Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

grammys

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Degkdckan

unread,
Feb 26, 1998, 3:00:00 AM2/26/98
to

Ok sound off time people--What is wrong with music these days? There's a lot
wrong judjing by the grammys. The Foo Fighters with one of the best albums ever
made loses TWICE!!!! They don't even bother broadcasting the rock categories.
and to top it off jamiriqui (i can't spell it) beats Fleetwood Mac and the
Rolling Stones IN THE POP CATEGORY, last time I checked none of them were pop
bands, especially jamiriqui.

Abort Me

unread,
Feb 26, 1998, 3:00:00 AM2/26/98
to

>Ok sound off time people--What is wrong with music these days? There's a lot
>wrong judjing by the grammys. The Foo Fighters with one of the best albums
>ever
>made loses TWICE!!!!

TCATS didn't deserve a grammy....Who did win in those categories anyway? The
real injustice was two years ago when they were denied Best Alternative Album
award (no offense to nirvana, but ff's debut is alot stronger as a whole than
unplugged)

>and to top it off jamiriqui (i can't spell it) beats Fleetwood Mac

Jamiroqui.....sounds like Egyptian for one-hit wonder

>and the
>Rolling Stones IN THE POP CATEGORY

Rolling Stones' last album was not a rock album, nor was it deserving of a
grammy nomination


,tym
"All the thing I said I wanted turned out to be heaven haunted" -Dave Grohl
Visit the Sea Whores Web Site @ http://members.aol.com/abortme

Mike Cunningham

unread,
Feb 26, 1998, 3:00:00 AM2/26/98
to

The fact of the matter is that the grammies have nothing to do with
critical value or quality and everything to do with major label
manufactured music and commercial success. If you don't expect anything
of the grammies, they will not disappoint you...

--
Mike Cunningham
Image Business
Durham, Ontario

Hiro Protagonist

unread,
Mar 1, 1998, 3:00:00 AM3/1/98
to


Mike Cunningham wrote:

> The fact of the matter is that the grammies have nothing to do with
> critical value or quality and everything to do with major label
> manufactured music and commercial success. If you don't expect anything
> of the grammies, they will not disappoint you...

Damn straight. 90% of the time, the Grammies nominates the crap that I don't
listen to. Hanson nominated? Come on! What bugs me even more is the
classfications. Prodigy and Chemical Brothers as "Alternative" or "Rock"? As much
as I like those guys, I don't see them in those categories.

Peace,
Vince Yim
--
+-------------------------------------------------------+
| E-mail address altered to avoid unsolicited junkmail. |
| Remove asterix marks (*) to reply by e-mail |
+-------------------------------------------------------+

0 new messages