they are?
Etu?
PButler111 wrote:
> >I just mean how is it known, what is known? Did he say, "Yeah, I had sex
> >with a guy once..." or what?
> >
> >-FC
>
> For some reason I was under the impression you'd read my book. Yes, he did say
> that to different people at different times about different situations.
>
> http://www.AngelsDance-AngelsDie.com
J. Rossi
>
>
> people catagorize themselves alot more than what they like to
> acknowledge...what does a persons sexual orientation have to do with what kind
> of person they are?
--
Feast of Friends, Sunday nights!
see http://www.joerossi.com
Brainflower: http://www.io.com/highway/brain.ram
Freeways & Mirrors: http://www.io.com/highway/freeways.ram j...@joerossi.com
PButler111
PButler111
Only the intelligent and literate. Obviously you're excused.
burndh...@my-dejanews.com
> >>Any specific incidents that have gone on record?
> I just mean how is it known, what is known? Did he say, "Yeah, I had sex
> with a guy once..." or what?
I'm not certain myself, but I heard that he gave Jimi Hendrix oral copulation.
Can anybody here prove or disprove this statement? I'm not jumping to any
conclusions, i'm just hoping to get a legitimate answer.
-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
PButler111
>copulation.
>Can anybody here prove or disprove this statement? I'm not jumping to any
>conclusions, i'm just hoping to get a legitimate answer.
It's a really silly rumor and completely untrue. Please don't repeat it again.
Vasily
PButler111 wrote:
--
Lasciate ogni speranza voi ch'entrate
Samantha Grundy
J. Rossi wrote:
> would somebody tell me what all the fuss is about Jim Morrison simply being happy?
he does not appear to have been happy at all, in any enduring way. I agree that the
word gay has been somewhat hijacked from regular usage, but well, it's a regularly
accepted term now..
Samantha Grundy
DawnsHwy03 wrote:
.what does a persons sexual orientation have to do with what kind of person they
are?
Like I said, it explained alot of things my friend had done when I knew he was gay
(well I'd suspected anyway) - modern explanation of Casanovas exploits are that
he was a closet gay...understandable (but not nec. true) if people think the same
of J.M.
barboy
pleease tell,flai...@aol.com,thanks
--
Posted via Talkway - http://www.talkway.com
Surf Usenet at home, on the road, and by email -- always at Talkway.
Samantha Grundy
PButler111 wrote:
> >Exactly who HAS read your "book"????
>
> Only the intelligent and literate.
You do yourself a disservice - as either you have been silly enough to
claim something you have no reason to suspect (What is to stop someone
unintelligent from reading it? ?- nothing)
It could only be known to be true if there are few enough readers for
you to know them *all*
Samantha
PButler111
Was there supposed to be some constructive point to this post? If so, you'd
best clarify.