Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: [AWARDS] Presenting the 2009 NOBODY GIVES A SHIT YEAR-END AWARDS! [00/49]

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Orson Wells as CitizenCain

unread,
Dec 14, 2009, 1:51:44 AM12/14/09
to

"Christopher Robin Zimmerman" <crzatrs...@spam.invalid.com> wrote in
message news:200912140530....@rspw.org...
> We did it! Again!


Spammed Usenet with pointless crap?

>
> For those of you just tuning in, these are the rec.sport.pro-wrestling.*
> Year-End Achievement Awards.

Woop-dee-fuckin'-doo and la-dee-freakin'-dah, that means about as much as
having a boil lanced.


> They celebrate the excellence, as well as
> the....opposite thereof, of the past year in professional wrestling.


Pssst! Professional wrestling is fake, you dumbass.


>
> The Awards are decided by the readers of r.s.p-w, voting for a 1st, 2nd,
> and 3rd place in nearly fifty categories. Believe it or else - this it
> super huge TWENTIETH year of r.s.p-w Awards!
>


Holy shit, twenty years of nerds voting on fake men wearing spandex. How
pathetic.


> A robust 45 ballots were added to mine to create the results you'll soon
> be reading.


Wow, a whole 45! Concidentally the calibur of gun you should use to blow
your brains out after posting this crap.

> I'm happy to say that we kept participation from Korea down
> under 10% this year! (One ballot arrived too late and one ballot was
> sent as a Word document - they weren't counted.) As I usually weasel
> out of taking responsibility for trying


So you won't count word documents? Fuck you!


> to jack up participation given the deadness of Usenet in general, I will
> say that I hope that the QUALITY of the response makes up for the lower
> quantity. As is always the case, I think we have some surprises in the
> results, but pleasantly so. If you disagree - hell, you should have
> voted!
>


And you're an idiot. Get bent, you shithead.


0 new messages