----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------
Cyba Nonymous urinated on the keyboard to produce this little bit of
shit for me to read:
>
> :Led Zeppelin was a good band in the OLD days, but compared to
> todays heavy bands, they're lame. Korn & Bizkit are ten times heavier and
> cooler than the slow,plodding and very boring Led Zeppelin. Jimmy Page
> ripped off most of his classic riffs from the old blues guys too. He's
> considered by alot of OLD posers to be a guitar god. Haha!! What guitar
> god rips off riffs. Musically,they don't compare to todays heavy bands,as
> songsmiths,or in any category. They were just a bunch of OLD posers!!!
I hate Trolls but this is a new low. Parental discretion is advised, folks.
This post may contain language innapropriate for children.
Also I want to note that although I have a deep hatred for Korn, I am very
familiar with their "work." (if you can call it that.) And I'm crossposting
this for the benefit of others whom I KNOW will enjoy this. So without
further ado, I must slay this biatch--the levee has broken.
What the fuck is your problem?! How could you let those bitches at MTV do
this to you?! They have been brainwashing you mindless fucks for a long
time and you need to do something about his shit. They promote the
teenybopper boy bands and then market Korn as the leader in the fight
against them. Then they start a war between all the stupid impressionable
youth of America. They have you voting on TRL while they (MTV, Korn, the boy
bands,etc) rake in all the dough at the expense of the brains of the
children of America.
Korn is a horrible band that only steals from the works of such talented
artists as Sepultura, Pantera, Slayer, and many more. While these artiss
were also derivative, they at least turned the hair band shit around them
into something creative and listenable. While still MTV raked in all the
money by making the stupid ass kids think that hair bands were a musical and
artistic revolution, when really MTV was pulling all their strings because
when Nirvana came around, nobody cared about the MTV hair bands anymore
anyway (besides VH1 and the people still under MTV's 80s brand mind control
years later). MTV does what it wants with the stupid people of America, and
has been doing so for almost 20 years now. Their image based brand of
incognito racial stereotyping and watered down, imitation music has been
killing the brain cells of people like your dumb ass for longer than I've
even been on this planet. Simply put, MTV killed music and stupid fucks
like you love every minute of it because MTV has taught you not to know any
better. I hope your blatant ignorance is absolutely blissful, because it
only could be to a stupid bitch like yourself. You leave it up to Musicless
Television to tell you what is "heavier and cooler?!" Fuck you.
When Led Zeppelin was around, there WAS no MTV, and music was allowed to be
MUSIC. With the exception of pre-MTV shit like KISS, no one could get away
with having shitty music and selling millions of albums. Led Zeppelin
wasn't a band about image, the public created their own mystique about the
band, and their music fit in right with it. Led Zeppelin created THE most
innovative music since the death of Hendrix, and if anyone disagrees with
that, well I have two words, you figure 'em out.
And what does someone who is so obviously stupid know about "the old blues
guys?!" Jimmy Page created a brand of rock that undeniably stems directly
from the blues, but he evolved blues into something completely new and
completely different. And then came bands like Aerosmith who ripped it off
blatantly, but did it with style. Much similar to that shit you call music.
Korn & Limp Bizkit are only in it for the money, which is why they steal
everything they've ever come up with from people that MTV never has and
never will air on their horrible channel because they made good music which
often contained worthwhile, non-hypocritical messages.
And the next subject, Jonathan Davis. All of this guy's lyrics for over 5
years have been about the same damn thing. 'All this pain inside of me',
'Fuck you ass licking dick sucking damn fucking diarrhea slut', 'i hate you,
you hurt me', 'you fucking faggot', and that stupid grumbly shit he did on
that Twist song. Where is the creativity in any of his lyrics?! I could
think up that horrible shit in 3 seconds. And Wimp Bizshit is no different.
They think they are 'cool' because they think they are the orginal masters
of the hip hop meets metal movement. Anthrax anyone?! And wow, a song like
Break Stuff must be really hard to make, huh? When you preach all of this
negativity, and put it on MTV, what does it breed?? A bunch of mindless
zombies that go out and preach even more negativity. Stupid people like you
think it's "cool" to be angry and then you come up with the fucked up state
that the world is in today, for the sake of being "cool," because that's
what MTV tells you to do.
Jimmy Page versus Munky or that Head guy??!?!?! If ANYONE should have to
think on that issue, they are brain-dead and don't deserve to talk anyway.
Robert Plant versus Jon Davis?!?!?! Ditto.
John Paul Jones versus Fieldy?!?!?! John Paul Jones plays actual notes.
And above all, JOHN BONHAM VERSUS DAVID SILVERIA?!?!?! That Davis guy
SUCKS!!! He has no rhythm, no improvisational skills, no sonic booming
capabilities, no drum solos (because he sucks and they all know it),
therefore he can't play a solo with his hands because he has none to play
(but the probably couldn't do it anyway), he has no kick foot as far as I'm
concerned, he has no NOTHING!!
And slow!? So are you calling Korn a speed metal band? And is Lowrider a
fast song? How about Helmet In The Bush? Shoots And Ladders? Porno Creep?
NO!! These are all slow, boring songs!!! Maybe Zeppelin had MUCH more slow
songs than Korn, at least they sounded good, and at least Zeppelin
experimented with other instruments and concepts. Korn does the same two
songs over and over, the slow song and the not slow song that their fans
would call the fast song but then again they don't listen to things like
Slayer or late 80s Sepultura so they wouldn't really know anything about
speed.
Like kingBenny said, Korn and Limp Bizkit would more than likely disagree
with you on everything you said there in your dumbass post. They are smart
enough to know real music (I mean face it, they do for the money and the
chicks, just like the hair bands did).
In a sentence:
Korn is shit, Limp Bizkit is shit, and YOU are shit.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------
End of Eddie's message.
--
"I wanna see it all go down" - Tool "Aenema"
Find out why MTV sucks at http://members.tripod.com/~vexor/mtv/
Remember, you've got to FIGHT for what you believe in.
>What the fuck is your problem?!<
What the fuck is *your* problem? You don't know that any of this is true.
>How could you let those bitches at MTV do this to you?! They have been
brainwashing you mindless fucks for a long time and you need to do something
about his shit.<
This is what I find so funny about all the fuckin trolls that come in here.
First of all, a lot of the people in here have been listening to Korn way
before they were played on MTV. I've been listening to them for about 4
years so shut the fuck up and don't hold your 'facts' to be true until you
know they are
>They have you voting on TRL<
again, shut up unless you know this is true. All of the people in here that
I know of hate mtv
>Korn is a horrible band that only steals from the works of such talented
artists as Sepultura, Pantera, Slayer, and many more.<
Korn sound like Panter and Slayer? ahaha. um, NO! IMO they don't sound
much like Sepultura, either. If any of the guys from the band thought so, I
doubt they would have done two songs w/ Jon, huh?
>When Led Zeppelin was around, there WAS no MTV, and music was allowed to be
MUSIC.<
That's about the stupidest thing I've ever heard. Music was allowed to be
music-what the fuck is that supposed to mean. Music will *always* be music
>With the exception of pre-MTV shit like KISS, no one could get away with
having shitty music and selling millions of albums.<
If you say so...
>And the next subject, Jonathan Davis. All of this guy's lyrics for over 5
>years have been about the same damn thing. 'All this pain inside of me',
>'Fuck you ass licking dick sucking damn fucking diarrhea slut', 'i hate
you,
>you hurt me', 'you fucking faggot',<
your point being? His lyrics are what make a lot of people listen to his
music-becuase they can relate
>and that stupid grumbly shit he did on that Twist song. Where is the
creativity in any of his lyrics?!<
I'd like to hear you try to repeat those 'shit' lyrics
>And above all, JOHN BONHAM VERSUS DAVID SILVERIA?!?!?! That Davis guy
SUCKS!!! He has no rhythm, no improvisational skills, no sonic booming
capabilities, no drum solos (because he sucks and they all know it),
therefore he can't play a solo with his hands because he has none to play
(but the probably couldn't do it anyway), he has no kick foot as far as I'm
concerned, he has no NOTHING!!<
This is entirely opinionated
>And slow!? So are you calling Korn a speed metal band?<
Korn? metal? no
>Korn does the same two songs over and over, the slow song and the not slow
song that their fans would call the fast song but then again they don't
listen to things like Slayer or late 80s Sepultura so they wouldn't really
know anything about speed.<
you don't know that's true. Again, don't say shit unless you know it's
true. I don't feel like going to look at the date Roots was release, but
does Ratamahatta or Lookaway sound familiar to you?
>Korn is shit, Limp Bizkit is shit, and YOU are shit.<
Whatever, man. You are the piece of shit who is judging people for the
music they listen to and ASSUMING that they watch MTV and ASSUMING that they
don't listen to any of the bands you mentioned. Get a fuckin clue man, you
are shit
~Karissa
*Karissa* wrote:
> >When Led Zeppelin was around, there WAS no MTV, and music was allowed to be
> MUSIC.<
>
> That's about the stupidest thing I've ever heard. Music was allowed to be
> music-what the fuck is that supposed to mean. Music will *always* be music
What they mean by that, smarts, is that music didn't have any image
hype. There were bands that had image: Bowie, Queen, Cooper, etc. But a)
mtv didn't promote their image, you found their image after buying the
records. b) they were a lot more TALENTED.
I for one do *not* have cable and have never even seen MTV in my life.
Miraculously i *still* like KoRn....Wait a second, that would mean that i
dont care about "image" or that shit. I heard their music, and i liked it.
Period. You assume way too much.
b) they were a lot more TALENTED.
That is an opinion. KoRn and Led Zeppelin sound nothing alike so you cant
really compare them equally.
Throgi
Wow! you assume that everybody that has heard KoRn has heard them on MTV
first. Like i said (in my other message), I have never seen MTV and i listen
to them. Did you stop to think for a second that people may like them for
their music? of course not, thats because you're an idiot.
>Korn is a horrible band that only steals from the works of such talented
>artists as Sepultura, Pantera, Slayer, and many more. While these artiss
>were also derivative, they at least turned the hair band shit around them
>into something creative and listenable. While still MTV raked in all the
>money by making the stupid ass kids think that hair bands were a musical
and
>artistic revolution, when really MTV was pulling all their strings because
>when Nirvana came around, nobody cared about the MTV hair bands anymore
>anyway (besides VH1 and the people still under MTV's 80s brand mind control
>years later).
^^^^^^^^^
(shortened to conserve space)
Again you assume that people like korn because they are on MTV. Again you
prove your ignorance. My statements from above apply here.
>When Led Zeppelin was around, there WAS no MTV, and music was allowed to be
>MUSIC. With the exception of pre-MTV shit like KISS, no one could get away
>with having shitty music and selling millions of albums. Led Zeppelin
>wasn't a band about image, the public created their own mystique about the
>band, and their music fit in right with it.
Just because something is played on MTV its not real music? If MTV was
around with Led Zeppelin im sure they would have been played on it....As far
as i know, KoRn wasn't even popular with MTV until their latest album
"follow the leader" so i dont think MTV exactly created them....
> Led Zeppelin created THE most
>innovative music since the death of Hendrix, and if anyone disagrees with
>that, well I have two words, you figure 'em out.
Wtf? "you figure 'em out" is 4 words, not 2. I see we're dealing with a
genius here....
>And what does someone who is so obviously stupid know about "the old blues
>guys?!" Jimmy Page created a brand of rock that undeniably stems directly
>from the blues, but he evolved blues into something completely new and
>completely different. And then came bands like Aerosmith who ripped it off
>blatantly, but did it with style. Much similar to that shit you call
music.
>Korn & Limp Bizkit are only in it for the money, which is why they steal
>everything they've ever come up with from people that MTV never has and
>never will air on their horrible channel because they made good music which
>often contained worthwhile, non-hypocritical messages.
Bizkit and Korn are seperate entities. Please treat them as such. Not
everything (probably not anything) that applies to one applies to the other.
With that in mind, bizkit *may* be in it for the money. Im not a limp fan,
so i dont know much about them. Korn is *not* in it for the money, although
im sure that they welcome the extra revenue (im not sure who wouldn't).
They've been writing for quite some time, long before they became "rich".
And im failing to see where Korn stole from? you're basing this on no facts
whatsoever so.....
>And the next subject, Jonathan Davis. All of this guy's lyrics for over 5
>years have been about the same damn thing. 'All this pain inside of me',
>'Fuck you ass licking dick sucking damn fucking diarrhea slut', 'i hate
you,
>you hurt me', 'you fucking faggot', and that stupid grumbly shit he did on
>that Twist song. Where is the creativity in any of his lyrics?! I could
>think up that horrible shit in 3 seconds.
He sings what he feels. Im dont see where creativity comes in. Music is a
form of communication. He is communicating all the pain he has felt, which
is something many can relate to. Btw, since you are "mr. great lyric writer"
(TM) please enlighten us with your lyrics composed in 3 seconds.....
>Jimmy Page versus Munky or that Head guy??!?!?! If ANYONE should have to
>think on that issue, they are brain-dead and don't deserve to talk anyway.
Thats your opinion. There is a difference between your opinion and actual
fact, so dont try to make it out to be one in the same.
>Robert Plant versus Jon Davis?!?!?! Ditto.
Ditto.
>John Paul Jones versus Fieldy?!?!?! John Paul Jones plays actual notes.
Actually im pretty sure that fieldy is playing notes.
>And above all, JOHN BONHAM VERSUS DAVID SILVERIA?!?!?! That Davis guy
>SUCKS!!!
> He has no rhythm, no improvisational skills, no sonic booming
>capabilities, no drum solos (because he sucks and they all know it),
>therefore he can't play a solo with his hands because he has none to play
>(but the probably couldn't do it anyway), he has no kick foot as far as I'm
>concerned, he has no NOTHING!!
haha, he has "no nothing"? you're *really* showing that intelligence.....
>And slow!? So are you calling Korn a speed metal band? And is Lowrider a
>fast song? How about Helmet In The Bush? Shoots And Ladders? Porno
Creep?
>NO!! These are all slow, boring songs!!!
slow = fact. boring = opinion. can you understand this?
> Maybe Zeppelin had MUCH more slow
>songs than Korn, at least they sounded good, and at least Zeppelin
>experimented with other instruments and concepts. Korn does the same two
>songs over and over, the slow song and the not slow song that their fans
>would call the fast song but then again they don't listen to things like
>Slayer or late 80s Sepultura so they wouldn't really know anything about
>speed.
Ummm....hate to break it to ya, but people in here *do* listen to slayer.
Another stupid assumption. God you're really on fire today.
>In a sentence:
>Korn is shit, Limp Bizkit is shit, and YOU are shit.
glad to see you could be the mature one here. grow up and stop trying to
force your views on others. It wont change their minds and it'll only piss
them off.
Throgi
Throgi wrote:
> Wtf? "you figure 'em out" is 4 words, not 2. I see we're dealing with a
> genius here....
He meant that you figure out what the two words are, you dumb fuck. The
two words are probably either "fuck you" or "fuck off".
> >Jimmy Page versus Munky or that Head guy??!?!?! If ANYONE should have to
> >think on that issue, they are brain-dead and don't deserve to talk anyway.
>
> Thats your opinion. There is a difference between your opinion and actual
> fact, so dont try to make it out to be one in the same.
What zeppelin played is harder to play and takes more talent to play
than what korn plays. There is no opinion in that. That is a
motherfucking fact.
What are you talking about 'depression?' I didn't say that *I* related, i
just said that a lot of people do. FYI, I already have a system, and I have
no intention on getting neon lights and what the fuck does that have to do
w/ anything? Oh, yeah, no job at McDonald's, either
~Karissa
Before Load came out, I would of said that Metallica had achieved a level
that Led Zeppelin had, but sadly Metallica threw it all away with Load. They
went from being the best heavy metal had to offer, to being a band that
played warmed over Motley Crue style hard rock.
>
big_E_fan7cups <big_E_f...@yahoo.com> wrote in article
<N36s3.406$IM3....@axe.netdoor.com>...
If you guys want so dearly to prove that 'your' band is the best, then actually
give reasons why 'your' band is better than someone elses. Saying [my band]
kicks [your band's] ass is pointless and immature. Do you really think that if
you say "Ministry kicks Napalm Death's ass" that it's really gonna change how
the other person feels about Napalm Death? Hell no. Be realistic, give
reasons. Perhaps then the person may be interested, decide to buy a Ministry
CD, love it, and agree with you. Or better yet, be mature enough to realize
that everyone has different tastes in music and shut the hell up.
______________
‹^› Sicko Zero ‹^›
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
"I hate what I have become to escape what I hated being." - Marilyn Manson
<<Okay people. I have been watching this little argument. Between
these two, its no question that Zep is better.>>
Depends on your musical tastes, some people don't like them or classic
rock.
<< Korn shouldn't even be mentioned in the
same sentence with... oops, almost did it. You get the picture. >>
Korn and Led Zeppelin (oh no the sacrilige).
<<Korn sucks. Zep is cool.>>
Both are your opinion, not general knowledge.
<<BUT, Metallica kicks both of their asses. Metallica
is the greatest band in the history of the world.>>
Your opinion again. Now for My opinion. AAAHHAHAHAH LMFAO. that's too
funny.
Unforgiven 2 just fucking rocks ;)~. I would probably take some of
there older stuff (pre "Black" album) over Korn's Newer Stuff. but I
would choose Zeppelin SoldoutticA and Korn's last two (LIP, FTL) any
day.
--
No Signature Needed (void in the US, Canada, and Occupied Territories)
:o)
Frank
Vexor wrote in message ...
``~~MiKe~~``
btw, quote
~Karissa
big_E_fan7cups wrote in message ...
>Okay people. I have been watching this little argument. Between these
two,
>its no question that Zep is better. Korn shouldn't even be mentioned in
the
>same sentence with... oops, almost did it. You get the picture. Korn
>sucks. Zep is cool. BUT, Metallica kicks both of their asses. Metallica
><<Okay people. I have been watching this little argument. Between
>these two, its no question that Zep is better.>>
>
>Depends on your musical tastes, some people don't like them or classic
>rock.
yeah, but most people have enough brains to admit that zep has alot
more talent than korn, even if they're not into the music...that's
pretty much fact...
--travis
thank you-my thoughts exactly
~Karissa
*Karissa* wrote:
totally true but i still go see there shows because they play a lot of there old
shit.
if i wanted to learn i would go to school
Correction: Metallica WAS the greatest band in the history of the world.
Now they have given up being experienced musicians and have destroyed
everything they stood for. Don't believe me? Go to
http://members.tripod.com/~vexor/mtv/metallica.html and find out for
yourself.
Well excessive profanity is a sign of ignorance, so either way my comment
still rings true....
>> >Jimmy Page versus Munky or that Head guy??!?!?! If ANYONE should have
to
>> >think on that issue, they are brain-dead and don't deserve to talk
anyway.
>>
>> Thats your opinion. There is a difference between your opinion and actual
>> fact, so dont try to make it out to be one in the same.
>
>What zeppelin played is harder to play and takes more talent to play
>than what korn plays. There is no opinion in that. That is a
>motherfucking fact.
Yes, but you assume that KoRn *cannot* play what led zeppelin played, which
is an invalid assumption. Like i said: they are completely different and
really cannot be compared.
Throgi
If KoRn could play a lot better than they've been playing, don't you think
they would?
Im assuming you mean your opinon of better. Let me explain again: Ok, while
korn may not be as talented overall as led zeppelin, they are a different
style of music and cannot be compared imo. I like the emotion and sound of
KoRn songs, and it satisfies me much more than Led Zeppelin. You may feel
that KoRn sucks, but thats only one persons opinion. You're free to think
whatever you want, but you are not free to impose your preferences upon
others. So in other words, i'll still like KoRn better and you will still
like Led Zeppelin better. This probably wont change, so lets just stop
arguing over nothing.
Throgi
Throgi wrote:
> Im assuming you mean your opinon of better. Let me explain again: Ok, while
> korn may not be as talented overall as led zeppelin, they are a different
> style of music and cannot be compared imo. I like the emotion and sound of
> KoRn songs, and it satisfies me much more than Led Zeppelin. You may feel
> that KoRn sucks, but thats only one persons opinion. You're free to think
> whatever you want, but you are not free to impose your preferences upon
> others. So in other words, i'll still like KoRn better and you will still
> like Led Zeppelin better. This probably wont change, so lets just stop
> arguing over nothing.
And that my friends [and enemies] is what I was saying. Led Zeppelin is
a lot more musically talented, but it is what you like that really
matters.
By doing that you are supporting them and their selling out. If you
want the real Metallica back don't give Alternica your money. Vote
with your wallet!
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.


Peer Pressure wrote in message <37b0ef8b...@news.prodigy.net>...
>Some have it, Some don't. On Tue, 10 Aug 1999 22:25:10 -0500,
>"big_E_fan7cups" <big_E_f...@yahoo.com> proved to: alt.music.korn,
>to not have it, by writing:
>
><<Okay people. I have been watching this little argument. Between
>these two, its no question that Zep is better.>>
>
>Depends on your musical tastes, some people don't like them or classic
>rock.
>
><< Korn shouldn't even be mentioned in the
>same sentence with... oops, almost did it. You get the picture. >>
>
>Korn and Led Zeppelin (oh no the sacrilige).
>
><<Korn sucks. Zep is cool.>>
>
>Both are your opinion, not general knowledge.
>
> <<BUT, Metallica kicks both of their asses. Metallica
>is the greatest band in the history of the world.>>
>
John Bianco wrote in message <7or0tu$u5v$1...@nntp9.atl.mindspring.net>...
>
>big_E_fan7cups wrote in message ...
>>Okay people. I have been watching this little argument. Between these
>two,
>>its no question that Zep is better. Korn shouldn't even be mentioned in
>the
>>same sentence with... oops, almost did it. You get the picture. Korn
>>sucks. Zep is cool. BUT, Metallica kicks both of their asses. Metallica
>>is the greatest band in the history of the world.
>>
>>
>
Vexor wrote in message ...
>big_E_fan7cups wrote in message ...
>>Okay people. I have been watching this little argument. Between these
>two,
>>its no question that Zep is better. Korn shouldn't even be mentioned in
>the
>>same sentence with... oops, almost did it. You get the picture. Korn
>>sucks. Zep is cool. BUT, Metallica kicks both of their asses. Metallica
>>is the greatest band in the history of the world.
>
>
>Correction: Metallica WAS the greatest band in the history of the world.
>Now they have given up being experienced musicians and have destroyed
>everything they stood for. Don't believe me? Go to
>http://members.tripod.com/~vexor/mtv/metallica.html and find out for
>yourself.
>
Popularity doesn't imply quality. Briteny Spears sells out shows all the
time. Is she some great musician? New Kids on the Block sold out all
their seats to every show. Where they great musicians? The last concert
I saw, more than 70% of the people were under drinking age. Point is, if
a band is trendy enough there will be plenty of kids to follow them. Do
you think all of those seats would've been sold without the trendy ass
losers?
--
Ken Witherow
Keeper of the alt.rock-n-roll.metal.metallica FAQ
http://www.frontiernet.net/~phantoml/armm.html
Linux 2.2.11 - Because I'd like to get there today
-}yeah, but most people have enough brains to admit that zep has alot
-}more talent than korn, even if they're not into the music...that's
-}pretty much fact...
-}
-}--travis
Yeah, I like Zeppelin more than Korn, but I know people who don't like
Zeppelin at all.
<<-}Opinion? That's what this newsgroup and just about every other
newsgroup is
-}made up of: OPINIONS. >>
Yep.
<<-}But the only people who would chose Korn over either one of those
far superior bands who I won't mention in the same sentence,are
teenagers, or maybe even preteens. Once you all grow up, you'll come
to your senses.>>
Like I said, I would choose anything from Zeppelin over Metallica and
Korn, But I would not choose anything from Metallica since the "Black"
album over Korns S/T, and very little of thier post black stuff over
LIP and FTL. And Justice For All and the previous albums are a
different story.
big_E_fan7cups wrote:
>
> What is the deal with Load? It is a great cd. It must be the haircuts. So
> what if they cut their hair? They still kick ass. Load was just as heavy
> as the black album, which happens to be one of the best selling albums of
> all time.
Yeah but I think Backstreet Boys sold more c.d.'s than Radiohead, so
what are you talking about a c.d. is only as good as the number of
people that buy it. Are you just saying that load was just as heavy as
black, meaning that whoever hates load would have to say black albums
sucks too? I don't listen to Metallica anyway, I don't know....
big_E_fan7cups wrote:
>
> You again? What is the deal with you and this webpage? Get a life. No
> artist goes through their entire careers without changing at least a little
> bit. Metallica's last couple of albums seem to have pissed of the former
> fans who haven't made it through puberty yet. Personally, I like all of
> Metallica's music. You say they sell out? Hell yes they sell out, every
> time they play, anywhere they play. There's not an empty seat in the house!
You know, I have called a bunch of artists sell outs from time to time.
But now that I think about it, isn't everyone selling out to something?
Listen to "Hooker with a Penis", on Aenima by Tool. I think that is
what the song is saying. Not to say that I agree with everything a band
I like says, but seems to me everybody sells out. I know someone will
disagree, so I will explain why when they do. . .
Of course then again this is me, and I'm almost always wrong. [no
sarcasm]
Thank you for directly quoting Jason Newstead from the VH1 Behind the
Music... Typical arrogance of a musician full of himself.
Jim
henson wrote in message <37B22517...@midwest.net>...
Jim Boyle wrote in message ...
Man if you are gonna make a post, why don't you say something? I've seen
three of your posts that were nothing but snips from one of my posts and
someone else's.
The problem isn't really heaviness as much as tightness and musical talent.
Compare ReLoad (of Shit) to Master of Puppets and tell me which album shows
a more mature and musically talented Metallica (hint: it's the latter).
--
"I wanna see it all go down" - Tool "Aenema"
Find out why MTV sucks at http://members.tripod.com/~vexor/mtv/
Remember, you've got to FIGHT for what you believe in.
>John Bianco wrote in message <7or0tu$u5v$1...@nntp9.atl.mindspring.net>...
>>
>>big_E_fan7cups wrote in message ...
>>>Okay people. I have been watching this little argument. Between these
>>two,
>>>its no question that Zep is better. Korn shouldn't even be mentioned in
>>the
>>>same sentence with... oops, almost did it. You get the picture. Korn
>>>sucks. Zep is cool. BUT, Metallica kicks both of their asses.
Metallica
>>>is the greatest band in the history of the world.
>>>
>>>
>>
i know thats exactally right. the hair doesnt matter. and load is great i
think, espically UIS. i dont think load is necessairly "heavy", but its just
plain and simple good music! the black album is my favorite album ever. i love
everything on it
Last I heard the Spice Girls sold a lot of albums...
You know people like you r so dumb! Y do you even care what people like
& listen to? Im a fan of classic rock pantera, soulfly, sep.,Korn, limp
& even some 80's rock like acdc. Music is heard of many sounds &
meaning. All these bands & it's members has different lifestyles &
therefor different lyrics. You can not compare these bands with each
other or there fans. "Every One is different" ~James
You are exactly right man. All bands are influenced by different things in life, that bring about the lyrics of songs. Whereas playing music, the instruments, is also about influences and also very much about "different-feelings". So it doesn't matter if the riffs are complicated and very fast like Led and Metallica, or if they are basic and very heavy/slow like Korns, each listener to their own. I personally dont like Led and Metallica all that much. I dont like the mind-rending, a-million-riffs-at-once sound of those band, and the lyrics do nothing for me. The songs of Led Zeplin are about mundane and banal topics that dont relate much to my own life. And Metallica is just not a very listen-to-and-bare type band for me. Whereas Korn is very much to my likings, in sound, lyrics (related wise) and heavy-ass-riffs. Thats my OWN opinion.~\déép/~"They may take away our freedom to walk, but they'll never take away our freedom to dream." --- Insurge
Why the hell should it matter. They're not gonna change just because I
don't go to there show. Vote for what with my wallet. I enjoy it so I go. 4
metallica concerts and I would go back for 5. Take a pee break every time
something is played thats more recent than the black album.
I don't believe what I'm seeing. You just basically said the newer
Metallica was shit because they are more mature and talented now than on
Master of Puppets. Either that or you don't know what the word latter
means. Which is it? Either way, you just showed everyone that you are a
moron.
I'm having trouble understanding why everything after the black album is
supposed to suck so bad. I was listening to Load last night. The style is
very similar to the black album. Load is a very good album. I knew it
kicks ass as soon as I heard the first snip of it in a music store. I'm
convinced that you are all upset with the haircuts. That's the only thing I
can figure out.
It's not just that they cut their hair. Their songs used to be fucking
SYMPHONIES; now they only make boring 3-chord 3-minute pop songs.
No, Master of Puppets was the latter because I mentioned ReLoad first and
Puppets second. I was referring to the order in which it was mentioned, not
in chronological order.
The problem isn't really heaviness as much as tightness and musical talent.
Compare Master of Puppets to ReLoad (of Shit) to and tell me which album
shows
a more mature and musically talented Metallica (hint: it's the former).
--
"I wanna see it all go down" - Tool "Aenema"
Find out why MTV sucks at http://members.tripod.com/~vexor/mtv/
Remember, you've got to FIGHT for what you believe in.
>John Bianco wrote in message <7or0tu$u5v$1...@nntp9.atl.mindspring.net>...
>>
>>big_E_fan7cups wrote in message ...
You are totally missing (or should I say, avioiding) the point. tzin mein
said that just because an artist sells a lot of albums, it doesn't make that
artist good; not that Metallica sucks.
trojanman38801 wrote:
> I don't believe what I'm seeing. You just basically said the newer
> Metallica was shit because they are more mature and talented now than on
> Master of Puppets. Either that or you don't know what the word latter
> means. Which is it? Either way, you just showed everyone that you are a
> moron.
I don't want to get in an argument about Metallica since I never
listened to them but he/she means the latter mentioned, not the latter
album as in release date.
If you are a fan of Metallica older material, you would understand, also if
you listend to 80s commercial heavy metal, you would understand that the
Loads is basically a bad version of 80s commercial heavy metal. If you like
Load or ReLoad, then listen to Great White, WhiteSnake, Motley Crue or
AC/DC, its the same mid tempo music that is played better and is far better
written than the Loads are.
>
Load has sold 4 million, with 2/3 of those sales coming in the first month
or so. Load has sold far less than all other Metallica albums except for
Kill em All and Reload. It was simpily put, a massively boring album, no
energy, piss poor songwriting, horrible drums and horrible solos, and piss
poor sound and production. Why should I enjoy it>
T he black album changed Metallica for the worse sadly, it made them lazy,
they chose to write simple hard rock songs, and lost their inspiration.
Metallica could of chosen to write music that push boundries and their
songwriting skills, instead they chose to dregde up 70s and 80s commercial
hard rock and metal. Why should I listen to Load when Def Leppards High n
Dry albums is a similar style of music, but has far better riffs, singing
and guitar solos.
>I don't believe what I'm seeing. You just basically said the newer
>Metallica was shit because they are more mature and talented now than on
>Master of Puppets. Either that or you don't know what the word latter
>means. Which is it? Either way, you just showed everyone that you are a
>moron.
>
>
New Metallica more talented, thats a laugh. New Metallica is mix of 70s
and 80s commercial hard rock and metal, and its boring. I have heard dozens
of bands that make music that is similar to the Loads, and they all are far
better at it.
Actually Metallica sold more tickets and sold them more quickly during the
damaged justice tour back in 89. And most of the people who see Metallica
today see them for their older material.
If Metallica does not get off their ass soon and make a album of quality
music, preferably metal, they will just continue to spiral further downward
in popularity. If Metallica makes another Load style album of music, or
worse, then they will probabaly sell 1.5 million copies, and sell less
tickets to their shows. Fans patience only lasts for so long.
The songs on Load average about 5 and half minutes each. Bleeding Me (8:18)
and The Outlaw Torn (9:52) follow their pattern of extremely long songs.
The 3-chord comment isn't even legitimate enough to waste time on. So since
your points have been shot down, what's next? The haircuts?
No shit, but since he posted this in a Metallica Rules (or Sucks according
to some people) thread, it is reasonable to draw the conclusion that he was
saying that Metallica sucks even though they sell a lot of albums.
One thing that James has said referring to Metallica's different approach to
the newer albums is the fact that he and Lars (who, as anyone knows is the
heart of Metallica) let Kirk and Jason have much more input on the music.
So the new stuff is just artistic expression, not selling out. Metallica
doesn't need to sell out. Anything with their name on it goes platinum
anyway. Its not like they have to "sell out" to sell more records. Its one
thing to disagree with their taste in music, but to call them sell outs is
really dumb.
Frank
big_E_fan7cups wrote in message ...
Better singing? The lead singer for Def Leppard (don't even know his name,
never cared to) sounds as much like a woman as any man ever could. And he
sings better than James? Why don't you just forget Metallica AND Def
Leppard and buy some Cindy Lauper cd's? That should suit you.
If Load bored the fans and turned them off so much, then why did Reload
debut at #1?
>you're a better man than me.
That I don't doubt.
>it's funny how their suckiness started oozing out at abou the time
>they cut their hair......coincidence? You be the judge.
I knew it! It all boils down to the haircuts!
DogmaRatt wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Aug 1999 20:06:34 -0400, "Vexor" <ve...@neo.rr.com> wrote:
>
> >big_E_fan7cups wrote in message ...
> >>What is the deal with Load? It is a great cd. It must be the haircuts.
> >So
> >>what if they cut their hair? They still kick ass. Load was just as heavy
> >>as the black album, which happens to be one of the best selling albums of
> >>all time.
>
> Well, have you actually sat daown and listened to the last three
> Metallica releases, excluding Garage, Inc? (TBA, Load and Re-Load) If
> you could sit through them, you're a better man than me. I grew
> listening to Metallica; I'm 30 now.. I bought 'Whiplash' through a
> friend in California when it came out. They definitely blow now. And
> it's funny how their suckiness started oozing out at abou the time
> they cut their hair......coincidence? You be the judge.
>
> >
> >
> >The problem isn't really heaviness as much as tightness and musical talent.
> >Compare Master of Puppets to ReLoad (of Shit) to and tell me which album
> >shows
> >a more mature and musically talented Metallica (hint: it's the former).
>
> 'Master of Puppets' is a work of art.
>On Tue, 10 Aug 1999 15:18:15 -0500, "*Karissa*" <kde...@ecol.net>
>wrote:
>
>>your point being? His lyrics are what make a lot of people listen to his
>>music-becuase they can relate
>
>What's with all this BS depression going on? "Boo hoo I'm gonna have
>to work a few more months at McDonald's until I can get a 'system' and
>neon undercarriage lights on my car"
LOL!! And a few more sets of baggy pants that are 43 sizes to big.
>
>jec wrote in message <37b0f7d5...@news.epix.net>...
>>On Tue, 10 Aug 1999 15:18:15 -0500, "*Karissa*" <kde...@ecol.net>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>your point being? His lyrics are what make a lot of people listen to his
>>>music-becuase they can relate
>>
>>What's with all this BS depression going on? "Boo hoo I'm gonna have
>>to work a few more months at McDonald's until I can get a 'system' and
>>neon undercarriage lights on my car"
>
>What are you talking about 'depression?' I didn't say that *I* related, i
>just said that a lot of people do. FYI, I already have a system, and I have
>no intention on getting neon lights and what the fuck does that have to do
>w/ anything? Oh, yeah, no job at McDonald's, either
It's gotta be a bitch to be unemployed......
I hate trolls too, but you're not supposed to reply to them.
:Also I want to note that although I have a deep hatred for Korn, I am very
:familiar with their "work." (if you can call it that.) And I'm crossposting
:this for the benefit of others whom I KNOW will enjoy this. So without
:further ado, I must slay this biatch--the levee has broken.
:
:
Although I'm sure there are some in alt.tv.mtv that can be helped, most of
the people in a.m.k don't watch MTV.
:What the fuck is your problem?! How could you let those bitches at MTV do
:this to you?!
I don't know, what have they done? I've never seen a bitch from MTV, in
fact, i've never seen MTV.
They have been brainwashing you mindless fucks for a long
:time and you need to do something about his shit.
I need to do something about people who think that just because a band is on
mtv, that every fan watched mtv.
They promote the
:teenybopper boy bands and then market Korn as the leader in the fight
:against them.
Sounds like a smart marketing tactic to me. That is what MTV is, a COMPANY.
It is their job to make money, although, they do seem to destroy music, and
attract "teeny fans", but what can we do? Maybe you shuld be going after
the magazines too? Seventeen? Teen? Bopper? TeenMusic? etc etc.
Then they start a war between all the stupid impressionable
:youth of America.
Glad I don't live there. People live in a country of capitalism, and yet
complain when the capitalism goes to far. If you don't like it, move.
They have you voting on TRL while they (MTV, Korn, the boy
:bands,etc) rake in all the dough at the expense of the brains of the
:children of America.
I have never voted for Korn on mtv. I did try to vote once over the net for
a band called snot, on the anniversary of the lead singers death.
:Korn is a horrible band that only steals from the works of such talented
:artists as Sepultura, Pantera, Slayer, and many more.
And sepultura ripped off someone else etc, etc. Music cannot be 100%
original. Why did John Bonham decide to play the drums? He probably wanted
to sound like someon else.
:years later). MTV does what it wants with the stupid people of America,
and
:has been doing so for almost 20 years now.
I agree, but what can we do? If MTV suddenly decided that they were going
to make Led Zepplin the new kings of MTV, there would be NOTHING you could
do about it. They would sudenly have thousands of teeny fans, who I'm sure
you would hate.
. Simply put, MTV killed music and stupid fucks
:like you love every minute of it because MTV has taught you not to know any
:better.
How can MTV teach me something, when I have never watched it? Know your
audience before you tell them who they are.
I hope your blatant ignorance is absolutely blissful, because it
:only could be to a stupid bitch like yourself. You leave it up to
Musicless
:Television to tell you what is "heavier and cooler?!" Fuck you.
Actually, no I don't. A friend of mine played Twist for me in 96, and I
hated it, This was long before MTV played Korn (as far as I know, did they
play LIP songs?). After hearing more songs, Korn began to grow on me, and I
bought their second album. Now, would you mind telling me where MTV told me
what was heavier and cooler? Did MTV tell me to watch Slayer over the
summer?
:When Led Zeppelin was around, there WAS no MTV, and music was allowed to be
:MUSIC.
There was still commercial marketing over the radio, and if you don't think
so, you are moe ignorant than some teenies.
With the exception of pre-MTV shit like KISS, no one could get away
:with having shitty music and selling millions of albums.
Tell me, is the beatles' music that original, that great? They sold
millions of albums, and a lot of the songs really aren't that great. Now,
I'm sure that I'm going to get flamed to hell for saying this, but IMHO its
the truth.
Led Zeppelin
:wasn't a band about image, the public created their own mystique about the
:band, and their music fit in right with it. Led Zeppelin created THE most
:innovative music since the death of Hendrix, and if anyone disagrees with
:that, well I have two words, you figure 'em out.
And how did their fans find out about them? Most likely via the radio,
another commercial marketing tool.
:Korn & Limp Bizkit are only in it for the money, which is why they steal
:everything they've ever come up with from people that MTV never has and
:never will air on their horrible channel because they made good music which
:often contained worthwhile, non-hypocritical messages.
Show me the proof. Show me one song that you consider a ripoff, and show me
the song you would compare it too. I agree that Korn has changed, and do
seem to be more money oriented NOW, but that doesn't mean that they always
have been.
:And the next subject, Jonathan Davis. All of this guy's lyrics for over 5
:years have been about the same damn thing. 'All this pain inside of me',
:'Fuck you ass licking dick sucking damn fucking diarrhea slut', 'i hate
you,
:you hurt me', 'you fucking faggot', and that stupid grumbly shit he did on
:that Twist song. Where is the creativity in any of his lyrics?! I could
:think up that horrible shit in 3 seconds.
And yet, you would probably sing mainly about that too if you had been
sexualy molested.
And Wimp Bizshit is no different.
:They think they are 'cool' because they think they are the orginal masters
:of the hip hop meets metal movement.
Who said they think they are the originals? Certainly not them.
: Anthrax anyone?
Judgement night anyone?
:And slow!? So are you calling Korn a speed metal band?
Certainly not, are you calling Korn a metal band?
And is Lowrider a
:fast song? How about Helmet In The Bush? Shoots And Ladders? Porno
Creep?
:NO!! These are all slow, boring songs!!!
Slow yes, boring no. I respect your opinion, but try not to preach it.
Maybe Zeppelin had MUCH more slow
:songs than Korn, at least they sounded good,
Thanks for sharing your opinion, I think the Korn songs sound good.
and at least Zeppelin
:experimented with other instruments and concepts. Korn does the same two
:songs over and over, the slow song and the not slow song that their fans
:would call the fast song but then again they don't listen to things like
:Slayer or late 80s Sepultura so they wouldn't really know anything about
:speed.
Don't listen to things like Slayer huh, I guess that is why I went to
Ozzfest right?
:Korn is shit, Limp Bizkit is shit, and YOU are shit.
Great, thanks for preaching. I think people who think their opinion is fact
are shit.
[s]
>I need to do something about people who think that just because a band is
on
>mtv, that every fan watched mtv.
yeah, no shit, man. All the power to ya! That is so annoying how people
*assume* that
~Karissa
Yup, I'm unemployed-how'd ya know? Guess again, fucker. How the hell would
you know if i worked or not? Try to have a *little* truth behind your
statement next time.
~Karissa
That's a fucken stereo-type. Not everyone who listens to korn wears baggy
clothes. That's like saying no one who listens to Led Zeppelin or Pink
Floyd, etc wears baggy clothes and that's a bunch of bullshit cuz I know a
lot of people who do. Again, back your statement up
~Karissa
1. Soul, R&B section
2. Request section
3. Hardcore metal section
4. Top 50
etc etc
Because Channel V is like that and I only watch the Hardcore metal section
which is called "Amped" and is broadcasted on Monday nights. Sometimes I
watch the request section for new film clips to bands like Slipknot and
Deftones. When the Slipknot film clip came out on Channel V it was competed
up against some Rap song (cant remember what it was) and it the ratio of was
Slipknot %60 and this other song was only %40. Whats MTV like?
~\dייp/~
"I wish I was infinite, and given my way. I'd be so fucking cool, when I'm
feeling the rush." --- Orgy
Do you even get my point, 2/3 of the CD sales for both Loads came with in
the first month or two, since then, the sales of these two CDs has died. Go
to used CD stores, you will find 5 to 10 copies of the Loads, and no copies
of the earlier CDs. Yes because of what Metallica did before, and the huge
fan base they got thoughout the years, their CDs debut at no #1 on the
charts, but the Loads feell off tha charts faster than Black or Justice, and
sell less than all other Metallica albums right now. The people have spoken
so to speak, and they do not like the Loads.
>
You have no clue about 80s metal do you? Def Leppard FYI was a metal band
at first, and their first two CDs were metal, albiet of a more commercial
variety. The CD I am giving as a example is Leppards 2nd CD, and it is a
great example of the mid tempo riff rock that Metallica tried to do with the
Loads.
The problem is, first Hetfeild still cant sing all that well, his range is
limited, better than many other speed metal singers, but limited none the
less. The 2nd problem is that the riffs off the Loads go nowhere, are
unintresting. Also the solos are just boring lazy solos. All this goes to
show that Metallica just does not do mid tempo hard rock all that well, they
are average at the very best, while many of their Load/ReLoad songs would
not of made the cut on many 80s metal/hard rock albums.
Metallica wasted its chance to get the same stature as Led Zeppelin with
the Loads sadly, they went backwards instead of forwards, and again took the
easy way out. Metallica putting out the Loads would of been equivlent to Led
Zep putting out a album that sounds like the Rolling Stones and Early Who.
I'm not really sure what it's like anymore-it used to be all music videos
(hence-mtv-music television), but now it's pretty much all shows (having no
relationg to music) and there's a show called TRL and it's like the top (10
or 15 or something like that) videos requested. I'm not really the person
to tell you what it's like, though, cuz I never watch it
~Karissa
>I am, and I don't understand.
It seems to me you may bea fan of Metallica older material, but have no
undertanding of 70 and 80s hard rockand heavy metal.
The one thing all of you fail to realize is
>that every artist will change somewhat during their career. It is human
>nature to change, not to stay the same forever.
I agree, and I myself like change.
Yes, the songs are shorter
>than they used to be, but still aren't that short.
I personally think the songs off the Loadsare too long. There are many
bands I listen to whose songs are in the 4 minuite range. The long songs on
the Loads just drag on.
As far as the music, its
>not as fast, but it still kicks ass. In fact, I like the newer stuff
better
>than the old speed metal stuff, even though it kicks ass bigtime.
>
>
If you like the newer stuff, I have a huge list of bands that you should
like, but my guess is that you like the Loads because it has the name
Metallica stamped on it. If you have ever listend to any rock radio, or any
number of 80s bands, you will understand why I and so many others are so
dissapointed in the Loads. Basically, the music on these albums comes across
as commercial hard rock played badly. Aint my Bitch sounds like a Guns n
Roses song, 2X4 and Better than You are almost like Motley Crue, Ronnie
uses a Van Halen riff and so on. At the very least, if Metallica is going to
play this style of music, at least do it well.
>One thing that James has said referring to Metallica's different approach
to
>the newer albums is the fact that he and Lars (who, as anyone knows is the
>heart of Metallica) let Kirk and Jason have much more input on the music.
Jason had only one songwriting credit on the Loads, but I will say that
Newsteads bass playing is the only thing that has improved. As for Hammet,
his Jimmy Page/Slash style solos just dont work with the songs.
>So the new stuff is just artistic expression, not selling out. Metallica
>doesn't need to sell out.
I actually do not think they sold out, they just lost their inspiration,
their ability to write good songs, and it seems that Bob Rock is a quasi
songwriter for Metallica even though his name is not on the credits, but he
has far too much imput on their process.
You got that backwards, pal.
--
RODRIGO
====================================================================
"You're gonna go beyond too, may pain and death bestow you." -- King Diamond
I am taking exception with this statement you made.
"Load was just as heavy as the black album, which happens to be one of
the best selling albums of all time."
What you seem to be saying is that good album sales justifies the
artistic merits of the music. I am not saying an album sucks because it
has sold a lot of copies. What I am saying is commercial success is no
yardstick for artistic merit.
Thanks anyway.
big_E_fan7cups wrote:
> >Why the hell should it matter. They're not gonna change just because I
> >don't go to there show. Vote for what with my wallet. I enjoy it so I go. 4
> >metallica concerts and I would go back for 5. Take a pee break every time
> >something is played thats more recent than the black album.
>
> I'm having trouble understanding why everything after the black album is
> supposed to suck so bad. I was listening to Load last night. The style is
> very similar to the black album. Load is a very good album. I knew it
> kicks ass as soon as I heard the first snip of it in a music store. I'm
> convinced that you are all upset with the haircuts. That's the only thing I
> can figure out.
Funny I shaved my hair the other day and I'm not pissed of with my self. Load
would be a great CD if it weren't Metallica. After being such a great band I was
expecting something spectacular. Instead I got the same old not as heavy music.
I still bought and I still listen to it occasionally. But I wanted something
that would kick my ass and instead I got something that any little band can do.
Still Love Metallica though!
"<]|:Karissa:|[>" wrote:
> John Green wrote in message <7p0f5e$hni$1...@usenet.usq.edu.au>...
> >I dont know much about MTV. But does it have sections like:
> >
> >1. Soul, R&B section
> >2. Request section
> >3. Hardcore metal section
> >4. Top 50
> >etc etc
> >
> >Because Channel V is like that and I only watch the Hardcore metal section
> >which is called "Amped" and is broadcasted on Monday nights. Sometimes I
> >watch the request section for new film clips to bands like Slipknot and
> >Deftones. When the Slipknot film clip came out on Channel V it was competed
> >up against some Rap song (cant remember what it was) and it the ratio of
> was
> >Slipknot %60 and this other song was only %40. Whats MTV like?
>
> I'm not really sure what it's like anymore-it used to be all music videos
> (hence-mtv-music television), but now it's pretty much all shows (having no
> relationg to music) and there's a show called TRL and it's like the top (10
> or 15 or something like that) videos requested. I'm not really the person
> to tell you what it's like, though, cuz I never watch it
>
> ~Karissa
Basically Karissa is right. I'm sad to say that on occasion I still flip the
tube over to MTV. Mostly stupid lame ass shows. When they do show videos its
there jams countdown with is top 20 r&b videos. TRL isn't that bad because Korn
and Limp Bizkit and Orgy have been on there before. Other than that it sucks.
They only half way decent show is called 120 minutes, it comes on Sunday nights
and show some good music and some crapy college band stuff. You should feal
lucky with your "Hardcore Metal section". I wish we had something like it.
"Dying style"? Care to explain yourself? If metal is dying, why do we have
so many great bands like Blind Guardian, Stratovarius, Mercyful Fate, Lefay,
King Diamond, Death, Morbid Angel, Shadow Gallery and Nevermore still
releasing amazing albums. There's plenty more that I don't listen to that
seem to be getting aclaim, In Flames, Immolation, Monstrosity, etc. The
classic thrash band Dark Angel just reformed... Iron Maiden got something
resembling their old line up together, Dokken got the guitarist from
Winger and just cut a pretty heavy album with plenty of shredding. Metalfests
are popping up everywhere. We just had one here in Mass, and I was surprised
at how many people showed up. I ask again - explain yourself.
Dave
--
"Music appears in the world despite
the music industry, not because of it."
-Robert Fripp
--
Corey
tzin mein <tzin...@cybersynergy.com.sg> wrote in message
news:37B3F929...@cybersynergy.com.sg...
--
Corey
big_E_fan7cups <big_E_f...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:M2Ns3.374$UQ6....@axe.netdoor.com...
>
> DogmaRatt wrote in message <37bc8502...@news.giganews.com>...
> >Well, have you actually sat daown and listened to the last three
> >Metallica releases, excluding Garage, Inc?
> Yes, I own them all.
>
> >you're a better man than me.
> That I don't doubt.
>
> >it's funny how their suckiness started oozing out at abou the time
> >they cut their hair......coincidence? You be the judge.
--
Corey
John Bianco <rft...@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:7p0gsi$hnf$1...@nntp1.atl.mindspring.net...
>
> big_E_fan7cups wrote in message ...
> >
--
Corey
John Bianco <rft...@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:7ovrgu$821$1...@nntp9.atl.mindspring.net...
>
> big_E_fan7cups wrote in message ...
> >Yes those were wonderful words from Jason himself. Great line. He
> >basically is telling the whiners, Fuck You!
> >
>
>
> If Metallica does not get off their ass soon and make a album of quality
> music, preferably metal, they will just continue to spiral further
downward
> in popularity. If Metallica makes another Load style album of music, or
> worse, then they will probabaly sell 1.5 million copies, and sell less
> tickets to their shows. Fans patience only lasts for so long.
>
>
--
Corey
Warden <dav...@flashcom.net> wrote in message
news:37B42AB0...@flashcom.net...
--
let him with understanding reckon the number of the beast,
for it is a human number. it's number is sixhundred and sixty-six.
Not that you anyone cares what I think, but, I can't stand Metallica. Just
because a band has more talent doesn't mean that they make better music...
~Sub~
DogmaRatt wrote in message <37bc8502...@news.giganews.com>...
>On Thu, 12 Aug 1999 20:06:34 -0400, "Vexor" <ve...@neo.rr.com> wrote:
>
>>big_E_fan7cups wrote in message ...
>>>What is the deal with Load? It is a great cd. It must be the haircuts.
>>So
>>>what if they cut their hair? They still kick ass. Load was just as
heavy
>>>as the black album, which happens to be one of the best selling albums of
>>>all time.
>
>Well, have you actually sat daown and listened to the last three
>Metallica releases, excluding Garage, Inc? (TBA, Load and Re-Load) If
>you could sit through them, you're a better man than me. I grew
>listening to Metallica; I'm 30 now.. I bought 'Whiplash' through a
>friend in California when it came out. They definitely blow now. And
>it's funny how their suckiness started oozing out at abou the time
>they cut their hair......coincidence? You be the judge.
>
>
>>
>>
>>The problem isn't really heaviness as much as tightness and musical
talent.
>>Compare Master of Puppets to ReLoad (of Shit) to and tell me which album
>>shows
>>a more mature and musically talented Metallica (hint: it's the former).
>
>'Master of Puppets' is a work of art.