Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Can't Preserve Audio Track Properties

0 views
Skip to first unread message

XPG

unread,
Jan 1, 2003, 7:34:14 AM1/1/03
to

> But is the MP3 decoder in Nero a good one?

Probably not.

> Or should I be using a
> different utility than Nero if I want high quality decoding of an
> MP3 to a WAV?

Feurio!

CQ

unread,
Jan 1, 2003, 7:38:42 AM1/1/03
to
In article <92F66D80D...@205.188.138.161>, so...@no.email.please
says...
> But is the MP3 decoder in Nero a good one? Or should I be using a
> different utility than Nero if I want high quality decoding of an
> MP3 to a WAV?
>
Nero may possibly have changed their decoder since this test was
conducted but it is still an interesting site.

http://mp3decoders.mp3-tech.org/decoders_nero.html

(Their original conclusion was, incidentally, that for the highest
possible quality you should indeed decode to wav first and then burn the
wav when using Nero, although the errors they found were very small and
in the extreme range of hearing, for all practical purposes inaudible.)
--
CQ

XPG

unread,
Jan 1, 2003, 7:48:51 AM1/1/03
to

XPG

unread,
Jan 1, 2003, 2:02:30 PM1/1/03
to

> I have heard that Feurio is great for DAE and will correct even C2
> errors but I would have thought that Feurio! uses the same MP3
> decoder as Nero Burning ROM because both products come from the
> same company.

No. Feurio is made by Fangmeier, and Nero by Ahead, although they can be
bougth in the same web.
You can search old posts by Jens Fangmeier in dejanews.com explaining that
Feurio uses a decoder based on Fraunhoffer decoder. Ahead uses a Fraunhoffer
Encoder, but not a Fraunhoffer decoder.
Also, Feurio can detect errors on defective MP3s and say their position.
Nero can't.


Robert Hancock

unread,
Jan 1, 2003, 3:58:40 PM1/1/03
to
I would not necessarily trust that report now - it is based on quite an old
Nero version.

--
Robert Hancock Saskatoon, SK, Canada
To email, remove "nospam" from hanc...@nospamshaw.ca
Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/


"XPG" <xpgQ...@myrealbox.com> wrote in message
news:auuo21$abka0$1...@ID-85492.news.dfncis.de...
>
> I forgot that:
> http://mp3decoders.mp3-tech.org/decoders_nero.html
>
>
>


XPG

unread,
Jan 1, 2003, 5:41:10 PM1/1/03
to

> I would not necessarily trust that report now - it is based on quite an
old
> Nero version.

Is there any evidence to think that they have solved the bug?

We have seen reports this year in this group of people complaining that MP3s
burned with Nero sound worse than MP3 decoded to WAV before with another
program.
I don't believe that they have solved it.


XPG

unread,
Jan 2, 2003, 7:49:42 AM1/2/03
to

> Hey, I must have been sleeping through all this because I thought
> they were both Ahead products!

Feurio is distributed by Ahead, but, fortunately, not made by Ahead.
This page also say that about Feurio's distribution:
http://www.cd-rw.org/software/audio_software/all-in-one/feurio.cfm

>What about InCD? That one is made
> by Ahead isn't it?

Yes.

0 new messages