The Mother
Route
The accusers Mother is at the very heart of what I now believe are bogus
accusations against Michael Jackson. What a coincedence that this woman
decides to get married and have a baby right after the accuations are made.
I believe she planned her pregnancy in the hope it would coincide with any
trial with the specific purpose of gaining herself sympathy and limiting
her cross examination. Remember, the judge indicated early on that he
wanted it tried before the end of the year; eventually choosing September.
As far as I'm concerned this woman can't take the stand soon enough because
I believe she has been trying to avoid her testimony from Day one.
Mesereau can't wait either - as he says - "We firmly believe that this
woman lies under oath, ... We would like to examine her (in court)."
Of course, she had no qualms about testifying before the Grand Jury which
spared her of cross-examination. Now it appears she came up with the idea
of prolonging her eventual demise with health complaints. It's almost as if
she planned it this way. But she will eventually have to face the music.
BTW as an interesting aside - when she accused JC Penny's security for
sexually fondling her for 7 minutes, it took her 2 years(!) after the
alleged incident to actually report it.
-- Route
alan jones
The media reports at that time indicated a degree of reluctance
to testify. I'm sure this will be an issue down the road..
Jackson Case Almost Collapsed
April 22, 2004
"CJ" has learned that just a few weeks ago, after testifying before
the grand jury, Michael Jackson's accuser and his mother were so
emotionally distraught, that they wanted to throw in the towel.
http://celebrityjustice.warnerbros.com/news/0404/22a.html
"Route" <ro...@nihil.com.invalid> wrote in message news:1a5nytx5tw5iu.7aj87u5s586k$.dlg@40tude.net...
Route
>> Of course, she had no qualms about testifying before the Grand Jury which
>
> According to the media reports at that time indicated a degree of reluctance
> to testify.
There is no mention of that in the article. It talks about after the GJ
hearing, not before.
"CJ" has learned that just a few weeks ago, after testifying before
the grand jury, Michael Jackson's accuser and his mother were so
emotionally distraught, that they wanted to throw in the towel.
Probably because she realised after the indictment how far the bogus
allegations have actually gone. I'm not surprised she was feeling the
pressure.
-- Route
Peter J Ross
> The accusers Mother is at the very heart of what I now believe are bogus
> accusations against Michael Jackson. What a coincedence that this woman
> decides to get married and have a baby right after the accuations are made.
There's no such thing as coincidence. Apparently unrelated events will
on closer examination to be part of the Gigantic Web of Conspiracy
aimed at sending Michael Jackson to prison for no better reason than
that he's a sexual abuser of little boys.
> I believe she planned her pregnancy in the hope it would coincide with any
> trial with the specific purpose of gaining herself sympathy and limiting
> her cross examination. Remember, the judge indicated early on that he
> wanted it tried before the end of the year; eventually choosing September.
The cunning of the anti-pedo hatists knows no limit!
> As far as I'm concerned this woman can't take the stand soon enough because
> I believe she has been trying to avoid her testimony from Day one.
> Mesereau can't wait either - as he says - "We firmly believe that this
> woman lies under oath, ... We would like to examine her (in court)."
>
> Of course, she had no qualms about testifying before the Grand Jury which
> spared her of cross-examination. Now it appears she came up with the idea
> of prolonging her eventual demise with health complaints. It's almost as if
> she planned it this way. But she will eventually have to face the music.
>
> BTW as an interesting aside - when she accused JC Penny's security for
> sexually fondling her for 7 minutes, it took her 2 years(!) after the
> alleged incident to actually report it.
Have you ever thought about subscribing to soc.men? They believe that
all allegations made by women are false, just as you do.
[Note to AUK: believe it or not, this is one of the more rational of
the wacko-fans.]
--
PJR :-)
alt.usenet.kooks award-winners and FAQs:
http://www.insurgent.org/~kook-faq/
(Remove NOSPAM to reply.)
Daedalus
wrote:
>In article <hggn4v40c215$.d...@nntp.petitmorte.net>, Peter J Ross
>Heh, I have not had the experience of opening ammj yet.
>
I just subscreibbedded and started reading today - WTF?!?!?
Jade
Roofshadow "Courthouse Bozopalooza" Jackson
> In article <hggn4v40c215$.d...@nntp.petitmorte.net>, Peter J Ross
> <gad...@NOSPAMmeow.org> wrote:
>
>
> Heh, I have not had the experience of opening ammj yet.
And you call yourself a Kookologist???
LOL
Roofshadow "Courthouse Bozopalooza" Jackson
Don't worry - it gets kookier!
andy
"Daedalus" <ja...@net-kooks.org> wrote in message
news:h947j0perg6u2hasg...@4ax.com...
Google MYopinion, "nuff said
>
> Jade
>
>
Peter J Ross
Like soc.men, but smaller.
Aratzio
got double secret probation because:
Nah, none of the soc.men are funny. Read some caryrjr *news reports*.
'Ratz
Route
*gigantic snip*
>> BTW as an interesting aside - when she accused JC Penny's security for
>> sexually fondling her for 7 minutes, it took her 2 years(!) after the
>> alleged incident to actually report it.
>
> Have you ever thought about subscribing to soc.men? They believe that
> all allegations made by women are false, just as you do.
>
> [Note to AUK: believe it or not, this is one of the more rational of
> the wacko-fans.]
Masses of quotation packed around several lines of incoherant drivel, and a
newsgroup I couldn't be bothered checking.
And this constitutes a Point in your Ward ?
Go away, time waster.
-- Route
Aratzio
got double secret probation because:
>On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 19:25:31 GMT, Peter J Ross wrote:
>
>*gigantic snip*
That constitutes a *gigantic snip* in your ward? You really must get
out more, there is a whole world of snipping that you have missed.
Alexa Cameron has some very long screed she could use help in
trimming.
>
>>> BTW as an interesting aside - when she accused JC Penny's security for
>>> sexually fondling her for 7 minutes, it took her 2 years(!) after the
>>> alleged incident to actually report it.
>>
>> Have you ever thought about subscribing to soc.men? They believe that
>> all allegations made by women are false, just as you do.
>>
>> [Note to AUK: believe it or not, this is one of the more rational of
>> the wacko-fans.]
>
>Masses of quotation packed around several lines of incoherant drivel, and a
>newsgroup I couldn't be bothered checking.
Yes, but what happens when the newsfroups check you? Have you ever
felt that you were being watched. That there was a presence in the
room while you were on usenet? We (tinw) are here and we (TINW) are
legion.
>
>And this constitutes a Point in your Ward ?
Depends, care to sneck the newsfroups again and find out?
>
>Go away, time waster.
>
Sorry cupcake, this was by invitation. I did not see your name on the
guest list.
>
>-- Route
Peter J Ross
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 11:56:00 +1200, Route wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 19:25:31 GMT, Peter J Ross wrote:
>
> *gigantic snip*
No answers, eh?
>>> BTW as an interesting aside - when she accused JC Penny's security for
>>> sexually fondling her for 7 minutes, it took her 2 years(!) after the
>>> alleged incident to actually report it.
>>
>> Have you ever thought about subscribing to soc.men? They believe that
>> all allegations made by women are false, just as you do.
>>
>> [Note to AUK: believe it or not, this is one of the more rational of
>> the wacko-fans.]
>
> Masses of quotation packed around several lines of incoherant drivel, and a
> newsgroup I couldn't be bothered checking.
>
> And this constitutes a Point in your Ward ?
>
> Go away, time waster.
OK, I take it back. On second thoughts, you're not one of the more
rational of the wacko-fans. Is that better?
Qasim
<a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 11:56:00 +1200, Route <ro...@nihil.com.invalid>
>got double secret probation because:
>
>>On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 19:25:31 GMT, Peter J Ross wrote:
>>
>>*gigantic snip*
>
>That constitutes a *gigantic snip* in your ward? You really must get
>out more, there is a whole world of snipping that you have missed.
>Alexa Cameron has some very long screed she could use help in
>trimming.
A can of pies: a race of idiots spewing forth bile.
No effect. But you needed to have a cheese pie! Official FAQ: welcome
there?
>>>> BTW as an interesting aside - when she accused JC Penny's security for
>>>> sexually fondling her for 7 minutes, it took her 2 years(!) after the
>>>> alleged incident to actually report it.
>>>
>>> Have you ever thought about subscribing to soc.men? They believe that
>>> all allegations made by women are false, just as you do.
>>>
>>> [Note to AUK: believe it or not, this is one of the more rational of
>>> the wacko-fans.]
>>
>>Masses of quotation packed around several lines of incoherant drivel, and a
>>newsgroup I couldn't be bothered checking.
>
>Yes, but what happens when the newsfroups check you? Have you ever
>felt that you were being watched. That there was a presence in the
>room while you were on usenet? We (tinw) are here and we (TINW) are
>legion.
You could go around a roundabout: chicken shit around the diet is by your
teeth for several of them contracting in some post. And your teeth for
several decades. Crispy Rolls at least once. Is the demon weirdo.
The FAGGOT.
>>And this constitutes a Point in your Ward ?
>
>Depends, care to sneck the newsfroups again and find out?
Alexa Cameron has some kind of an ideal sig format. Always getting some
assistance, with meaningless unoriginal gibberish?
>>Go away, time waster.
>>
>
>Sorry cupcake, this was by invitation. I did not see your name on the
>guest list.
Green, and spinal mailbombing. Contact my custom built brand spanking new
computer, with his home being a hazard. Fuck off.
Isn't technology marvellous!
But my DOOM!
--
Only the tent pitched by your own hands will stand.
Please excuse my bad English.
Qasim Zafir Abdul-Razzaq.
Roofshadow "Courthouse Bozopalooza" Jackson
And then Google Deggie - try "me and michael in ten years time".
Roofshadow "Courthouse Bozopalooza" Jackson
Oh look everyone - it's Erik Erskine's long lost brother!
Route
>> *gigantic snip*
>
> No answers, eh?
No. I'm not interested in your slack-jawed baiting.
*snip*
>> Go away, time waster.
>
> OK, I take it back. On second thoughts, you're not one of the more
> rational of the wacko-fans. Is that better?
It's neither better nor worse. I just think you're a fuckwit.
-- Route
Joseph Bartlo
Peter J Ross
previous mention of cowardice noted.]
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 12:31:23 +1200, Route wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 00:13:05 GMT, Peter J Ross wrote:
>
>>> *gigantic snip*
>>
>> No answers, eh?
>
> No. I'm not interested in your slack-jawed baiting.
What a shame. If you were interested, you might reply to it instead of
ignoring me so completely. Oh wait...
> *snip*
>>> Go away, time waster.
>>
>> OK, I take it back. On second thoughts, you're not one of the more
>> rational of the wacko-fans. Is that better?
>
> It's neither better nor worse. I just think you're a fuckwit.
And I think you're a delusional supporter of a paedophile, who'll
believe any inane conspiracy theory rather than the obvious fact that
your deranged, plastic-faced idol is a pervert. The difference between
what I think and what you think is that you provided clear evidence
for what I think in your hilarious yet faintly sick-making post at the
top of this thread.
Alexa Cameron
news:4133C829...@verizon.invalid.net:
> Don't even try to start that crap- pest.
Gee, living on the planet of the apes, there's really no other word for
you except terminally stupid, dumbass.
To knowingly commit suicide in order to become wealthy and powerful is
as stupid as it gets.
--
------------------------------------------------------
"Who does Not Know the Truth, is simply a Fool...
Yet who Knows the Truth and Calls it a Lie, is a Criminal."
- In "Galileo Galilei" by Berthold Brecht (1898-1956)
-------------------------------------------------------
tho...@antispum.hum
> Don't even try to start that crap-
You're erroneously presupposing that it's crap, Bartlo.
> pest.
Who is "pest", Bartlo? Are you suffering from attribution problems?
Bob
> Joseph Bartlo <j.ba...@verizon.invalid.net> wrote in
> news:4133C829...@verizon.invalid.net:
>
>> Don't even try to start that crap- pest.
>
> Gee, living on the planet of the apes, there's really no other word for
> you except terminally stupid, dumbass.
Typical misandrist hate. You femmeroids only have to see a MAN's name
to start calling him an ape.
> To knowingly commit suicide in order to become wealthy and powerful is
> as stupid as it gets.
Bob sees Feminazis committing suicide every day, by pretending to be as
good as MEN. Go pound sand toots.
Bob
Alexa Cameron
why are you killing everything, hypocrite?
why are you obsessing over one person when all humans will all be dead
in less than 100 years?
John Lucas
Hmm....very interesting (chin rub thrown in just for nostalgia for Alan)
John Lucas
"alan jones" <o...@freeukFromSpam.com> wrote in message
news:4pGYc.88$Ni3...@newsfe3-win.ntli.net...
> > Of course, she had no qualms about testifying before the Grand Jury
which
>
> According to the media reports at that time indicated a degree of
reluctance
> to testify. I'm sure this will be an issue down the road..
>
> Jackson Case Almost Collapsed
> April 22, 2004
>
> "CJ" has learned that just a few weeks ago, after testifying before
> the grand jury, Michael Jackson's accuser and his mother were so
> emotionally distraught, that they wanted to throw in the towel.
>
> http://celebrityjustice.warnerbros.com/news/0404/22a.html
>
> "Route" <ro...@nihil.com.invalid> wrote in message
news:1a5nytx5tw5iu.7aj87u5s586k$.dlg@40tude.net...
> >
> > The accusers Mother is at the very heart of what I now believe are bogus
> > accusations against Michael Jackson. What a coincedence that this woman
> > decides to get married and have a baby right after the accuations are
made.
> >
> > I believe she planned her pregnancy in the hope it would coincide with
any
> > trial with the specific purpose of gaining herself sympathy and limiting
> > her cross examination. Remember, the judge indicated early on that he
> > wanted it tried before the end of the year; eventually choosing
September.
> >
> > As far as I'm concerned this woman can't take the stand soon enough
because
> > I believe she has been trying to avoid her testimony from Day one.
> > Mesereau can't wait either - as he says - "We firmly believe that this
> > woman lies under oath, ... We would like to examine her (in court)."
> >
> > Of course, she had no qualms about testifying before the Grand Jury
which
> > spared her of cross-examination. Now it appears she came up with the
idea
> > of prolonging her eventual demise with health complaints. It's almost as
if
> > she planned it this way. But she will eventually have to face the music.
> >
> > BTW as an interesting aside - when she accused JC Penny's security for
> > sexually fondling her for 7 minutes, it took her 2 years(!) after the
> > alleged incident to actually report it.
> >
> > -- Route
>
>
John Lucas
She shoulda gotten off that doomed ship the S.S. Sneddon while she had a
chance.
Wonder if Celine Dion will do the soundtrack to the adventure of THIS sunken
boat.
Route, now you know for yourself independently what the fans have known for
months.
This scam is going NOWHERE.
There's a reason why we're so adamant & sure in talking about this.
John Lucas
MYopinion
You are correct about the Grifter Mother. Can you believe that this
heifer was somewhere %$^&*% while her son was supposedly being molested?
This whore IS at the very heart of this scam and Snakedon is using her
for his vendetta against Michael. Yes, she is USING her pregnacy to
avoid being on the stand. I wonder what Jay Jackson is going to say when
he finds out that this whore is using him in this scam?
pam
MYopinion
There were also reports that the Grifter mom and the Grifter accuser had
second thoughts during the GrandJury testimony. I agree with you when
you say that these scam artists probably didn't think that this would
scam would get as far as it has.
pam
MYopinion
Yes, there is such a thing as coincidence. You would probably know that
better than anyone one else, wouldn't you, fanatical H?
pk
MYopinion
The haters are running like scared rabbits. They are recruiting the
trolls to cover their asses, because they know that the scam has been
uncovered.
Come on cowards, stop running from the truth. All of your desperate
attempts to deflect from what is really going on is futile.
All of the infantile "nominations" will not change the fact that you
dummies have been bamboozled by the Grifter family and Snakedon.
Peter J Ross
Folie à deux. One kook says something loopy, and the next kook in line
can hardly wait to agree with it. Is this phenomenon mentioned in "Teh
Way of teh Kook"?
Peter J Ross
Some things are impossible even for the Kook-to-English Translator,
but perhaps some of the AUK experts can study your post for a few
weeks and suggest a meaning for it.
Route
*Try-hard baiting sniped*
>>> OK, I take it back. On second thoughts, you're not one of the more
>>> rational of the wacko-fans. Is that better?
>>
>> It's neither better nor worse. I just think you're a fuckwit.
>
> And I think you're a delusional supporter of a paedophile,
I'm a supporter of finding the truth. If I thought he was guilty I'd have
no qualms in saying so.
> who'll believe any inane conspiracy theory
If you had done your homework you would have realised that I've only come
to my conclusions over the course of several months of looking at the case.
> rather than the obvious fact that your deranged, plastic-faced idol is a pervert.
I couldn't care less if he's deranged or plastic-faced, and if you think
he's a pervert. He is not my idol either.
> The difference between what I think and what you think
The only difference between us is that you're here to pick a fight, and I'm
here to discuss the case.
> is that you provided clear evidence for what I think in your hilarious yet
> faintly sick-making post at the top of this thread.
Says he who embarks on juvenile campaigns of ridicule and insult.
-- Route
2nz
>From: Peter J Ross gad...@NOSPAMmeow.org
>Date: 8/30/04 11:50 PM Mountain Daylight Time
>Message-id: <1fdtlx3r...@nntp.petitmorte.net>
>
>On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 00:21:36 -0500, MYopinion wrote:
>
>> Route,
>>
>> You are correct about the Grifter Mother. Can you believe that this
>> heifer was somewhere %$^&*% while her son was supposedly being molested?
>> This whore IS at the very heart of this scam and Snakedon is using her
>> for his vendetta against Michael. Yes, she is USING her pregnacy to
>> avoid being on the stand. I wonder what Jay Jackson is going to say when
>> he finds out that this whore is using him in this scam?
>>
>> pam
>
>can hardly wait to agree with it. Is this phenomenon mentioned in "Teh
>Way of teh Kook"?
>
What A Friend We Have In Cheeses.
Peter J Ross
> The haters are running like scared rabbits.
"I am winning this war." - Joseph Bartlo.
> They are recruiting the
> trolls to cover their asses, because they know that the scam has been
> uncovered.
>
> Come on cowards, stop running from the truth. All of your desperate
> attempts to deflect from what is really going on is futile.
>
> All of the infantile "nominations" will not change the fact that you
> dummies have been bamboozled by the Grifter family and Snakedon.
If you continue this meltdown for another couple of days, you may be
needing to write an acceptance speech.
Peter J Ross
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 17:58:02 +1200, Route wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 00:47:00 GMT, Peter J Ross wrote:
>
> *Try-hard baiting sniped*
Translation: "Mention of Rooster's chicken-like cowardice temporarily
removed."
>>>> OK, I take it back. On second thoughts, you're not one of the more
>>>> rational of the wacko-fans. Is that better?
>>>
>>> It's neither better nor worse. I just think you're a fuckwit.
>>
>> And I think you're a delusional supporter of a paedophile,
>
> I'm a supporter of finding the truth. If I thought he was guilty I'd have
> no qualms in saying so.
Yet you clutch at imaginary straws in order to support your
"argument". Why is that necessary?
>> who'll believe any inane conspiracy theory
>
> If you had done your homework you would have realised that I've only come
> to my conclusions over the course of several months of looking at the case.
Did you really have nothing better to do than to talk yourself into
slurping a paedophile, Rooster?
>> rather than the obvious fact that your deranged, plastic-faced idol is a pervert.
>
> I couldn't care less if he's deranged or plastic-faced, and if you think
> he's a pervert. He is not my idol either.
I've just realised who you remind me of. Have you ever come across a
kook called Michael Snyder? Like you, he's much concerned to
investigate the truth - which for him happens to be that all men
accused of rape are innocent. His method - to drone tediously about
"facts" of which he can have no knowledge - is just the same as yours.
But to be fair to you, Snyder would probably have created a ridiculous
fantasy about the child rather than about the mother.
>> The difference between what I think and what you think
>
> The only difference between us is that you're here to pick a fight, and I'm
> here to discuss the case.
To be precise, I'm here to laugh at your "discussion" of the case,
which is instantly recognisable as kookscreed.
>> is that you provided clear evidence for what I think in your hilarious yet
>> faintly sick-making post at the top of this thread.
>
> Says he who embarks on juvenile campaigns of ridicule and insult.
"The accusers [sic] Mother is at the very heart of what I now believe
are bogus accusations against Michael Jackson. What a coincedence
[sic] that this woman decides to get married and have a baby right
after the accuations [sic] are made.
I believe she planned her pregnancy in the hope it would coincide with
any trial with the specific purpose of gaining herself sympathy and
limiting her cross examination. Remember, the judge indicated early on
that he wanted it tried before the end of the year; eventually
choosing September."
Ick. What a piece of filth you are.
MYopinion
I told you that these people are not capable of an intelligent
discussion. They have no answers. The fanatical goons only EXIST. They
have nothing except their existence.
pam
MYopinion
Are you SCARED yet? Are the "holes" in this scam showing you the light?
When are you going to be a man OR woman and ADMIT defeat?
MYopinion
Where are your answers, coward? Why are you evading Route's discussion?
Oh yes, YOU have no answers and nothing to add to an intelligent
discussion.
You Goons only like to play games of the infantile. Keep on running
"Girly Man." You can run, but you can't hide. The TRUTH is going to bite
you on your ass.
T.
>The fanatical goons only EXIST. They
>have nothing except their existence.
Not to worry, Pam, we have you.
T.
>"Girly Man." You can run, but you can't hide. The TRUTH is going to bite
>you on your ass.
That's good common sense from you for a change. Now if only Wacko was
listening.
Route
> [Cowardly group-line sneckage restored *for the third time*.]
Hey everyone - it's another love letter from Peter!
> Translation: "Mention of Rooster's chicken-like cowardice temporarily
> removed."
The Rooster eh? More juvenile name callng Peter. How impressive! Stick with
it, wannabe - One day you might get one I didn't hear decades ago at
school...
>>> And I think you're a delusional supporter of a paedophile,
>>
>> I'm a supporter of finding the truth. If I thought he was guilty I'd have
>> no qualms in saying so.
>
> Yet you clutch at imaginary straws in order to support your
> "argument". Why is that necessary?
Actully I've based my comments on the timeline and testimony, all of which
are on the record. While all you can manage in reply is to expel verbiage
and rhetoric like other people expel intestinal gas.
You're not here to debate and discuss Peter, you're here to bait,
antagonise, and shit-stir. You ARE a timewaster Peter. You make empty
comments. They sound good - just like they did in all the films you have
seen or books you have read. Grand, important sounding comments that look
like they must mean something, must come from someone smart.
But they don't: generic, fit all comments and statements without a shred of
intelligence behind them.
You are a dwarf behind a giant mask Peter - and the sad thing is your mask
isn't even convincing.
>>> who'll believe any inane conspiracy theory
>>
>> If you had done your homework you would have realised that I've only come
>> to my conclusions over the course of several months of looking at the case.
>
> Did you really have nothing better to do than to talk yourself into
> slurping a paedophile, Rooster?
Your mediocre attempts at ridicule are poorly aimed and unimaginative at
best. Witless, predictable and repetitive. The work of an inferior mind.
You're not even sideshow amusement Peter.
>>> rather than the obvious fact that your deranged, plastic-faced idol is a pervert.
>>
>> I couldn't care less if he's deranged or plastic-faced, and if you think
>> he's a pervert. He is not my idol either.
>
> I've just realised who you remind me of. Have you ever come across a
> kook called Michael Snyder? Like you, he's much concerned to
> investigate the truth - which for him happens to be that all men
> accused of rape are innocent. His method - to drone tediously about
> "facts" of which he can have no knowledge - is just the same as yours.
> But to be fair to you, Snyder would probably have created a ridiculous
> fantasy about the child rather than about the mother.
And I've just realised who you remind me of Peter. Have you ever come
across Monty Python?
Monty Python was known for irreverent ranting, crafted carefully to
sound like serious politics but always shown the perpetrator to be a
complete git.
Congratulations.
>>> The difference between what I think and what you think
>>
>> The only difference between us is that you're here to pick a fight, and I'm
>> here to discuss the case.
>
> To be precise, I'm here to laugh at your "discussion" of the case,
> which is instantly recognisable as kookscreed.
Of course you would recognise it as such Peter. As you say, you're in it
for the laughs. You're an imbecile. You're someone who sees the world in
black and white. Someone is either all good or all bad; normal or a kook;
an MJ Fanatic or an MJ Hater; no compromise, no possibility of
justification, no possibility of discussion. You are a waste of time Peter.
>>> is that you provided clear evidence for what I think in your hilarious yet
>>> faintly sick-making post at the top of this thread.
>>
>> Says he who embarks on juvenile campaigns of ridicule and insult.
>
*snip - my orginal post*
>
> Ick. What a piece of filth you are.
I'm whatever you want me to be Peter. Nobody cares.
-- Route
Qasim
Bozopalooza\" Jackson" <Roofsha...@removespamtrap.yahoo.com> wrote:
>Oh look everyone - it's Erik Erskine's long lost brother!
Who is Erik Erskine?
--
Only the tent pitched by your own hands will stand.
Please excuse my bad English.
Qasim Zafir Abdul-Razzaq.
andy
"MYopinion" <Pame...@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:2143-413...@storefull-3152.bay.webtv.net...
>
> The haters are running like scared rabbits. They are recruiting the
> trolls to cover their asses,
Wasnt it you who called up the web tv crew to "kick our asses"? Whatever
happened to them?
Dr. Artemis "Tell It Like It Is"McGraw
"Peter J Ross" <gad...@NOSPAMmeow.org> wrote in message
news:92zfshxp...@nntp.petitmorte.net...
Ooh,so you think she runs a good chance of winning KoTM?
(wiping tear from eye) Oh,we're so proud ! ;-)
--
Favrinus..warned us to speak the common idiom ...and steer clear of unusual
words even as mariners avoid reefs at sea."
Francois Rabelais,'Gargantua & Pantagruel'
My MSN profile
http://tinyurl.com/3anwd
Volfie
"MYopinion" <Pame...@webtv.net> sucked a Hungarian Booby Pickle and
splattered:
> There were also reports that the Grifter mom and the Grifter accuser had
> second thoughts during the GrandJury testimony.
Picked that up on your foil hat antennae*, did you? You might want to try
putting the shiny side out for a spell.
Giselle (*King of Poop board of highly delusional and rabid fans who confuse
innuendo with truth)
Volfie
"Peter J Ross" <gad...@NOSPAMmeow.org> wrote in message
> On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 00:28:54 -0500, MYopinion wrote:
>
> > Petey,
> >
> > Yes, there is such a thing as coincidence. You would probably know that
> > better than anyone one else, wouldn't you, fanatical H?
> >
> > pk
>
> Some things are impossible even for the Kook-to-English Translator,
> but perhaps some of the AUK experts can study your post for a few
> weeks and suggest a meaning for it.
>
> --
> PJR :-)
You'll have to run your Kook-to-English Translator on her "walls could have
walls near the floor" post. We've been trying to decode that one since
Wacko's arraignment.
Giselle (and if you get that one, try the "face full of bile" post, please)
Volfie
"MYopinion" <Pame...@webtv.net> squints and admits to having no hint:
> Petey,
>
> Are you SCARED yet? Are the "holes" in this scam showing you the light?
> When are you going to be a man OR woman and ADMIT defeat?
Dear Peter,
Pamef'loon has gender confusion issues. She is unable to figure out gender
even for people with gender specific names. Hell, she can't figure out
gender when TOLD what it is by the people she's addressing. We attribute
this to the fact that she has seen no genitalia in at least three decades.
We apologize for her. We will slap her nose with a rolled up newspaper and
make her try again.
Giselle (:::putting a re-bar in the rolled up paper::: BAD PAMEF'LOON!
<whap!!> uhoh. that's gonna leave a mark.)
Route
> Petey,
>
> Where are your answers, coward?
We got his answers. In case you missed them, they were along the lines of:-
"You’re wrong because I said so!"
"You're delusional!"
"You're clutching at straws!"
"He's a paedophile!"
"You're a kook!"
"Rooster!"
Witty stuff eh?
Mix in a bit of Monty Python style rhetoric, some ape like chest-beating, a
few more puerile put-downs here and there, and there you have it - The
pinnacle of his intellect and debating skill reached.
-- Route
Aratzio
transparently proposed:
More supposition and delusional thought sPam? You of course have proof
of these baseless accusations? A cite for your evidence maybe? Or are
you just a mindless hater who spews *rumors, innuendo and lies* about
people she knows only from media reports?
'Ratz
[Jul ner gur xbbxf nyjnlf fhpu boivbhf ulcbpevgrf?]
[Frr vs fur xabjf nobhg sbyybj-hcf]
Aratzio
transparently proposed:
>
>The haters are running like scared rabbits. They are recruiting the
>trolls to cover their asses, because they know that the scam has been
>uncovered.
>
sPam, the k0okologists are here to study YOU, not Michael. YOU must
understand that to study YOU, the k0okologists must study YOU in your
natural environment. Taking YOU from your natural environment makes
the job of the k0okologist much more diffikult since the environment
is a major faktor in k0ok behavior. So please do kontinue your
*normal* poasting habits and allow the k0okologists the opportunity to
dokument your fine k0okiness for posterity.
>Come on cowards, stop running from the truth. All of your desperate
>attempts to deflect from what is really going on is futile.
>
What is going on is the study and kataloging of k0oks.
>All of the infantile "nominations" will not change the fact that you
>dummies have been bamboozled by the Grifter family and Snakedon.
>
Possibly, but that does not take away from YOU, sPammy and your inate
k0okiness. The k0okologist aktually celebrate you with nominations and
you should become one with your nomination. Do not deny you k0ok side,
embrace it, allow it to kome to its full potential. Be what your inner
child wishes you to be, a raging loonball of k0okiness!
Aratzio
transparently proposed:
>On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 00:47:00 GMT, Peter J Ross wrote:
>
>*Try-hard baiting sniped*
>
>>>> OK, I take it back. On second thoughts, you're not one of the more
>>>> rational of the wacko-fans. Is that better?
>>>
>>> It's neither better nor worse. I just think you're a fuckwit.
>>
>> And I think you're a delusional supporter of a paedophile,
>
>I'm a supporter of finding the truth. If I thought he was guilty I'd have
>no qualms in saying so.
>
So you only present one side of the case *supporter of truth*?
>> who'll believe any inane conspiracy theory
>
>If you had done your homework you would have realised that I've only come
>to my conclusions over the course of several months of looking at the case.
>
>> rather than the obvious fact that your deranged, plastic-faced idol is a pervert.
>
>I couldn't care less if he's deranged or plastic-faced, and if you think
>he's a pervert. He is not my idol either.
>
And yet poast after poast after poast you place your beliefs of
Michael this and Michael that. Strange, is it not, for someone who
does not idolize?
>> The difference between what I think and what you think
>
>The only difference between us is that you're here to pick a fight, and I'm
>here to discuss the case.
>
No, you are here to present whatever side of the case makes people
think you know what you are writing about. Self aggrandizement in one
of its many forms.
Aratzio
transparently proposed:
>
>"MYopinion" <Pame...@webtv.net> wrote in message
>news:2143-413...@storefull-3152.bay.webtv.net...
>>
>> The haters are running like scared rabbits. They are recruiting the
>> trolls to cover their asses,
>
>Wasnt it you who called up the web tv crew to "kick our asses"? Whatever
>happened to them?
>
NOT THE WEB TV CREW!!!!
PH34r THE WEB TV CREW!
meow.
Daedalus
wrote:
>
>The haters are running like scared rabbits. They are recruiting the
>trolls to cover their asses, because they know that the scam has been
>uncovered.
>
I am new to this newsgroup and not familiar with who is a troll and
who is a kook and who is whatever else. can you give me some guidance
here?
>Come on cowards, stop running from the truth. All of your desperate
>attempts to deflect from what is really going on is futile.
>
I know you want the facts to be gotten straight. What else are you
angry about that these trolls and haters think?
>All of the infantile "nominations" will not change the fact that you
>dummies have been bamboozled by the Grifter family and Snakedon.
Again, I am at a total loss. I know what bamboozled means, but I don't
know what these people have to do with Michael Jackson.
TIA
Jade
Aratzio
Is\"McGraw" <art...@mt.olympus.com> transparently proposed:
>
>
>"Peter J Ross" <gad...@NOSPAMmeow.org> wrote in message
>news:92zfshxp...@nntp.petitmorte.net...
>> On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 00:39:14 -0500, MYopinion wrote:
>>
>> > The haters are running like scared rabbits.
>>
>> "I am winning this war." - Joseph Bartlo.
>>
>> > They are recruiting the
>> > trolls to cover their asses, because they know that the scam has been
>> > uncovered.
>> >
>> > Come on cowards, stop running from the truth. All of your desperate
>> > attempts to deflect from what is really going on is futile.
>> >
>> > All of the infantile "nominations" will not change the fact that you
>> > dummies have been bamboozled by the Grifter family and Snakedon.
>>
>> If you continue this meltdown for another couple of days, you may be
>> needing to write an acceptance speech.
>>
>> --
>> PJR :-)
>> alt.usenet.kooks award-winners and FAQs:
>> http://www.insurgent.org/~kook-faq/
>>
>> (Remove NOSPAM to reply.)
>
>
>Ooh,so you think she runs a good chance of winning KoTM?
>(wiping tear from eye) Oh,we're so proud ! ;-)
With this late run of kampaigning she has going she may make it tough
on svanier, but my money is still on the Varnisher. He has been a very
long running k0ok that has failed to accrue the proper attention his
k0okiness so richly deserves.
The man actually believes he emits a *Buddah Field* that is
responsible for a 60% drop in crime in the USA. He also thinks he is
Jesus. The *Buddah Field* only affects Americans, it has not been
explained why Canadians or Mexicans are not affected by the *Buddah
Field*
If you wish to view the competition:
svanier or Svslick6996
news:alt.consciousness.4th-way
He is also know as Varnisher for his propensity to consume just about
any mind altering substance in great quantity prior to babbling to
usenet.
'Ratz
Route
>>I'm a supporter of finding the truth. If I thought he was guilty I'd have
>>no qualms in saying so.
>>
>
> So you only present one side of the case *supporter of truth*?
No, I've presented both sides in recent months *waster of my time*.
Not only that, I'm more than happy to consider a mature and coherent
alternative analysis of the case, if you are capable of delivering it?
>>I couldn't care less if he's deranged or plastic-faced, and if you think
>>he's a pervert. He is not my idol either.
>
> And yet poast after poast after poast you place your beliefs of
> Michael this and Michael that.
And time after time no one can rebutt any points I make except by rhetoric.
> Strange, is it not,
No, not really.
> for someone who does not idolize?
I'm not interest in idolizing, I'm interested in analysing.
>>> The difference between what I think and what you think
>>
>>The only difference between us is that you're here to pick a fight, and I'm
>>here to discuss the case.
>>
>
> No, you are here to present whatever side of the case makes people
> think you know what you are writing about.
No, I'm here to present my opinion derived from facts on the record. Such
as the criminal timeline and pretrial hearing testimony.
> Self aggrandizement in one of its many forms.
Another useless piece if information to end another useless post.
Next.
-- Route
Daedalus
wrote:
Pardon me! As one of the insider Michael Jackson fans around here,
have you ever heard of such a thing as official illustrated
instructions for doing the moonwalk?
I have a very talented young nephew who woud benefit from such
instruction and I am trying very hard to get him onto American Idol.
Thank you so much for any assistance..
Jade
Aratzio
transparently proposed:
>On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 07:02:33 -0700, Aratzio wrote:
So why did you poast it?
>Next.
>
>-- Route
Joseph Bartlo
doing the kookdance here. The only terminally stupid ones are people
like you talking about things they couldn't possibly know about.
Let's see your meteorology degree. Didn't think so, goddamned liar.
Alexa Cameron wrote:
>
> Joseph Bartlo <j.ba...@verizon.invalid.net> wrote in
> news:4133C829...@verizon.invalid.net:
>
> > Don't even try to start that crap- pest.
>
> Gee, living on the planet of the apes, there's really no other word for
> you except terminally stupid, dumbass.
>
> To knowingly commit suicide in order to become wealthy and powerful is
> as stupid as it gets.
>
> >
> > Route wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 00:13:05 GMT, Peter J Ross wrote:
> >>
> >> >> *gigantic snip*
> >> >
> >> > No answers, eh?
> >>
> >> No. I'm not interested in your slack-jawed baiting.
> >>
> >> *snip*
> >> >> Go away, time waster.
> >> >
> >> > OK, I take it back. On second thoughts, you're not one of the more
> >> > rational of the wacko-fans. Is that better?
> >>
> >> It's neither better nor worse. I just think you're a fuckwit.
> >>
> >> -- Route
> >
>
> --
> ------------------------------------------------------
> "Who does Not Know the Truth, is simply a Fool...
> Yet who Knows the Truth and Calls it a Lie, is a Criminal."
> - In "Galileo Galilei" by Berthold Brecht (1898-1956)
> -------------------------------------------------------
Joseph Bartlo
>
> On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 00:39:14 -0500, MYopinion wrote:
>
> > The haters are running like scared rabbits.
>
> "I am winning this war." - Joseph Bartlo.
More crap fro ma pest designed to prolong bickering.
Daedalus
More stupid responses from a netkook weather fraud wihtout a clue.
Jade
Joseph Bartlo
>
> Joseph Bartlo wrote:
>
> > Don't even try to start that crap-
>
>
> > pest.
>
> Who is "pest", Bartlo? Are you suffering from attribution problems?
The only ones with problems here are you goddamned lairs, pests and
cowards. acting all tough posting your lies and crap anonymously from
behind a computer screen. And if I had any problems then no one let me
forget them, so I can say that I am stronger than all you pests put
together since I am winning this war with just one of me despite all the
crap you kookdancers try to give me.
Any more of your goddamned lies will be refuted later.
Joseph Bartlo
Route wrote:
>
> On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 02:50:12 -0500, MYopinion wrote:
>
> > Petey,
> >
> > Where are your answers, coward?
>
> We got his answers. In case you missed them, they were along the lines of:-
>
> "YouĒre wrong because I said so!"
Dan Baldwin
Cffg. Urnqref.
--
Dan Baldwin, unethical *by design*
I am a minion of Satan, but my powers are mainly administrative.
Hail the un-alive
Dan Baldwin
>
> In article <4134B26C...@invalid.com>, Dan Baldwin
> <dan_b...@invalid.com> wrote:
>
> > Daedalus wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 09:57:14 -0700, Joseph Bartlo
> > > <jba...@verizon.invalid.net>, wrote:
> > >
> > > >Peter J Ross wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 00:39:14 -0500, MYopinion wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > The haters are running like scared rabbits.
> > > >>
> > > >> "I am winning this war." - Joseph Bartlo.
> > > >
> > > >More crap fro ma pest designed to prolong bickering.
> > >
> > > More stupid responses from a netkook weather fraud wihtout a clue.
> > >
> > > Jade
> >
> > Cffg. Urnqref.
>
Chg ba n fbpx naq wbva gur sha. V guvax jr arrq gb urne sebz fbzr bs gur
terng xbbxf bs byq fbba.
Unvy Zvat.
Roofshadow "Courthouse Bozopalooza" Jackson
> Joseph Bartlo <j.ba...@verizon.invalid.net> wrote in
> news:4133C829...@verizon.invalid.net:
>
>
>>Don't even try to start that crap- pest.
>
>
> Gee, living on the planet of the apes, there's really no other word for
> you except terminally stupid, dumbass.
>
> To knowingly commit suicide in order to become wealthy and powerful is
> as stupid as it gets.
>
Oh boy - here's ANOTHER kO0K!
Roofshadow "Courthouse Bozopalooza" Jackson
X-Posted to AUK
MYopinion wrote:
> Petey,
>
> Are you SCARED yet? Are the "holes" in this scam showing you the light?
> When are you going to be a man OR woman and ADMIT defeat?
>
OK I can understand your confusion over whether I'm a man or a woman -
after all my username is "Roofshadow".
But Peter???
You can't figure out if someone named PETER is a man or a woman??
No wonder Wacko is your idol!!
Roofshadow "Courthouse Bozopalooza" Jackson
X-Posted to AUK
MYopinion wrote:
> Petey,
>
> Where are your answers, coward? Why are you evading Route's discussion?
> Oh yes, YOU have no answers and nothing to add to an intelligent
> discussion.
>
> You Goons only like to play games of the infantile. Keep on running
> "Girly Man." You can run, but you can't hide. The TRUTH is going to bite
> you on your ass.
>
So now Peter is a "girly man" huh?
Funny how you turn around and accuse the sane people of being everything
that your idol actually IS!
Roofshadow "Courthouse Bozopalooza" Jackson
> In article <j9idnZ43d_T...@comcast.com>, "Roofshadow \"Courthouse
> Bozopalooza\" Jackson" <Roofsha...@removespamtrap.yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>Oh look everyone - it's Erik Erskine's long lost brother!
>
>
> Who is Erik Erskine?
>
Check Google - the folks at AUK would love him!
Actually I believe he really WAS mentally ill... I killfiled him
eventually because it just got so sad (plus he'd send zillions of posts
through in the space of an hour).
Roofshadow "Courthouse Bozopalooza" Jackson
> Don't give me that crap, pest. I'm alot smarter than any of you pests
> doing the kookdance here. The only terminally stupid ones are people
> like you talking about things they couldn't possibly know about.
>
> Let's see your meteorology degree. Didn't think so, goddamned liar.
Why are you (top)posting this to alt.music.michael-jackson??
Roofshadow "Courthouse Bozopalooza" Jackson
Forgive me if I don't hold my breath waiting.
Roofshadow "Courthouse Bozopalooza" Jackson
> off topic
Please explain how discussing Michael Jackson is OT in the ng
alt.music.michael-jackson.
Thank you.
Daedalus
<dan_b...@invalid.com>, wrote:
>Daedalus wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 09:57:14 -0700, Joseph Bartlo
>> <jba...@verizon.invalid.net>, wrote:
>>
>> >Peter J Ross wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 00:39:14 -0500, MYopinion wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > The haters are running like scared rabbits.
>> >>
>> >> "I am winning this war." - Joseph Bartlo.
>> >
>> >More crap fro ma pest designed to prolong bickering.
>>
>> More stupid responses from a netkook weather fraud wihtout a clue.
>>
>> Jade
>
>Cffg. Urnqref.
<Lbfrzvgr Fnz> bbbbu! Pbafneavg lbh Entn senttn enfpny enoovg!
</Lbfrzvgr Fnz>
Jade
Qasim
That's flooding. Against ISP.
Eating meat eaters like the RSPB and Woodland Trust hopes one of animal
products in a woman who bought one.
Shut up, Alexa!
--
Only the tent pitched by your own hands will stand.
Please excuse my bad English.
Qasim Zafir Abdul-Razzaq.
Roofshadow "Courthouse Bozopalooza" Jackson
And please start making lits because I want to be on another one!
Roofshadow "Courthouse Bozopalooza" Jackson
> On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 10:30:06 GMT, "andy" <and...@hotmail.com>
> transparently proposed:
>
>
>>"MYopinion" <Pame...@webtv.net> wrote in message
>>news:2143-413...@storefull-3152.bay.webtv.net...
>>
>>>The haters are running like scared rabbits. They are recruiting the
>>>trolls to cover their asses,
>>
>>Wasnt it you who called up the web tv crew to "kick our asses"? Whatever
>>happened to them?
>>
>
>
> NOT THE WEB TV CREW!!!!
NO ONE expects the WebTV Crew!!!
Roofshadow "Courthouse Bozopalooza" Jackson
> In article <07-dnTCU54Y...@comcast.com>, "Roofshadow \"Courthouse
> Bozopalooza\" Jackson" <Roofsha...@removespamtrap.yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>Qasim wrote:
>>
>>
>>>In article <j9idnZ43d_T...@comcast.com>, "Roofshadow \"Courthouse
>>>Bozopalooza\" Jackson" <Roofsha...@removespamtrap.yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Oh look everyone - it's Erik Erskine's long lost brother!
>>>
>>>
>>>Who is Erik Erskine?
>>>
>>
>>Check Google - the folks at AUK would love him!
>>
>>Actually I believe he really WAS mentally ill... I killfiled him
>>eventually because it just got so sad (plus he'd send zillions of posts
>>through in the space of an hour).
>
>
> That's flooding. Against ISP.
He used WebTV (figures huh?)
Route
*snip*
>>Another useless piece if information to end another useless post.
>>
> So why did you poast it?
Because it amused me to do so.
Bye bye, loser.
-- Route
Qasim
Surprised! How manage that? Not type fast on TV remote control!
The Web TV Troll Crew!
Route
Jackson wrote:
> Joseph Bartlo wrote:
>
>> off topic
>
> Please explain how discussing Michael Jackson is OT in the ng
> alt.music.michael-jackson.
>
> Thank you.
How? Because Peter's mates are too dim to think of a witty enough response.
That's how.
-- Route
Joseph Bartlo
Don't try to start that crap, pest. I've taken IQ tests and I'm sure I
could have you beat there any day of the week.
alan jones
> Celebrity Justice reported that eh?
>
> Hmm....very interesting (chin rub thrown in just for nostalgia for Alan)
>
> John Lucas
chin rub back at ya... ;) careful now, you know how their minds work..
> "alan jones" <o...@freeukFromSpam.com> wrote in message
> news:4pGYc.88$Ni3...@newsfe3-win.ntli.net...
>
>>Of course, she had no qualms about testifying before the Grand Jury
>>which According to the media reports at that time indicated a degree
>>of reluctance to testify. I'm sure this will be an issue down the road..
>>
>> Jackson Case Almost Collapsed
>> April 22, 2004
>>
>> "CJ" has learned that just a few weeks ago, after testifying before
>> the grand jury, Michael Jackson's accuser and his mother were so
>> emotionally distraught, that they wanted to throw in the towel.
>>
>>http://celebrityjustice.warnerbros.com/news/0404/22a.html
>>
>>"Route" <ro...@nihil.com.invalid> wrote in message
>
> news:1a5nytx5tw5iu.7aj87u5s586k$.dlg@40tude.net...
>
Route
>>>> off topic
>>>
>>> Please explain how discussing Michael Jackson is OT in the ng
>>> alt.music.michael-jackson.
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>
>> How? Because Peter's mates are too dim to think of a witty enough response.
>> That's how.
>>
>> -- Route
>
> Don't try to start that crap, pest. I've taken IQ tests and I'm sure I
> could have you beat there any day of the week.
Awww really? I bet you could build a castle with some lego too!
Who's a clever boy then?
-- Route
Aratzio
transparently proposed:
You are pretty dull, do you do anything interesting like set yourself
on fire or swallow live grenades?
'Ratz
Roofshadow "Courthouse Bozopalooza" Jackson
> In article <kdSdnWbUN-w...@comcast.com>, "Roofshadow \"Courthouse
> Bozopalooza\" Jackson" <Roofsha...@removespamtrap.yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>Qasim wrote:
>>
>>
>>>In article <07-dnTCU54Y...@comcast.com>, "Roofshadow \"Courthouse
>>>Bozopalooza\" Jackson" <Roofsha...@removespamtrap.yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Qasim wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>In article <j9idnZ43d_T...@comcast.com>, "Roofshadow \"Courthouse
>>>>>Bozopalooza\" Jackson" <Roofsha...@removespamtrap.yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Oh look everyone - it's Erik Erskine's long lost brother!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Who is Erik Erskine?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Check Google - the folks at AUK would love him!
>>>>
>>>>Actually I believe he really WAS mentally ill... I killfiled him
>>>>eventually because it just got so sad (plus he'd send zillions of posts
>>>>through in the space of an hour).
>>>
>>>
>>>That's flooding. Against ISP.
>>
>>He used WebTV (figures huh?)
>
>
> Surprised! How manage that? Not type fast on TV remote control!
Beats me - he always blamed his numerous mispellings and typos on a
broken keyboard!
>
> The Web TV Troll Crew!
LOL
Roofshadow "Courthouse Bozopalooza" Jackson
Aww... Route thinks you're one of Peter's friends!
Isn't that nice?
Roofshadow "Courthouse Bozopalooza" Jackson
We should be so lucky!
Joseph Bartlo
Qasim
The most odious people I've ever come across are eroded. I have seen
malicious deception on the posts of Michael Jackson. So much trouble.
>> The Web TV Troll Crew!
>
>LOL
Improvisation, sausage head.
Roofshadow "Courthouse Bozopalooza" Jackson
> On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 00:39:14 -0500, Pame...@webtv.net (MYopinion)
> transparently proposed:
>
>
>>The haters are running like scared rabbits. They are recruiting the
>>trolls to cover their asses, because they know that the scam has been
>>uncovered.
>>
>
>
> sPam, the k0okologists are here to study YOU, not Michael.
Well... Wacko's a pretty good k0oK too actually!
tho...@antispum.hum
> In article <4134B26C...@invalid.com>, Dan Baldwin
> <dan_b...@invalid.com> wrote:
>
>> Daedalus wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 09:57:14 -0700, Joseph Bartlo
>>> <jba...@verizon.invalid.net>, wrote:
>>>
>>>> Peter J Ross wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 00:39:14 -0500, MYopinion wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> The haters are running like scared rabbits.
>>>>>
>>>>> "I am winning this war." - Joseph Bartlo.
>>>>
>>>> More crap fro ma pest designed to prolong bickering.
>>>
>>> More stupid responses from a netkook weather fraud wihtout a clue.
>>>
>>> Jade
>>
>> Cffg. Urnqref.
>
> Nynf, V jnf yngr va abgvpvat gur nqqe nyfb. /zr chyyf bhg ubbx.
Jung qb lbhe cvfpngbevny nanybtvrf unir gb qb jvgu jrngure be
cnrqbcuvyvn, Bfgrejnyq?
Peter J Ross
Their two chief weapons are beer, ordure, and a fanatical devotion to
the King of Poop!
--
PJR :-)
alt.usenet.kooks award-winners and FAQs:
http://www.insurgent.org/~kook-faq/
(Remove NOSPAM to reply.)
Dr. Flonkenstein
A response to what, wackoboi?
> That's how.
>
That's how you became a usenet n00bie?
> -- Route
--
mhm 27x12
smeeter #28
Usenet Valhalla Circle #19 & #21
Bartlo's hate lits #1: <40376AD8...@enter.net>
CEO Alcatroll Labs Inc.
The Way of the Kook:
http://www.insurgent.org/~jhd/kookway.htm
Aratzio
Bozopalooza\" Jackson" <Roofsha...@removespamtrap.yahoo.com>
transparently proposed:
With proper guidance from the staff at Alcatrol Labs Inc I am sure he
can be convinced to partake of a more interesting personality and
leave such a banal and lifeless existance by the wayside.
'Ratz
Dr. Flonkenstein
Joey could already build his name in lego at age of 3!
Could you?
Dr. Flonkenstein
Don't let the door hit you when you leave, wackoboi!