Yes! It's another "Oasis are crap" post.
Rob Dale
I've got some spare time on my hands, so I've decided to invade your
newsgroup and voice my opinions. I don't really care if they're
wanted or not because I'm never going to meet any of you sad wankers,
am I?
Anyway, I reckon Oasis are shit, not just because of the efforts of
Liam Gallagher but because they are a bunch of talentless arseholes.
Admittedly, their "DEFINATLY, MAYBE" (probably spelt wrong, but who
gives a shit) album was quite good, but "WHAT'S THE STORY....." was
complete and utter pants (local expression translated as: not very
good really!).
Noel is a guitarist of poor quality, not that I'm any better but
compared to people like John Squire (Stone Roses as if you didn't
know), he is pretty crap.
The Drummer for "WHAT'S THE STORY....." is particularly shite,
compared to Tony McCarrol (thats probably spelt wrong as well),
off-of "DEFINATLY MAYBE", I think.
Liam's voice has since turned into an irritating whine.
I don't even acknowledge the other member(s) because I'm totally
fed-up with their overblown media coverage.
Actually Oasis are always going on about how they're great BEATLES
fans or ROLLING STONES fans, whatever....... everyone with a bit of
brains knows that they totally ripped off the Stone Roses from that
time they all spent cooped up in Rockfield Studios, South Wales.
Oasis picked up so many great ideas in the presence of the Roses,
which definatly come through in their live performances, but not on
their shite album. And do Oasis give any credit to Roses in any of
their many interviews........NO THEY FUCKING DON'T DO THEY?
Well thats what I think, anyway.
Who gives a shit anyway!
ROB
Wanda Behrman
bclo...@aol.com (BCLouwers) wrote:
>Ok, where shall I begin. Can't begin by dogging the Roses 'cause they're
>the bomb. Can't say that Oasis aren't influenced by the Roses 'cause they
>are.
>Anyway, I can say that Noel is a great guitarist. Not the greatest,
>rather just one among many greats. We all know that Jimi Hendrix is,
>always was, and forever will be the greatest. Have you seen ...There and
>Then bub? Didn't think so. Why don't you check out the version of
>Champagne Supernova from Earl's Court and then tell me what a shit
>guitarist Noel is and how Alan White sucks. You don't even really know
>what you're talking about, do you? Opinions are like assholes, everyone
>has one. You must have a lot of time on your hands if you're WASTING it
>sending posts to a newsgroup for a band you don't like. If you have that
>much time, why don't you fly your ass over here to Detroit and do my
>laundry. And scrub my toilet while you're at it.....
>Brian
>GC-MI-USA
>
George Harrison and Eric Clapton rank up there with the greatest
guitarists too.
Nick Behrman
"Oasis is taller than Jesus Christ!"
lawr...@ufrsd.k12.nj.us
In article <5944te$81c...@cms.salford.ac.uk>,
MCA...@news.salford.ac.uk (Rob Dale) wrote:
>
> I've got some spare time on my hands, so I've decided to invade your
> newsgroup and voice my opinions. I don't really care if they're
> wanted or not because I'm never going to meet any of you sad wankers,
> am I?
That's the magic of newsgroups, gotta love 'em...
> ...The Drummer for "WHAT'S THE STORY....." is particularly shite,
> compared to Tony McCarrol (thats probably spelt wrong as well),
> off-of "DEFINATLY MAYBE", I think.
If anything, I think Alan's better, but then again, that's me...
> Liam's voice has since turned into an irritating whine.
> I don't even acknowledge the other member(s) because I'm totally
> fed-up with their overblown media coverage.
Conversly, Liam's toned some of it down from DM to WTSMG, as far as live,
I don't really know. As far as media coverage, who controls that? The
media!
> Actually Oasis are always going on about how they're great BEATLES
> fans or ROLLING STONES fans, whatever....... everyone with a bit of
> brains knows that they totally ripped off the Stone Roses from that
> time they all spent cooped up in Rockfield Studios, South Wales.
> Oasis picked up so many great ideas in the presence of the Roses,
> which definatly come through in their live performances, but not on
> their shite album. And do Oasis give any credit to Roses in any of
> their many interviews........NO THEY FUCKING DON'T DO THEY?
> Well thats what I think, anyway.
> Who gives a shit anyway!
> ROB
I'm sure the Roses weren't _totally_ original. Every band uses ideas
from others, they use what works. As far as credit, yeah, it's nice
to at least acknowledge the source of something unoriginal. Big deal
anyway, as long as they're having fun doing what they do, it's more
than most do...
o
Joe Lawrence /|\
lawr...@ufrsd.k12.nj.us / \ ..o
-------------------==== Posted via Deja News ====-----------------------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Post to Usenet
BCLouwers
Karim Adab
Rob Dale <MCA...@news.salford.ac.uk> wrote in article
<5944te$81c...@cms.salford.ac.uk>...
> I've got some spare time on my hands, so I've decided to invade your
> newsgroup and voice my opinions. I don't really care if they're
> wanted or not because I'm never going to meet any of you sad wankers,
> am I?
> Anyway, I reckon Oasis are shit, not just because of the efforts of
> Liam Gallagher but because they are a bunch of talentless arseholes.
> Admittedly, their "DEFINATLY, MAYBE" (probably spelt wrong, but who
> gives a shit) album was quite good, but "WHAT'S THE STORY....." was
> complete and utter pants (local expression translated as: not very
> good really!).
> Noel is a guitarist of poor quality, not that I'm any better but
> compared to people like John Squire (Stone Roses as if you didn't
> know), he is pretty crap.
> The Drummer for "WHAT'S THE STORY....." is particularly shite,
> compared to Tony McCarrol (thats probably spelt wrong as well),
> off-of "DEFINATLY MAYBE", I think.
> Liam's voice has since turned into an irritating whine.
> I don't even acknowledge the other member(s) because I'm totally
> fed-up with their overblown media coverage.
> Actually Oasis are always going on about how they're great BEATLES
> fans or ROLLING STONES fans, whatever....... everyone with a bit of
> brains knows that they totally ripped off the Stone Roses from that
> time they all spent cooped up in Rockfield Studios, South Wales.
> Oasis picked up so many great ideas in the presence of the Roses,
> which definatly come through in their live performances, but not on
> their shite album. And do Oasis give any credit to Roses in any of
> their many interviews........NO THEY FUCKING DON'T DO THEY?
> Well thats what I think, anyway.
> Who gives a shit anyway!
> ROB
No one gives a shit what you think, I hope you die horribley in fact, and
am confident that you play the guitar (if at all) like a gibbon. Noel is
pretty good actually. Can you write million-selling songs? No? No? Well
FUCK OFF, chimp-boy.
KARIM
M.D.Warren
rem...@rmond.mindspring.com (Wanda Behrman) wrote:
>
>George Harrison and Eric Clapton rank up there with the greatest
>guitarists too.
>
>Nick Behrman
>"Oasis is taller than Jesus Christ!"
>
I never rated George much as a lead guitarist..his rythym work was
fine..but I always found his solos..especially the early ones..rather
strained. he did get better later on when he did slide guitar tho:)
Mike Warren.
Deek
MCA...@news.salford.ac.uk (Rob Dale) wrote:
>I've got some spare time on my hands, so I've decided to invade your
>newsgroup and voice my opinions. I don't really care if they're
>wanted or not because I'm never going to meet any of you sad wankers,
>am I?
Thankfully, no.
>Anyway, I reckon Oasis are shit, not just because of the efforts of
>Liam Gallagher but because they are a bunch of talentless arseholes.
Oh DO go on, please? my sides are splitting!
>Admittedly, their "DEFINATLY, MAYBE" (probably spelt wrong, but who
>gives a shit) album was quite good, but "WHAT'S THE STORY....." was
>complete and utter pants (local expression translated as: not very
>good really!).
Fancy yourself as a bit of a critic then do you?
>Noel is a guitarist of poor quality, not that I'm any better but
>compared to people like John Squire (Stone Roses as if you didn't
>know), he is pretty crap.
It works though, doesn't it. Maybe that's what *really* pisses you
off? Besides, who's comparing? Noel's the first to admit his limited
ability, naming both John Squire and Graham Coxon from Blur among
others as far better guitarists. So your point was?
>The Drummer for "WHAT'S THE STORY....." is particularly shite,
>compared to Tony McCarrol (thats probably spelt wrong as well),
>off-of "DEFINATLY MAYBE", I think.
Now I *know* you've got your head up your arse. You *are* Tony
McCarrol, aren't you? Admit it like a man! Get back to Classical Gas
immediately!
>Liam's voice has since turned into an irritating whine.
>I don't even acknowledge the other member(s) because I'm totally
>fed-up with their overblown media coverage.
Yeah, Bonehead and Guigs are *never* out of the news eh?
>Actually Oasis are always going on about how they're great BEATLES
>fans or ROLLING STONES fans, whatever....... everyone with a bit of
>brains knows that they totally ripped off the Stone Roses from that
>time they all spent cooped up in Rockfield Studios, South Wales.
Yeah right, that explains the Roses lack of ideas for so long, Oasis
stole them all, of course!
>Oasis picked up so many great ideas in the presence of the Roses,
>which definatly come through in their live performances, but not on
>their shite album. And do Oasis give any credit to Roses in any of
>their many interviews........NO THEY FUCKING DON'T DO THEY?
Erm, yes they do actually, read many have you? They namecheck them all
the time, citing them as MAJOR influences on their work.
Perhaps if the Roses had shifted off their fat arses and DONE
something during those five years, they could have had *some* claim to
their crown. As it was, the spotlight was well and truly stolen by
Oasis, and good on them that's what I say. All this wasn't handed to
them on a plate you know, they've worked damn hard for their success,
a concept totally unknown to the Roses. Don't get me wrong, I love
both bands, but the Roses ultimate demise was *totally*
self-inflicted. Same goes for Oasis' success, they wanted it so they
went out and GOT it.
>Well thats what I think, anyway.
>Who gives a shit anyway!
> ROB
This last bit made sense though.
-
Deek,
Edinburgh, Scotland
(de...@dr.u-net.com)
ian
Best guitarist title goes to Bob Mould from Husker Du no doubt.
--
XianX
XstraightedgeXyouthX
'Raise your hammer,write your name in hell Straightedge I win again'
Brett Vargo
Karim Adab wrote:
>
>
> No, I agree! Steve Craddock is a superb guitarist! Noel is only average,
> but as a song writer I'm sure you agree he's second to none.
> >
Glad someone agrees about Steve Craddock, but, as brilliant as a songwriter
as Noel is, he's still second to Lennon-McCartney! Well, and Elvis Costello.
But Noel's definitely up there!
Daniel Bolger
The nights are getting longer, the days are getting colder, but this
does not deter lawr...@ufrsd.k12.nj.us from saying:
>> ...The Drummer for "WHAT'S THE STORY....." is particularly shite,
>> off-of "DEFINATLY MAYBE", I think.
You're Alan White? Do you here that, folks, we're in the presence of a
celebrity! Wahey! How's the album going?
Daniel Bolger: Worst 'flu he's ever had.
dan...@colouruk.demon.co.uk
http://www.geocities.com/SunsetStrip/5674
Karim Adab
Brett Vargo <brett...@earthlink.net> wrote in article
<32B62D...@earthlink.net>...
> Nick Behrman wrote:
> >
>
> > George Harrison and Eric Clapton rank up there with the greatest
> > guitarists too.
> >
>
> Yes, not to turn this thread into another "best guitarist" thread, but
George
> Harrison is the all time best (well, my favourite at least, but I suppose
I'm
> a bit biased). Eric Clapton's work alone on "While My Guitar Gently
Weeps"
> would have qualified him, but, of course, there's plenty more ace moments
in
> The Yardbirds, Bluesbreakers, Cream, and Derek & The Dominoes! Also up
there
> are Peter Green (Fleetwood Mac guitarist/singer in their best
incarnation,
> 1967-70), Roger McGuinn (from The Byrds, certainly one of the most
> influential), John Squire (Stone Roses), Keith Richards, and Johnny Marr
> (Smiths). And Graham Coxon is becoming a fabulous textural player (all
you
> Blur haters out there will disagree, I'm sure!), and Steve Craddock (of
Paul
> Weller, Ocean Colour Scene fame...again, all you OCS haters will probably
> disagree) is getting better all the time and was absolutely burning when
I
> saw OCS last week!
>
> Brett
Bryony Culbertson
In article <5944te$81c...@cms.salford.ac.uk>, Rob Dale
<MCA...@news.salford.ac.uk> writes
>I've got some spare time on my hands, so I've decided to invade your
>newsgroup and voice my opinions. I don't really care if they're
>wanted or not because I'm never going to meet any of you sad wankers,
>am I?
bunch of talentless arseholes
>Admittedly, their "DEFINATLY, MAYBE" (probably spelt wrong, but who
>gives a shit) album was quite good, but "WHAT'S THE STORY....." was
>complete and utter pants (local expression translated as: not very
>good really!).
>compared to people like John Squire (Stone Roses as if you didn't
>know), he is pretty crap.
>compared to Tony McCarrol (thats probably spelt wrong as well),
>off-of "DEFINATLY MAYBE", I think.
>I don't even acknowledge the other member(s) because I'm totally
>fed-up with their overblown media coverage.
>fans or ROLLING STONES fans, whatever....... everyone with a bit of
>brains knows that they totally ripped off the Stone Roses from that
>time they all spent cooped up in Rockfield Studios, South Wales.
>which definatly come through in their live performances, but not on
>their shite album. And do Oasis give any credit to Roses in any of
>their many interviews........NO THEY FUCKING DON'T DO THEY?
>Who gives a shit anyway!
> ROB
right to slag of oasis, and no we don't want your opinion, so get a life
and F**k off!
--
Bryony
David Saltmer
In article <L4UTYMAs...@glio.demon.co.uk>, Bryony Culbertson
<bry...@glio.demon.co.uk> writes
>In article <5944te$81c...@cms.salford.ac.uk>, Rob Dale
><MCA...@news.salford.ac.uk> writes
>>I've got some spare time on my hands, so I've decided to invade your
>>newsgroup and voice my opinions. I don't really care if they're
Isn't it the weirdest thing that some people can't be happy without
trying to upset others. Don't care what he says. Merry Christmas Rob
Dale.
--
David Saltmer
Alex O'Connor
Hello All Oasis Fans.
>I've got some spare time on my hands, so I've decided to invade your
>newsgroup and voice my opinions. I don't really care if they're
>wanted or not etc. etc
Yes, I do have some spare time on my hands, so I've decided to invade your
newsgroup and voice my opinions. I really don't give a shit if they're
wanted or not. Besides READ THE SUBJECT DUH!!
I had a dream last night, that Oasis were good **and** original. Oh gosh,
you dream some things don't you? Hahahahahahahaahahahahaha. Oasis are shit
and should get a life the scruffy gits. They think they're hard just
because they stick "V"s up at reporters. All Oasis fans GET A LIFE.
> Isn't it the weirdest thing that some people can't be happy without
> trying to upset others. Don't care what he says. Merry Christmas Rob
> Dale.
Bah Humbug!
Alex O'Connor - Little Shit, Funking Twat
I need my head KICKING IN!
Judge Rogers
Get a life fuckhead...
J. Slater
In article <32CC53...@cyberway.com.sg>, Judge Rogers
<jro...@cyberway.com.sg> writes
>Alex O'Connor wrote:
>>
>> Hello All Oasis Fans.
>>
>> >I've got some spare time on my hands, so I've decided to invade your
>> >newsgroup and voice my opinions. I don't really care if they're
>> >wanted or not etc. etc
>> Yes, I do have some spare time on my hands, so I've decided to invade
your
>> newsgroup and voice my opinions. I really don't give a shit if
they're
>> wanted or not. Besides READ THE SUBJECT DUH!!
>>
>> I had a dream last night, that Oasis were good **and** original. Oh gosh,
>> you dream some things don't you? Hahahahahahahaahahahahaha. Oasis are shit
>> and should get a life the scruffy gits. They think they're hard just
>> because they stick "V"s up at reporters. All Oasis fans GET A LIFE.
>>
>> > Isn't it the weirdest thing that some people can't be happy without
>> > trying to upset others. Don't care what he says. Merry Christmas Rob
>> > Dale.
>>
>> Bah Humbug!
>> Alex O'Connor - I'M A Little Shit, Funking Twat. I HAVE A WANK OVER
ANTHEA TURNER AND SHAG MY COUSINS. I LIVE IN A BOX AND BEG FOR MY
LIVING. I LIKE 3T AND BOYZONE.
>> I need my head KICKING IN!
>
>Get a life fuckhead...
--
Russ
Jinxster
> In article <32CC53...@cyberway.com.sg>, Judge Rogers
> <jro...@cyberway.com.sg> writes
> >Alex O'Connor wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello All Oasis Fans.
> >>
> >> >I've got some spare time on my hands, so I've decided to invade your
> >> >newsgroup and voice my opinions. I don't really care if they're
> >> >wanted or not etc. etc
They're not. Bugger off. This is the Oasis fan site. If you don't
like them, get outta here!
> >> I had a dream last night, that Oasis were good **and** original. Oh gosh,
> >> you dream some things don't you? Hahahahahahahaahahahahaha. Oasis are shit
> >> and should get a life the scruffy gits. They think they're hard just
> >> because they stick "V"s up at reporters. All Oasis fans GET A LIFE.
> >>
Listen, we like them. We're not alone in this. If all you can think of
doing with your spare time is slagging off other people's fave bands
just for the hell of it, it's you who needs a life.
Jinxster, Voice of Reason.
nirvana
Jinxster <TL6...@QMWCC3.qmw.ac.uk> wrote in article
<32DD2E...@QMWCC3.qmw.ac.uk>...
I am of the beleif that Oasis SUCKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! They suck big
ejaculated green donkey cocks!!!!!! Listen to real music!!!!!!! Heavy Metal
kicks all mighty ass!!!!!
Duvall
nirvana <pat...@ix.netcom.com> wrote in article
<01bc056e$5b4ac720$b2e41fcc@pentium-133>...
Evidentially you like them, or why else would you have your sorry arse in
here!! Have too much time on your hand right, so you have to go to each
music newsgroup and put down decent bands, well I got news for you mother
fucker, get a life, go spend your free time elsewhere!!
Monde
Jinxster <TL6...@QMWCC3.qmw.ac.uk> wrote:
> > >> >I've got some spare time on my hands, so I've decided to invade your
> > >> >newsgroup and voice my opinions. I don't really care if they're
> > >> >wanted or not etc. etc
>
> They're not. Bugger off. This is the Oasis fan site. If you don't
> like them, get outta here!
this newsgroup's not called alt.fan.music.oasis, it's called
alt.music.oasis. so i would think y'all could deal with a little
dissenting opinion. if Oasis were that great, would you have to care
what anyone else thinks?
so here's my question: what do the fans think is so great about them?
i don't think they're very interesting myself. they seem to be trying
to sound like sixties music or something but lack all the neat
psychedelic noises that made this music interesting. and what's with
some of the lyrics...they sound like they may have just been made up as
they recorded the songs. i wanna know what a 'wonderwall' is. what
'champagne supernover' means.
and the last complaint i have about Oasis is that the singer's voice is
really screechy. i would use headphones and tapes, if i had them, but i
don't right now. recently got all my tapes stolen. so i have to listen
to Live 105 (the SF 'alternative' station) and it's like they play Oasis
every hour on the hour so i guess that's why i get frustrated by them.
even songs i LIKE a LOT get tiresome at some point when played once an
hour or so.
sorry for ranting, and taking an unpopular viewpoint here. but i don't
see any reason why i shouldn't. you're cordially invited to tell me to
stick it up my cornhole and twist, if you wish... :}
monde (who likes industrial music!)
--
demi monde :: aka :: monde kontrolle :: mo...@sirius.com
+--------->the compound eye BBS: 415.749.0426<---------+
defenestration: http://www.sirius.com/~monde
unsolicited e-mail advertisements are charged a $500 fee
jffs...@aol.com
In article <1997011905...@ppp017-sf2.sirius.com>,
nos...@thisaddress.com (Monde) writes:
>so here's my question: what do the fans think is so great about them?
I've been an Oasis freak ever since I got my first taste of them from
the
"Definately Maybe" album. My room mate was a student rep for Sony, and he
got via UPS a big box o' Oasis CD's, so I managed to snarf one. I was
instantly
impressed.
American rock music these days seems to fall into one of three
catagories:
"alternative" nay-sayers like Pearl Jam or NIN who dread the day they ever
became famous and who seem to think nothing is right with the world;
rap/dance
acts like Coolio or Snoop whose songs are becoming the disco of the 90's;
and
sappy balladeers like Celine Dion who are... well... sappy beyond belief.
In the middle of this all-time low in the history of American rock
music comes
Oasis, a British band who have revived the concept of the *rock* star!
They're a throw-back to the days when Keith Moon would drive cars into
hotel swimming pools... when rock stars were *rock stars*.
Oasis' songs are without a doubt the best songwriting being churned out
today anywhere in the world. Songs like "Wonderwall" and "...Anger" will
be radio staples a decade from now and longer. Will any radio stations be
playing "industrial" then? Not likely.
Plus, Oasis are great to their fans. When they release a single, they
make certain to include two or three bonus songs not available on their
albums. Often
times these bonus songs are as good or better than the latest Peal Jam or
STP
single! Sure, they had some problems last fall and had to cancel some US
shows, but I still say they're a fan's band.
If you love "industrial" music so much, go post to an industrial
newsgroup and complain there. But rest assured, you'll be hearing these
Oasis tunes "on the hour every hour" for a great number of years. Why?
Because they're classics.
-Jeff
Jeff
Tim
Monde <nos...@thisaddress.com> wrote in article
<1997011905...@ppp017-sf2.sirius.com>...
Monde Kontrolle? What are you doing here? Or are you a totally different
Monde Kontrolle (How many can there be)?
Please be nice to her, people. (At least try and keep those flames civil.)
> this newsgroup's not called alt.fan.music.oasis, it's called
> alt.music.oasis. so i would think y'all could deal with a little
> dissenting opinion. if Oasis were that great, would you have to care
> what anyone else thinks?
Fair point, but you have to realise that we've been cursed on a few
occasions with plagues of little brats who say 'Oasis SUX and if you like
them you're sad'. Because of this we are paranoid about anyone who
expresses negative views.
> so here's my question: what do the fans think is so great about them?
> i don't think they're very interesting myself. they seem to be trying
> to sound like sixties music or something but lack all the neat
> psychedelic noises that made this music interesting. and what's with
> some of the lyrics...they sound like they may have just been made up as
> they recorded the songs. i wanna know what a 'wonderwall' is. what
> 'champagne supernover' means.
I can't tell you what I think is great about them, but I just think there's
something great about them. It's something to do with being loud and
simplistic and a bit mad and proud of it. The term 'In Yer Face' comes to
mind. Also you won't have heard some of the songs like Listen Up or D'Yer
Wanna Be a Spaceman where Noel proves that he really IS a great songwriter,
even though he never makes sense.
I don't find them at all sixties. But I may be blinded by all the
modern-day amps and effects. There are some riffs that were originally
Beatles (and some bits from REM, The Roses, The Levellers, Gary Glitter!
etc) but the overall _sound_ is totally different and pretty unique.
Champagne Supernova is, of course, gibberish. But that doesn't stop people
constantly asking what one is. To the annoyance of my militant friend
Pauline.
I am a firm supporter of Gibberish in lyric writing. Many of the best
lyrics are gibberish which make half-sense or no sense at all but still
sound cool. Examples below:
"Can you tell a green field from a cold steel rail" (Floyd - Waters)
"I could park a juggernaut in your mind" (Roses)
"I'll give you anything, everything if you want things" (Floyd - Syd)
The entire of 'Lucy In The Sky With Diamonds' (Beatles)
> and the last complaint i have about Oasis is that the singer's voice is
> really screechy. i would use headphones and tapes, if i had them, but i
> don't right now. recently got all my tapes stolen. so i have to listen
> to Live 105 (the SF 'alternative' station) and it's like they play Oasis
> every hour on the hour so i guess that's why i get frustrated by them.
> even songs i LIKE a LOT get tiresome at some point when played once an
> hour or so.
Singers voices are a personal thing. There are many perfectly good bands I
find un-listenable just because I hate the sound made by the singer. Radio
sucks because they overplay songs until you're sick of them and also
because they play lots of teeny crap 'cos the record companies tell them
to.
Hope you catch the bastard who nicked your tapes - that really is low! If
somebody nicked my CD collection I'd probly kill myself that afternoon.
> sorry for ranting, and taking an unpopular viewpoint here. but i don't
> see any reason why i shouldn't. you're cordially invited to tell me to
> stick it up my cornhole and twist, if you wish... :}
Well I suppose I should flame you just on principle then - please don't
take it personally:
Monde: Eat my Jelly Babies.
(That's not really so bad is it)
--
Syd Barrett: (asked if he would enjoy playing again) Yes, that would be
nice. I used to enjoy it, it was a gas. But so's doing nothing.
Richey Edwards: Children smile at nothing at all and it takes a lot to make
an adult smile. You need something pretty spectacular."
Tim
satanict...@gmail.com
> I've got some spare time on my hands, so I've decided to invade your
> newsgroup and voice my opinions. I don't really care if they're
> am I?
> Liam Gallagher but because they are a bunch of talentless arseholes.
> gives a shit) album was quite good, but "WHAT'S THE STORY....." was
> complete and utter pants (local expression translated as: not very
> good really!).
> Noel is a guitarist of poor quality, not that I'm any better but
> compared to people like John Squire (Stone Roses as if you didn't
> know), he is pretty crap.
> The Drummer for "WHAT'S THE STORY....." is particularly shite,
> compared to Tony McCarrol (thats probably spelt wrong as well),
> off-of "DEFINATLY MAYBE", I think.
> Liam's voice has since turned into an irritating whine.
> fed-up with their overblown media coverage.
> Actually Oasis are always going on about how they're great BEATLES
> fans or ROLLING STONES fans, whatever....... everyone with a bit of
> brains knows that they totally ripped off the Stone Roses from that
> time they all spent cooped up in Rockfield Studios, South Wales.
> Oasis picked up so many great ideas in the presence of the Roses,
> which definatly come through in their live performances, but not on
> their shite album. And do Oasis give any credit to Roses in any of
> their many interviews........NO THEY FUCKING DON'T DO THEY?
> Well thats what I think, anyway.
> Who gives a shit anyway!
> ROB