In article <
1caf6479-c9bb-4810...@googlegroups.com>,
David Dalton <
dalto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 16, 2022 at 2:06:02 AM UTC-3:30, David Dalton wrote:
> > November 16, 2022. To get UTC add 3.5 hrs.
> >
> > Sarah stuff (non-overlap) 1:54 a.m. -->
>
> complete 12:59 p.m.
Why can't Sarah stuff (overlap) proceed as well
without Sarah rubber stamping what she likes or
deems necessary of the rest of my stuff, i.e.,
everything other than Sarah stuff (non-overlap)
but including popthrough devi type stuff subs
(non-overlap) instead of [DTS] (non-overlap)?
Well, the Sarah stuff (overlap) is too entwined
with the rest of the stuff and dependent on
some of it.
What do I want Sarah to rubber stamp?
[PCMM]
[F123]
popthrough devi type stuff subs (non-overlap)
[F4M]
[F4P]
[SMPES] and later s.m.p.e. onset
[SSA]
[RAFHDBE]
a.s.c. (1) -- (6)
[GSB]
[HCP]
(including mt&gc, P+, P-, 2nd+, 2nd-, w.s., Selective Cull,
and less likely Possibility of Extinction)
(B) completion
(MJ)
(J2)
Can she make modifications? No, not at this stage now
that Sarah stuff (non-overlap) is on, but maybe later
after she gains perineum click negotiation ability
in a.s.c. (1) and after she gains change access
to the m.s.h.c.p. (with her high Level 0 access).
Can she require that everything be filtered through
her internal definition of love as well as mine
(while not denying any rage or tough love, such
that love for the environment and non-human species
my mean being tough on the most criminal humans,
though I have provided a lenient escape option)?
That would be OK with me. Is it OK? Yes,
indeed her internal definition of love would
have priority over my essential messages (which
invoke my internal definition of love).
But I don't know if she is reading or off surfing
in Mexico or Hawaii or something.
Sarah, if you do rubber stamp the above, with that
filter condition, let me know by right elbow
activation (at least warming, maybe an ache,
maybe a zap). It may be too late to phone the
out of town landline since it would wake my brother.
What evidence do I have that Sarah stuff (non-overlap)
is on? Not much yet, just that I got a zap in my
forehead part of my brain when it came on. Perhaps
Sarah has more evidence. I also have no evidence
that (B) has been done for some. But even if yu
don't believe, Sarah, humour me and do the
rubber stamping. If anyone who knows her or
can easily contact her is reading, pass this to
her in case she has given up reading me.
"And don’t you know that there’s a wolf stalking in sheep’s clothing
tells me he’s the real thing; Think what your life would be missing
if you didn’t have him to sing; To sing about" (Sarah McLachlan)