Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Copyright Lawsuit Against JP
0 views
Skip to first unread message
Archavenger
Jun 30, 2010, 4:10:04 PM6/30/10
to
Morning Glory
Jul 1, 2010, 3:14:54 PM7/1/10
to
On Jun 30, 4:10 pm, Archavenger <a...@aaa.org> wrote:
> http://tmz.vo.llnwd.net/o28/newsdesk/tmz_documents/0629_led.pdf
> http://tmz.vo.llnwd.net/o28/newsdesk/tmz_documents/0629_led.pdf
Interesting. If Holmes wants a jury trial, he'll have to pay for it.
Archavenger
Jul 1, 2010, 5:10:00 PM7/1/10
to
Holmes stands to make a tidy sum if he prevails. Three years worth of
Dazed and Confused royalties could be $1 million, perhaps.
Dazed and Confused royalties could be $1 million, perhaps.
Morning Glory
Jul 1, 2010, 7:36:10 PM7/1/10
to
On Jul 1, 5:10 pm, Archavenger <a...@aaa.org> wrote:
> Holmes stands to make a tidy sum if he prevails. Three years worth of
> Dazed and Confused royalties could be $1 million, perhaps.
>
> Holmes stands to make a tidy sum if he prevails. Three years worth of
> Dazed and Confused royalties could be $1 million, perhaps.
>
> On 2010-07-01 15:14:54 -0400, Morning Glory <jade_...@yahoo.com> said:
>
> > Interesting. If Holmes wants a jury trial, he'll have to pay for it.
>
> > Interesting. If Holmes wants a jury trial, he'll have to pay for it.
I wonder why he's suing now on a song that was copyright and renewed
more than ten years ago. We all know JP and company tried to pass the
song off as their own without consulting Holmes or even giving him the
credit. I think this lawsuit is forty years too late.
orange
Jul 2, 2010, 5:43:25 PM7/2/10
to
"Archavenger" <a...@aaa.org> wrote in message
news:2010063016100416807-aa@aaaorg...
> http://tmz.vo.llnwd.net/o28/newsdesk/tmz_documents/0629_led.pdf
>
news:2010063016100416807-aa@aaaorg...
> http://tmz.vo.llnwd.net/o28/newsdesk/tmz_documents/0629_led.pdf
>
No comment. This person must be American...... ;-)))
stuth...@comcast.net
Jul 5, 2010, 3:24:14 PM7/5/10
to
Holmes lives in NYC. Page lives in England. Why is this suit in the
Central District of California?
Central District of California?
A minor question compared to "WHY DID JAKE HOLMES WAIT 40 YEARS TO
BRING THIS LAWSUIT?"
Archavenger
Jul 7, 2010, 3:44:31 PM7/7/10
to
Holmes was probably inspired by the February 2010 copyright victory of
Larrikin Music against the band Men at Work for the flute solo in their
1981 song Down Under. Larrikin waited 28 years before filing its
lawsuit last year. So Holmes must have figured it was worth the trouble
to file suit.
Larrikin Music against the band Men at Work for the flute solo in their
1981 song Down Under. Larrikin waited 28 years before filing its
lawsuit last year. So Holmes must have figured it was worth the trouble
to file suit.
On 2010-07-05 15:24:14 -0400, "stuth...@comcast.net"
Sekula
Jul 18, 2010, 12:27:15 PM7/18/10
to
<stuth...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:73c09f31-ffd7-428f...@c10g2000yqi.googlegroups.com...
The longer you leave a suit, the more money the claimant has a share of if
he wins I'd say.
0 new messages