Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Clay Aiken's Columbus concert

6 views
Skip to first unread message

Alida Spry

unread,
Jul 26, 2007, 7:13:39 PM7/26/07
to
This is taken from a post on the Clay Board:

There was a review of Clay’s performance with the Columbus symphony
orchestra Saturday night in The Other paper today which was simply awesome.
What makes it even better is that the entertainment critic (a male) usually
doesn’t have a nice thing to say about anyone. The Other paper is a free
publication distributed throughout the Columbus Metropolitan area on
Thursdays. Lots of people read it because it’s free. Just wish I had a
scanner and could scan the whole article, but since I can’t I decided to do
the next best thing and type out the best parts:

A TRANSCENDENT NIGHT OF PURE POP BEAUTY
Clay Aiken is an utterly convincing singer. Deal With it.

By John Petric

If you haven’t suspected it by now, this ought to confirm it. Yours truly is
over the hill.

I liked Clay Aiken.

* * *

So yes, Clay Aiken. He’s a piece of work isn’t he? A cross between John
Edwards and Paul McCartney, he mines the emotional veins dug by Streisand,
Manilow and Celine, yet without the soul, severe schmaltz or extreme
hysteria of those three.

* * *

And yet, let me tell you …..he can sing like a son of a gun. When he isn’t
sounding like God’s most precious choirboy, he approaches Luther Vandrossian
levels of soul pop.

So the first half of the first half was just that. Even the songs that weren’t
about self-affirmation sounded like they were. And then everything suddenly
coalesced a few tunes later for what would turn out to be the master stroke.
“These Open Arms.”

“What if everything you ever took for granted was gone?” … “And everything
you thought was right was wrong?”

Those very questions might be on Michael Vick’s mind right now. But our boy
Clay was singing from the fist-sized organ in his chest. He’s no dummy. In
fact, I figure him to be quite shrewd. The placing and pacing of “Arms” woke
me up and won me over.

Aiken sang those soul-numbing lyrics with every ounce of focused emotional
force he could conjure. Every hurt, every slight, every deep yearning to be
loved when he wasn’t came out in that song. And let me tell you, we’re
talking utterly convincing. I would’ve dabbed his eyes myself if he’d been
teary.

* * *

With violins and cellos and violas caressing the melody, Aiken had the force
of Oprah’s entire universe behind him. It was pure pop beauty, and I was
awestruck by the moment.

Having achieved that level, Aiken returned to it frequently in the second
half, but not before he had some fun with golden oldies and whatnot. He had
a fine sense of humor, often self-deprecating and a little bit wicked, like
when he mentioned the “Chemical Contaminated” grass.

His goofy, well-executed medley (with awesome symphonic accompaniment –
mustn’t forget that) included dead-on snippets of Michael Jackson, Madonna,
Prince and even “Achy Breaky Heart.”

After “These Open Arms” my favorite song was “Without You” a not-so-minor
pop masterpiece. Aiken didn’t quite nail it as perfectly as Harry Nilsson,
who was nowhere near the technically accomplished singer Aiken is. But he
nailed it nonetheless, in his own patented I-die-for-your- sins-every- night
way of performing.

And I found myself trying to figure out how I was going to tell the world I
didn’t hate the guy—that, indeed, I was somewhat touched by him.

0 new messages