Lynyrd Skynyrd/Rush?
Linda Brown
Review, Advertisement, Handbill, Photo, etc.) of the Rush/Lynyrd Skynyrd
show on 20 December 1976. This was 'the only' show Rush ever opened for
Skynyrd. Any information on this particular show is greatly appreciated.
Also, did anybody on AMR happen to attend this particular show? Thank you.
Dan Iwerks
Tell ya what, Linda. We'll sell you the information. Only $200.
--
**************************************************
"Everything is funny; it just depends to whom."
Dan Iwerks iwe...@patriot.net Oh, and everyone sucks but me.
**************************************************
Woody Jerk
<01bf4729$d24f3220$c003460c@default>:
>Does anybody have any information whatsoever (Ticket Stub, Newspaper
>Review, Advertisement, Handbill, Photo, etc.) of the Rush/Lynyrd Skynyrd
>show on 20 December 1976. This was 'the only' show Rush ever opened for
>Skynyrd. Any information on this particular show is greatly
>appreciated. Also, did anybody on AMR happen to attend this particular
>show? Thank you.
>
The majority of AMR had not been *born* at that date.
Woody Jerk
Skynard Rules
In My Trailer Park!!
Linda Brown
Dan Iwerks <iwe...@patriot.net> wrote in article
<3858515E...@patriot.net>...
> Linda Brown wrote:
>
> > Does anybody have any information whatsoever (Ticket Stub, Newspaper
> > Review, Advertisement, Handbill, Photo, etc.) of the Rush/Lynyrd
Skynyrd
> > show on 20 December 1976. This was 'the only' show Rush ever opened
for
> > Skynyrd. Any information on this particular show is greatly
appreciated.
> > Also, did anybody on AMR happen to attend this particular show? Thank
you.
>
Pseudojudo
I thought Rush opened for Kiss also in 1975 and the Beginning of 76?
Linda Brown wrote in message <01bf4748$75cf4ac0$e104460c@default>...
s_d_...@my-deja.com
I'm certain it was late 1977 or early 1978 because it was my first year
of college. It was at Cincinnati's Riverfront Coliseum (now Cinergy
Field). I actually sold the ticket because a few weeks before the
concert, the opening act changed. Why it changed, I don't know. Not
that I didn't want to see Skynyrd at that time, but I really wanted to
see Rush again. That was the motivating factor in buying the ticket in
the first place. I had only seen Rush twice up until then, and decided
to sell my ticket when they were no longer on the bill. Not too long
after that date it hit the news that Skynyrd's plane had gone down. I
regretted selling the ticket at that time, as I do now.
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
Linda Brown
3/4/77 Starcastle/Rush/Boston
5/2/78 The Sweet/Rush
The 12/20/76 show in Tennessee was the only time Rush ever opened for
Lynyrd Skynyrd ever. I'm looking for 'any' information on this one
historic show. I live in L.S.'s hometown and at the 'Freebird Cafe' (owned
and ran by Ronnie Vant Zants wife and daughter) there is a schedule of all
Skynyrd shows, that shows 12/20/76 was the only time Rush 'ever' shared the
same stage.
s_d_...@my-deja.com wrote in article <83bepo$dc1$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>...
spudboy
<s_d_...@my-deja.com> wrote in message news:83bepo$dc1$1...@nnrp1.deja.com...
> I had a ticket for Lynyrd Skynyrd (headliner) with Rush (opener), but
> I'm certain it was late 1977 or early 1978 because it was my first year
> of college. It was at Cincinnati's Riverfront Coliseum (now Cinergy
> Field). I actually sold the ticket because a few weeks before the
> concert, the opening act changed. Why it changed, I don't know. Not
> that I didn't want to see Skynyrd at that time, but I really wanted to
> see Rush again. That was the motivating factor in buying the ticket in
> the first place. I had only seen Rush twice up until then, and decided
> to sell my ticket when they were no longer on the bill. Not too long
> after that date it hit the news that Skynyrd's plane had gone down. I
> regretted selling the ticket at that time, as I do now.
>
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Before you buy.
riverfront stadium is now cinergy field-- riverfront coliseum in now the
firststar center--- oh- and cinergy field gets blown-up in 2003-- can't
wait-- bengals just got out of there and the reds are soon to follow (thank
god) astroturf sux...
-christopher
s_d_...@my-deja.com
can't believe I got that mixed up with the Coliseum -- I've been to
both many times).
Linda, my reason for posting was to say that Rush *was scheduled* to
open for Skynyrd, not that they actually *did open*. The bill/line-up
changed after the initial announcement of the concert and subsequent
advertisements, yet prior to the concert date itself. I never said
that Rush actually opened for LS. I don't know if Rush wanted out
(doubtful) or needed to change because of some other scheduling
difficulties prior to, or after that particular date (probable). Or
maybe Skynyrd wanted them off the bill or wanted some other band on
more than Rush. I did have a ticket that said "Lynyrd Skynyrd/Rush".
The tickets, of course, were to be honored at the gate. Sooooo, there
were/are ads, tickets/stubs, etc. out there. Unfortunately, the
combination of the bands in question did not come to be in Cincinnati.
Sorry to delay or sidetrack your quest for all things Rush.
Also, Linda, I too know what bands played on whatever tour in
Cincinnati as I have access to the concert date/band database just like
everyone else here. Plus, I have never missed any Rush date in
Cincinnati, Dayton, or Columbus (Rush concert tally -- 41 and still
counting), so I already knew "who played when". I now know firsthand
why your posts are snubbed so quickly.
I apologize to everyone else for this lengthy post.
s_d_...@my-deja.com
believe I got that mixed up with the coliseum -- I've been to both many
times).
Linda- My main reason for posting was to say that Rush *was scheduled*
to open for Skynyrd, not that they actually *did open*. The
bill/lineup changed after the initial announcement of the concert and
subsequent advertisements, yet prior to the concert date itself. I
never said that Rush actually opened for LS. I don't know if Rush
wanted out (doubtful) or needed to change because of some other
scheduling difficulties prior to, or after that particular date
(probable). Or maybe Skynyrd wanted them off the bill or wanted some
other band on more than Rush. Until I sold it, I did have a ticket
that said "Lynyrd Skynyrd/Rush" for Cincinnati late '77 to early '78.
The tickets, of course, were to be honored at the gate. Sooooo, there
were/are ads, tickets, etc. out there. Unfortunately, the combination
of the bands in question did not come to be in Cincinnati. Sorry to
delay or sidetrack your quest for all things Rush.
Linda, like you, I too know what bands opened/headlined on whatever
tour in Cincinnati as I have access to the concert date/band database
like everyone else here. Plus, I have never missed any Rush show in
Cincinnati, Dayton, or Columbus (Rush concert tally -- 41 and still
counting) so I knew already "who played when". I now know firsthand
why your posts are snubbed so quickly.
I apologize to everyone else for the lengthy post.
Linda Brown
had that Rare Ticket, eh. Especially when the Ticket said Lynyrd
Skynyrd/Rush and they changed bands. I'm still trying to find information
on that Clarksville TN.show. I havn't heard of anyone that's seen this
particular show. Like a needle in a haystack. Thanks for the information
and again, sorry bout' the mix-up. Keep it burning bright!
s_d_...@my-deja.com wrote in article <83cjp7$4ue$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>...
s_d_...@my-deja.com
LS/Rush show. I had no idea it was such a rarity. I had assumed that
since that line-up was scheduled in Cincinnati that it was the same for
at least a few other cities. Again, I'm certain this was late 1977 or
early 1978. Maybe LS and Rush's tour paths just happened to cross
then, but usually two bands of that stature (at that point LS
definately being the bigger draw) don't do one-off shows. Also, I have
absolutely no idea why Rush was off the bill. I wanted to see Rush so
badly that once they announced that someone else (I cannot think of who
it was for the life of me) was the opening act, I sold my ticket. And
now that I think about it, the concert could have been slated for
Columbus as easily as Cincinnati. I am certain about the time frame,
though. I went to college just outside of Columbus. At the time, my
parents lived in a small town between Columbus, Cincinnati, and Dayton,
so I frequented concerts in all three cities. Maybe you could cross
reference this with the LS tour date list you spoke of. As you stated,
Rush would not be listed but LS played one (or more) of those three
cities late '77 to early '78. Let me know (either here or by e-mail)
when, where, and who opened if you get the chance. I hadn't thought
about selling that ticket for a long time, until your initial post.
This is bugging me now.
Trioxin5
Can the newsgroup get any lamer?
EMarie2112
76?>
Can the newsgroup get any lamer?>>
Yup...just did :o)
Ellen
"She would of been a good woman," The Misfit said, "if it had been somebody
there to shoot her every minute of her life."
- Flannery O'Connor "A Good Man is Hard to Find"
http://xroads.virginia.edu/~DRBR/goodman.html
H.V.C. of the DT variety
news:19991223014331...@ng-fu1.aol.com...
> wrote: <<> I thought Rush opened for Kiss also in 1975 and the Beginning
of 76?>
> Can the newsgroup get any lamer?>>
>
> Yup...just did :o)
Kiss is still lamer than this newsgroup.
--
High Voltage Cable
AIM: JoshCable
Lewis Black: http://www.tir.com/~jtcable/lewispage.html
New Kiss album, All Systems Gay.
Strange days have found us
Strange days have tracked us down
They're going to destroy
Our casual joys
Trioxin5
>76?>
>
>Can the newsgroup get any lamer?>>
>
>Yup...just did :o)
>
>
No you still got me beat. You're online way too much doing absolutely nothing
significant.
Paul
>No you still got me beat. You're online way too much doing absolutely nothing
>significant.
>
Mind if I chime in? Thanks.
Either a) Eggs really DOESN'T do anything of significance, and you're stalking
her, or b) you've just made a completely unfounded statement ("u r a fewl").
Either way, you obviously know when and for how long Ellen is online. I bet
she, on the other hand, took one look at your post and said "who's this
fuckhead?"
Paul
TapeHead4
"I always dreamed of the day when dozens of people, none of whom I've ever met,
from all over the world would engage in a public discussion of the area between
my balls and my a-hole" - The Prof
EMarie2112
No you still got me beat. You're online way too much doing absolutely nothing
significant.>>
HAHAHA
I make my living online, but that's nothing significant. I suppose pouring all
my time into a fan site is a better way to spend my time. Okay...I will take
that into consideration.
Oh...and by the way...how do you know how much time I spend online? Are you
stalking me? Should I be concerned?
EMarie2112
stalking
her, or b) you've just made a completely unfounded statement ("u r a fewl").
Either way, you obviously know when and for how long Ellen is online. I bet
she, on the other hand, took one look at your post and said "who's this
fuckhead?"
Paul>>>
I should have read your post before responding to trioxickinthehead myself :o)
Trioxin5
>stalking
>her, or b) you've just made a completely unfounded statement ("u r a fewl").
>Either way, you obviously know when and for how long Ellen is online. I bet
>she, on the other hand, took one look at your post and said "who's this
>fuckhead?"
It's no secret that you're online 24-7 either Tapehead. You should be as
defensive as she is, Mr. AIM. You've both frequented my site with a finetooth
comb and you know damn well no one is listening to either of you except in this
lonely pathetic newsgroup. Now excuse me as I have better people to talk to.
Dark
news:19991222233457...@ng-fw1.aol.com...
> > I thought Rush opened for Kiss also in 1975 and the Beginning of 76?
>
> Can the newsgroup get any lamer?
Can we get more whiners who bitch about the lame NG, but fail to post
anything noteworthy themselves? *YAWN*
You bore me. At least Doug posts interesting spams.
- Dark, waiting for an interesting spam, before making his own spam
--
http://www.wackyware.com/partner/register.cfm?sponsor=12155
http://www.alladvantage.com/go.asp?refid=CKY565
Lerxst in Wonderland®
Trioxin5 snivelled:
> No you still got me beat. You're online way too much doing absolutely
nothing
> significant.
Alright, douchebag, here goes. First off, Trioxin5 indicates that there are
4 others before you. That is an unfortunate development of evolution, but
nature has a way of correcting it's mistakes. Perhaps it will do away with
you by giving you an...er...aversion to...uh...reproduction--I don't know
and I don't care. The Egg, Paul, and many others here have more class in
their worst moment than you will have in your best--again, that's nature's
mysteries at work. Deal with it.
With respect toward your net time, you got all snivelly and pissy because
you and Doogie did your damnedest to make 'The Ultimate Rush Page' and it
showed, yet wasn't lauded. Had you put your considerable powers of myopia
in to your school work perhaps spelling and grammar structure would show as
well. Had you spent some time away from the computer your social skills
might also be a somewhat more developed. That is not a subject that you
should spend too much time pointing fingers about.
Now, once again, you are coming in to AMR and getting your knickers all
knotted up because you don't feel that some of the regulars here fit your
mold. They are just too damn individual and freethinking seems to be the
battle cry here. If they cross your personal boundary you make every
attempt your stunted social skills can muster to 'hurt their feelings'. It
doesn't seem to be working for you, so you might want to investigate other
approaches. Oh...and watching The Bowerey Boys meet Dracula for the
fifteenth time while you stew on it isn't what I am suggesting.
Quick...call an attorney, you whiney little bitch. Better yet, come back
here and call everybody a bunch of losers, grab your toys, and go home.
Maybe there is something good on the Sci-Fi channel. I eagerly await your
pride getting all puffed up so that you respond and prove every point made
hereinabove. Come on...quick...while we still have a full moon.
Dark
> it first hand. I was going to get all Shakespeare on his ass, but I am
afraid
> that it just might send him over the edge and I don't want to be
responsible
> for that.
Allow me to post something I ran across a while back at this point....
----- Original Message -----
From: G.P. <G.P.@G.P.Com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 1999 10:28 AM
Subject: Shakespearian Insult Kit
> To construct a Shakespearean insult, combine one word from each of the
> three columns below, and preface it with "Thou":
>
> Column 1 Column 2 Column 3
> artless base-court apple-john
> bawdy bat-fowling baggage
> beslubbering beef-witted barnacle
> bootless beetle-headed bladder
> churlish boil-brained boar-pig
> cockered clapper-clawed bugbear
> clouted clay-brained bum-bailey
> craven common-kissing canker-blossom
> currish crook-pated clack-dish
> dankish dismal-dreaming clotpole
> dissembling dizzy-eyed coxcomb
> droning doghearted codpiece
> errant dread-bolted death-token
> fawning earth-vexing dewberry
> fobbing elf-skinned flap-dragon
> froward fat-kidneyed flax-wench
> frothy fen-sucked flirt-gill
> gleeking flap-mouthed foot-licker
> goatish fly-bitten fustilarian
> gorbellied folly-fallen giglet
> impertinent fool-born gudgeon
> infectious full-gorged haggard
> jarring guts-griping harpy
> loggerheaded half-faced hedge-pig
> lumpish hasty-witted horn-beast
> mammering hedge-born hugger-mugger
> mangled hell-hated joithead
> mewling idle-headed lewdster
> paunchy ill-breeding lout
> pribbling ill-nurtured maggot-pie
> puking knotty-pated malt-worm
> puny milk-livered mammet
> qualling motley-minded measle
> rank onion-eyed minnow
> reeky plume-plucked miscreant
> roguish pottle-deep moldwarp
> ruttish pox-marked mumble-news
> saucy reeling-ripe nut-hook
> spleeny rough-hewn pigeon-egg
> spongy rude-growing pignut
> surly rump-fed puttock
> tottering shard-borne pumpion
> unmuzzled sheep-biting ratsbane
> vain spur-galled scut
> venomed swag-bellied skainsmate
> villainous tardy-gaited strumpet
> warped tickle-brained varlet
> wayward toad-spotted vassal
> weedy unchin-snouted whey-face
> yeasty weather-bitten wagtail
EMarie2112
Tapehead. You should be as
defensive as she is, Mr. AIM. You've both frequented my site with a finetooth
comb and you know damn well no one is listening to either of you except in this
lonely pathetic newsgroup. Now excuse me as I have better people to talk to.>>
Paul, now the stalker himself is being defensive by calling us defensive. How
funny. I would be insulted if this post was not so unfounded and idiotic.
It is scary how the diseased human mind functions. I mean, I studied
personality disorders like this in school, but it is still always a trip to see
it first hand. I was going to get all Shakespeare on his ass, but I am afraid
that it just might send him over the edge and I don't want to be responsible
for that.
Trioxin5
>anything noteworthy themselves? *YAWN*
>
>You bore me.
The archetypical child of the newsgroup and we are responsible for entertaining
you? Here's the only note you need, I have been entertaining people on
www.newworldreport.com, not for your sorry ass. Your entertaining spams are a
result of my work. So how's that?
Trioxin5
>funny. I would be insulted if this post was not so unfounded and idiotic.
>
What's new? If you're in the post, it's always silly.
>It is scary how the diseased human mind functions. I mean, I studied
>personality disorders like this in school, but it is still always a trip to
>see
>it first hand.
Is this your job? Seeing who has disorders via internet newsgroup posts? I
wouldn't cal that first hand, Miss Psychology. (Emphasis on psycho.)
>> I was going to get all Shakespeare on his ass, but I am afraid
>that it just might send him over the edge and I don't want to be responsible
>for that.
Glad you didn't. It's not that funny. When are you going to get over the
Shakespeare crap?
Paul
>It's no secret that you're online 24-7 either Tapehead.
Since about 22 hrs of my day are spent sleeping, driving, working, running, at
dinner, out with friends, or studying, I usually make it online at around 12pm,
for an hour or two. Now if I really was online 24/7, wouldn't you have to be
doing the same in order to know that I was? And what - are you following me or
something? Weird.
>You've both frequented my site with a finetooth
>comb
It's actually the same brush I use to comb the hairs on my big gay ass.
>and you know damn well no one is listening to either of you except in
>this
>lonely pathetic newsgroup.
Shit! I have to talk to my fellow co-workers, students, friends, and realtives
about this one. Maybe I'm not speaking loud enough? Perhaps I should start
quoting "all that Shakespeare crap."
>Now excuse me as I have better people to talk to.
Riiiight. Just like you responded to my initial post, you will respond to this
one. Better people to talk to my ass. AND...if you don't respond, well I can
assume I've scared you away! You lose either way, but I'm sure you're used to
that.
Trioxin5
>The Egg, Paul, and many others here have more class in
>their worst moment than you will have in your best
I don't need to demonstrate class when I am in this ghetto/trailerpark of a
newsgroup. Some posts are getting too out of hand/stupid for me and Doug to
handle and it needs to stop.
>to your school work perhaps spelling and grammar structure would show as
>well.
Ut oh. When you guys can't find a single thing to bitch about you bring up the
ever-reliable spelling/grammar slam. You can't even spell VCR.
>Now, once again, you are coming in to AMR and getting your knickers all
>knotted up because you don't feel that some of the regulars here fit your
>mold. They are just too damn individual and freethinking seems to be the
>battle cry here. >>
You cannot prove they are individuals or freethinkers when I have witnessed
them posting a zillion parodies. Nothing individualistic about that.
If they cross your personal boundary you make every
>attempt your stunted social skills can muster to 'hurt their feelings'. It
>doesn't seem to be working for you, so you might want to investigate other
>approaches.
Refer to reply paragraph 2.
Oh...and watching The Bowerey Boys meet Dracula for the
>fifteenth time while you stew on it isn't what I am suggesting.
>
>Quick...call an attorney, you whiney little bitch. Better yet, come back
>here and call everybody a bunch of losers, grab your toys, and go home.
>Maybe there is something good on the Sci-Fi channel. I eagerly await your
>pride getting all puffed up so that you respond and prove every point made
>hereinabove. Come on...quick...while we still have a full moon. >
Who's doing the "molding"? Relax. You don't have to bust a chub waiting for me
to reply. You are only confirming you spend every waking moment on this thing
and have this as your only social outlet to show off your "skills." It's a
matter of fragile self-worth on your part not mine or Doug's...we're getting
hits and feedback from some interesting people..we're not interested in what
you guys think. We're trying to make you more enlightened about what this
newsgroup is about-Rush...not eggs, not beeswax.
If this is all it takes for your diapers to get wet, I suggest you cuddle up to
your favorite cabbage patch kid, stick your thumb in your mouth and have that
Bowery Boys marathon you've been dreaming about.
Dark
> Glad you didn't. It's not that funny. When are you going to get over the
> Shakespeare crap?
When're you gonna get over that life crap?
- Dark, in a good yet bad mood... don't ask ;P
Dark
> I don't need to demonstrate class when I am in this ghetto/trailerpark of
a
> newsgroup. Some posts are getting too out of hand/stupid for me and Doug
to
> handle and it needs to stop.
People should demonstrate class constantly, it sets a good example for
others... also... if you find it difficult to demonstrate class, isn't that
just a sign that you don't do it often? I suppose that means that if you
don't demonstrate class often, and find it difficult when you do try, that
you are inherently a being without class at all...
> Ut oh. When you guys can't find a single thing to bitch about you bring up
the
> ever-reliable spelling/grammar slam. You can't even spell VCR.
Whenever you can't think of a good come-back, you whine about how 'everyone'
slams you for spelling/grammar... well as I pointed out quite a while ago, I
correct everyone's grammar, whenever I feel like correcting it... spelling
too, dammit! (see my note to the prof if you don't believe me, and he's a
person I don't slam, because he has a brain, and other nice things)
Go away. Adult education classes (assuming you're out of high school) are
pretty cheap, take some and learn to spell. People take you seriously if you
present your arguements in a logical, well thought out, and easy to
understand manner.
> You cannot prove they are individuals or freethinkers when I have
witnessed
> them posting a zillion parodies. Nothing individualistic about that.
A parody is a joke based on something. It is not a copy. Satire works in the
same way. If you can't understand that parody can be individual, what the
hell do you call Black Adder? (Personally I call it one of the most
individual, entertaining, and funny satires I've ever seen)
> Refer to reply paragraph 2.
Refer to my ass, which is about the same reasoning level as your 'paragraph
2'.
> matter of fragile self-worth on your part not mine or Doug's...we're
getting
> hits and feedback from some interesting people..we're not interested in
what
Hmm... feedback from interesting people... Dahmer was interesting... but I
certainly wouldn't want some of his feedback...
> you guys think. We're trying to make you more enlightened about what this
Who is included in this 'you guys'? Everyone who reads AMR? I'm assuming
that's what you meant... well, sorry, there are quite a few rush fans who go
here, who have absolutely nothing to do with you or Lerxst, or even this
whole argument... Don't care, huh? Sounds familiar... in fact, it reminds me
about a certain person posting msg's equivalating to 'rush doesn't care',
and a certain *coughNyarlcough* person mentioning something about
'projection of own emotions upon others'...
> newsgroup is about-Rush...not eggs, not beeswax.
Ok, so where's the new rush news, brain dead? Better yet, where were you
when I asked for everyone's opinion on Counterparts, while trying to steer a
thread back on topic? I don't see your post there... quit bitching about off
topic crap, and post some that's on topic yourself, or at least reply to
someone who tries ;P
> Bowery Boys marathon you've been dreaming about.
Who? This must be some american thing... who the fuck are the bowery boys?
and more importantly, if I shot them and used their dead carcasses to beat
you to a bloody pulp, would anyone care?
- dark, who isn't usually in such an odd mood...
Dark
> The archetypical child of the newsgroup and we are responsible for
entertaining
Coming from the local elementary school drop-out, that's a real insult. ;P
> you? Here's the only note you need, I have been entertaining people on
> www.newworldreport.com, not for your sorry ass. Your entertaining spams
are a
> result of my work. So how's that?
My entertaining spams... Hmm... Here's a list of the most entertaining
threads that pop into my head at 2 am from the last little while... Good vs.
Evil troll hunt (to which I'm about to go off onto a tangent of my own,
simply cause everyone else seems to have stopped posting to it), the capital
punishment debate, and the occasional small thread. So I'm to understand
that you were responsible for these? Heh. Get a clue, we don't want you not
because we hate your sorry ass, but because you whine worse than by baby
brother (and he whines so bad I have a tendency to go outside and knock down
a tree or two). If something bothers you, do something about it, don't
whine, and if all else fails, KF the people or mark the thread read ;P
- Dark the irritable ;P
EMarie2112
Shakespeare crap?>>
Same time we get over the Mozart crap.
Don't be intimidated by something beyond your ability to comprehend. It really
is not becoming...oh wait...I forgot who I was typing to :o)
EMarie2112
antidepressant) wrote: <<I don't need to demonstrate class when I am in this
ghetto/trailerpark of a
newsgroup>>
Yo buss dis. I ain't think dat anyone would min' if you left dis newsgroup
forever. See what I'm sayin? You has nevuh had anythin interestin to say an' yo
delusions uh website grandeur be terribly annoyin an' unfounded. Sheeit!
Lerxst in Wonderland®
Trioxin5 <selectiveseratonin...@apg.com> wrote (only in the
loosest sense of the word)
> I don't need to demonstrate class when I am in this ghetto/trailerpark of
a
to
> handle and it needs to stop.
Or what? What are you going to do, clown? Stop coming here? Why....it'd
be a Christmas dream. You don't get it, do you? Much like the band's
response to your web page, we are not interested in you. Now, since the
band completely ignored you and your efforts does that make them Ghetto?
Wait...it does! RUSH IS GHETTO!
> Ut oh. When you guys can't find a single thing to bitch about you bring up
the
> ever-reliable spelling/grammar slam. You can't even spell VCR.
'Ut'? Dude, your nerves must really have mis-fired when you went to type
that one. Oh, and one thing I have noticed about the labrynth that is your
particular level of idiocy. There is plenty of stuff to bitch about. The
spelling seems to be the one that you could most easily correct.
> You cannot prove they are individuals or freethinkers when I have
witnessed
> them posting a zillion parodies. Nothing individualistic about that.
WHAT? Are you a complete idiot? Oh my God! You really are spun. I just
lost interest in finishing my well thought out, humorous, and irreverent
reply. Instead...I smell fodder for a new thread.....
Giovanni
EMarie2112 <emari...@aol.comNOSPAM> schreef in berichtnieuws
19991224100115...@ng-fc1.aol.com...
> Yo buss dis. I ain't think dat anyone would min' if you left dis newsgroup
> forever. See what I'm sayin? You has nevuh had anythin interestin to say
an' yo
> delusions uh website grandeur be terribly annoyin an' unfounded. Sheeit!
> Ellen
>
Quoting Shakespeare again, Ellen? It has GOT to stop someday?
(for all you Americans; I'm not being too serious here, just a feeble
attempt at sarcasm which seems quite difficult for you guys and gals to get
a grip on)
Trioxin5
>really
>is not becoming.
Story of your life.
Dark
Projecting your faults onto others again?
- Dark, still mildly annoyed, despite having killed pixellated
monsters all day ;P
EMarie2112
ability to comprehend. It really
is not becoming.>
Story of your life.>>>
Boy...you sure told me!
I'll go hide under a rock now and cry :(
Andrew Jacobs
that they did because they are two of my favorite bands of all time.
What's odd about it is that they are both so different and there's
probably a lot of fans of both bands that don't like one or the other
but I happen to be a huge fan of both bands.