Beachwood is no more..
Samantha Leigh Tully
remember someone out there (no names here) bought all the MonkeeX addresses
I had.
--
Samantha Leigh Tully
http://ca.geocities.com/nx...@rogers.com/
David
fine. All Wood And Stones is doing well (and is now being sold through
Amazon, as of yesterday.) James is doing well, his email works fine. Got
two emails from him today. www.jamesleestanley.com, which has always been
James' only web site is up on my screen right this moment. So "Beachwood"
in what respect is no more?
"Samantha Leigh Tully" <nx...@nope.com> wrote in message
news:K7CdnZs1COv...@rogers.com...
EJ
da...@nospam.com says...
> Not sure what you mean here. Beachwood Recordings, as a company, is just
> fine. All Wood And Stones is doing well (and is now being sold through
> Amazon, as of yesterday.) James is doing well, his email works fine. Got
> two emails from him today. www.jamesleestanley.com, which has always been
> James' only web site is up on my screen right this moment. So "Beachwood"
> in what respect is no more?
>
Beachwood recordings recently changed its mailing address. Could that be
the source of the mixup?
Just a thought....
ES
jedino...@yahoo.com
just
> fine. All Wood And Stones is doing well (and is now being sold
through
> Amazon, as of yesterday.) James is doing well, his email works fine.
Got
> two emails from him today. www.jamesleestanley.com, which has always
been
> James' only web site is up on my screen right this moment. So
"Beachwood"
> in what respect is no more?
I think she means Beachwood as in her personal website, not Beachwood
Recordings.
At least, I THINK that's what she means.
~j
Samantha Leigh Tully
"David" <da...@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:EEAOd.4675$mG6....@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
E.T.
> So "Beachwood"
> in what respect is no more?
She means 1334beachwood.com is no
longer owned and operated.
--
Estrella
--
http://www.senorita-estrella.net/monkees/faq.html
David
killed the site? That's confusing as hell.
Sorry, Samantha, but your initial post simply wasn't clear as to what you
meant. Had your post said "I killed my 1334Beachwood.com site.", what you
said would have been easily understood. But when you said "Beachwood is
dead" it made it sound as though you believed that James' company had gone
out of business.
"Samantha Leigh Tully" <nx...@nope.com> wrote in message
news:3smdnTUvNPF...@rogers.com...
Samantha Leigh Tully
> You killed the site because I wasn't sure what you meant when you said you
> killed the site? That's confusing as hell.
>
> Sorry, Samantha, but your initial post simply wasn't clear as to what you
> meant. Had your post said "I killed my 1334Beachwood.com site.", what you
> said would have been easily understood. But when you said "Beachwood is
> dead" it made it sound as though you believed that James' company had gone
> out of business.
JLS is not a Monkee. 1334beachwood.com was shortened to "The Beachwood Site"
when it was up.
jedino...@yahoo.com
"Beachwood" by itself has more than one application. That's why the
confusion.
~j
Samantha Leigh Tully
<jedino...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1108026011.2...@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Leisa
1334 Beachwood is a fictional address mentioned briefly in a 40 year old TV
show. James Lee Stanley and Beachwood Recordings is real life and current.
It's natural for those of us not living in fantasy land to think of the real
life definition, when you are (IMO) purposefully vague like that. You knew
that Beachwood Recordings was James' company. You knew that many people here
are fans and friends of his. And you had to have known that few people here
even knew you had a website with that name, much less gave a rat's ass if
it's functional or not. You were either purposely vague knowing it would get
attention, or you're delusional enough to think the AMM world was hanging on
your every action and would want to know or even care that you took your
website down. Either way, stop being such an attention whore.
Damn, first rant in a long time. Felt good.
Leisa
Samantha Leigh Tully
> TV show. James Lee Stanley and Beachwood Recordings is real life and
> current. It's natural for those of us not living in fantasy land to think
> of the real life definition, when you are (IMO) purposefully vague like
> that. You knew that Beachwood Recordings was James' company. You knew that
> many people here are fans and friends of his. And you had to have known
> that few people here even knew you had a website with that name, much less
> gave a rat's ass if it's functional or not. You were either purposely
> vague knowing it would get attention, or you're delusional enough to think
> the AMM world was hanging on your every action and would want to know or
> even care that you took your website down. Either way, stop being such an
> attention whore.
>
> Damn, first rant in a long time. Felt good.
>
> Leisa
JLS is still not a monkee and you and him can kiss my ass. He's not even
talented. His music is boring and I'm just hanging around til I hear the
Monkees are dead. I give them 5 years.
I will say this to you. I was not being "purposely vague". Monkee fans who
visited my site would just shorten it down to "Beachwood". Whenever I would
talk about something I wanted them to see, pictures, music.. I would just
say "Let me put it up on Beachwood..."
Now I will leave you to kiss the asses of non-talented people who have a
following of 50 people who travel the country listening to 3 minute sleeping
pills.
This is my last post until they all die.
Shane Worden
> This is my last post until they all die.
OOH! That is just too good to resist not taking bets on. I've got a 20
spot saying that threat won't last long.....
Shane
Cyn
"Shane Worden" <idolt...@prodigy.net> wrote in message
news:VWQOd.3634$xW2....@newssvr31.news.prodigy.com...
Cyn
SteveT
Samantha Leigh Tully wrote:
> JLS is still not a monkee and you and him can kiss my ass. He's not even
> talented. His music is boring and I'm just hanging around til I hear the
> Monkees are dead. I give them 5 years.
>
> I will say this to you. I was not being "purposely vague". Monkee fans who
> visited my site would just shorten it down to "Beachwood". Whenever I would
> talk about something I wanted them to see, pictures, music.. I would just
> say "Let me put it up on Beachwood..."
>
> Now I will leave you to kiss the asses of non-talented people who have a
> following of 50 people who travel the country listening to 3 minute sleeping
> pills.
>
> This is my last post until they all die.
Ok, until all who dies? JLS, Monkee Fans, non-talented people, the 50 people
who travel the country...?
It's kinda vague, was that done purposely?
jedino...@yahoo.com
Promise?
~j
David
> JLS is still not a monkee and you and him can kiss my ass. He's not even
> talented. His music is boring and I'm just hanging around til I hear the
> Monkees are dead. I give them 5 years.
Odd, you used to think James was pretty talented. Especially when you were
claiming that you were going to bed him. Under any circumstances, the truth
is that James is more talented than any of the Monkees.
> This is my last post until they all die.
From your keyboard to God's monitor.
EJ
da...@nospam.com says...
>
> "Samantha Leigh Tully" <nx...@nope.com> wrote in message
> news:s6Kdncr3w43...@rogers.com...
>
> > JLS is still not a monkee and you and him can kiss my ass. He's not even
> > talented. His music is boring and I'm just hanging around til I hear the
> > Monkees are dead. I give them 5 years.
>
> Odd, you used to think James was pretty talented. Especially when you were
> claiming that you were going to bed him. Under any circumstances, the truth
> is that James is more talented than any of the Monkees.
Speaking of kiss-ass....Samantha did more than a little of that when she
was a member of James' list....
I will never understand why anyone would hang around a place one with
people one hates. Seems a colossal waste of time and effort. Nor do I
understand why anyone would wish another dead. Seems like a rather sad
way to go through life.
>
> > This is my last post until they all die.
>
> From your keyboard to God's monitor.
>
Ditto
EJ
EJ
Ev...@aol.com says...
>
>
> I will never understand why anyone would hang around a place one with
> people one hates.
That should read:
I will never understand why anyne would hang around a place one HATES
with people one hates.
Sorry about that....
EJ
Nadine Sandauer
.I'm just hanging around til I hear the
> Monkees are dead. I give them 5 years.
You know, it's quite possible that *you'll* be dead in 5 years... that would
suck, eh?
ns
Cyn
>
the truth is that James is more talented than any of the Monkees.
>
day.
Cyn
brilton
ask: what IS it with this newsgroup that attracts the netk00k psycho chicks? Is
it sort of a pre-requisite in a.m.m. to be a mentally unhinged female Monkees
fan (present company who *aren't* mentally unhinged female Monkees fan are
excluded of course)? Or is merely symptomatic of a wider malaise of Monkee
fandom in general? And what does that say about the sort of fans that the
Monkees attract? Are their live shows safe to go to, or is it a bit like the
local mental ward?
Only asking.
jedino...@yahoo.com
really have to
> ask: what IS it with this newsgroup that attracts the netk00k psycho
chicks? Is
> it sort of a pre-requisite in a.m.m. to be a mentally unhinged female
Monkees
> fan (present company who *aren't* mentally unhinged female Monkees
fan are
> excluded of course)? Or is merely symptomatic of a wider malaise of
Monkee
> fandom in general? And what does that say about the sort of fans that
the
> Monkees attract? Are their live shows safe to go to, or is it a bit
like the
> local mental ward?
I think you can't judge even a single forum by the behavior of one or
of a few unstable people. Keep in mind also that this forum has no
moderation and no way to ban people. So those who have been removed
from every other civil forum drift over here, because they know they
cannot be silenced, only ignored. (And a lot of people here, myself
included, do take a little fun in poking the trolls.) Besides, for
every Jennifer and Nichole and whoever else makes trouble or is just a
pain in the fucking ass, there's a Shane and an EJ to balance things
out (apologies if I left you out--I was trying trying to think of a
couple people who have rarely if ever caused any trouble; I know
there's plenty more of you out there).
I have to admit that I've run into some people in this fandom that have
significantly lowered my opinion of humanity. The originator of this
thread is one of them. But I've also met the best friends I've ever by
being a Monkees fan, and that makes it worth it.
Besides, there are creeps and freaks and loonies in EVERY single
fandom. (If you don't believe me, go to
http://www.journalfen.net/community/fandom_wank and browse for a while,
or find someone who's been in the LoTR fandom for a while and mention
"Victoria Bitter.")
So basically you have to be realistic about people. Trolls are going to
come here and try to rile things up, and lunatic people will always
find a way into fandom. It's the nature of the beast. But the idea of
hating or running from the object of fannish activities (whether it's
the Monkees, the Beatles, the cast of Stargate SG-1, or Josh Groban)
because some of their fans don't know how to behave like civilized
human beings has never made much sense to me.
~j
EJ
jedino...@yahoo.com says...
> I think you can't judge even a single forum by the behavior of one or
> of a few unstable people. Keep in mind also that this forum has no
> moderation and no way to ban people. So those who have been removed
> from every other civil forum drift over here, because they know they
> cannot be silenced, only ignored. (And a lot of people here, myself
> included, do take a little fun in poking the trolls.) Besides, for
> every Jennifer and Nichole and whoever else makes trouble or is just a
> pain in the fucking ass, there's a Shane and an EJ to balance things
> out (apologies if I left you out--I was trying trying to think of a
> couple people who have rarely if ever caused any trouble; I know
> there's plenty more of you out there).
Thanks for the kind words :) There are many sane folks here....David and
Nadine and tamio and...and...and...well...LOTS. Most of us have been
here a long time---some off and on <G>---and we have seen the trolls
come and go...and come back again. Some I killfile and some I consider
free entertainment <G> We're not all crazy but don't tell anyone <G>
Crazy can be fun <G>
>
> I have to admit that I've run into some people in this fandom that have
> significantly lowered my opinion of humanity. The originator of this
> thread is one of them. But I've also met the best friends I've ever by
> being a Monkees fan, and that makes it worth it.
Hear hear :) There are people here I have known for the better part of
10 years who I consider to be good friends. We have been together
through moves from Prodigy and GEnie to AOL to IRC to mailing lists to
this newsgroup. We have been to shows together, visited one another,
laughed together, cried together, and pretty much been there for one
another. We have also taken on trolls, argued, debated, written,
defended and been silly. In other words---we behave completely normally
<G>
>
> Besides, there are creeps and freaks and loonies in EVERY single
> fandom. (If you don't believe me, go to
> http://www.journalfen.net/community/fandom_wank and browse for a while,
> or find someone who's been in the LoTR fandom for a while and mention
> "Victoria Bitter.")
Oh yeah. They are like weeds, They spring up anywhere they can get an
opening. And some of them are the SAME weeds...they just migrate from
group to group dropping aliases as they go, like bad seeds <G>
>
> So basically you have to be realistic about people. Trolls are going to
> come here and try to rile things up, and lunatic people will always
> find a way into fandom. It's the nature of the beast. But the idea of
> hating or running from the object of fannish activities (whether it's
> the Monkees, the Beatles, the cast of Stargate SG-1, or Josh Groban)
> because some of their fans don't know how to behave like civilized
> human beings has never made much sense to me.
>
I never understood it either. It seems to me that if the object is to
get to know the object of one's fandom that acting like a lunatic and
throwing tantrums and being vindictive and basically acting like a
deranged harpy would have just the opposite effect. And who can blame
the object of worship? If we cant deal with one troll here how can they
deal with herds of them? <G> If they would just learn that you can get
much further by acting like a civilized human being...
EJ
>
>
-to-
>. But the idea of
>hating or running from the object of fannish activities (whether it's
>the Monkees, the Beatles, the cast of Stargate SG-1, or Josh Groban)
>because some of their fans don't know how to behave like civilized
>human beings has never made much sense to me.
Oh, you couldn't pay me enough to make me go sit in a crowd of Monkee
fans these days. (if there still was such a thing as a crowd of Monkee
fans. ;) ) It's not fear of the crazies, but a distaste for all that
sticky sweet adulation from adult women. It gets in the way of
enjoying the music. Years ago, when I went to Monkee conventions, I
usually stood in the back of the room to be away from the screamers.
I've become even less tolerant in my old age. ;)
I've met some really great people - some of them right here on amm -
who also happen to like some aspect of The Monkees. Difference is,
they're NORMAL. They don't "love" the M's or idolize them.
We sold some Josh Groban stuff on eBay, and if the reaction we got was
any indication, those are some of the most obsessed fans I've ever
seen. It's not just kids, either... some of the fans who were writing
us were in their 70s, following the tour around the country, hoping to
find a way to meet this kid. Amazing.
-to-
Shane Worden
<jedino...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1108357338.9...@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Besides, for
> every Jennifer and Nichole and whoever else makes trouble or is just a
> pain in the fucking ass, there's a Shane and an EJ to balance things
> out
*blush* Why, thank you very much! It was an honor just to be nominated
<GG> Not a bad way to start Valentine's Day.
Shane
JanB, Trolip Extraordinaire
"-to-" <t...@nothere.comm> wrote in message
news:rtj111htrlqmte64b...@4ax.com...
> On 13 Feb 2005 21:02:18 -0800, jedino...@yahoo.com wrote:
> Oh, you couldn't pay me enough to make me go sit in a crowd of Monkee
> fans these days. (if there still was such a thing as a crowd of Monkee
> fans. ;) ) It's not fear of the crazies, but a distaste for all that
> sticky sweet adulation from adult women. It gets in the way of
> enjoying the music. Years ago, when I went to Monkee conventions, I
> usually stood in the back of the room to be away from the screamers.
> I've become even less tolerant in my old age. ;)
Actually, I discovered that the sound is better in the back.
JanB
brilton
jedino...@yahoo.com wrote:
I did have my tongue partially in my cheek when I wrote that. Please also
note the caveat that I employed regarding the "present company excluded"
exception. I know all about trolls & netk00ks, my observation is that amm
seems to have a disproportionate amount of them considering the relatively
low amount of traffic in this particular newsgroup. And what seems to be a
tendency for people to take it to Real Life. That's all. Although I must
say that the quality of the k00ks is rather high in here.
Gappy
news:42114C71...@notlirb.net...
> I did have my tongue partially in my cheek when I wrote that. Please also
> note the caveat that I employed regarding the "present company excluded"
> exception. I know all about trolls & netk00ks, my observation is that amm
> seems to have a disproportionate amount of them considering the relatively
> low amount of traffic in this particular newsgroup. And what seems to be a
> tendency for people to take it to Real Life. That's all. Although I must
> say that the quality of the k00ks is rather high in here.
>
it is my theory that the relative easy accessability to the guys make the
problem worse.
gaps
~ A rich person is not one who has the most, but one who desires the least ~
sleep...@loveisonlysleeping.com
> Scuse the top posting. I don't post in here an awful lot, but I
really have to
> ask: what IS it with this newsgroup that attracts the netk00k psycho
chicks? Is
> it sort of a pre-requisite in a.m.m. to be a mentally unhinged female
Monkees
> fan (present company who *aren't* mentally unhinged female Monkees
fan are
> excluded of course)? Or is merely symptomatic of a wider malaise of
Monkee
> fandom in general? And what does that say about the sort of fans that
the
> Monkees attract? Are their live shows safe to go to, or is it a bit
like the
> local mental ward?
>
> Only asking.
I really would like to know the answer to this one too.
sleep...@loveisonlysleeping.com
Actually, I totally agree, but unfortanately I was afraid that when the
crazy ones speak up, the nicer people shy away. I hope this isn't
always the case.
neffie
E.T.
> I know all about trolls & netk00ks, my observation is that amm
> seems to have a disproportionate amount of them considering the relatively
> low amount of traffic in this particular newsgroup.
That's because of the low volume of "real
news" that is postable (without it being
rehashed 10 times). The oldbies have
practically read and said most of the
interesting Monkee-related stories,
and have barely no interest to do another
"Top Ten Monkee Album/Episode/Song/Quote etc."
poll so the responsiblity of creating
an "interesting", non-flaming conversation
lies upon the shoulders of newbies and
some of the midbies. The majority of
them have found a "haven" in Yahoo!
mailing lists; they didn't want to
stay in the kitchen.
> And what seems to be a tendency for people
> to take it to Real Life.
Fans make friends online and extend
some of those friendships offline.
In a perfect world, enemies would
be just made online (i.e. "what
happens online stays online") without
involving "Real Life" but "internet
rage" happens universally. Organizations
like CyberAngels and WiredSafety are proof
of that extension of human
interaction.
Considering the low volume of fans flocking
to their shows (in comparison to what
they had in 1986 and 1996), I wouldn't
doubt that Monkee fans may "see" nutcases in
the audience these days. The difference
between here and there is that concerts
have security. :)
--
Estrella
--
http://www.senorita-estrella.net/monkees/faq.html
St. Matthew
>every Jennifer and Nichole and whoever >else makes trouble or is just
a
>pain in the fucking ass, there's a Shane >and an EJ to balance things
>out
Shut. The fuck. Up. :)
St. Matthew
St. Matthew
Nadine Sandauer
"St. Matthew" <choic...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1108514282.9...@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> Monkees fans are, by far, the meanest fans I've ever met.
U R SEW MEEN 2!
;) lol
ns
Jan
> ...sorry, Monkees fans are the 2nd meanest...
>
We just don't have alot of patience with psychos who use multiple names and
personalities and
argue with themselves. It's creepy and weird. It amazes me that people
like that don't end up
in padded rooms. Or maybe they do, and get out.
Jan
JanB, Trolip Extraordinaire
> Shut. The fuck. Up. :)
>
Aw...truth hurts, huh?
JanB
jedino...@yahoo.com
St. Matthew wrote:
> Monkees fans are, by far, the meanest fans I've ever met.
We are not, you meanie poopy head!!
Sheesh, calm the fuck down. If you want happy fluffy bunny Monkees fans
(of which there are quite a few), go elsewhere.
~j