Do all Oasis fan hate Blur?
Unknown
I wanna know the answer. I myself loved both.
BTW, oasis is by no point greater than Beatles .
Vivek Srivastava
matthew () wrote:
: I wanna know the answer. I myself loved both.
Yes...it need not be paradoxical that if one likes one band they should
hate the other...I like both. Just my thought...
-Vivek
ryszard s zurek
i like 'em both. *krys*
H Joseph Leitch
(matthew) wrote:
>I wanna know the answer. I myself loved both.
I love them both too, for different reasons.
Blur sounds good and has good lyrics. most of the time.
Oasis just plain ROCKS!!!!!!!!!!
Sara
Robbie Murray
On Fri, 19 Jul 1996 16:31:48 GMT, in <4sogel$f...@hkusuc.hku.hk>
(matthew) wrote.....
>I wanna know the answer. I myself loved both.
No!
>BTW, oasis is by no point greater than Beatles .
Bollocks! Beatles are crap!!!
Ian M West
On Fri, 19 Jul 1996 16:31:48 GMT, (matthew) wrote:
>I wanna know the answer. I myself loved both.
>BTW, oasis is by no point greater than Beatles .
>
No they don't. Hope thats of some help.
--
* Ian West "been on the shelf too long, *
* email: sittin' at home in my bed too long, *
* i...@tcp.co.uk now its time to hear my song, *
* home page: how you gonna take me?" *
* don't make me laugh... - The Verve, "This Is Music" *
NetsoftLtd
No, I quite like Blur, but OASIS are the men for the job.
And I disagree, OASIS are NOT as good as the Beatles (but maybe they will
be...)
Slide Away
Patrick
JILL
Peter Williams wrote:
>
> (matthew) wrote:
> >I wanna know the answer. I myself loved both.
>
> their songs, though.
>
> >BTW, oasis is by no point greater than Beatles .
>
>
> Cera
Who is blur? Again, I live in America and I've never heard
of Blur until I got the Internet. If they aren't on the radio or MTV,
then I don't know who they are, so if someone could tell me a few things
about them I'd appriciate it.
Lisa
Scott Broe
All this talk about Oasis and Blur has got me thinking (and i'm sure we
all know how dangerous that can be!!)....
Over here in Canada, I don't think there is quite the same adulation for
Oasis as in the UK. From what I've been hearing of late, Oasis is
absolutely huge overseas. Now my question is... Is Blur just as huge? Or
has Oasis passed them by in popularity long ago? Maybe Blur is bigger?
Somebody tell me who's winning the popularity race!!!!
Retreating back into his corner of the world,
Scott
Matthew Wood
ryszard s zurek wrote:
>
> In <4sogel$f...@hkusuc.hku.hk> (matthew) writes:
> >
> >I wanna know the answer. I myself loved both.
>
Mee too!
Thats not an invitation to flame me, BTW.
Matt
Unknown
Peter Williams <eni...@intecc.co.uk> wrote:
>I'm inclined to disagree. Oasis ARE better than the Beatles.
ok eveybody has the freedom to speak up.But I think most will disagree
(including OASIS !)
JILL
No, actually, Noel said that the Beatles are the "ultimate pop
band". Which they are. But, it's all a matter of musical preference. I
do, however, feel pity for the minority who think not, but it's their
loss.
Lisa
JILL
JILL
JILL
Pauline Bejjani
>
>
> Who is blur? Again, I live in America and I've never heard
> of Blur until I got the Internet. If they aren't on the radio or MTV,
> then I don't know who they are, so if someone could tell me a few things
> about them I'd appriciate it.
Well, I know in Canada nobody'd ever heard of them until they did a cover
(I think it's a cover, at least) of a song called Boys and Girls that
basically goes, "Girls who like boys who do girls like they're boys who do
boys like they're girls.. balahblahalha Always should be someone you
really love" and it's got a dance tune to it, sort of. Crap all song, but
I borrowed another of their albums from a friend and the rest of their
tunes aren't so bad. You probably haven't seen them much on MTV.. not at
all popular anywhere but England. :)
--
What?? Yaokaysure, whatEVER bud-e!!
Chris Basford
In article, <31F3EF...@cyberstreet.com>, JILL <9...@cyberstreet.com>
writes
>
>
> No, actually, Noel said that the Beatles are the "ultimate pop
>band". Which they are. But, it's all a matter of musical preference. I
>do, however, feel pity for the minority who think not, but it's their
>loss.
> Lisa
**********************************
/////Ch...@g3vkm.demon.co.uk//////
**********************************
brno
I live in Australia and Oasis is certainnly much more popular than Blur.
I have heard that in the UK, they are about equal, though I think Oasis
are just ahead.
So there you go.
CC.
rtse
> Who is blur? Again, I live in America and I've never heard
> of Blur until I got the Internet. If they aren't on the radio or MTV,
> then I don't know who they are, so if someone could tell me a few things
> about them I'd appriciate it.
Blur is Oasis's "rival" band. I live in the States too, and you
haven't heard any Blur stuff?!? Doesn't your local modern rock station
play them? Surely you have heard Boys & Girls...it starts out with that
Nintendo game sound and goes on and on about "girls who like boys who
like boys like they're girls who do boys like they're girls like they're
boys..". Sound familiar? Personally I quite enjoy Blur. But Oasis are
the ultimate rock band!
Iain Hynd
brno <cla...@ocean.com.au> wrote:
>So there you go.
>CC.
In the UK that stupid bull popularity war between them which was
invented by the press was long won by Oasis (when (WTS)MG & Great
Escape came out). There is no competeion now as Oasis have won by
complete miles. Blur are hiding in the shadows right now.
Eric Kiernan
Oasis fans don't hate them ingeneral. Some detested them, some don't
care, some believe they lack that flair. Think for yourself and at the
end of the day why does it matter - we should be able to live in piece
and harmony together forever.
Alternatively we could just machete all the Blur fans.
Eric.
PS I like both but guess which I prefer?
Eric Kiernan
>
> Bollocks! Beatles are crap!!!
>
You uneducated Twat - Only the most influential band ever producing no
less than thirteen long playing recordings which are remastered on to CD
and sold in there millions. You're a Tosser! :-<<<
Eric.
Eric Kiernan
What is this petty whose winning competition, it's dead at the moment in
England as Oasis are not in the spot light at the moment.
Can't we just let it drop!
Eric
H Joseph Leitch
In New Jersey, more people have HEARD of Oasis than have heard of Blur,
but most people who know about Oasis say that they can't stand them,
they're a bunch of morons, etc..
Those of us who do like Oasis couldn't help but hear about Blur, and we
were interested to see just what all the fuss over there was all about.
It seems that most of us (the Oasis fans) like Blur too (my sister and I
have all the albums by both bands, and our friends who also like Oasis
KEEP borrowing them...I haven't seen "Parklife" in weeks!) -- so it looks
like the "big feud" did just what it was designed to do and got people to
buy records from both groups...
Sara
IF YOU ARE GOING TO JONES BEACH, EMAIL ME--PLEASE!!
JILL
Sorry about posting the same thing four times. My computar was
doing something weird that day. I didn't do it to be annoying or
whatever. Sorry if I was. :-(
Lisa
Mark Stewart
It used to be that blur were just ahead of oasis, but WTSMG chanbed all
that, blur are an eighties group, and will remain so.
Pierre Joseph Stefanos
> Who is blur? Again, I live in America and I've never heard
> of Blur until I got the Internet. If they aren't on the radio or MTV,
> then I don't know who they are, so if someone could tell me a few things
> about them I'd appriciate it.
> Lisa
Someone please forward this to damon albarn, will ya?? i'd luv to see the
expression on his face if he read this!
;^)
henry shorr
Maybe The subject should be: "Do all Beatle fans Hat Oasis?"
-David Shorr
Ahmad Nazri Muhd Naim
[][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][]
"The Love You Take Is Equal To The Love You Make"
- The Beatles
Name: Ahmad Nazri
From Singapore,
e-mail: naz...@singnet.com.sg
Mr G Clarkson
mh...@taynet.co.uk (Iain Hynd) wrote:
There is no competeion now as Oasis have won by
>complete miles. Blur are hiding in the shadows right now.
>
Man I'm sick to death of people like you that think that Blur
needs to beat Oasis to be better and vice versa. Both bands
have totally different styles of music and so don't even
compare. As far as I'm concerned they are both winners for the
fact that they both make really good music which is reflective
of thier own personal style. The only competition is the one
that the media has managed to convince you of.
Aimee
Jon Lawrence
In article <4tfbfn$8...@lantana.singnet.com.sg>, Ahmad Nazri Muhd Naim
<naz...@singnet.com.sg> writes
Who cares? What do you mean who's winning, does it matter. If i said
blur would you suddenly like blur alot. It's up to you who you prefer
or like the same as. So nobodys winning. Stop writing threads like
that, cause we get them every week.
--
Jon Lawrence
Iain Hynd
>Aimee
For God sake you fool. I wonder why you didn't quote my whole article
considering I clearly say "that stupid bull popularity war". That
quote above was the verdict most press came to. The press have
stopped. So shut up or learn to bloody read it all instead of just
what you want to read.
P.S. Man I'm sick to death of people like you.
SammiiJay
Blur sucks! Period.
Curtis Frank
In <4u8ifd$m...@newsbf02.news.aol.com> samm...@aol.com (SammiiJay)
writes:
>
>Blur sucks! Period.
Blur rocks! Period.
Sweetxpres
The reason Oasis is bigger than Blur in America is because Oasis has more
of an American feel. Blur has a British sound that just doesn't go in
America.
dana rocks
like liam says blur is chimney sweep music, which sings all about
english things americans cant relate too, im not denying that that are
good...just making a point
dana
--
MZ
SammiiJay
This is pretty true. Blur's not bad, but "Tracy Jack" is a *horrible*
song! I like "Charmless Man" a lot. Anyway, Blur is a pop band, Oasis is
a rock band. Blur will never make it in the US like Oasis.
Geir Hongro
Blur are great and so are Oasis.
Still Dodgy are better than both of them! (That's why the whole
war is meaningless...)
Geir Hongro
Samuel Ng
Of course,Oasis is winning1
Curtis Frank
In <4uj34s$p...@o.online.no> Geir Hongro <hon...@ils.uio.no> writes:
>
>cjf...@ix.netcom.com(Curtis Frank) wrote:
>>In <4u8ifd$m...@newsbf02.news.aol.com> samm...@aol.com (SammiiJay)
>>writes:
>>>
>>>Blur sucks! Period.
>>Blur rocks! Period.
>>
>
>Blur are great and so are Oasis.
>Still Dodgy are better than both of them! (That's why the whole
>war is meaningless...)
>
>Geir Hongro
>
>http://www.uio.no/~hongro/engelsk.htm
>
>
their own opinions, and we all like different stuff. Personally, I do
not like Dodgy, but I'm not going to post 1000 threads about how they
suck because it's just not prudent, relevant or worthwhile. Let people
like who they like and call it a day.
Shawn
Soulichanh Phrachanh
cjf...@ix.netcom.com(Curtis Frank) writes:
>In <4u8ifd$m...@newsbf02.news.aol.com> samm...@aol.com (SammiiJay)
>writes:
>>
>>Blur sucks! Period.
>Blur rocks! Period.
Blur's good.....Oasis is good!
Quit this shit!
___________________________________________________________________________
Love to all... I'm a little skater, drinking stout.
Souli Phrachanh I can't handle, heaving out.
sp...@uow.edu.au When I hear a cop-car, hear me shout.
Am I making myself clear? "Beat me up and floor me out!"
___________________________________________________________________________
Mr G Clarkson
sp...@wumpus.its.uow.edu.au (Soulichanh Phrachanh) wrote:
>
>Blur's good.....Oasis is good!
>Quit this shit!
I totally agree.
Finally someone has something intelligent to say the Blur/Oasis
thing.
Aimee
gru...@grumpy.demon.co.uk
Mr G Clarkson <clar...@nelson.planet.org.nz> wrote:
>sp...@wumpus.its.uow.edu.au (Soulichanh Phrachanh) wrote:
>Aimee
Well I totally disagree!
Blur are excellent!
Oasis are fucking shit!!
Eddie "Hammer" Jones
Assaf
In Article<84022720...@grumpy.demon.co.uk>, <gru...@grumpy.demon.co.uk> write:
> Path: news.NetVision.net.il!news-penn.gsl.net!news.gsl.net!news-dc.gsl.net!news.gsl.net!news-res.gsl.net!news.gsl.net!hunter.premier.net!news.cais.net!mr.net!nntp04.primenet.com!news.shkoo.com!nntp.primenet.com!news.asu.edu!ennfs.eas.asu.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!news.sgi.com!enews.sgi.com!EU.ne
t!usenet2.news.uk.psi.net!uknet!usenet1.news.uk.psi.net!uknet!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!grumpy.demon.co.uk
>Well I happen to think otherwise:
Oasis kick ass.
Blur kiss it.
Persinthia Lawdro
>Of course, if You like Blur, tell me why.
Incomparable. Two different kinds of music. Blur writes brilliant pop songs
and when I saw them live they were great. I think 'The Great Escape' is one
of the best pop albums of the 90's. I don't consider Oasis pop, but more of a
straight ahead rock and roll band. I personally love both bands. Oasis has
released two fine albums. Blur, on the other hand, has alot more material (4
albums worth and alot of b-sides) and all of it is great as well. I've been
listening to Blur since 'Leisure' in 1991 and can't really say they've been
riding Oasis's coattails, since they have 1) been releasing albums longer
than Oasis and 2) have been quite successful on their own merits.
The Stone Roses were/are a fine band, but as far as 80's leftover's are
concerned, I'll take My Bloody Valentine over them anyday.
Max Silva
Assaf wrote:
>
> In Article<84022720...@grumpy.demon.co.uk>, <gru...@grumpy.demon.co.uk> write:
> > Path: news.NetVision.net.il!news-penn.gsl.net!news.gsl.net!news-dc.gsl.net!news.gsl.net!news-res.gsl.net!news.gsl.net!hunter.premier.net!news.cais.net!mr.net
> >
> > Mr G Clarkson <clar...@nelson.planet.org.nz> wrote:
> >
> > >sp...@wumpus.its.uow.edu.au (Soulichanh Phrachanh) wrote:
> >
> >
> > >>
> > >>Blur's good.....Oasis is good!
> > >>Quit this shit!
> > >
> > >I totally agree.
> > >Finally someone has something intelligent to say the Blur/Oasis
> > >thing.
> >
> > >Aimee
> >
> > Well I totally disagree!
> >
> > Blur are excellent!
> >
> > Oasis are fucking shit!!
> >
> > Eddie "Hammer" Jones
> >
> >
> >
>
> >Well I happen to think otherwise:
> Oasis kick ass.
Blur sucks, they're trying to ride Oasis' fame and talent to get
somewhere. I have heard both live, Oasis in Houston at a small club
(400 people), got to talk and hang with them, great guys. Heard Blur
live in San Francisco, someone should introduce the band members of Blur
to each other so they can all play the same thing at the same time. And
the argument that Blur are experimenting with different types of sounds
doesn't wash, you can experiment with different ways to play tennis
without a net, but nothing of value is accomplished. Except for the
fact that Oasis had the good taste to say Blur sucks, why is there
anything at all to link this bands together? The Great Stephen Patrick
said himself that they (Oasis), not the overrated Stone Roses, are the
best thing to come out of Manchester (all of England?) since the SMITHS.
Before anyone gets mad at me for talking bad about the Roses, I like
them, but they never lived up to the potential they showed. By the way,
Stone Roses are one of Oasis' favorite bands, Liam and Noel don't really
fight much, and Oasis doesn't really hate Blur, it just gives them
something to talk about in NME (according to the guys in Feb '95).
Of course, if You like Blur, tell me why.
"I may not agree with what you say, but I would defend to the death your
right to say it." -Voltaire
Geir Hongro
>and when I saw them live they were great. I think 'The Great Escape' is one
>of the best pop albums of the 90's. I don't consider Oasis pop, but more of a
>straight ahead rock and roll band.
Both are typical songwriters bands, like Dodgy, like Lightning
Seeds, like XTC, like Crowded House and like some others.
When it comes to the way of arranging the songs there are big
differences, and I think the kind of Oasis fan who hates Blur is
the one who doesn't care for the songs, but just look for
fuzz-guitars.
That is a very ignorant way of listening to music. The SONGS are
the most important thing, and the way it is played is just
something they put on top. Personally I prefer Blur's more
sophisticated arrangements to Oasis' plain rock'n'roll, but both
groups have GREAT songs.
Geir Hongro
http://www.uio.no/~hongro/engelsk.htm
Max Silva
joseph lucas-howells
> No, I quite like Blur, but OASIS are the men for the job.
> And I disagree, OASIS are NOT as good as the Beatles (but maybe they will
> be...)
> Slide Away
> Patrick
shut up nitty