patton's sexuality
dirty mind
seriousness: Is Mike Patton bi?
CHRISTINA BRANDBERG NIELSEN
dirty mind skrev i meddelelsen
<14520-37...@newsd-623.iap.bryant.webtv.net>...
Please note: the following question is asked with total sincerity and
seriousness: Is Mike Patton bi?
Erm......why would he be that???????
brujo
Travoltaj
* Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network *
The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!
Skullomania
mind) wrote:
>Please note: the following question is asked with total sincerity and
>seriousness: Is Mike Patton bi?
Have you heard "The Man in the Blue Slip?" (from Bob Ostertag's "Fear
No Love")
What do YOU think?
skull
Jitske Eizinga
He probably experiments with a lot of things.
On Wed, 06 Oct 1999 14:20:57 GMT, nat...@hotmail.com (Skullomania)
wrote:
Harry Hulsizer
Yes, hes bi.....lingual.
Eraserhead
> Actually, he talks about sucking dicks a lot
Where in particular, other than Be Aggressive, which Roddy Bottum wrote?
Eraserhead
> Jitske Eizinga wrote:
>
> > Actually, he talks about sucking dicks a lot
>
> Where in particular, other than Be Aggressive, which Roddy Bottum wrote?
Shit, not that it matters one bit.
Nick C.
Jitske Eizinga <pat...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:37fba199...@news.A2000.nl...
> Actually, he talks about sucking dicks a lot
I hope you people are kidding. I mean jesus christ; following your logic, it
might be safe to assume he experimented in child molestation, enjoys being
operated on, and moonlights as a vampire, among other things. Shut up
already.
d a v e
i'm glad i'm not the only one...
Jitske Eizinga
>might be safe to assume he experimented in child molestation, enjoys being
>already.
>
>
Oops, you're the first one to compare bisexuality to child
molestation.
Where are you from? Texas
I couldn't care less about Patton's sexuality. The over focus on
everything about this man's life is probably the reason why he like to
alienate himself from his so called fans
On Wed, 6 Oct 1999 18:07:35 -0700, "Nick C." <fr...@pipeline.com>
wrote:
>
>Jitske Eizinga <pat...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:37fba199...@news.A2000.nl...
>> Actually, he talks about sucking dicks a lot
>> He probably experiments with a lot of things.
>
>I hope you people are kidding. I mean jesus christ; following your logic, it
>might be safe to assume he experimented in child molestation, enjoys being
>operated on, and moonlights as a vampire, among other things. Shut up
>already.
>
>
hlk
> >I hope you people are kidding. I mean jesus christ; following your logic, it
> >might be safe to assume he experimented in child molestation, enjoys being
> >operated on, and moonlights as a vampire, among other things. Shut up
> >already.
>
> Oops, you're the first one to compare bisexuality to child
> molestation.
Oops...look, he's comparing being operated on to bisexuality,
too...let's get him!
mi...@my-deja.com
"Liam Padmore" <Bg...@bigpond.com> wrote:
>
> >Oops, you're the first one to compare bisexuality to child
> >molestation.
> >
>
> >>> He probably experiments with a lot of things.
>
>
> I recall reading something somewhere (an old HM, I think. Any aussies
> here...?) in an interview with Mike. Basically he was saying that
singers
> cop more flack than actors, even though actors are more, erm,
visible. What
> I mean is this: Saying that Mike molests kids, or sucks cock, or even
rapes
> people (he never said it was a chick in Jizzlobber...) because he
sings
Not to mention how many times he has died in the songs he sings. But
he keeps coming back, what an amazing man!
> about it is just like saying that Tom Hanks is a simple-minded
Alabama fool,
> or an AIDS victim, or even a boy in a man's body (remember "BIG",
anyone?)
>
> Of course, that's only one man's opinion....
>
You're not alone.
Mike
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
Nick C.
> molestation.
You're obviously not understanding me. People were assuming that the content
of the lyrics sung reflect his tates/preferences/life, which is obviously a
stupid assumption to make seeing as how Mike Patton has sung lyrics over the
years which put him in the role of a number of different characters.
It's no wonder he's said in interviews that he doesn't like writing
lyrics...
Graham
wait... does that mean that i should bring a condom with me when i go in for
my root canal next week?
--
-Graham
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Son, when you participate in sporting events,
it's not whether you win or lose... it's
how drunk you get." - Homer Simpson
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
hlk <ace...@no.matter.how.thin.you.slice.it.it's.still.baloney.com> wrote in
message news:37fcc9bc....@ca.news.verio.net...
> pat...@hotmail.com (Jitske Eizinga) wrote:
> > >I hope you people are kidding. I mean jesus christ; following your
logic, it
> > >might be safe to assume he experimented in child molestation, enjoys
being
> > >operated on, and moonlights as a vampire, among other things. Shut up
> > >already.
> >
> > Oops, you're the first one to compare bisexuality to child
> > molestation.
>
Nick C.
for
> my root canal next week?
Better safe than sorry.
Liam Padmore
>Oops, you're the first one to compare bisexuality to child
>molestation.
>
>>> Actually, he talks about sucking dicks a lot
>>> He probably experiments with a lot of things.
Warning: One Man's Opinion alert...
I recall reading something somewhere (an old HM, I think. Any aussies
here...?) in an interview with Mike. Basically he was saying that singers
cop more flack than actors, even though actors are more, erm, visible. What
I mean is this: Saying that Mike molests kids, or sucks cock, or even rapes
people (he never said it was a chick in Jizzlobber...) because he sings
about it is just like saying that Tom Hanks is a simple-minded Alabama fool,
or an AIDS victim, or even a boy in a man's body (remember "BIG", anyone?)
Of course, that's only one man's opinion....
Bgrat
Vladimir Ignjatijevic
>In article <MP3L3.35748$ei1....@newsfeeds.bigpond.com>,
> "Liam Padmore" <Bg...@bigpond.com> wrote:
>
>Not to mention how many times he has died in the songs he sings. But
>he keeps coming back, what an amazing man!
>
Hahaha... :)
Vladimir Ignjatijevic
he always pick words because of the rhythm, not meaning...
Nick C. wrote in message <7tiqoi$6og$1...@autumn.news.rcn.net>...
>> Oops, you're the first one to compare bisexuality to child
>> molestation.
>
Vlad Drac
song that is probably not even there. Look at the Pink Cigarette where
people talk about all the symbolism behind PC. He probably laughs his
ass off.
Let's stop this stupid conversation about Mike's sexuality. Don't
forget other Bungle ban members read this shit. Let's not alienate
them from us.
Let's just love them for who they are and the music they make, no
matter what or who they fuck
;)))
Please people, don't flame. It's a joke.
Vlad Drac
wouldn't like this subject to generate the longest thread, now would
we?
On Thu, 7 Oct 1999 15:03:41 -0700, "Nick C." <fr...@pipeline.com>
wrote:
>> Oops, you're the first one to compare bisexuality to child
Thuggmin
Its amazing...within two days of its original posting, people were
absolutely convinced Patton could possibly, be a child molester, just
because somebody wanted to know if he was bi or not. And we wonder why
things such as the Enquirer exist.
hlk
> Its amazing...within two days of its original posting, people were
> absolutely convinced Patton could possibly, be a child molester
What??? Who was convinced? Maybe you're missing some sarcasm.
Peter van Schaik
>What??? Who was convinced? Maybe you're missing some sarcasm.
I'm afraid so! He just doesn't get it.
dirty mind
This is absurd! If you listen to ANY of his lyrics, you will hear quite
a bit of continuity. He may derive the first line from purely rhythmical
inspiration, but from that point on he obviously builds on the manifest
content of those first words to create a theme or story-line. If it was
mostly rhythm and little meaning, you would have something closer to
Fatomas. But in FNM and Bungle, obviously meaning is abundant.
Thuggmin
Peter van Schaik wrote in message <37ffb236...@news.A2000.nl>...
>
>>What??? Who was convinced? Maybe you're missing some sarcasm.
>
>I'm afraid so! He just doesn't get it.
>
Perhaps it was my sarcasm you didnt get.
Peter van Schaik
On Sat, 9 Oct 1999 23:23:08 -0400, "Thuggmin" <thug...@superior.net>
wrote:
MrHag...@webtv.net
.......^...........^...........^....
http://community.webtv.net/MrHaggerty/FancyKetchup
Nick C.
news:25262-38...@newsd-273.iap.bryant.webtv.net...
> Patton is married to a woman.
Well that clears that up!
Peter van Schaik
On Mon, 11 Oct 1999 03:08:23 -0700, "Nick C." <fr...@pipeline.com>
wrote:
><MrHag...@webtv.net> wrote in message
Tim Howard
lyric's are written long before the words. The words just fit in.
Don't quote me on that though
dirty mind <craz...@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:21594-37...@newsd-622.iap.bryant.webtv.net...
Peter van Schaik
dirty mind
out: I have WebTV, so I don't think I can paste other peoples comments
onto my own(?), but to those of you who I am about to repond, you know
who you are. Look, once again, he may derive the first few words of a
song TOTALLY based on sound or rhythm or whatever, but from there a
strict rule of thematic continuity is obeyed. How do I know? Because its
obvious. I don't care what youv'e read. Am I calling Patton a liar? No,
it's not that simple. It could be that you guys are lying, or that the
interviewer is misqouting him, or that you are misunderstanding what you
have read, or that Patton IS lying, or whatever!!!! Regardless of what
you have read, all you have to do is look at the fucking songs and see
that they are not based excusively on sound or rhythm. I"m not saying
that sound or rythym does not influence his choice of particular words,
but you guys are making it sound like these things are the MAIN factors.
C'mon!!! He may choose the word "street" over "road" because one sounds
better or ryhmes with the last line, but they both have the same
meaning, AND MEANING IS OBVIOUSLY VERY IMPORTANT TO HIM BECAUSE ALL OF
HIS FUCKING LYRICS ARE COHESIVE AND LINEAR LIKE A NICE LITTLE NURSERY
RYHME. Get it? Forget the fucking interviews! Read the blasted lyrics.
He can say whatever he wants in the interviews, but the lyrics show the
plan of the architect who built them far better than any anecdote
delivered after the fact. OK?
Nigel Pegg
Angel Dust had really prethunk lyrics, same with TRT and MrB's earlier
stuff.
The lyrics still make sense on KFAD, but were not very central (put
together after the fact). AOTY, barely any thought seems to have been put
into them (look at 'home sick home'. How many times can you rhyme 'home'
with itself?). So I wouldn't paint the guy as a totally cerebral and
painstaking architect.
I think California has the most coherent lyrical structuring of anything
MP-related since AD, but not all the writing falls to him there either.
Speaking of lyrics between old/new songs, anyone else notice the recycled
lyric from 'Bloody Mary' in 'Last Cup of Sorrow'?
that's all
nig
DIABO...@webtv.net
dirty mind
Vladimir Ignjatijevic
dirty mind wrote in message
<7308-38...@newsd-621.iap.bryant.webtv.net>...
who? your father?