Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

They Hired a Jackson -- What Did They Expect?

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Mojo

unread,
Feb 4, 2004, 5:10:59 PM2/4/04
to

<http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&cid=597&u=/nm/20040204/tv_nm/televis
ion_richmond_dc&printer=1>

Yahoo! News Wed, Feb 04, 2004

They Hired a Jackson -- What Did They Expect?
Wed Feb 4, 6:11 AM ET
By Ray Richmond

LOS ANGELES (Hollywood Reporter) - It's the breast that's launched a
thousand fits.

Who needs WMD when we've got Janet Jackson (news) and Justin Timberlake
(news), on a stage at the Super Bowl, with the whole country watching,
flashing the establishment? Naughty pop stars though they are, they couldn't
possibly have imagined the can o' worms they were cranking open.

Jackson has already admitted planning the boob-baring boo-boo herself,
thereby absolving CBS and halftime show producer MTV of something akin to
treason. The FCC (news - web sites) wasted little time choking on its
collective Cheetos, vowing this week to get to the bottom of this and
inspiring FCC chairman Michael Powell (news) to label the moment a
"classless, crass and deplorable stunt. Our nation's children, parents and
citizens deserve better."

To which I reply: They do?

Did Jackson sell nuclear secrets to China while I wasn't paying attention?
Is our national security suddenly fully compromised? Did our terrorism alert
level just go to red?

Or was this simply a case of a couple of rambunctious entertainers picking
the wrong moment to perpetrate a PR stunt -- that is, when a new puritanism
is coming swiftly into vogue at the highest levels of government?

Let's not waste a lot of time overanalyzing whether this little
improvisational diversion may have done emotional harm to any kids who were
watching. It was there and gone in a mere few fleeting seconds.
If anything is going to damage the moral fiber of America's youth, it's the
indignation and fallout in the moment's wake, the high-voltage,
far-out-of-proportion reaction of grown men and women.

This naturally isn't about the children. It never is. It's about
re-election-minded public officials who won't rest until they work the
indecency-outrage angle as much as possible to show that they're not really
in bed with Big Media.

Of course, the FCC is already in obscenity crackdown mode. This simply gives
the censorheads more fodder. Meanwhile, it's apparently just fine during the
game for Bud Light to run a spot that appears to endorse a monkey's being
intimate with a woman and another ad (plugging Budweiser) that shows a woman
ranting and raving shrewlike at her husband.

The message would seem to be this: It's permissible to demean women, and
even to look at them as sexual playthings. God knows football telecasts are
chock-full of phallic imagery. But just let one female make the sexuality
itself overt and there's hell to pay. Because that's different, you see.
That's pornography.

It's been forgotten that part of the risk you run with live television is
that things you don't plan sometimes occur. Someone may even want to act up
at your expense. That unpredictable nature of the live broadcast was once
considered part of its allure. But in this increasingly uptight era, there
can apparently be no surprises without consequences.

Was it inappropriate? Sure. But let me get this straight: You hire Janet
Jackson and then you're shocked -- shocked! -- when she doesn't behave like
a Girl Scout? It's a given that when you get into business with a Jackson,
you're occasionally going to encounter a breast case scenario. That's just
the way it is.

Given the whole star-spangled, mom/apple pie tenor of the event, it was
shortsighted to plan a halftime bash around Nelly, Kid Rock, P. Diddy and
Jackson to begin with. That's not exactly swift demographic planning for an
annual event that is TV's big blowout of the year and as American as apple
pie. So in large measure, CBS and MTV have only themselves to blame.

This doesn't make Michael Powell any less a strident prude, however. And
when an administration insists on allowing the rampant politicization of
broadcasting, this is the result. You wind up stoking national outrage over
the brief flashing of a flap of skin, making you look like the real boob.

That's the naked truth.


artemis jackson

unread,
Feb 11, 2004, 9:14:29 PM2/11/04
to
."
"Mojo" <GoAwa...@Home.com> wrote in message
news:T5eUb.13222$uM2....@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
I wasn't offended or shocked by the incident,but I think it lacks
class.Truly sexy people don't need to resort to desperate stunts like
this-they generate heat fully clothed(eg Marlene Dietrich in a man's
tuxedo - now THAT is hot! .)
I put it in the 'try too hard' basket..

--
Artemis 67-
Proud denizen of Brisbane ,Australia......home of TimWard, inventor of the
phrase, 'Wacko Jacko


0 new messages