http://www.forartist.com/forensic/modification/mj/jackson.htm
Compare that to the photo of Prince Michael I. There's no
resemblance at all.
HellT
It would be intereresting to show what he'd look like after 20 years
(without any further plastic surgery), from what he looks like today.
Uggghhh.
> It would be intereresting to show what he'd look like after 20 years
> (without any further plastic surgery), from what he looks like today.
> Uggghhh.
It's a no brainer:
http://tinyurl.com/9c7g9
What he SHOULD have done is take a photo when Michael was full grown (1978)
& go from there instead of using this one when he was 13/14.
Oh I gotta get that site out & end all of this foolishness.
A clue: He screwed up the nose. And Michael's face/head shape/proportions
was different when he grew up than from the source photo at 13. Jaw's not
wide enough. So much wrong on this depiction...
The middle aged pic was horrible the first time much less the elder one.
Plus, the source photo is flipped to begin with.
John Lucas
"Hell Toupee" <my...@notmine.com> wrote in message
news:43963A91...@notmine.com...
>That amateur job?! Hahahahaha!
>
You know jack shit about forensic art, Lucas. Why do you try to act
otherwise?
>What he SHOULD have done is take a photo when Michael was full grown (1978)
>& go from there instead of using this one when he was 13/14.
What credentials can you present that qualify you to know better than
a forensic artist what to do?
>
>Oh I gotta get that site out & end all of this foolishness.
>
What the fuck are you talking about, k00ky? You never manage to do
anything but make us laugh.
>A clue: He screwed up the nose.
How do you know? Wacko hasn't had his natural nose since his twenties.
> And Michael's face/head shape/proportions
>was different when he grew up than from the source photo at 13. Jaw's not
>wide enough. So much wrong on this depiction...
I understand now that pictures of Wacko at 19 are your favorite ones
to wank to.
>The middle aged pic was horrible the first time much less the elder one.
Despite your horrible grammar, I think you meant to say that the
middle age picture was innacurate in your view.
That would be an absurd thing to say since Wacko has had too much
surgery for any one to have an inkling what he may have looked like
today.
That's kind of the point of the forensic artist doing this excercise.
He would be the most qualified person to have an idea. His depiction
is certainly closer than anything you could come up with, so you need
to STFU now.
>Plus, the source photo is flipped to begin with.
Not only is it bizarre that you know that, it's pretty hilarious
because you don't realize that has no bearing on the outcome of an age
progression.
Jade
>On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 09:03:35 -0500, "John Lucas"
><john...@coastalnow.net>, wrote:
>
>>That amateur job?! Hahahahaha!
>>
>
>You know jack shit about forensic art, Lucas. Why do you try to act
>otherwise?
>
He payed for his own, he wanted to see what his future husband would
look like after he has saved his money for 40 years to have his sex
change operation.
--
Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker - May, 2005
Hammer of Thor - July, 2005
David Formosa (aka ? the Platypus) on 10-22-2005
Message-Id: <slrndlk3ae....@dformosa.zeta.org.au>
"But it is not isolated AUK has a massive impact the rest of usenet."
He has drawn faces. True, they were U-shaped happy faces on bimbos whose
facial reality (or lack thereof) were incidental to their big hooters and
graphic netherparts but I digress....
>>Oh I gotta get that site out & end all of this foolishness.
>>
>
> What the fuck are you talking about, k00ky? You never manage to do
> anything but make us laugh.
>
>>A clue: He screwed up the nose.
>
> How do you know? Wacko hasn't had his natural nose since his twenties.
Here's a clue for k00kass from someone who actually studied forensic face
rebuilding: the human nose grows, spreads and sags under the weight of the
years since it is built of cartilage and tissue. It does not narrow to
razor blade thiness nor lift like a ski-jump when brushed by an errant hand.
That huge honker was as accurate as it was ugly. Pappy Jack WAS right about
that. In fact, if anything, it was a bit on the kind side as nose
progressions go.
>
>> And Michael's face/head shape/proportions
>>was different when he grew up than from the source photo at 13. Jaw's not
>>wide enough. So much wrong on this depiction...
>
> I understand now that pictures of Wacko at 19 are your favorite ones
> to wank to.
The jaw in the last photo -- at least the parts not including the fake
chin -- is exactly the jaw Wacko has now with a bit more
softness/fleshiness added to it. k00kass is so busy denying the truth of
that face he can't even see something that hasn't been altered by surgery.
>
>>The middle aged pic was horrible the first time much less the elder one.
>
> Despite your horrible grammar, I think you meant to say that the
> middle age picture was innacurate in your view.
Aw. Look what mean ol' Mr. Gravity does to a real face, eh, k00kass?
Welcome to the real world.
>
> That would be an absurd thing to say since Wacko has had too much
> surgery for any one to have an inkling what he may have looked like
> today.
>
> That's kind of the point of the forensic artist doing this excercise.
Oh, fucking "DUH!", Kookass. You are almost as st00pid as our Awawrd
Whining Sk00l TeEcher.
> He would be the most qualified person to have an idea. His depiction
> is certainly closer than anything you could come up with, so you need
> to STFU now.
The depiction is overly kind. I doubt that would be Wacko's hairline and
it's certainly not his hair color for his mid-40s as we've seen under the
slipped wig; the hair he has now is gray.
>>Plus, the source photo is flipped to begin with.
>
> Not only is it bizarre that you know that, it's pretty hilarious
> because you don't realize that has no bearing on the outcome of an age
> progression.
Clue for k00kass: Hold the photos up to a mirror. There. Happy now?
<k00kass>
Oh oh. Gotta go wank again.
</k00kass>
> That amateur job?! Hahahahaha!
>
> What he SHOULD have done is take a photo when Michael was full grown
> (1978) & go from there instead of using this one when he was 13/14.
Think about what you just said, goofball. You've already departed into
typical f'loon behavior by trying to influence perception from his most
popular era.
> Oh I gotta get that site out & end all of this foolishness.
Never happen.
> A clue: He screwed up the nose. And Michael's face/head
> shape/proportions was different when he grew up than from the source
> photo at 13. Jaw's not wide enough. So much wrong on this depiction...
> The middle aged pic was horrible the first time much less the elder
> one. Plus, the source photo is flipped to begin with.
MJ's entire face is screwed up anyway.
> John Lucas
>
"Stephen J. Mancusi is the senior forensic artist for the large
metropolitan police department. He has been creating forensic images
for over twenty years. His composite sketches have been instrumental
in identifying many criminal suspects including high-profile cases
such as The Stuyvesant Town Rapist, and the Central Park Assault. His
drawings have appeared in all of the major New York newspapers, local
and network TV news programs. He has been featured in articles in the
New York Times, London Sunday Telegraph, The Daily News and the
Peekskill Herald. Mr. Mancusi has appeared on ABC's 20/20, New York
Views, NBC's Unsolved Mysteries, Court TV's Justice Factory, Hollywood
at Large, New York 1 (Click for video interview), Pro 7 German
Television Network, Good Morning America and the Late Show with David
Letterman.
In addition to his work for the city police department, Stephen has
developed composite sketches for other law enforcement and
governmental agencies including the FBI and U.S. Postal Inspections
Service.
A professional artist and illustrator for over twenty-two years,
Stephen's experience encompasses a variety of media including
acrylics, 3D and 2D digital art, oil, pencil and pastel on a wide
range of subject matter. His illustrative portfolio includes
television, book jackets, magazine cover art, and poster art (view
client list). His paintings, pastels and drawings have been displayed
in The Metropolitan Museum of Art, as well as New York galleries and
artist's clubs.
On the lecture circuit, he has addressed a number of groups from
varying disciplines including the Mystery Writers of America, Society
of Professional Investigators, DEA (Drug Enforcement Agency) and the
Detective Bureau's Investigation and Homicide Courses. He has also
conducted lectures and workshops for various schools and colleges like
the School of VISUAL ARTS as well as community groups throughout
Westchester and New York City. Because of his expertise in the field,
Stephen has provided training for forensic artists of other police
departments in the tri-state area.
Stephen Mancusi is also certified in forensic art by the International
Association for Identification (I.A.I.)."
http://www.forartist.com/biopage.htm
I've put his credentials out there for us to evaluate, F'Lucas, it's
your turn. Tell us what qualifies _you_ to criticize this certified
professional forensic artist's work.
Hell "Watch F'Lucas run away now" Toupee
But....but... k00kass can draw BOOBIE GIRLS!!!
And he does a fine rendition of Boss Hogg in stick figure.
Jade
....And I hear he often draws welfare.
And yet he rarely draws a bath.
I heard he Drew Cary.
KookAss can really draw flies.
--
Cujo - The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in
dfw.*, alt.paranormal, alt.astrology and alt.astrology.metapsych.
Winner of the 8/2000 & 2/2003 HL&S award. Hail Petitmorte!
Colonel of the Fanatic Legion. FL# 555-PLNTY Motto: ABUNDANCE!.
Hammer of Thor - July 2005. Supreme Holy Overlord of alt.fucknozzles.
"The Google archives; for 7 years and running--for all to see for as long
as the Internet shall live--evidences that I am the victor, and you
are the failures." - Edmo, keeping a record of his failures.