Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Bonus disc on Tull Christmas Album

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Nutella

unread,
Dec 26, 2009, 12:34:56 PM12/26/09
to
Did anyone hear the new bonus disc on the Tull Christmas Album that
was released five years ago?
I didn't want to re-purchase the album all over again if it wasn't a
big deal. But, if it's excellent, I can live with another copy.

rwalker

unread,
Dec 27, 2009, 12:06:11 AM12/27/09
to

No. I didn't know that there had been a rerelease.

Phillip Helbig---undress to reply

unread,
Dec 27, 2009, 5:11:41 PM12/27/09
to
In article <cpqdj5933qvvsitis...@4ax.com>, rwalker
<rwa...@despammed.com> writes:

> >Did anyone hear the new bonus disc on the Tull Christmas Album that
> >was released five years ago?
> >I didn't want to re-purchase the album all over again if it wasn't a
> >big deal. But, if it's excellent, I can live with another copy.
>
> No. I didn't know that there had been a rerelease.

Yes; I got an ad for it on a flyer handed out at the "Ian Anderson plays
the Christmas Jethro Tull" concert.

I don't like this; it punishes those who bought the CD the first time
around.

rwalker

unread,
Dec 28, 2009, 12:01:15 AM12/28/09
to
On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 22:11:41 +0000 (UTC),
hel...@astro.multiCLOTHESvax.de (Phillip Helbig---undress to reply)
wrote:

There seems to a lot of that these days by lots of artists. There's
the regular edition, then the bonus edition with extra tracks, and
then the supreme edition with more tracks and a DVD. It does tend to
make you a bit cynical.

Phillip Helbig---undress to reply

unread,
Dec 28, 2009, 1:46:53 AM12/28/09
to
In article <hqegj5tu9heo1us6o...@4ax.com>, rwalker
<rwa...@despammed.com> writes:

> >> No. I didn't know that there had been a rerelease.
> >
> >Yes; I got an ad for it on a flyer handed out at the "Ian Anderson plays
> >the Christmas Jethro Tull" concert.
> >
> >I don't like this; it punishes those who bought the CD the first time
> >around.
>
> There seems to a lot of that these days by lots of artists. There's
> the regular edition, then the bonus edition with extra tracks, and
> then the supreme edition with more tracks and a DVD. It does tend to
> make you a bit cynical.

Yes; Neil Young is a prime example. However, when all the different
formats are released at once, I can decide what I want to buy, so that's
fine---as long as I can get all I want with one format. (In other
words, I don't want a "bonus track" on the basic edition which isn't on
the deluxe edition.) However, in the case above, the double CD was
released a few years after the original single CD, which I had already
bought.

rwalker

unread,
Dec 28, 2009, 2:28:48 AM12/28/09
to
On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 06:46:53 +0000 (UTC),

hel...@astro.multiCLOTHESvax.de (Phillip Helbig---undress to reply)
wrote:

>In article <hqegj5tu9heo1us6o...@4ax.com>, rwalker

Yes, you're right. That's even worse.

0 new messages