Probably not.
> Or should I be using a
> different utility than Nero if I want high quality decoding of an
> MP3 to a WAV?
Feurio!
http://mp3decoders.mp3-tech.org/decoders_nero.html
(Their original conclusion was, incidentally, that for the highest
possible quality you should indeed decode to wav first and then burn the
wav when using Nero, although the errors they found were very small and
in the extreme range of hearing, for all practical purposes inaudible.)
--
CQ
No. Feurio is made by Fangmeier, and Nero by Ahead, although they can be
bougth in the same web.
You can search old posts by Jens Fangmeier in dejanews.com explaining that
Feurio uses a decoder based on Fraunhoffer decoder. Ahead uses a Fraunhoffer
Encoder, but not a Fraunhoffer decoder.
Also, Feurio can detect errors on defective MP3s and say their position.
Nero can't.
--
Robert Hancock Saskatoon, SK, Canada
To email, remove "nospam" from hanc...@nospamshaw.ca
Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/
"XPG" <xpgQ...@myrealbox.com> wrote in message
news:auuo21$abka0$1...@ID-85492.news.dfncis.de...
>
> I forgot that:
> http://mp3decoders.mp3-tech.org/decoders_nero.html
>
>
>
> I would not necessarily trust that report now - it is based on quite an
old
> Nero version.
Is there any evidence to think that they have solved the bug?
We have seen reports this year in this group of people complaining that MP3s
burned with Nero sound worse than MP3 decoded to WAV before with another
program.
I don't believe that they have solved it.
Feurio is distributed by Ahead, but, fortunately, not made by Ahead.
This page also say that about Feurio's distribution:
http://www.cd-rw.org/software/audio_software/all-in-one/feurio.cfm
>What about InCD? That one is made
> by Ahead isn't it?
Yes.