Does Kurt sing on "Beans"?
Xmrcrowley
Can anybody tell me who sings the demo "Beans". is it Kurt or just a
computer-generated-studio voice overdub or something?
Just Wondering
David
Bliss69305
The vocals on "Beans" are hardly computer-generated, as the song was
recorded by Kurt on 4-track. So, yes, that is Kurt singing.
Leo
my guess would be that the kc's vocals were made to sound like that by
taking
advantage of the pitch control knob on most four tracks. everything was
recorded at a slow speed and sped up as it was being placed onto another
tape from the four track..
leo
Stoney4429
actually. i took it and slowed it down one time and it sounds like
krist...
but who fucking knows
Stoney.
mstpimp
so it wasn't helium? i thought this was what he did to get his voice
this high and why the songs breaks long enuf to take in more
Tim Moffat
Yeah, I slowed it down as well and it does sound a lot like Chris
singing. Hes got a real "unique" voice. It sorta sounded like his
singing in "Do You Love Me" or "The Landlord Is A Piece Of Shit From
Hell" in Montage of Heck 1. Anyway, Thats just my opinion. Who knows
whos singing in it!
Tim.
Geraldo
Nirvana Freak <nirvan...@videotron.ca> wrote:
>Xmrcrowley wrote:
>>
>> Can anybody tell me who sings the demo "Beans". is it Kurt or just a
>> computer-generated-studio voice overdub or something?
>>
>> Just Wondering
>>
>> David
>YES, Kurt is the one who sings Beans...how??? Simple...he breathed some
>helium. Helium has the property to lighten the voice...which means,
>that if Kurt was singing at a high pitched tone...and had breathed some
>helium...IT WOULD HAVE MADE it weider...like at a higher pitch...If you
>don't believe me, try breathing some helium yourself...you'll see what I
>mean...but not TOO MUCH....it could kill ya....
>Nirvana Freak
HELIUM??? HYUK, HYUK, HYUK!!
Are you really *that* stupid???
Almost all 4-tracks - even bottom range ones - have a tape speed
controll, enabling you to speedup/slowdown your recording..
It's a fake anyway, I thought someone proved that ages ago!!
.
marcob
Chris Lawrence <mus...@islandnet.com> wrote:
>Nirvana Freak wrote:
>>
>> Xmrcrowley wrote:
>> >
>> > Can anybody tell me who sings the demo "Beans". is it Kurt or just a
>> > computer-generated-studio voice overdub or something?
>> >
>> > Just Wondering
>> >
>> > David
>>
>> Didn't any of you have physics courses at school or somethin??? THINK
>> HELIUM....helium makes your voice lighter...therefor...at a high pitched
>> tone...Therefor...if Kurt was already singing at a high tone and had
>> taken some breathes of helium while singing...it would have given such a
>> sound....try it for yourself...you'll see what I mean...so YES IT IS
>> KURT SINGING ON BEANS!
>>
>> Nirvana Freak
>Look, you super-cool, ultra-rad Nirvana freak...helium isn't the
>only possibility. In fact, it's quite obvious by the guitar sound that
>the effect was achieved by using the pitch control on a 4-track, which
>has already been stated and is true. So, quit with this helium crap.
>Chris
THANK YOU CHRIS!!! For the record, everyone listen up.....Leo & Chris
are telling you guys how Kurt made his voice sound the way it did on
Beans. Believe me, I know that this is right.
Marc
marcob
Nirvana Freak <nirvan...@videotron.ca> wrote:
>Xmrcrowley wrote:
>>
>> Can anybody tell me who sings the demo "Beans". is it Kurt or just a
>> computer-generated-studio voice overdub or something?
>>
>> Just Wondering
>>
>> David
>YES, Kurt is the one who sings Beans...how??? Simple...he breathed some
>helium. Helium has the property to lighten the voice...which means,
>that if Kurt was singing at a high pitched tone...and had breathed some
>helium...IT WOULD HAVE MADE it weider...like at a higher pitch...If you
>don't believe me, try breathing some helium yourself...you'll see what I
>mean...but not TOO MUCH....it could kill ya....
>Nirvana Freak
NOPE, no helium, just read LEO'S explaination. He is right & what he
says was how it was done.
Nirvana Freak
Chris Lawrence wrote:
>
> Nirvana Freak wrote:
> >
> > Xmrcrowley wrote:
> > >
> > > Can anybody tell me who sings the demo "Beans". is it Kurt or just a
> > > computer-generated-studio voice overdub or something?
> > >
> > > Just Wondering
> > >
> > > David
> >
> > HELIUM....helium makes your voice lighter...therefor...at a high pitched
> > tone...Therefor...if Kurt was already singing at a high tone and had
> > taken some breathes of helium while singing...it would have given such a
> > sound....try it for yourself...you'll see what I mean...so YES IT IS
> > KURT SINGING ON BEANS!
> >
> > Nirvana Freak
>
> Look, you super-cool, ultra-rad Nirvana freak...helium isn't the
> only possibility. In fact, it's quite obvious by the guitar sound that
> the effect was achieved by using the pitch control on a 4-track, which
> has already been stated and is true. So, quit with this helium crap.
>
> Chris
>
> Check out my list of Nirvana bootlegs/concerts at:
> http://www.geocities.com/SunsetStrip/Towers/8712/bootleg4.htm
Maybe BUT....think about it this way....YOU try to do such a high pitch
voice JUST by using the pitch control....believe me, it's also part of
it....not my fault if you're closed-minded....I have accepted that pitch
control thing but I also believe helium was part of it...ADMIT IT it
could be a possiblity!
Nirvana Freak
Nirvana Freak
mstpimp wrote:
>
> On Tue, 20 May 1997 18:26:28 -0400, Nirvana Freak
> <nirvan...@videotron.ca> wrote:
>
> >Xmrcrowley wrote:
> >>
> >> Can anybody tell me who sings the demo "Beans". is it Kurt or just a
> >> computer-generated-studio voice overdub or something?
> >>
> >> Just Wondering
> >>
> >> David
> >
> >
> >helium. Helium has the property to lighten the voice...which means,
> >that if Kurt was singing at a high pitched tone...and had breathed some
> >helium...IT WOULD HAVE MADE it weider...like at a higher pitch...If you
> >don't believe me, try breathing some helium yourself...you'll see what I
> >mean...but not TOO MUCH....it could kill ya....
> >
> >Nirvana Freak
>
> responses to the same post.
And by the way....I'M FEMALE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Nirvana Freak
Did you ever think I could have had some problems with my puter and that
it had said for the 2 1st ones that it didn't get through so I tried
sending it again but forgot EXACTLY what I wrote in them??? Have you
ever thought that was a possiblity cause that's what happened!
David Perle
mar...@paonline.com (marcob) wrote:
>*Beans* is NOT faked it IS Nirvana. I don't know how any faked bs got
>started but it is just that BS.
Well, I do remember someone posting something a while back, some
quote about the song (maybe even from Come As You Are), where some
lyrics from the song were quoted, and none of them are in the song.
BUT, and I just thought about this after I hit 'f' to respond...I have
a version of Beans with a little bit of other vocals before the "beans
beans beans...jackie ate some beans..." part. It's something about
how "I'm gonna beat you up." Does anyone else know about these
"mysterious other lyrics" that made the authenticity of what we know
as Beans questionable?
David
---------------
http://www.netcom.com/~dperle/nirvana (Current Version: 3.5)
Detailed Explanations For Why Tom Grant's "Kurt Cobain was Murdered!"
Theory Should Not Be Believed / Personal response from Courtney Love
Join the mailing list to receive update information -- David W. Perle
Check out my Nirvana Links Page for over 300 completely described links!
Mr D.J. Beech
Xmrcrowley (xmrcr...@aol.com) wrote:
: Can anybody tell me who sings the demo "Beans". is it Kurt or just a
: computer-generated-studio voice overdub or something?
: Just Wondering
: David
Sounds like Kurt on helium to me.
Darren
Phil Oliver
On Thu, 22 May 1997 05:13:22 GMT, mar...@paonline.com (marcob) wrote:
>fel...@HDSPAMBLOCKbiosys.net (Phil Oliver) wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 20 May 1997 00:15:06 GMT, mar...@paonline.com (marcob) wrote:
>
>>>stone...@aol.com (Stoney4429) wrote:
>>>
>>>>actually. i took it and slowed it down one time and it sounds like
>>>>krist...
>>>
>>>Gawd, it is NOT krist, it IS Kurt. Read Leo's explaination of how it
>>>was done.
>
>>I heard "Beans" is faked and is not Nirvana.
>
>>-Phil Oliver
>
>*Beans* is NOT faked it IS Nirvana. I don't know how any faked bs got
>started but it is just that BS.
How can you be certain that it IS Nirvana? The voice is so screwed up
that it wouldn't be that surprising if it weren't them, there have
been plenty of "normal" sounding songs that were supposedly
Nirvana but really weren't (not to mention "Kurt's Home Guitar
rehearsals"). I'm not claiming it's not Nirvana, but I'm also not
claiming it definitely IS them.
-Phil Oliver
Phil Oliver
>Didn't any of you have physics courses at school or somethin??? THINK
>HELIUM....helium makes your voice lighter...therefor...at a high pitched
>tone...Therefor...if Kurt was already singing at a high tone and had
>taken some breathes of helium while singing...it would have given such a
>sound....try it for yourself...you'll see what I mean...so YES IT IS
>KURT SINGING ON BEANS!
And I suppose he gave the guitar some helium as well?
-Phil Oliver
SLIPPYBOY
what bootleg is this "other" version of beans on??
***El-Bulge-O***SILLY MONKEY***El-Bulge-O***
http://members.aol.com/slippyboy/page1.html
For my incomplete Nirvana listing, go to:
http://members.aol.com/slippyboy/nirvana.html
!!!!RADIOACTIVE PROSTITUTE!!!!
Geraldo
Chris Lawrence <mus...@islandnet.com> wrote:
>Just cuz, CAYA says it was a "Vaselines-influenced" song, but I'm
>pretty sure that was in the lyrics, not the specific guitar line
>(though,
>slowed down, it probably does bear a resemblance to Frances and Eugene's
>writing style.
>Chris
Really? Other than the obvious son of a gun, jesus, and molly's lips I
dare you to name another sont that the Vaselines did that remotely
resembles it. In fact those 3 songs Nirvana covered barely resemble
it. Face it, it's a fake!!!!!! Somebody constructed it from the
description in CAYA.. why else did it 'appear' from thin air, and
without the other songs it was reputed to have been with... and don't
give that bs about them being those acoustic versions, coz they were
from a radio broadcast..
Geraldo
Chris Lawrence <mus...@islandnet.com> wrote:
>But yeah, that is possible, if you record with the pitch control all the
>way down and play it back with it all the way up.
>Chris
Yeah, but if you listen the pich is wavering.. this is a classic cover
up move when faking vocals because it destorts the voice in such a way
as to make it almost impossible to get back to normal speed - and
therefore difficult to prove a fake - like it is..
Bliss69305
>what bootleg is this "other" version of beans on??
It's on Dressed for Success
marcob
fel...@JISPAMBLOCKbiosys.net (Phil Oliver) wrote:
>-Phil Oliver
Look, Beans IS Kurt singing & playing. Kurt's Home Guitar Rehearsals
is FAKE. These two facts are widely know among serious Nirvana
collectors. I have no idea how to convince you of these two facts.
If you pass up *Beans* it is your loss.
Tim Moffat
> >>
> >> Can anybody tell me who sings the demo "Beans". is it Kurt or just a
> >> computer-generated-studio voice overdub or something?
> >>
> >> Just Wondering
> >>
> >> David
>
> >helium. Helium has the property to lighten the voice...which means,
> >that if Kurt was singing at a high pitched tone...and had breathed some
> >helium...IT WOULD HAVE MADE it weider...like at a higher pitch...If you
> >don't believe me, try breathing some helium yourself...you'll see what I
> >mean...but not TOO MUCH....it could kill ya....
>
> >Nirvana Freak
>
>
> Are you really *that* stupid???
>
> Almost all 4-tracks - even bottom range ones - have a tape speed
> controll, enabling you to speedup/slowdown your recording..
>
> It's a fake anyway, I thought someone proved that ages ago!!
>
> .
Its not a fake!!!!
DRifTeR
does anyone have beans in mp3 format? e-mail me if you do. thanks.
--
DRifTeR__________________________
_______...@navix.net_________
http://connect.ccsn.edu/~dhain01/
---------------------------------
"There was no such thing as society,
and even if there was,
I most certainly had nothing to do with it."
-Mark Renton (Trainspotting)
Phil Oliver
On Sat, 24 May 1997 00:59:06 GMT, mar...@paonline.com (marcob) wrote:
>fel...@JISPAMBLOCKbiosys.net (Phil Oliver) wrote:
>>How can you be certain that it IS Nirvana? The voice is so screwed up
>>that it wouldn't be that surprising if it weren't them, there have
>>been plenty of "normal" sounding songs that were supposedly
>>Nirvana but really weren't (not to mention "Kurt's Home Guitar
>>rehearsals"). I'm not claiming it's not Nirvana, but I'm also not
>>claiming it definitely IS them.
>
>
>Look, Beans IS Kurt singing & playing. Kurt's Home Guitar Rehearsals
>is FAKE. These two facts are widely know among serious Nirvana
>collectors. I have no idea how to convince you of these two facts.
I would be convinced that it's them if someone explained HOW
these "serious collectors" know it's real.
-Phil Oliver
Geraldo
Chris Lawrence <mus...@islandnet.com> wrote:
>Have you even heard anything by the REAL Vaselines, or just Nirvana's
>covers? I'm not saying it's a direct copy of the Vaselines style, but
>the resemblance is there.
Yes I have. Your poin is?
I also have the Devo original (which I had well before Incesticide or
the radio 1 session).
Like I said, your point is?
>Face it, Beans was a joke. Whether or not the existing Beans is real
>or not, I'm not at liberty to say.
The joke is on anybody who believes it is real, esp. those who favour
the helium thing.
Ger.
joe
Numchuck wrote:
>
> Nirvana Freak wrote:
> >
> > mstpimp wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 20 May 1997 18:26:28 -0400, Nirvana Freak
> > > <nirvan...@videotron.ca> wrote:
> > >
> > > >Xmrcrowley wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Can anybody tell me who sings the demo "Beans". is it Kurt or just a
> > > >> computer-generated-studio voice overdub or something?
> > > >>
> > > >> Just Wondering
> > > >>
> > > >> David
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >YES, Kurt is the one who sings Beans...how??? Simple...he breathed some
> > > >helium. Helium has the property to lighten the voice...which means,
> > > >that if Kurt was singing at a high pitched tone...and had breathed some
> > > >helium...IT WOULD HAVE MADE it weider...like at a higher pitch...If you
> > > >don't believe me, try breathing some helium yourself...you'll see what I
> > > >mean...but not TOO MUCH....it could kill ya....
> > > >
> > > >Nirvana Freak
> > >
> > > responses to the same post.
> >
> > Did you ever think I could have had some problems with my puter and that
> > it had said for the 2 1st ones that it didn't get through so I tried
> > sending it again but forgot EXACTLY what I wrote in them??? Have you
> > ever thought that was a possiblity cause that's what happened!
>
> listen in the quiet bits at the end of the verse (Make sure it is a c.d
> or mpeg copy) you can here lots of white noise (from some sort of
> digital machine)
what are u guys talking about. it might sould dumb to u guy but whats
"beans". is it kind of concert kurt did? let me know. im not really into
nirvana but i like them
Scott Brooks
It's also on one of the Outsectices (Volume #3)
Bliss69305 <bliss...@aol.com> wrote in article
<19970524032...@ladder01.news.aol.com>...
marcob
fel...@KESPAMBLOCKbiosys.net (Phil Oliver) wrote:
>-Phil Oliver
OK, have you listened to the " Home Rehearsals"? If you are seriously
into Kurt & Nirvana you know that there is NO WAY that that is Kurt's
guitar playing or singing. That's how "serious collector's" know, if
you listen to enough of Kurt's guitar playing & singing you can hear
that it NOT him.
Hey Phil, I am not selling these things so don't keep coming at me
with your wise ass questions. Maybe you can go play in traffic
instead! : )
Numchuck
Phil Oliver
On Tue, 27 May 1997 04:47:32 GMT, mar...@paonline.com (marcob) wrote:
>fel...@KESPAMBLOCKbiosys.net (Phil Oliver) wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 24 May 1997 00:59:06 GMT, mar...@paonline.com (marcob) wrote:
>
>>>Look, Beans IS Kurt singing & playing. Kurt's Home Guitar Rehearsals
>>>is FAKE. These two facts are widely know among serious Nirvana
>>>collectors. I have no idea how to convince you of these two facts.
>
>>I would be convinced that it's them if someone explained HOW
>>these "serious collectors" know it's real.
>
>>-Phil Oliver
>
>OK, have you listened to the " Home Rehearsals"? If you are seriously
>into Kurt & Nirvana you know that there is NO WAY that that is Kurt's
>guitar playing or singing. That's how "serious collector's" know, if
>you listen to enough of Kurt's guitar playing & singing you can hear
>that it NOT him.
When did I ever say that the "Home Rehearsals" were real? I've
already said that I knew those were faked, the person who's
supposedly "Kurt" isn't even playing the right chords! What I
keep asking is "How do you know it's him playing 'Beans'? "
There's nothing distinctive about the playing in "Beans" to
indicate Kurt, it's just a simple strum of a couple chords.
>Hey Phil, I am not selling these things so don't keep coming at me
>with your wise ass questions. Maybe you can go play in traffic
>instead! : )
"Wise ass questions"??? You keep insisting that "All serious
collectors know that 'Beans' is real", all I've asked is "How do
you know that?" My sincerest apologies, from now on whenever
people in this newsgroup make a claim like that, I won't be a
"wise ass" and ask them to prove it...
-Phil Oliver
Geraldo
>>Look, Beans IS Kurt singing & playing. Kurt's Home Guitar Rehearsals
>>is FAKE. These two facts are widely know among serious Nirvana
>>collectors. I have no idea how to convince you of these two facts.
>I would be convinced that it's them if someone explained HOW
>these "serious collectors" know it's real.
>-Phil Oliver
The problem is that most *serious* nirvana collectors feel quite
worried when put on the spot about Beans. They want to believe it's
real, but they know it's fake. Plain and simple. It's fake, faker than
Bill Clintons smile..
G
Geraldo
Chris Lawrence <mus...@islandnet.com> wrote:
>All you've been saying is "it's fake", "it's fake", "it's fake!". How
>about giving us some PROOF as to why you believe it to be a fake? It
>could make this whole thread a little more interesting.
>Chris
Proof?
!: Lyrics don't match those in CAYA.. Why should this be so if Azerad
*heard* the actual song.
2: Vaselines influence. Neither the lyrics nor the music sounds like
the sort of stuff the vaselines did. It does however sound like what
someone might imagine they sound from Azerads description of their
music, and also from the impression Nirvana gabve via their style of
covering other peoples material (see Devo, Shocking Blue 'My Sharona'
(by whoever), etc.)
3: If you slow down the vocals it does *not* sound even remotly like
Cobain. Before you try the old 'but it was speeded up so his voice is
destorted'.. even if you speed up someones vocals/voice and then dub
that onto a tape. Make a 5th generation dub of that recording (ie,
record it onto another tape, record that onto another tape, etc) and
then if you restore the 5th gen copy to the correct speed it still
*sounds* like the person it is. Beans does *not*. Further proof of
this is a demo my band made. We recorded backwards messages for our
demo. We used a 4-track, recorded the tape at normal (mid speed) pitch
then flipped the cassette over and played it backwards, dubbing it to
tape, and varying the speed of palyback. My sister came home for
christmas and listened to our demo, liked it but wanted to know what
we said backwards so I re-dubbed the message onto my 4-track (lost the
original recording) and played it at 'normal' pitch and the right way
round. I could *clearly* hear my voice (even though the pitch was
wavering) and also I could *clearly* hear the voices of my band mates,
and we *all* sounded like ourselves (with wavering pitched voices). We
didn't sound like someone else entirely - like Beans does.
Beans is just too conveniant. It fits in with an ideal rather than
fact - the ideal that the song *was* recorded, and that it's likely
that Kurt would have tried to disguise his voice to such an extent
that is is impossible to tell if it is really him, and sounds more
likely to be someone else entirely. I can't do it for a while coz my
sound card is screwed, but if you all want I will send out a WAV file
via email to anyone who thinks I am wrong.
Kurt has a very distinctive voice and anyone who is fooled by the fake
is pretty dumb. If I wanted to get some cash from gullible people I
would have done this type of thing because you all seem to have fallen
for it. For gods sake, why would the song be described as vaseline
like and not 'smurf' like.. Don't you think Azerrad would have
included that small fact??
Ger.
marcob
No.re...@I.dont.want.junk.mail (Geraldo) wrote:
>>-Phil Oliver
It is not fake. BTW, I am NOT *quite worried*. What makes YOU think
it is fake?
Leo
> Beans is just too conveniant. It fits in with an ideal rather than
> fact - the ideal that the song *was* recorded, and that it's likely
> that Kurt would have tried to disguise his voice to such an extent
> that is is impossible to tell if it is really him, and sounds more
> likely to be someone else entirely.
and while this may true, until proved by a completely reliable
source, like perhaps michael azzerad, krist noveselic, or anyone
of that sort, i think we basically have to believe 'beans' is legit
because it is possible that it could be kurt.
leo
Geraldo
Leo <dad...@neosoft.com> wrote:
>and while this may true, until proved by a completely reliable
>source, like perhaps michael azzerad, krist noveselic, or anyone
>of that sort, i think we basically have to believe 'beans' is legit
>because it is possible that it could be kurt.
>leo
That's what I meant in the post I did before last in the tread. Cris
retaliated with calls for 'proof', and to be honest I have about as
much *real* evidence against beans as anyone has for it. But the real
problem is that *real* Nirvana collectors *want* to believe beans is
real, but just cant really. As I said it's too conveniant, that
coupled with the audio evedence I presented, what other conclusion can
be drawn? It's a fake until proven real!!
Ger
SLIPPYBOY
A fake until proven real? I can't agree with you on that one....If that
was the case, then songs like "It's Closing Soon" would have to be
considered fakes...I mean, is there any definitice proof that that's a
"real" nirvana song? I know it's far-fetched, but still...There are only a
few people who can determine if a song is really by nirvana, so until we
get statements from them, let's just take everything as it comes; and in
this case, "Beans" is coming at me as a nirvana song.
--Dave
Brian McKenna
Geraldo wrote:
>
> slip...@aol.com (SLIPPYBOY) wrote:
>
> >A fake until proven real? I can't agree with you on that one....If that
> >was the case, then songs like "It's Closing Soon" would have to be
> >considered fakes..
>
> saw it..
>
> Sheesh, if that is the only argument you can think of..
>
> ger
Chris Lawrence flame in 3....2....1..
--
Feel free to check out my Nirvana Discography with Pics at
http://www.bendov.net/dust/discpics.htm Featuring pics of rare singles,
EP's, compilations, promos, blah, blah, blah
Bliss69305
What the hell are you talking about?! It's Closing Soon was not recorded
in front of a live audience!
tourette's
Well Sub Pop had it on a song list by their artists. I can't remember
where I saw it, might have been at their site unsure but if it's on a
Sub Pop song list well then it must be for real!
tourette's -http://www.geocities.com/SunsetStrip/Palms/3385/title.html
SLIPPYBOY
it's fake because you "posted a hole bunch about it"?? So if i posted
that the earth was flat 7346587 times, then it would be true? kewl!
SLIPPYBOY
once again, I PROVED that you're an idiot, Geraldo...you have no clue what
you're talking about. go back to alt.music.newkidsontheblock.
Geraldo
Chris Lawrence <mus...@islandnet.com> wrote:
>I could always pester Michael Azerrad about it, but I won't. I really
>don't give a damn, and I'm sure he doesn't either. Move on with your
>lives!!
>Chris
Hell! I could pester Azerrad too, it's not like it's hard to find his
email address or anything -but I too don't really care. The thing
that anoys me though is how everyone takes it for granted that it's
real *just* because it is on bootlegs. There are countless fakes out
there that sound more realistic than beans (that instramental version
of Sifting, B&W blues etc.), but people just want to believe it's real
so they have another one over on the people that want to goet into
bootlegs.
Ger
Geraldo
tourette's <toure...@geocities.com> wrote:
>Well Sub Pop had it on a song list by their artists. I can't remember
>where I saw it, might have been at their site unsure but if it's on a
>Sub Pop song list well then it must be for real!
I never said the song didn't exist.. Just that the 'helium' version is
a fake.. Totally unconvincing.
SLIPPYBOY
are you insane?!?! the instrumental version of sifting IS real! it's been
documented in official recording sessions....next thing that geraldo guy
is gonna say is that the demo of Mr. Moustache is fake "because the
whining at the end doesn;t sound like Kurt". gawd, what an idiot....
SLIPPYBOY
Geraldo wrote:
>Beans however, is a fake. I know, I think I know the guy who made it..
>well claims to have, but sorry I am not revealing sources.. Suck on
>that.
You are SO pathetic. i have something for you: "My favorite inside
source...."
If you like Nirvana and Kurt so much, then how do you feel about that? or
are you just gonna blow it off by saying that it's not from a real nirvana
song?
g manderin olf linnlie
Oh and by the way,
Big Long Now, About a Girl, In Bloom, and tourette's are fakes too!
Especially tourette's, Kurt would NEVER do a song that was just
screaming and About a Girl is just some local Seattle band with a vocal
machine that sounds like Kurt.
In Fact anything before Nevermind was a fake because Dave wasn't in the
band yet. Unless Chad Channing was an alias used by Dave....
Hmmmmmm.... or Chad could've been a name for a drum machine.
And all those rumors about Dave Grohl in Pearl Jam ARE true!!
He was never in Nirvana! It was Dave Foster the whole time!
Dave Navarro and David Alan Grier were also in Nirvana for a time.
marcob
No.re...@I.dont.want.junk.mail (Geraldo) wrote:
>mar...@paonline.com (marcob) wrote:
>>It is not fake. BTW, I am NOT *quite worried*. What makes YOU think
>>it is fake?
>Um, it is fake.. I posted a hole bunch about it.. pick up the speed
>boy..
Hey Jerry........you are missing a hell of a lot.
Geraldo
g manderin olf linnlie <gam...@gisco.net> wrote:
<childish prattle removed>
Look dude, I have been posting to this group since before the Joseph
Betz incident. I choose now to be anonymous due to junk mail, but
basicly I think I know a little more about the general rule of thumb
than you do. Hell I remember when it used to be a damn flame war hell
here.. and I remember a time before Chris Lawrence too (or atleast a
time when he wasn't very vocal)..
ger.
SLIPPYBOY
Geraldo wrote:
> what ever
>I say means exactly zero to anyone but me.
I can't agree with you more. Are you really that dumb, or is this just an
act? Everything that you say DOES mean nothing to me....and according to
you, the same goes for everyone else. Why not just pack up your bullshit
hypothesis and get out of here! Accept the fact, that until Beans is
proven fake, it will still remain a Nirvana song. As of now, there is no
proof to contradict the validity of that song.
Israel's Daughter
Phil Oliver wrote:
>
> On 10 Jun 1997 07:07:22 GMT, slip...@aol.com (SLIPPYBOY) wrote:
>
> >Accept the fact, that until Beans is
> >proven fake, it will still remain a Nirvana song. As of now, there is no
> >proof to contradict the validity of that song.
>
> real, it will not remain a Nirvana song. If I take a tape recorder
> into the bathroom later tonight and record the sounds of me taking a
> dump, will it remain a Nirvana song until someone proves that it's
> really me shitting and not Kurt?
>
> -Phil Oliver
Phil, you really are proving to be quite literally anal retentive...
Wasn't that you who also jumped into the discussion on making poopys?
Heh.
Phil Oliver
>Phil Oliver wrote:
>>
>> On 10 Jun 1997 07:07:22 GMT, slip...@aol.com (SLIPPYBOY) wrote:
>>
>> >Accept the fact, that until Beans is
>> >proven fake, it will still remain a Nirvana song. As of now, there is no
>> >proof to contradict the validity of that song.
>>
>> That's a bit ass backwards, more appropriately, until it is proven
>> real, it will not remain a Nirvana song. If I take a tape recorder
>> into the bathroom later tonight and record the sounds of me taking a
>> dump, will it remain a Nirvana song until someone proves that it's
>> really me shitting and not Kurt?
>>
>> -Phil Oliver
>
>Phil, you really are proving to be quite literally anal retentive...
More like fecal retentive I suppose, but you're on the right track.
>Wasn't that you who also jumped into the discussion on making poopys?
Um, actually, I started that discussion. If you wish to psychoanalyze
me on the basis of my frequent references to feces, so be it. But I
think I just use it as an analogy to make other things seem more
absurd.
-Phil Oliver
Oliver
In article <33aa6ed4...@news.enter.net>, Phil Oliver
<fel...@YNSPAMBLOCKbiosys.net> writes
this. All you do is make negative comments.
bugger off.
--
Ollie
My wrist hurts!!! :)
Phil Oliver
No, I'm not everywhere, but thanks for believing in my omniscience.
>On the KoRn mailing list and on this.
I am most certainly not on a Korn mailing list, thank you very much.
What the hell are you talking about?
>All you do is make negative comments.
Well, when people post shit about Korn into the newsgroups I read, I
feel the need to make negative comments. Call me wacky.
-Phil Oliver
Israel's Daughter
Phil Oliver wrote:
>
> Well, when people post shit about Korn into the newsgroups I read, I
> feel the need to make negative comments. Call me wacky.
>
> -Phil Oliver
You feel a lot of needs, don't you Phil..
You aren't wacky, just a tired ol wanker.
Don't you realize that responding to X-post and off topic material
perpetuates it, and then your needs become out of control?
YODA998916
Geraldo Wrote:
<<Hell! I could pester Azerrad too, it's not like it's hard to find his
email address or anything>>
How would you find his email address?
Phil Oliver
On 18 Jun 1997 18:14:56 GMT, yoda9...@aol.com (YODA998916) wrote:
>So, Grealdo, how would you find Michael Azzerads e-mail address?
The same way the rest of us do, and look for the name "Michael
Azzerad" and see which e-mail address was next to it, perhaps?
Azzerad writes for ATN and does a fair amount of work online, so his
address isn't hard to locate at all. He is rather sick of receiving
Nirvana-related questions, however.
-Phil Oliver
-----
"I'm mean if you going to be hypocrite like the rest of us
just admit you posturing potser." - Ruwan Jayatilleke, in
<Pine.SOL.3.91.970616...@hejira.hunter.cuny.edu>
Israel's Daughter
Phil Oliver wrote:
>
> Azzerad writes for ATN and does a fair amount of work online, so his
> address isn't hard to locate at all. He is rather sick of receiving
> Nirvana-related questions, however.
>
> -Phil Oliver
> -----
Bah! I'll bet a fair number of those were from YOU.
Phil Oliver
Why do you think I'd ask Azzerad about Nirvana? Don't you think I'd
rather ask him about his excretory habits?