"The SS: Hitlers Instrument of Terror" and Kurt Meyer and Michael
Wittman who all have books written about them by different authors,
reported the exact same data, about prisoners being taken by the
The Waffen SS - as instructed by Der Fuhrer, were told never to hurt a
man that surrenders. When enemy soldiers surrender, it is even un-
necessary to disarm them, for they have surrendered knowing they are
outnumbered and outgunned, thus if they fire their weapon against a
superior numerical force, they will die without question. Therefore,
Adolf Hitler/Thomas Jefferson instructed his Waffen SS to just point
the way for the prisoners to go, and don't even disarm them. And this
was repeated, in numerous books I have skimmed through. I saw the
exact same thing in numerous books that were not collaborating, and
then I read about Lt. John Frost who defends the SS and their honor.
What was interesting is that the Jews used incidents where Allied
soldiers were not disarmed and just pointed which way to go as panzers
rolled on, was that the allied soldiers on their own through down
their guns, and as soon as the tanks were out of sight, the allied
soldiers picked up their guns again and thought they could gain a
medal and survive by attacking further proceeding Waffen SS soldiers,
of which they did. These men failed and were executed, they flew a
white flag, but then when it was convenient to betray that, they did
and then the claims of men who were surrendering were gunned down in
cold blood by the Waffen SS - this was not true, yet this lie stands
today against the Waffen SS.
Hitler instructed his SS to be totally loose and humane to enemy
soldiers who surrendered, and loose they were they didnt even disarm
them. Once you surrender to a Waffen SS man it's your duty and honor
to refrain from further combat, we trust you us Germans..
Spielberg owes us all!!
Really? Why, pray tell, did so many of them run into hiding after
Eichmann and Mengele fled to South America. Hoess was captured hiding
in a farmhouse. Looks like pretty guilty behavior to me.
And none of your mcFey shite, either, b'luto.
> "Joe Bruno" <br...@indystart.com> wrote in message
> And none of your mcFey shite, either, b'luto.
Have a look at what the CIA has to say about the following gentlemen at
Yes or no?
Was Rudolf Hoess, an SS officer and former commandant of Auschwitz,
discovered and arrested by British Military Police after being on the lam
and living under a false identity for more than a year?
[for details, see http://www.bad-bad.de/gesch/hoess.htm;
Was Adolf Eichmann, an SS officer who was the secretary for the Wannsee
Conference and the head of RSHA Referat IV B4, the RSHA department that
dealt with Jewish affairs and evacuation, discovered and abducted by
Israeli agents in Argentina after being on the lam and living under a
false identity for more than fifteen years?
[for details, see http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB150/index.htm,
Was Franz Stangl, an SS officer who worked in the T-4 euthanasia program
and later served as commandant of the Sobibór and Treblinka exterminbation
camps tracked down and arrested by Simon Wiesenthal's operatives in Brazil
[for details, see http://www.auschwitz.dk/sobibor/franzstangl.htm]
Was Gustav Wagner, an SS officer who served as the deputy Sobibór
commander, arrested in 1978 in Brazil after being on the lam for more than
[for details, see http://www.auschwitz.dk/sobibor/Trials.htm]
Was Josef Mengele, an SS officer notorious for the pseudo-medical
experiments that he conducted at Auschwitz-Birkenau, identified in Brazil,
where he had been living on the lam for more than thirty years, after he
[for details, see http://www.posner.com/articles/mengele.htm,
What the fuck are you babbling about, Psycho?
You're so full of shit, your skin must be rapidly turning dark brown.
You never heard of Adolf Eichmann or Josef Mengele?
That's a lie, cause I posted plenty on them.
"Joe Bruno" <br...@indystart.com> wrote in message
"Eugene Holman" <hol...@mappi.helsinki.fi> wrote in message
Is that the same CIA who, along with the FBI declared that the attack on the
WTC was motivated by pro-israel US foreign policy and the ongoing conflict
between Ersatz israel and the Palestinians?
PROOOOFFFFF, b'luto. You're forever screeching for it.
>Really? Why, pray tell, did so many of them run into hiding after
The Diaries of Charles A. Lindbergh, p.986
"That young girl riding on her bicycle - she must know that on the
day the Russians come she will probably be raped by a dozen soldiers.
When do they come? In days? In weeks? That, we have not told the
Germans. She has a good face - nicely dressed in old but clean and
brightly colored garments - like the daughter of a middle class
American family. I realize that we Americans are holding her at
Dessau. She cannot flee to safety.
We will not let her pass our sentries on the roads. We are turning her
and thousands of
others like her over to the Soviet soldiers for their sport. I feel
"German children look in through the window. We have more food than
we need, but regulations prevent giving it to them. It is difficult to
look at them. I feel ashamed of myself, of my people, as I eat and
watch those children. They are not to blame for the war. They are
hungry children. What right have we to stuff ourselves while they look
on - well-fed men eating, leaving unwanted food on plates, while
hungry children look on."
Berlin Correspondent, The Times, September 10th, 1945
"...Another small boy turned out of Danzig had a scrawled postcard
attached to him stating that his soldier father was long since missing
and that his mother and two sisters had died of hunger."
At this time, Denmark, formerly occupied by the Germans as a means
of denying the allies a North Sea bridgehead was bursting at the seams
with surplus food and was pleading with the allies to put it to good
use. It was refused.
Fuck you twice and fuck your brother 5 times.
> Kurt Knoll.
> "Joe Bruno" <b...@indystart.com> wrote in message
> > in a farmhouse. Looks like pretty guilty behavior to me.- Hide quoted text -
> - Show quoted text -
It's true, the SS was simply a front for tea cozy collecting soldiers
who liked to discuss their tea cozy collection whilst knitting.
Just a knitting circle, really.
With really fabulous uniforms and accessories.
> > Do you mean hiding from you two faced coock sucker make them look guilty. I
> > do not think you guys ever did have any honest intentions. Get yourself a
> > good education before you open your mouth.
> > Kurt Knoll.
> Fuck you twice and fuck your brother 5 times.
Could explain why nazis dont breed
Could explain why Kurt and Werner are so close. Remember, kids, incest is
"What did you say. Did the burry the train with the show wen
can you show us the buried train Sara. As you know seeing is beliving."
(Kurt Knoll, Kitimat, B.C.'s Leading Revisionist Scholar)
The Nizkor Project: http://www.nizkor.org/
Get real guy. I know a german soldier once who said me that.
> "Kenneth McVay OBC" <kmc...@shell.vex.net> wrote in message
> > In article <1179344563....@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,
> > george <gbl...@hnpl.net> wrote:
> >>On May 17, 2:52 am, Joe Bruno <b...@indystart.com> wrote:
> >>> > Do you mean hiding from you two faced coock sucker make them look
> >>> > guilty. I
> >>> > do not think you guys ever did have any honest intentions. Get
> >>> > yourself a
> >>> > good education before you open your mouth.
> >>> > Kurt Knoll.
> >>> Fuck you twice and fuck your brother 5 times.
> >>Could explain why nazis dont breed
> > Could explain why Kurt and Werner are so close. Remember, kids, incest is
> > BAD.
> Get real guy. I know a german soldier once who said me that.
Really? Where can we read the original document, Kurt? We all know what
kind of liar you are.
Ordinarily he was insane, but he had lucid moments when he was merely stupid.
- Heinrich Heine, eerily summing up the persona of "Ben Cramer"
His tribe is well known for being liars down through the centuries.
I read that on the net.
No answer eh.
You think Kurt is stupid? Compared to his brother, he's Albert
Something wrong, b'luto? Gone all purple in the kisser again? Careful. At
your advanced age, you're likely to pop a valve.
In the past there was survival of the fittest and humans evolved
into higher beings with that. But it was a cruel world. Notice in the
above speech that he did say:
"we took the physically weak, the mentally ill, the genetically
defective criminals and not only kept them alive and cared for
them-that is our duty as human beings, which we certainly do not want
to ignore in the future either"
Survival of the fittest should be replaced by sterilization. We would
still evolve into higher beings, but this way is much more humane.
We should take care for those who need help and many work hours
would be done to provide for them, and all we ask in return is for
them not to pass their misfortune onto more generations. We are not
asking too much at all.
It was a great speech. These policies that would make a nation
unimaginably great, a heaven on earth. Heil Hitler.
First I'm amused that you think anybody would read your posts.
Especially your cut and paste tripe. But regarding your alleged
original comments (which are rare); do you REALLY think that anyone
wants to be part of something that includes a person like yourself?
"Racially aware whites", have exhibited virtually no redeeming
qualities and provide no value to mankind. Period.
There was a difference between Waffen-SS and Totenkopf units who
worked in death camps. Typical revisionist way to mix things together.
But Waffen-SS also commited war crimes. Especially in th east.
Remember Hitler's order of commissars and communist party members for
Totenkopf was at the same time an elite Waffen-SS division and also
the instrument of terror in Camps. There were men who fought at the
front and sometimes served in camps. There is a tie between holocaust
and Waffen-SS and no real historian denies it.
<oneey...@gmail.com> wrote in message
Waffe-SS had a long process. And they weren't a "normal" soldiers. At
first they had very strict rules about physicality. It wasn't an
overnight decision to just change the name.
>You must also remember the war in Russia and France was not only
> a regular war but mostly also a terrorist or call it a Partisanen war.
It was a racial and ideolgical war. Hitler made that clear to army
commanders and SS-units.
> Partisans eg terrorist were not covered by the Geneva conventions. When a
> terrorist eg Partisans shoot regular soldiers into the back what do you
> expect them to do.
Countless of destroyed villages and 18 million dead civilians in the
hands of Nazi-German troops. "Terrorist" is an excuse and nazi-troops
didn't need one, they had an order from Führer.
What else is new. I remember as a kid when the waffen ss was formed. It was
a whole division of regular soldier who where over night members of the
waffen SS. You must also remember the war in Russia and France was not only
a regular war but mostly also a terrorist or call it a Partisanen war.
Partisans eg terrorist were not covered by the Geneva conventions. When a
terrorist eg Partisans shoot regular soldiers into the back what do you
expect them to do.
<oneey...@gmail.com> wrote in message
There's nothing like an idiot to say "you altered my text" and then
repost it to prove that not a single word was altered.
Kurt, Werner called. The neuron died.
"Sara Salzman" <cata...@concentric.net> wrote in message
> Really Sara was it the whole txt or just part of it. Take a word count of my
> original posting and then take a word count of my posting where he replied
> Kurt Knoll.
I did. It is EXACTLY the same, Kurt. He didn't delete a single word.
You are an idiot.
I know an SS guy who lives above the Dachau gas chamber who told me
that Leading Revisionist Scholar Kurt Knoll is too stupid to rise to
the lofty level of idiot.
"All shit like you have is lies and smears. Shit like you
can't refute what I post so shit like you resort to cheap
personal attacks and you wonder why kike filth is hated so much!
(Scott Bradbury, Bellville's leading revisionist scholar)
"Sara Salzman" <cata...@concentric.net> wrote in message