In article <
dalton-47BE87....@mx05.eternal-september.org>,
David Dalton <
dal...@nfld.com> wrote:
>I have read that Sinead O'Connor has been ordained, but
>I thought she was Catholic. So has she joined another
>denomination or was she ordained by a rebel Catholic
>bishop?
Pretty much. Wikipedia (you have heard of that, haven't you?) has this to
say:
| In the late 1990s, Bishop Michael Cox of the Irish Orthodox Catholic and
| Apostolic Church (an Independent Catholic group not in communion with the
| Catholic Church) ordained O'Connor as a priest. The Catholic Church
| considers ordination of women to be invalid and asserts that a person
| attempting the sacrament of ordination upon a woman incurs
| excommunication. The bishop had contacted her to offer ordination
| following her appearance on the RTÉ's Late Late Show, during which she
| told the presenter, Gay Byrne, that had she not been a singer, she would
| have wished to have been a Catholic priest. After her ordination, she
| indicated that she wished to be called Mother Bernadette Mary.
--
"The anti-regulation business ethos is based on the charmingly naive notion
that people will not do unspeakable things for money." - Dana Carpender
Quoted by Paul Ciszek (pciszek at panix dot com). But what I want to know
is why is this diet/low-carb food author doing making pithy political/economic
statements?
Nevertheless, the above quote is dead-on, because, the thing is - business
in one breath tells us they don't need to be regulated (which is to say:
that they can morally self-regulate), then in the next breath tells us that
corporations are amoral entities which have no obligations to anyone except
their officers and shareholders, then in the next breath they tell us they
don't need to be regulated (that they can morally self-regulate) ...