Mr. Allan Chen, I believe, for the Heisman. and the Hamiltonian.
Allan Chen is in fact a Hamiltonian.
Now back to your regularly scheduled programming.
-mike
--
_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
Name: Michael Vernal
Email: ver...@fas.harvard.edu
AOLIM: cerebus42
ICQ: 33907792
Web: http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~vernal/
_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
Pete
* Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network *
The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!
> Mr. Allan Chen, I believe, for the Heisman. and the Hamiltonian.
> Allan Chen is in fact a Hamiltonian.
d^2/dx^2+d^2/dy^2+d^2/dz^2 == Allan Chen?
Just for the record, I'd like to say that quantum physics/physical
chemistry blows. Schroedinger, Laplace, Laguerre, Fourier, and all
those other guys can go to hell. :)
--
Ben Johnson
bdjohns1 (at) uiuc (dot) edu
Remove -usenet to reply
cerebus <ver...@fas.harvard.edu> wrote in article
<80tir0$s2b$1...@news.fas.harvard.edu>...
> TwoStep665 <twost...@aol.com> wrote:
> > Joe Hamilton is the best player in College Football. He more than
deserves the
> > award. He is the nation's leading passer for the nations leading
offense. If
> > Ga Tech had a defense they would be #1.
>
> Mr. Allan Chen, I believe, for the Heisman. and the Hamiltonian.
>
> Allan Chen is in fact a Hamiltonian.
>
>I think Mike has a new girl friend. Natalie Portman goes to the same
>school he does. That is why he does not post here so often. As for
lol. could you blame him if it were true? unfortunately for mike, as
he knows all too well, it just ain't the truth. ;-)
ben
before you start saying stuff like this maybe you should check your facts.
Chad Pennington for Marshall has thrown for 7 more TD's and about 700 more
yards than Hamilton. If you look at total offense, Hamilton is 3rd behind
Brees and Ratay.
Additionally, look at the defenses Hamilton got his TD's against. Games aren't
supposed to have 80 combined points a game, thats ridiculous. That goes to
show the caliber of defenses in the ACC, both Georgia Tech's and their
opponents. Dayne, on the other hand, broke the all-time rushing record in what
I would hope even SEC/ACC fans would agree is the hardest conference to run the
ball against. The big ten is all about rushing, and thats what defenses are
built to stop. Dayne's faced 8-9 man fronts his whole career and still
dominated. Enough said?
And I will add this, and anyone here can hold me to it. If Ron Dayne does not
win the Heisman trophy, I will do B&P's for anyone that wants them...
Matt
bighu...@aol.com
CD-R Trading Site- www.homestead.com/cdrtrading/index.html
Avg yds per rush:
Dayne: 6.1
Jones: 5.6
Jones has several more carries than Dayne despite playing 1 less game.
Additionally, Dayne has about 130 more total yards than Jones, but Wisconsin
has played an extra game, so Daynes average per game is 4 yards less.
But consider this:
According to the broadcasters of this past weekends Iowa/Wisconsin game, Dayne
has sat out a total of NINE quarters this year due to big leads. So
essentially he's gotten his avg. yards per game in 3 quarters. I'm guessing
that Jones has played in most of Virginia's 4th quarters since they're haven't
had too many big leads.
Ice
BigHurt574 wrote:
Looking forward to a bowl in MIAMI!!!
On Wed, 17 Nov 1999, supermock wrote:
> Maybe because Ron Dayne isn't even the leading rusher this season (you
> have to give that up to Thomas Jones of UVA), yet Hamilton is the top
dude. I could take him out. give me my car and my shotgun and dayne
ain't got nothing on me.
anyway. wisconsin might be playing stanford in the rose bowl. if so, I'm
in pasadena my friend and I'll be sure to say my best to mr. dayne...
k.
hmmm...something like that. I think there might be a 4th variable and
needs to be considered. :-)
damn. it's hard for this history major to remember his techie roots..
> Just for the record, I'd like to say that quantum physics/physical
> chemistry blows. Schroedinger, Laplace, Laguerre, Fourier, and all
> those other guys can go to hell. :)
hellz yeah. i got out of chem before I hit that...
k.
Ron Dayne is good. But IMHO, the Big Ten is overrated.
she's going out with some loser on the swim team ..... and she's not that hot
in person ..... trust me ...... her face is way overproportioned for her body.
peace,
peter.
======================
dave matthews band resources
http://members.aol.com/petedogg77/
========================
Everytime she sneezes
I believe it's love and
Oh, oh, lord, I'm not ready for this sort of thing
~Adam Duritz
Well, Schroedinger's there. He's a sicko, and evidently he was a Nazi
as well. Plus, who the hell bases a theoretical model on the murder of
a cute little kittie?
On Wed, 17 Nov 1999, supermock wrote:
> Well, Schroedinger's there. He's a sicko, and evidently he was a Nazi
> as well. Plus, who the hell bases a theoretical model on the murder of
> a cute little kittie?
Yeah...Schroedinger's cat was definitely twisted.
Heisenberg did have a redeeming quality though - he gave us a rather
clever excuse for losing homework.
"I calculated the momentum of my assignment with such great accuracy
that according to the Position-Momentum Uncertainty Priciple, it could
be located anywhere in the known universe."
"You've wasted every moment of your Saturdays and your Sundays. You're wasted
from the boredom...was never supposed to be like this." - Adam Gardner
ok, so we've gone from hamilton is statistically best from you "firmly believe"
the big ten is rated as the toughest conference, and other similar "computer"
rankings say the same
Whatever. It's as infinitely improbable that my dog ate it.
Though my brother's dog did eat half of my math problem set when I stayed
there for a few phish shows in october. I was soooooo pissed.
I think you're taking this discussion a little too personally.
On Wed, 17 Nov 1999, supermock wrote:
"ivy league" crap? what are you talking about?
k.
--------
kai...@leland.stanford.edu stanford university
http://www.stanford.edu/~kaiyen class of 2000
dude. that was a low blow man.
sigh..
as do I. we are clearly part of the Pac-10.
herman kat
--
"It's these little things, they can pull you under.
Live your life filled with joy and wonder."
R.E.M.
>i have when people start a little conversation in the middle of the thread that
>has nothing to do with the original post. You are forced to scan through this
>"Ivy League" crap in order to read what you are interested in
now that is funny. come on people, let's keep the off off topic posts
out of here. ;-) and don't just blame the ivy league, there are other
offenders too. lol.
ben
the point was, its not sagarin or any one guy. its unbiased formulas that are
used to calculate the best teams/conferences based on margin of victory,
strength of schedule, etc..
sagarin was a mathematician at harvard i think it was and came up with these
ratings, and his are used in the calculation of the BCS
Whatever. You're just mad 'cause you're a Jacobian.
-mike
just my two cents, mike
In article <Pine.GSO.4.10.991117...@ux9.cso.uiuc.edu>,
"Mr. President" <lo...@students.uiuc.edu> wrote:
> How is the big ten overrated? I think it is obvious to most that
they are
> the toughest and most balanced conference in the country. I mean
look at
> it up and down....one team beats wisconsin by 30 something, and then
loses
> to Illinois at home (Mich), Illinois gets spanked by Minnesota at
home,
> and minnesota beats PSU, but loses to Purdue and OSU at home. Mich
St.
> beats Michigan then gets spanked by Purdue and Wisconsin, everyone
beating
> up everyone else, thus the most balanced power conference in the
league.
> And the thing is there is like 2 bad teams this year, not half the
> confeence, so every team is playing another ranked team every week
pretty
> much. Think about this too.....Minnesota was essentially 11 points
from
> going 11-0 this season. They lost to wisconsin by 3 in OT, OSU by 3,
and
> purdue by 5. How can one argue with that?
>
> On Wed, 17 Nov 1999, supermock wrote:
>
> > Hamilton may be 3rd in total offense, but you have to realize that
> > Brees and Rattay also have twice the number of passing attempts that
> > Hamilton has. Rattay ranks fourth in efficiency, and Brees is...
32nd?
> > And while Chad Pennington is good, I still firmly believe Joe has
the
> > QB spot covered.
> >
> > Ron Dayne is good. But IMHO, the Big Ten is overrated.
> >
> > Pete
> >
> >
> > * Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion
Network *
> > The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet -
Free!
> >
> >
> >
>
>
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
>>i have when people start a little conversation in the middle of the thread that
>>has nothing to do with the original post. You are forced to scan through this
>>"Ivy League" crap in order to read what you are interested in
> now that is funny. come on people, let's keep the off off topic posts
> out of here. ;-) and don't just blame the ivy league, there are other
> offenders too. lol.
Yeah, I resent being called an Ivy Leaguer :)
Go Illinois...
he is the leader in passing effiecency and is the leader of the highest scoring
offence (41.7 ppg) and #1 total offense (517 ypg)
from what i've seen of hamilton he's more of a big play quarterback
not saying either is better, both styles have worked pretty well for both
I don't see how you can complain when the original post wasn't even on topic!
Now, if there was a discussion of "Ivy League crap" in the middle of a DMBc
thread, THEN I'd be mad. :o)
~Liz~
(FSAMember414)
"What's yours is mine and what's mine is ours."
ekgv4...@aol.com or ekg...@bu.edu
http://www.angelfire.com/pa3/ekgv414/index.html