Exclusive Wal-Mart CD entitled "All is Well" to be released November 28,
2006.
You can pre-order it now!
This is a legitimate CD and Wal-Mart has confirmed it. It's not a scam or
mistake.
I just read about it on the Clay Board in this thread:
http://p071.ezboard.com/ftheclayboardfrm11.showMessageRange?topicID=84982.topic&start=1&stop=20
Thought I would share the news.
Alida
Alida
"Alida Spry" <a_s...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:vw50h.7877$PA3.2788@trndny04...
Sorry, but nobody really cares anymore. This place has been dead for a year
now. I think Carol might be dead as well.
--
--K
Undisputed 2004 Bragging Rights Champion
On Oct 28, 12:01 am, "Karrde" <karrde_smuggl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> "Alida Spry" <a_s...@yahoo.com> wrote in messagenews:vw50h.7877$PA3.2788@trndny04...
>
> >http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.do?product_id=5347146
>
> > Exclusive Wal-Mart CDSorry, but nobody really cares anymore. This place has been dead for a year
> now. I think Carol might be dead as well.
>
> --
> --K
> Undisputed 2004 Bragging Rights Champion
That's a lie and please dont speak for people you dont know. I wanted
to know that and I'm glad it was posted here, so please take your
troll-like self and go troll another group, k?
If no one cares and the group is dead, may I ask why YOU are here? If I see
a heading of something that I'm not interested in, I don't read that thread
and I certainly don't go around telling people not to post stuff. What
exactly is the problem with posting news about "Clay Aiken" in the "Clay
Aiken" newsgroup? Did I miss something?
Get a life.
Alida
"Alida Spry" <a_s...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:aKA0h.553$WB4.16@trndny04...
On Oct 28, 12:01am, "Karrde" <karrde_smuggl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> "Alida Spry" <a_s...@yahoo.com> wrote in
> messagenews:vw50h.7877$PA3.2788@trndny04...
>
> >http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.do?product_id=5347146
>
> > Exclusive Wal-Mart CDSorry, but nobody really cares anymore. This place
> > has been dead for a year
> now. I think Carol might be dead as well.
>
> --
> --K
> Undisputed 2004 Bragging Rights Champion
> That's a lie and please dont speak for people you dont know.
What is a lie? And for whom am I speaking? Up until this thread, there was
one post this month, one in September, eleven in August (only two of which
were Aiken related), six (all spam) in July. Need I go on? There may be a
lot of watching around here, but that's about it.
> I wanted
to know that and I'm glad it was posted here, so please take your
troll-like self and go troll another group, k?
I've been here a long, long time. Just try to get rid of me, Miss Crusty.
--K
Google it. It shouldn't take long. There's not that much posting history
for this group.
> If I see a heading of something that I'm not interested in, I don't read
> that thread and I certainly don't go around telling people not to post
> stuff.
Paranoid much? Please point me to the place in my post where I told you not
to post something. If you can't find it, I would appreciate an apology from
you.
> What exactly is the problem with posting news about "Clay Aiken" in the
> "Clay Aiken" newsgroup? Did I miss something?
Nothing and probably.
> Get a life.
I've got one, as evidenced by the fact that I don't get bitter about the
things that people write in newsgroups. May I ask why your panties are so
up in bunch over the fact that this newsgroup is a virtual ghost town?
--K
On Oct 29, 8:51 pm, "Karrde" <karrde_smuggl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> "Tin@" <tinas49...@yahoo.com> wrote in messagenews:1162043943.3...@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
> On Oct 28, 12:01am, "Karrde" <karrde_smuggl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > "Alida Spry" <a_s...@yahoo.com> wrote in
> > messagenews:vw50h.7877$PA3.2788@trndny04...
>
> > >http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.do?product_id=5347146
>
> > > Exclusive Wal-Mart CDSorry, but nobody really cares anymore. This place
> > > has been dead for a year
> > now. I think Carol might be dead as well.
>
> > --
> > --K
> > Undisputed 2004 Bragging Rights Champion
> > That's a lie and please dont speak for people you dont know.
>What is a lie?
That nobody cares, I care and I'm not a nobody. The truth is YOU dont
care, making YOU a nobody.
>And for whom am I speaking?
You SHOULD be speaking for yourself, but you have chosen to speak for
those of us who DO care.
Up until this thread, there was
> one post this month, one in September, eleven in August (only two of which
> were Aiken related), six (all spam) in July. Need I go on? There may be a
> lot of watching around here, but that's about it.
>
> > I wantedto know that and I'm glad it was posted here, so please take your
> troll-like self and go troll another group, k?
>
> I've been here a long, long time. Just try to get rid of me, Miss Crusty.
>
> --K
No problem, Miss Troll. Keep up your trolling and I'll make you see how
unimportant your shallow life is.
Sorry, this was off topic but this little exchange caused me to muse on
the evolution of the Internet.
Anyway, Clay Aiken. When I post about him, I post on one of the many
messageboards devoted to him. I assume that most online fans have a
preference.
Tin@ wrote:
> On Oct 29, 8:51?pm, "Karrde" <karrde_smuggl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > "Tin@" <tinas49...@yahoo.com> wrote in messagenews:1162043943.3...@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > On Oct 28, 12:01am, "Karrde" <karrde_smuggl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > "Alida Spry" <a_s...@yahoo.com> wrote in
> > > messagenews:vw50h.7877$PA3.2788@trndny04...
> >
> > > >http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.do?product_id=5347146
> >
> > > > Exclusive Wal-Mart CDSorry, but nobody really cares anymore. This place
> > > > has been dead for a year
> > > now. I think Carol might be dead as well.
> >
> > > --
> > > --K
> > > Undisputed 2004 Bragging Rights Champion
> > > That's a lie and please dont speak for people you dont know.
>
>
>
> >What is a lie? ?
>
> That nobody cares, I care and I'm not a nobody. The truth is YOU dont
> care, making YOU a nobody.
>
>
>
> >And for whom am I speaking?
>
> You SHOULD be speaking for yourself, but you have chosen to speak for
> those of us who DO care.
>
>
>
>
>
> ?Up until this thread, there was
> > one post this month, one in September, eleven in August (only two of which
> > were Aiken related), six (all spam) in July. ?Need I go on? ?There may be a
> > lot of watching around here, but that's about it.
> >
> > > I wantedto know that and I'm glad it was posted here, so please take your
> > troll-like self and go troll another group, k?
> >
> > I've been here a long, long time. ?Just try to get rid of me, Miss Crusty.
>>> "Alida Spry" <a_s...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>> news:vw50h.7877$PA3.2788@trndny04...
>>>> http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.do?product_id=5347146
>>>>
>>>> Exclusive Wal-Mart CD
>>>
>>> Sorry, but nobody really cares anymore. This place has been dead for a
>>> year now. I think Carol might be dead as well.
>>>
>>> --
>>> --K
>>> Undisputed 2004 Bragging Rights Champion
>>>
>>
>> If no one cares and the group is dead, may I ask why YOU are here?
>
> Google it. It shouldn't take long. There's not that much posting history
> for this group.
>
I didn't research how many members were in this group before I posted. I
simply had something relevant to the group and posted it since it was about
Clay and this is a Clay group whether or not there is much activity. I
personally don't post much in most of the groups to which I belong that
doesn't mean that I don't read the posts.
>> If I see a heading of something that I'm not interested in, I don't read
>> that thread and I certainly don't go around telling people not to post
>> stuff.
>
> Paranoid much? Please point me to the place in my post where I told you
> not to post something. If you can't find it, I would appreciate an
> apology from you.
You seemed to imply that I shouldn't have psted that info because it wasn't
of interest to YOU and therefore it wasn't of interest to anyone else which
is clearly not true. You're not getting an apology because I don't think
you deserve one.
>
>> What exactly is the problem with posting news about "Clay Aiken" in the
>> "Clay Aiken" newsgroup? Did I miss something?
>
> Nothing and probably.
>
>> Get a life.
>
> I've got one, as evidenced by the fact that I don't get bitter about the
> things that people write in newsgroups. May I ask why your panties are so
> up in bunch over the fact that this newsgroup is a virtual ghost town?
>
> --K
>
"My panties aren't in a bunch" over anything other than the fact that your
original post was rude. As I mentioned before, just because you don't care,
doesn't mean that there aren't members who simply read the groups and don't
post. You just assumed that you could make a blanket statement that no one
cares since you don't care.
I repeat my question, why are you reading this group if you don't care and
why take the time to post about how much you don't care?
By the way, who is Carol and did you kill her?
I didn't say you should have researched before you posted. You questioned
why I am here. I simply told you that the reason is well documented in the
Google archives of this group.
> I simply had something relevant to the group and posted it since it was
> about Clay and this is a Clay group whether or not there is much activity.
> I personally don't post much in most of the groups to which I belong that
> doesn't mean that I don't read the posts.
There's not much to read. I think roughly half of the (non-spam) posts here
in the last year have been from me. I AM the group, baby.
>>> If I see a heading of something that I'm not interested in, I don't read
>>> that thread and I certainly don't go around telling people not to post
>>> stuff.
>>
>> Paranoid much? Please point me to the place in my post where I told you
>> not to post something. If you can't find it, I would appreciate an
>> apology from you.
>
> You seemed to imply that I shouldn't have psted that info because it
> wasn't of interest to YOU and therefore it wasn't of interest to anyone
> else which is clearly not true.
I implied nothing. You inferred and assumed.
> You're not getting an apology because I don't think you deserve one.
And you have not earned my respect, so don't expect me to treat you as if
you have. My original reply to you was innocuous (I know the intelligence
level on Usenet has been steadily decreasing over the last decade, so I hope
you know what that word means). You could have chosen to keep the level of
discourse at a higher level, but instead you decided to get paranoid,
delusional and nasty. What comes your way next is likewise up to you.
>>> What exactly is the problem with posting news about "Clay Aiken" in the
>>> "Clay Aiken" newsgroup? Did I miss something?
>>
>> Nothing and probably.
>>
>>> Get a life.
>>
>> I've got one, as evidenced by the fact that I don't get bitter about the
>> things that people write in newsgroups. May I ask why your panties are
>> so up in bunch over the fact that this newsgroup is a virtual ghost town?
>>
>> --K
>>
>
> "My panties aren't in a bunch" over anything other than the fact that your
> original post was rude.
My original post was not rude. If you want every word sanitized for your
protection, I suggest you stick to web-based boards. Thank you, though, for
conceding the fact that your panties are in a bunch.
> As I mentioned before, just because you don't care, doesn't mean that
> there aren't members who simply read the groups and don't post. You just
> assumed that you could make a blanket statement that no one cares since
> you don't care.
I thought it was pretty obvious that the level of caring about Caken's
career is at an all-time low in here as is evidenced by the startling lack
of posts.
> I repeat my question, why are you reading this group if you don't care and
> why take the time to post about how much you don't care?
I repeat my answer (see what I mean about the decline of Usenet?). Search
Google Groups for all posts made by me in this group. If you start reading
the earliest ones, you probably won't need to view more than a dozen posts
before you get more information than you ever wanted.
> By the way, who is Carol and did you kill her?
Google it and probably.
--K
On Oct 29, 8:51pm, "Karrde" <karrde_smuggl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> "Tin@" <tinas49...@yahoo.com> wrote in
> messagenews:1162043943.3...@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
> On Oct 28, 12:01am, "Karrde" <karrde_smuggl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > "Alida Spry" <a_s...@yahoo.com> wrote in
> > messagenews:vw50h.7877$PA3.2788@trndny04...
>
> > >http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.do?product_id=5347146
>
> > > Exclusive Wal-Mart CDSorry, but nobody really cares anymore. This
> > > place
> > > has been dead for a year
> > now. I think Carol might be dead as well.
>
> > --
> > --K
> > Undisputed 2004 Bragging Rights Champion
> > That's a lie and please dont speak for people you dont know.
> >What is a lie?
> That nobody cares, I care and I'm not a nobody. The truth is YOU dont
care, making YOU a nobody.
How can we be certain that you aren't just saying that you care in an
attempt to malign the most prolifant poster here? Furthermore, what
evidence can you put forth to show that you are not, in fact, a nobody? I
have certainly never heard of you before and I AM the group.
> >And for whom am I speaking?
> You SHOULD be speaking for yourself, but you have chosen to speak for
those of us who DO care.
Did I ever say "I, Karrde, speak for Miss Tin Foil Hat"?
Up until this thread, there was
> one post this month, one in September, eleven in August (only two of which
> were Aiken related), six (all spam) in July. Need I go on? There may be a
> lot of watching around here, but that's about it.
>
> > I wantedto know that and I'm glad it was posted here, so please take
> > your
> troll-like self and go troll another group, k?
>
> I've been here a long, long time. Just try to get rid of me, Miss Crusty.
>
> --K
> No problem, Miss Troll. Keep up your trolling and I'll make you see how
unimportant your shallow life is.
Let's just see who is trolling here, shall we? I am the only real regular
member of this group. I post a simple friendly response to the first live
person to wander through here in months; a warning that there is not much
activity here and not to expect any other replies. The original poster and
yourself then make lame attempts to rile me up, to get me to talk myself
into a corner. Weakest troll job I've seen, girls, really. I'd say that it
is just proof that one man can easily out-think two girls, but then you
might pull out that tired old "troll" cliché again.
--J
Usenet still attracts a more intelligent crowd on average. You wouldn't
know it from reading Miss AOL/Yahoo, but it's true.
--K
>
> Google it and probably.
>
> --K
OK, whatever. I do not have time to sit around researching how many posts
you've made and what you've said since the group was started. That is
ridiculous. All I wanted to do was post some relevant info and that's it.
You decided you had to start something.
I am not going to continue this stupid thread. You've insulted my
intelligence repeatedly in that last post and I am not going to respond with
any further remarks because I might say something I'll regret and possibly
use words of which YOU don't know the meaning.
On Nov 2, 9:15 pm, "Karrde" <karrde_smuggl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> "Alida Spry" <a_s...@yahoo.com> wrote in messagenews:SUp1h.3097$mX4.924@trndny03...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > snipped...
>
> >>>> "Alida Spry" <a_s...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >>>>news:vw50h.7877$PA3.2788@trndny04...
> >>>>>http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.do?product_id=5347146
>
> >>>>> Exclusive Wal-Mart CD
>
> >>>> Sorry, but nobody really cares anymore. This place has been dead for a
> >>>> year now. I think Carol might be dead as well.
>
> >>>> --
> >>>> --K
> >>>> Undisputed 2004 Bragging Rights Champion
>
> >>> If no one cares and the group is dead, may I ask why YOU are here?
>
> >> Google it. It shouldn't take long. There's not that much posting
> >> history for this group.
>
> > I didn't research how many members were in this group before I posted.I didn't say you should have researched before you posted. You questioned
> why I am here. I simply told you that the reason is well documented in the
> Google archives of this group.
>
> > I simply had something relevant to the group and posted it since it was
> > about Clay and this is a Clay group whether or not there is much activity.
> > I personally don't post much in most of the groups to which I belong that
> > doesn't mean that I don't read the posts.There's not much to read. I think roughly half of the (non-spam) posts here
> in the last year have been from me. I AM the group, baby.
>
> >>> If I see a heading of something that I'm not interested in, I don't read
> >>> that thread and I certainly don't go around telling people not to post
> >>> stuff.
>
> >> Paranoid much? Please point me to the place in my post where I told you
> >> not to post something. If you can't find it, I would appreciate an
> >> apology from you.
>
> > You seemed to imply that I shouldn't have psted that info because it
> > wasn't of interest to YOU and therefore it wasn't of interest to anyone
> > else which is clearly not true.I implied nothing. You inferred and assumed.
>
> > You're not getting an apology because I don't think you deserve one.And you have not earned my respect, so don't expect me to treat you as if
> you have. My original reply to you was innocuous (I know the intelligence
> level on Usenet has been steadily decreasing over the last decade, so I hope
> you know what that word means). You could have chosen to keep the level of
> discourse at a higher level, but instead you decided to get paranoid,
> delusional and nasty.
You were nasty first. if you dont like the behavior, dont do it. You
will get treated as you treat.
What comes your way next is likewise up to you.
>
>
>
>
>
> >>> What exactly is the problem with posting news about "Clay Aiken" in the
> >>> "Clay Aiken" newsgroup? Did I miss something?
>
> >> Nothing and probably.
>
> >>> Get a life.
>
> >> I've got one, as evidenced by the fact that I don't get bitter about the
> >> things that people write in newsgroups. May I ask why your panties are
> >> so up in bunch over the fact that this newsgroup is a virtual ghost town?
>
> >> --K
>
> > "My panties aren't in a bunch" over anything other than the fact that your
> > original post was rude.My original post was not rude. If you want every word sanitized for your
> protection, I suggest you stick to web-based boards. Thank you, though, for
> conceding the fact that your panties are in a bunch.
>
> > As I mentioned before, just because you don't care, doesn't mean that
> > there aren't members who simply read the groups and don't post. You just
> > assumed that you could make a blanket statement that no one cares since
> > you don't care.I thought it was pretty obvious that the level of caring about Caken's
> career is at an all-time low in here as is evidenced by the startling lack
> of posts.
>
> > I repeat my question, why are you reading this group if you don't care and
> > why take the time to post about how much you don't care?I repeat my answer (see what I mean about the decline of Usenet?). Search
> Google Groups for all posts made by me in this group. If you start reading
> the earliest ones, you probably won't need to view more than a dozen posts
> before you get more information than you ever wanted.
>
> > By the way, who is Carol and did you kill her?Google it and probably.
>
> --K- Hide quoted text -- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -- Show quoted text -
On Nov 2, 9:29 pm, "Karrde" <karrde_smuggl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> "Tin@" <tinas49...@yahoo.com> wrote in messagenews:1162185987.9...@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
>
> On Oct 29, 8:51pm, "Karrde" <karrde_smuggl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Tin@" <tinas49...@yahoo.com> wrote in
> > messagenews:1162043943.3...@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
> > On Oct 28, 12:01am, "Karrde" <karrde_smuggl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > "Alida Spry" <a_s...@yahoo.com> wrote in
> > > messagenews:vw50h.7877$PA3.2788@trndny04...
>
> > > >http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.do?product_id=5347146
>
> > > > Exclusive Wal-Mart CDSorry, but nobody really cares anymore. This
> > > > place
> > > > has been dead for a year
> > > now. I think Carol might be dead as well.
>
> > > --
> > > --K
> > > Undisputed 2004 Bragging Rights Champion
> > > That's a lie and please dont speak for people you dont know.
> > >What is a lie?
> > That nobody cares, I care and I'm not a nobody. The truth is YOU dontcare, making YOU a nobody.
>
> How can we be certain that you aren't just saying that you care in an
> attempt to malign the most prolifant poster here?
What would be the point of me "maligning" someone I dont know? Make
sense, canya?
Furthermore, what
> evidence can you put forth to show that you are not, in fact, a nobody? I
> have certainly never heard of you before and I AM the group.
If you are the group, that speaks very sadly by your own account. YOU
are the one that said this group is dead, so I guess that means you are
dead. Sad. Move along troll, nothing for you to do in a dead group.
>
> > >And for whom am I speaking?
> > You SHOULD be speaking for yourself, but you have chosen to speak forthose of us who DO care.
>
> Did I ever say "I, Karrde, speak for Miss Tin Foil Hat"?
Not that I've seen, but you did say no one cares, and I in fact do
care, as I am a fan of Clay Aiken. So you did opt to speak for
everyone.
>
> Up until this thread, there was
>
> > one post this month, one in September, eleven in August (only two of which
> > were Aiken related), six (all spam) in July. Need I go on? There may be a
> > lot of watching around here, but that's about it.
>
> > > I wantedto know that and I'm glad it was posted here, so please take
> > > your
> > troll-like self and go troll another group, k?
>
> > I've been here a long, long time. Just try to get rid of me, Miss Crusty.
>
> > --K
> > No problem, Miss Troll. Keep up your trolling and I'll make you see howunimportant your shallow life is.
>
> Let's just see who is trolling here, shall we? I am the only real regular
> member of this group. I post a simple friendly response
Telling someone that no one cares is not friendly, in fact it is rude.
to the first live
> person to wander through here in months;
Maybe if there weren't rude trolls like you, more people would post.
People like you keep other people from posting as they dont want to get
trolled.
a warning that there is not much
> activity here and not to expect any other replies.
You said no such thing, you said no one cared, not no one would
respond. Go reread your original post, unless you want to see yourself
for the liar you are.
The original poster and
> yourself then make lame attempts to rile me up, to get me to talk myself
> into a corner.
You did that yourself, so stop whining.
Weakest troll job I've seen, girls, really.
I'm not a troll, so that could explain why I'm doing such a bad job at
trolling.
I'd say that it
> is just proof that one man can easily out-think two girls, but then you
> might pull out that tired old "troll" cliché again.
>
> --J- Hide quoted text -- Show quoted text -
I suggest we just ignore you-know-who. If we have further problems, we can
always just block him.
I will continue to post any news that I hear which is relevant to Clay
Aiken.
I'm looking forward to the new Xmas CD. I pre-ordered one and I'm planning
to pick up a couple extras to give as gifts since they're inexpensive.
Alida
> > Did I ever say "I, Karrde, speak for Miss Tin Foil Hat"?
> Not that I've seen, but you did say no one cares, and I in fact do
care, as I am a fan of Clay Aiken. So you did opt to speak for
everyone.
Googling how to get sand out of a vagina. I'll get back to you with some
suggestions.
> > Let's just see who is trolling here, shall we? I am the only real
> > regular
> > member of this group. I post a simple friendly response
> Telling someone that no one cares is not friendly, in fact it is rude.
If you weren't such a tightly wound little slot, you would have seen the
comment for what it was. You chose to be confrontational, so you reap what
you sow.
to the first live
> > person to wander through here in months;
>Maybe if there weren't rude trolls like you, more people would post.
People like you keep other people from posting as they dont want to get
trolled.
Boo-hoo.
You chose your own attitude. Get over yourself and stop blaming everyone
else for your own misery.
a warning that there is not much
> activity here and not to expect any other replies.
> You said no such thing, you said no one cared, not no one would
respond. Go reread your original post, unless you want to see yourself
for the liar you are.
My original reply was "meant as a warning that there is not much activity
here and not to expect any other replies." I stand by those words. It was
a nice try though . . . for a girl.
The original poster and
> yourself then make lame attempts to rile me up, to get me to talk myself
> into a corner.
> You did that yourself, so stop whining.
Oh, I'm not whining. In fact, I'm laughing at the fact that your attempts
to crab and bitch me into submission have failed.
> > Weakest troll job I've seen, girls, really.
> I'm not a troll, so that could explain why I'm doing such a bad job at
trolling.
I suggest you take a long look at your behaviour here the last few days.
--K
No, you can't, not really.
> I will continue to post any news that I hear which is relevant to Clay
> Aiken.
Good for you. Nobody ever told you to not post post about Caken. You
really are thick, aren't you?
> I'm looking forward to the new Xmas CD. I pre-ordered one and I'm
> planning to pick up a couple extras to give as gifts since they're
> inexpensive.
How much are they? I really don't know how much Jesus music goes for
compared to regular fare. Is his CD selling at a discount already? If so,
why do you think that is?
--K
No it isn't. I never asked you to read every post I've ever made here. You
are the one who asked the question and I handed you all the information you
would need to find the answers you seek. The Google search I suggested
pulls up a grand total of 37 entries. That's not exactly a monumental task.
> All I wanted to do was post some relevant info and that's it. You decided
> you had to start something.
I started nothing. Do you always take offense so easily?
> I am not going to continue this stupid thread. You've insulted my
> intelligence repeatedly in that last post and I am not going to respond
> with any further remarks because I might say something I'll regret and
> possibly use words of which YOU don't know the meaning.
What could you possibly regret? You've already made a fool of yourself.
The whole "I'm not going to continue this" argument is just a cover that
people use when they know they've lost. Start behaving like a good little
girl and perhaps you will be treated with respect.
--K
> You were nasty first.
I disagree.
> if you dont like the behavior, dont do it. You
will get treated as you treat.
That's what I've been saying. Perhaps you should heed your own advise.
And another thing, you might want to check your preferences in GG. Your
quotes don't look right.
--K
Why do you feel you have to make derogatory comments about everything? You
say that this is "Jesus music" as if that is something bad. If you're not a
Christian, then why do you even waste your time inquiring about a Christmas
CD?
I'm ignoring all of your other pointless drivel and I'll respond to your
question regarding the new Xmas CD in the event that someone else might have
similiar questions.
It is a Walmart exclusive mini CD. There are only four songs and I believe
it is selling for $4.84. It's not selling at a discount, it's a mini CD.
It was available for pre-order but the orders exceeded what they were
expecting so it will now only be available in the store starting on November
28th.
Alida
I wasn't aware "Jesus" was a derogatory term.
--K
It's just the way you choose to use words that, at least to me, gives them a
negative connotation. Perhaps I'm reading too much into your comments or
I'm allowing my first impressions to cloud my judgement. If it wasn't meant
as a derogatory comment then it certainly doesn't seem respectful either.
Just my opinion.
Alida
On Oct 26, 11:38 am, "Alida Spry" <a_s...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.do?product_id=5347146
>
> Exclusive Wal-Mart CD entitled "All is Well" to be released November 28,
> 2006.
>
> You can pre-order it now!
>
> This is a legitimate CD and Wal-Mart has confirmed it. It's not a scam or
> mistake.
>
> I just read about it on the Clay Board in this thread:http://p071.ezboard.com/ftheclayboardfrm11.showMessageRange?topicID=8...
On Oct 28, 2:01 am, "Karrde" <karrde_smuggl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> "Alida Spry" <a_s...@yahoo.com> wrote in messagenews:vw50h.7877$PA3.2788@trndny04...
>
> >http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.do?product_id=5347146
>
> > Exclusive Wal-Mart CDSorry, but nobody really cares anymore. This place has been dead for a year
Sony made a mistake yesterday and uploaded snippets from the songs. I
believe that if you go on the Clay Board, you'll be able to find someone who
has the snippets saved.
"All Is Well" is sung in his lower register and it is really wonderful.
Alida
<NYt...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1163106536.4...@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 8, 9:19 pm, "Karrde" <karrde_smuggl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> "Alida Spry" <a_s...@yahoo.com> wrote in messagenews:tEN3h.2987$qG.952@trndny02...
>
>
>
> > Why do you feel you have to make derogatory comments about everything?
> > You say that this is "Jesus music" as if that is something bad. If you're
> > not a Christian, then why do you even waste your time inquiring about a
> > Christmas CD?I wasn't aware "Jesus" was a derogatory term.
>
> --K
The way you used it was meant to be derogatory. No one who listens to
"Jesus music" calls it that, just people who like to mock Christians
call it that, so therefore your usage was derogatory. And Christmas
isn't always Christian music. Frosty the snowman has nothing to do with
Christianity or the real meaning of Christmas.
On Nov 8, 9:19pm, "Karrde" <karrde_smuggl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> "Alida Spry" <a_s...@yahoo.com> wrote in
> messagenews:tEN3h.2987$qG.952@trndny02...
>
>
>
> > Why do you feel you have to make derogatory comments about everything?
> > You say that this is "Jesus music" as if that is something bad. If
> > you're
> > not a Christian, then why do you even waste your time inquiring about a
> > Christmas CD?I wasn't aware "Jesus" was a derogatory term.
> The way you used it was meant to be derogatory.
Thanks for telling me what I meant. I shall be sure to defer to you to
explain everything I say. BTW, could you please tell me how I feel about
the flat tax?
--K
On Nov 16, 9:42 pm, "Karrde" <karrde_smuggl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> "Tin@" <tinas49...@yahoo.com> wrote in messagenews:1163123916.8...@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
>
> On Nov 8, 9:19pm, "Karrde" <karrde_smuggl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > "Alida Spry" <a_s...@yahoo.com> wrote in
> > messagenews:tEN3h.2987$qG.952@trndny02...
>
> > > Why do you feel you have to make derogatory comments about everything?
> > > You say that this is "Jesus music" as if that is something bad. If
> > > you're
> > > not a Christian, then why do you even waste your time inquiring about a
> > > Christmas CD?I wasn't aware "Jesus" was a derogatory term.
> > The way you used it was meant to be derogatory.Thanks for telling me what I meant. I shall be sure to defer to you to
> explain everything I say. BTW, could you please tell me how I feel about
> the flat tax?
>
> --K
Maybe after you address what I said. Sad it took you a week to come up
with such a lame response.
Sad that you think everyone else has the same lonely and empty hours that
you do. Sometimes I am on a group two days in a row and sometimes I'm busy
and don't get back for a week or more. Deal with it.
I thought I HAD addressed your bitchy comments, but if you seek validation
that much, let me go into a bit more detail for you.
I do not feel I have to make derogatory comments about everything. As I've
said before, you get what you give with me. You've been a sarcastic bitch
to me, so why should I be any different towards you? I don't mind being
talked to like that, but I expect you to be able to take what you get in
return.
You assume that "Jesus music" was intended to be derogatory. That is your
problem, not mine. If you have issues and guilt over your religious
choices, you should probably look within yourself. Many Christians would
love to have their religious-based pop music be called "Jesus music." The
music is a celebration of their faith, after all. And to refer to all
religious music as such would be insulting to Islamic, Jewish, Buddhist,
etc. artists, would it not?
As for your bold statements about my religious preference, you again seem to
be assuming things about which you know nothing. And this is a newsgroup
about Caken. Whether I listen to Christmas songs or not, the subjects of
his album and his career just might be of interest to me, don't you think?
On an totally unrelated note, you are the bitch who likes to pick on
Miracle, aren't you? Oh, this should be fun.
--K
On Nov 18, 1:35 pm, "Karrde" <karrde_smuggl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> "Tin@" <tinas49...@yahoo.com> wrote in messagenews:1163883503.3...@f16g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>
> On Nov 16, 9:42pm, "Karrde" <karrde_smuggl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Tin@" <tinas49...@yahoo.com> wrote in
> > messagenews:1163123916.8...@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
>
> > On Nov 8, 9:19pm, "Karrde" <karrde_smuggl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > "Alida Spry" <a_s...@yahoo.com> wrote in
> > > messagenews:tEN3h.2987$qG.952@trndny02...
>
> > > > Why do you feel you have to make derogatory comments about everything?
> > > > You say that this is "Jesus music" as if that is something bad. If
> > > > you're
> > > > not a Christian, then why do you even waste your time inquiring about
> > > > a
> > > > Christmas CD?
> > > I wasn't aware "Jesus" was a derogatory term.
> > > The way you used it was meant to be derogatory.Thanks for telling me
> > > what I meant. I shall be sure to defer to you to
> > explain everything I say. BTW, could you please tell me how I feel about
> > the flat tax?
>
> > --K
> > Maybe after you address what I said. Sad it took you a week to come upwith such a lame response.
>
> Sad that you think everyone else has the same lonely and empty hours that
> you do.
Where's your proof of that lie?
> Sometimes I am on a group two days in a row and sometimes I'm busy
> and don't get back for a week or more. Deal with it.
>
> I thought I HAD addressed your bitchy comments, but if you seek validation
> that much, let me go into a bit more detail for you.
I'm talking about how you used "Jesus music" as a derogatory term. I
only got bitchy after you proved you were a jerk.
>
> I do not feel I have to make derogatory comments about everything. As I've
> said before, you get what you give with me. You've been a sarcastic bitch
> to me, so why should I be any different towards you? I don't mind being
> talked to like that, but I expect you to be able to take what you get in
> return.
You're the one who started with the rude behavior, so dont throw back
at me what I told you regarding your jerkness. You were a jerk, so you
will be treated as such til you stop the behavior.
>
> You assume that "Jesus music" was intended to be derogatory.
IT IS, no Chriostian person uses that term, only Christian haters do,
making it derogatory.
That is your
> problem, not mine. If you have issues and guilt over your religious
> choices, you should probably look within yourself.
Why would I have guilt or issues with making great choices in my life?
Seems better than the choices you make, to spread hate and decension
everywhere.
Many Christians would
> love to have their religious-based pop music be called "Jesus music." The
> music is a celebration of their faith, after all. And to refer to all
> religious music as such would be insulting to Islamic, Jewish, Buddhist,
> etc. artists, would it not?
Christians call their music, Christian, why is that term so hard to
grasp and what other religion would be insulted by someone saying they
listen to Chrisitian music? Dont you think Islamic and Chrisitan music
is quite different? There's no confusing the two, yanno?
>
> As for your bold statements about my religious preference, you again seem to
> be assuming things about which you know nothing.
Took that cue from you. You assumed no one cared about Clay Aiken in a
Clay Aiken group, so again, if you dont like the behavior, dont do it.
You have assumed many things about me, so when you stop, I will, until
then, I will assume the same way you do.
And this is a newsgroup
> about Caken. Whether I listen to Christmas songs or not, the subjects of
> his album and his career just might be of interest to me, don't you think?
Based on your statements, no, I dont think you have any interest in
Clay except to slam him and anyomne who does like him.
>
> On an totally unrelated note, you are the bitch who likes to pick on
> Miracle, aren't you? Oh, this should be fun.
Learn some history, child and if you dont think Miracle can hold her
own against anyone, you dont know Miracle. And if you're friends with
Satan's spawn, then I am 100% correct on exactly what kind of evil you
are.
>
> --K- Hide quoted text -- Show quoted text -
On Nov 18, 1:35pm, "Karrde" <karrde_smuggl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > Sad that you think everyone else has the same lonely and empty hours
> > that
> > you do.
> Where's your proof of that lie?
The only other explanation is that you love me and need my constant
attention.
>Sometimes I am on a group two days in a row and sometimes I'm busy
> and don't get back for a week or more. Deal with it.
>
> I thought I HAD addressed your bitchy comments, but if you seek validation
> that much, let me go into a bit more detail for you.
>I'm talking about how you used "Jesus music" as a derogatory term. I
only got bitchy after you proved you were a jerk.
Again (and I really do loathe talking to brick walls) you only assume that I
was being derogatory. I can see why you would be so paranoid, however.
You've gone on and on about how homosexuality is abhorrent and sinful, so
you are obviously a religious fanatic. I don't have a problem with people
being over the top with their religious views, but the fact that someone
with such biblically-based homophobic views has such paranoia about others
defaming her religion does not surprise me. What does surprise me is that
you are such a staunch Caken fan what with all of the speculation about his
sexuality. Not that it matters to me, but if he is gay that will really
piss you off, huh?
And, no, you didn't get bitchy after I was a jerk to you. You made
assumptions about my original remark, which I have already addressed. But
I'll address it once more later in this post.
> > I do not feel I have to make derogatory comments about everything. As
> > I've
> > said before, you get what you give with me. You've been a sarcastic
> > bitch
> > to me, so why should I be any different towards you? I don't mind being
> > talked to like that, but I expect you to be able to take what you get in
> > return.
> You're the one who started with the rude behavior, so dont throw back
at me what I told you regarding your jerkness. You were a jerk, so you
will be treated as such til you stop the behavior.
Oh my, based on your behavior in other groups, that will probably never
happen. You seem to have a history of over-reacting and just being a
general crab-ass.
> > You assume that "Jesus music" was intended to be derogatory.
> IT IS, no Chriostian person uses that term, only Christian haters do,
making it derogatory.
That is your opinion. It is wrong. You can choose not to hear the words I
am saying to you, but I am still saying them.
> > That is your
> > problem, not mine. If you have issues and guilt over your religious
> > choices, you should probably look within yourself.
> Why would I have guilt or issues with making great choices in my life?
Seems better than the choices you make, to spread hate and decension
everywhere.
Wow! Again, something that seems to have come up in your postings in other
groups. You certainly are quick to get defensive about your life choices,
whether it be your religion, your parenting, your upbringing. Have you ever
heard the phrase, "The lady doth protest too much?" You strike me as having
little self-confidence.
> Many Christians would
> love to have their religious-based pop music be called "Jesus music." The
> music is a celebration of their faith, after all. And to refer to all
> religious music as such would be insulting to Islamic, Jewish, Buddhist,
> etc. artists, would it not?
> Christians call their music, Christian, why is that term so hard to
grasp and what other religion would be insulted by someone saying they
listen to Chrisitian music? Dont you think Islamic and Chrisitan music
is quite different? There's no confusing the two, yanno?
As if you've ever heard any Islamic music. You don't seem to have much of a
world view.
> > As for your bold statements about my religious preference, you again
> > seem to
> > be assuming things about which you know nothing.
> Took that cue from you. You assumed no one cared about Clay Aiken in a
Clay Aiken group, so again, if you dont like the behavior, dont do it.
You have assumed many things about me, so when you stop, I will, until
then, I will assume the same way you do.
I originally told Alida that her post would sadly most likely fall on deaf
ears in here since nobody frequents the group these days. And don't even
pull the bullshit that you frequent the group. If you are a lurker only,
then you don't "frequent" the group. This group has been dead for months
(until this past week, that is). Alida and I have talked and are fine with
one another now. In fact, we have quite a bit in common. You are the one
who seems intent on continuing down this path. Again, all one needs do is
take a look at your posting history to see that this is just par for the
course for you.
> > And this is a newsgroup
> > about Caken. Whether I listen to Christmas songs or not, the subjects of
> > his album and his career just might be of interest to me, don't you
> > think?
> Based on your statements, no, I dont think you have any interest in
Clay except to slam him and anyomne who does like him.
My interest in watching this group was not Clay, but rather one of self
preservation and defiance of those who would like to re-write Usenet
history. That does not mean that my follow-up question about his most
recent work was not a serious one. Again, others seemed to get it. Why do
you have such a problem?
> > On an totally unrelated note, you are the bitch who likes to pick on
> > Miracle, aren't you? Oh, this should be fun.
> Learn some history, child and if you dont think Miracle can hold her
own against anyone, you dont know Miracle. And if you're friends with
Satan's spawn, then I am 100% correct on exactly what kind of evil you
are.
Oh, I'm sure she can hold her own against the likes of you. I must say,
however, that Miracle is one of the nicest ladies one could ever meet. We
used to live not too far from one another and we have traded correspondence
through the mail. She's sent lovely gifts to my children. Perhaps you
weren't such an utter cunt (sorry to all the ladies here, but I gotta call
'em like I se 'em and I don't use that word much at all) to everyone on
Usenet, you'd see her for the wonderful person that she is.
--K
On Nov 18, 11:17 pm, "Karrde" <karrde_smuggl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> "Tin@" <tinas49...@yahoo.com> wrote in messagenews:1163915173.3...@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>
> On Nov 18, 1:35pm, "Karrde" <karrde_smuggl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Sad that you think everyone else has the same lonely and empty hours
> > > that
> > > you do.
> > Where's your proof of that lie?
>The only other explanation is that you love me and need my constant
> attention.
You must have pulled that out of your butt, because it's crap. If I
needed any of you attention, I would respond to your every post, in
every group you post in, I start threads to catch your attention (kinda
like you do to Alida), I'd e-mail you, but instead, REALITY is I am
responding to you in ONE thread in ONE group and have never e-mailed
your sorry butt. Sorry you feel the need to pump up your ego so badly,
but you have nothing to support such a lame claim.
>
> >Sometimes I am on a group two days in a row and sometimes I'm busy
>
> > and don't get back for a week or more. Deal with it.
>
> > I thought I HAD addressed your bitchy comments, but if you seek validation
> > that much, let me go into a bit more detail for you.
> >I'm talking about how you used "Jesus music" as a derogatory term. Ionly got bitchy after you proved you were a jerk.
>
> Again (and I really do loathe talking to brick walls) you only assume that I
> was being derogatory.
No, I know, because as a Christian, I've had to deal with Christian
haters, who talk like you. NO Christian I know calls it "Jesus
Music",just Christian haters.
I can see why you would be so paranoid, however.
I'm not paranoid in the slightest, why would I be?
> You've gone on and on about how homosexuality is abhorrent and sinful, so
> you are obviously a religious fanatic.
No, I'm a follower of the Bible, but it does appear that your a bit
obssessed with me, you've obviously been researching me, so it appears
you WANT my attention or why would you do so much research on me?
I don't have a problem with people
> being over the top with their religious views, but the fact that someone
> with such biblically-based homophobic views has such paranoia about others
> defaming her religion does not surprise me. What does surprise me is that
> you are such a staunch Caken fan what with all of the speculation about his
> sexuality.
Specualtion is just that and I can appreciate someone's talent
regardless of their sexual persuasion. See, it's YOUR TYPE that likes
to perpetuate that Christians hate gays, which simply isn't true. We
hate the sin, but I know your small brain can't sort out the
difference. I could care less ifClay was a flaming gay, since I dont
want him as a boyfriend, I like his music, so his sexual pereferences
are not my business. Why are you so concerned with who he takes to bed?
And the fact that Clay professes to be a Christian means more to me
then small brains like you speculating on things that aren't a known
fact.
Not that it matters to me, but if he is gay that will really
> piss you off, huh?
Nope, why would it? Supposedly Barry Manilow is too and that would not
change my 30+ years of loving his talent. Again, small brains like you
like to perpetuate lies about Christians as haters and we simply are
not.
>
> And, no, you didn't get bitchy after I was a jerk to you.
I never said you were a jerk to me, you were a jerk to the original
poster. See how you twist your lies. YOU WERE RUDE. It is rude to say
no once cares about something and it is rude to speak for others. You
are guilty of both, so stop your lying and face the truth, you are a
rude jerk and I will call you on it whenever I see it. Deal with it.
You made
> assumptions about my original remark, which I have already addressed. But
> I'll address it once more later in this post.
>
> > > I do not feel I have to make derogatory comments about everything. As
> > > I've
> > > said before, you get what you give with me. You've been a sarcastic
> > > bitch
> > > to me, so why should I be any different towards you? I don't mind being
> > > talked to like that, but I expect you to be able to take what you get in
> > > return.
> > You're the one who started with the rude behavior, so dont throw backat me what I told you regarding your jerkness. You were a jerk, so you
> will be treated as such til you stop the behavior.
>
> Oh my, based on your behavior in other groups, that will probably never
> happen. You seem to have a history of over-reacting and just being a
> general crab-ass.
Can we all say OBSSESSIVE? I knew we could. Why are you checking up on
me?
>
> > > You assume that "Jesus music" was intended to be derogatory.
> > IT IS, no Chriostian person uses that term, only Christian haters do,making it derogatory.
>
> That is your opinion. It is wrong.
Opinions aren't wrong.
You can choose not to hear the words I
> am saying to you, but I am still saying them.
The lies you are saying.
>
> > > That is your
> > > problem, not mine. If you have issues and guilt over your religious
> > > choices, you should probably look within yourself.
> > Why would I have guilt or issues with making great choices in my life?Seems better than the choices you make, to spread hate and decension
> everywhere.
>
> Wow! Again, something that seems to have come up in your postings in other
> groups. You certainly are quick to get defensive about your life choices,
> whether it be your religion, your parenting, your upbringing. Have you ever
> heard the phrase, "The lady doth protest too much?" You strike me as having
> little self-confidence.
OBSSESSION! Get this life you claim you have, because researching a
complete stranger doesn't seem like much of a life.
>
> > Many Christians would
> > love to have their religious-based pop music be called "Jesus music." The
> > music is a celebration of their faith, after all. And to refer to all
> > religious music as such would be insulting to Islamic, Jewish, Buddhist,
> > etc. artists, would it not?
> > Christians call their music, Christian, why is that term so hard tograsp and what other religion would be insulted by someone saying they
> listen to Chrisitian music? Dont you think Islamic and Chrisitan music
> is quite different? There's no confusing the two, yanno?
>
> As if you've ever heard any Islamic music.
I live in So. Calif, you think I haven't been exposed to everything?
Idiot is what you are. Pathetic idiot.
You don't seem to have much of a
> world view.
???????? Based on???????
>
> > > As for your bold statements about my religious preference, you again
> > > seem to
> > > be assuming things about which you know nothing.
> > Took that cue from you. You assumed no one cared about Clay Aiken in aClay Aiken group, so again, if you dont like the behavior, dont do it.
> You have assumed many things about me, so when you stop, I will, until
> then, I will assume the same way you do.
>
> I originally told Alida that her post would sadly most likely fall on deaf
> ears in here since nobody frequents the group these days.
You said NO ONE CARED. That is a lie and its rude.
And don't even
> pull the bullshit that you frequent the group.
When I see there is a new post I do, I hardly need to check in when
nothing is posted, right?
If you are a lurker only,
> then you don't "frequent" the group.
I see, so people who read this board dont frequent it, huh? I read the
Lost group every day but rarely post there, so I dont frequent that
group? I think you have confused "lurker" and "frequent". Frequent
means how often you go there, Lurker is someone who reads but doesn't
post. I lurk a lot of groups I read daily and you are an idiot.
This group has been dead for months
> (until this past week, that is). Alida and I have talked and are fine with
> one another now. In fact, we have quite a bit in common. You are the one
> who seems intent on continuing down this path.
I cant continue if you dont, so it appears you want to continue this
path also.
Again, all one needs do is
> take a look at your posting history to see that this is just par for the
> course for you.
Yeah, all someone needs to do is be OBSSESSEDE like you to know what I
do in other groups.
>
> > > And this is a newsgroup
> > > about Caken. Whether I listen to Christmas songs or not, the subjects of
> > > his album and his career just might be of interest to me, don't you
> > > think?
> > Based on your statements, no, I dont think you have any interest inClay except to slam him and anyomne who does like him.
>
> My interest in watching this group was not Clay, but rather one of self
> preservation and defiance of those who would like to re-write Usenet
> history. That does not mean that my follow-up question about his most
> recent work was not a serious one. Again, others seemed to get it. Why do
> you have such a problem?
The above statement is supposed to make me believe you have a life????
>
> > > On an totally unrelated note, you are the bitch who likes to pick on
> > > Miracle, aren't you? Oh, this should be fun.
> > Learn some history, child and if you dont think Miracle can hold herown against anyone, you dont know Miracle. And if you're friends with
> Satan's spawn, then I am 100% correct on exactly what kind of evil you
> are.
>
> Oh, I'm sure she can hold her own against the likes of you. I must say,
> however, that Miracle is one of the nicest ladies one could ever meet.
I've met her, she is a a vile, hate-filled evil blight on this Earth.
We
> used to live not too far from one another and we have traded correspondence
> through the mail. She's sent lovely gifts to my children.
Yeah, I know how she sucks up to people.
Perhaps you
> weren't such an utter cunt (sorry to all the ladies here, but I gotta call
> 'em like I se 'em and I don't use that word much at all) to everyone on
> Usenet, you'd see her for the wonderful person that she is.
Again, go do your research and see who attacked who first. Her hatred
of Christians is what has sparked our war and she thinks because she
had a drunken mother that all people will be like her mother. Too bad
it was HER that turned out like her loser mother and not me. I raised
my niece for 18 mos. with love, respect and I did it soberly, unlike
the mother Miracle was. She projected her hatred of her mother onto me,
so OBSSESSED ONE, go research what a vile person Miracle has been to
me, see why I feel like I do about her. She has spewed more hatred than
good. Do research or shut up about what you dont know about.
>
> --K
>You must have pulled that out of your butt, because it's crap. If I
needed any of you attention, I would respond to your every post, in
every group you post in, I start threads to catch your attention (kinda
like you do to Alida), I'd e-mail you, but instead, REALITY is I am
responding to you in ONE thread in ONE group and have never e-mailed
your sorry butt. Sorry you feel the need to pump up your ego so badly,
but you have nothing to support such a lame claim.
Pfffft. So easy to get your goat, isn't it? You might be a fun one.
>No, I know, because as a Christian, I've had to deal with Christian
haters, who talk like you. NO Christian I know calls it "Jesus
Music",just Christian haters.
Perhaps it's not "Christian haters" you have dealt with in the past. You've
shown yourself to be very unlikable. The folks in question probably just
hate you.
>> You've gone on and on about how homosexuality is abhorrent and sinful, so
>> you are obviously a religious fanatic.
>No, I'm a follower of the Bible, but it does appear that your a bit
obssessed with me, you've obviously been researching me, so it appears
you WANT my attention or why would you do so much research on me?
And "God hates the faggots", right? I've run across your type before. As
for researching you, I took all of five minutes to confirm that you are the
hag that has harassed Miracle. Google is your friend . . . if you know how
to use it.
>Specualtion is just that and I can appreciate someone's talent
regardless of their sexual persuasion. See, it's YOUR TYPE that likes
to perpetuate that Christians hate gays, which simply isn't true. We
hate the sin, but I know your small brain can't sort out the
difference. I could care less ifClay was a flaming gay,
If YOUR brain wasn't so small, you'd know that it was "couldn't care less."
And to say you hate the sin but not the sinner is much like saying you
support the troops but don't support the war. This is not the time for
political commentary, however, so if you don't understand remind me to draw
pictures for you later.
> since I dont
want him as a boyfriend, I like his music, so his sexual pereferences
are not my business. Why are you so concerned with who he takes to bed?
And the fact that Clay professes to be a Christian means more to me
then small brains like you speculating on things that aren't a known
fact.
It means more to you "then" small brains, huh? Wow! How does someone so
stupid find the little button to turn the computer on?
>I never said you were a jerk to me, you were a jerk to the original
poster. See how you twist your lies. YOU WERE RUDE. It is rude to say
no once cares about something and it is rude to speak for others.
It may have been your perception that I was rude, but I think we've all seen
how hyper-sensitive you are. So your perception was wrong. So you made a
snap judgment. And how is it rude to say that nobody cares about something?
You could argue that it was incorrect, but to say it is rude? You are one
f'd up weirdo.
>> Oh my, based on your behavior in other groups, that will probably never
>> happen. You seem to have a history of over-reacting and just being a
>> general crab-ass.
>Can we all say OBSSESSIVE? I knew we could. Why are you checking up on
me?
Considering my five minutes of research (prompted by checking up on my
friend, Miracle) uncovered the same psychotic pattern of behavior that you
are exhibiting here, I would say that you were quite easy to nail. Which,
coincidentally, is what all the boys in your high school said about you.
>
> > > You assume that "Jesus music" was intended to be derogatory.
> > IT IS, no Chriostian person uses that term, only Christian haters
> > do,making it derogatory.
>
>> That is your opinion. It is wrong.
>Opinions aren't wrong.
If I am color blind and the sky is green, in my opinion, then my opinion is
wrong. Your opinion of my intentions is, likewise, wrong.
>>You can choose not to hear the words I
>> am saying to you, but I am still saying them.
>The lies you are saying.
You have yet to point out anywhere that I have lied.
>I live in So. Calif, you think I haven't been exposed to everything?
Idiot is what you are. Pathetic idiot.
I know a lot of great people from Cali, but there are those that think just
because they live in the state that they are worldly wise. Such snobbish,
narrow-minded bigotry. I will again assert that you don't seem to have much
of a world view.
>> I originally told Alida that her post would sadly most likely fall on
>> deaf
>> ears in here since nobody frequents the group these days.
>You said NO ONE CARED. That is a lie and its rude.
Okay, I was wrong. I am man enough to admit when I am wrong. One person
who lurks here cares. Happy?
>>And don't even
>> pull the bullshit that you frequent the group.
>When I see there is a new post I do, I hardly need to check in when
nothing is posted, right?
I thought I asked you to not pull any bullshit. Unless you've posted under
a different alias, this is the first thread to which you have EVER posted in
this group.
>>This group has been dead for months
>> (until this past week, that is). Alida and I have talked and are fine
>> with
>> one another now. In fact, we have quite a bit in common. You are the one
>> who seems intent on continuing down this path.
>I cant continue if you dont, so it appears you want to continue this
path also.
Yup. It appears that I do. You got a problem with that?
>>Again, all one needs do is
>> take a look at your posting history to see that this is just par for the
>> course for you.
>Yeah, all someone needs to do is be OBSSESSEDE like you to know what I
do in other groups.
I wasn't obssessede (sic) until I saw that you are a regular on the incest
groups. What are you doing hanging out there?
>> My interest in watching this group was not Clay, but rather one of self
>> preservation and defiance of those who would like to re-write Usenet
>> history. That does not mean that my follow-up question about his most
>> recent work was not a serious one. Again, others seemed to get it. Why do
>> you have such a problem?
>The above statement is supposed to make me believe you have a life????
I defend myself and my family. Yes, I think being a good husband and father
means that I have a life. Do you have a husband? Children?
>> Oh, I'm sure she can hold her own against the likes of you. I must say,
>> however, that Miracle is one of the nicest ladies one could ever meet.
>I've met her, she is a a vile, hate-filled evil blight on this Earth.
Hmmmm, when and where did you meet her?
>Again, go do your research and see who attacked who first. Her hatred
of Christians is what has sparked our war
I see you were friends in November of 1999. By December, something had
happened. I can't find the post where that turned. Perhaps you can point
me to it. However, I suspect that, as you did here, you took one little
comment and blew it out of proportion, spiraling yourself out of control.
<snip>
>I raised
my niece for 18 mos. with love, respect and I did it soberly,<snip>so
OBSSESSED ONE, go research what a vile person Miracle has been to
me, see why I feel like I do about her. She has spewed more hatred than
good. Do research or shut up about what you dont know about.
I certainly see why she was concerned about your niece being in the same
home as you. You are certifiably nuts. Your sister must have been one
horrible mother to have had her kids taken from her and given to YOU. What
demons are in your family history to make your sister turn out the way she
did?
--K
On Nov 28, 1:20 am, "Karrde" <karrde_smuggl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> "Tin@" <tinas49...@yahoo.com> wrote in messagenews:1163951141.9...@f16g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>
> >You must have pulled that out of your butt, because it's crap. If Ineeded any of you attention, I would respond to your every post, in
> every group you post in, I start threads to catch your attention (kinda
> like you do to Alida), I'd e-mail you, but instead, REALITY is I am
> responding to you in ONE thread in ONE group and have never e-mailed
> your sorry butt. Sorry you feel the need to pump up your ego so badly,
> but you have nothing to support such a lame claim.
>
> Pfffft. So easy to get your goat, isn't it?
So easy to show what an idiot you are.
>You might be a fun one.
>
> >No, I know, because as a Christian, I've had to deal with Christianhaters, who talk like you. NO Christian I know calls it "Jesus
> Music",just Christian haters.
>
> Perhaps it's not "Christian haters" you have dealt with in the past.
Miracle is a Christian hater, she's all but said it.
You've
> shown yourself to be very unlikable. The folks in question probably just
> hate you.
>
I'm unlikable because I stand up to bullies like you. Good for me. I
could care less if a moron like you likes me or not.
> >> You've gone on and on about how homosexuality is abhorrent and sinful, so
> >> you are obviously a religious fanatic.
> >No, I'm a follower of the Bible, but it does appear that your a bitobssessed with me, you've obviously been researching me, so it appears
> you WANT my attention or why would you do so much research on me?
>
> And "God hates the faggots", right?
Go hates sin.
I've run across your type before. As
> for researching you, I took all of five minutes to confirm that you are the
> hag that has harassed Miracle. Google is your friend . . . if you know how
> to use it.
Shows what an idiot you are, Miracle harassed me. I just stood up to
her like I'm standing up to you. Notice who left the group we posted
in. That bitch is long gone.
>
> >Specualtion is just that and I can appreciate someone's talentregardless of their sexual persuasion. See, it's YOUR TYPE that likes
> to perpetuate that Christians hate gays, which simply isn't true. We
> hate the sin, but I know your small brain can't sort out the
> difference. I could care less ifClay was a flaming gay,
>
> If YOUR brain wasn't so small, you'd know that it was "couldn't care less."
> And to say you hate the sin but not the sinner is much like saying you
> support the troops but don't support the war.
????? You really are an idiot, aren't you? You can easily support our
troops, who dont decide what war they get to fight, without supporting
the war. And I can easily love someone even if I dont like what they
do. You can't? If you can't then you have a small, small heart.
This is not the time for
> political commentary, however, so if you don't understand remind me to draw
> pictures for you later.
>
> > since I dontwant him as a boyfriend, I like his music, so his sexual pereferences
> are not my business. Why are you so concerned with who he takes to bed?
> And the fact that Clay professes to be a Christian means more to me
> then small brains like you speculating on things that aren't a known
> fact.
>
> It means more to you "then" small brains, huh? Wow! How does someone so
> stupid find the little button to turn the computer on?
>
> >I never said you were a jerk to me, you were a jerk to the originalposter. See how you twist your lies. YOU WERE RUDE. It is rude to say
> no once cares about something and it is rude to speak for others.
>
> It may have been your perception that I was rude, but I think we've all seen
> how hyper-sensitive you are. So your perception was wrong. So you made a
> snap judgment. And how is it rude to say that nobody cares about something?
First, because it was a lie and second, because it is.
> You could argue that it was incorrect, but to say it is rude? You are one
> f'd up weirdo.
>
> >> Oh my, based on your behavior in other groups, that will probably never
> >> happen. You seem to have a history of over-reacting and just being a
> >> general crab-ass.
> >Can we all say OBSSESSIVE? I knew we could. Why are you checking up onme?
>
> Considering my five minutes of research (prompted by checking up on my
> friend, Miracle) uncovered the same psychotic pattern of behavior that you
> are exhibiting here, I would say that you were quite easy to nail. Which,
> coincidentally, is what all the boys in your high school said about you.
Really? So then how come I was a virgin all through high school? I was
that easy to nail, huh? See, you lie like its a natural for you.
Pathetic.
>
>
>
> > > > You assume that "Jesus music" was intended to be derogatory.
> > > IT IS, no Chriostian person uses that term, only Christian haters
> > > do,making it derogatory.
>
> >> That is your opinion. It is wrong.
> >Opinions aren't wrong.If I am color blind and the sky is green, in my opinion, then my opinion is
> wrong. Your opinion of my intentions is, likewise, wrong.
>
> >>You can choose not to hear the words I
> >> am saying to you, but I am still saying them.
> >The lies you are saying.You have yet to point out anywhere that I have lied.
>
> >I live in So. Calif, you think I haven't been exposed to everything?Idiot is what you are. Pathetic idiot.
>
> I know a lot of great people from Cali, but there are those that think just
> because they live in the state that they are worldly wise. Such snobbish,
> narrow-minded bigotry. I will again assert that you don't seem to have much
> of a world view.
And just like you think I was easy to nail in high school, I consider
your lack of real knowledge of me.
>
> >> I originally told Alida that her post would sadly most likely fall on
> >> deaf
> >> ears in here since nobody frequents the group these days.
> >You said NO ONE CARED. That is a lie and its rude.Okay, I was wrong. I am man enough to admit when I am wrong. One person
> who lurks here cares. Happy?
>
> >>And don't even
> >> pull the bullshit that you frequent the group.
> >When I see there is a new post I do, I hardly need to check in whennothing is posted, right?
>
> I thought I asked you to not pull any bullshit. Unless you've posted under
> a different alias, this is the first thread to which you have EVER posted in
> this group.
I might have posted here before, I'm not sure, but this is the only
name I post under.
>
> >>This group has been dead for months
> >> (until this past week, that is). Alida and I have talked and are fine
> >> with
> >> one another now. In fact, we have quite a bit in common. You are the one
> >> who seems intent on continuing down this path.
> >I cant continue if you dont, so it appears you want to continue thispath also.
>
> Yup. It appears that I do. You got a problem with that?
>
> >>Again, all one needs do is
> >> take a look at your posting history to see that this is just par for the
> >> course for you.
> >Yeah, all someone needs to do is be OBSSESSEDE like you to know what Ido in other groups.
>
> I wasn't obssessede (sic) until I saw that you are a regular on the incest
> groups. What are you doing hanging out there?
Is there a reason you feel a need to lie so much about me? Who are you
trying to impress?
>
> >> My interest in watching this group was not Clay, but rather one of self
> >> preservation and defiance of those who would like to re-write Usenet
> >> history. That does not mean that my follow-up question about his most
> >> recent work was not a serious one. Again, others seemed to get it. Why do
> >> you have such a problem?
> >The above statement is supposed to make me believe you have a life????I defend myself and my family. Yes, I think being a good husband and father
> means that I have a life. Do you have a husband? Children?
>
> >> Oh, I'm sure she can hold her own against the likes of you. I must say,
> >> however, that Miracle is one of the nicest ladies one could ever meet.
> >I've met her, she is a a vile, hate-filled evil blight on this Earth.Hmmmm, when and where did you meet her?
>
> >Again, go do your research and see who attacked who first. Her hatredof Christians is what has sparked our war
>
> I see you were friends in November of 1999. By December, something had
> happened. I can't find the post where that turned. Perhaps you can point
> me to it. However, I suspect that, as you did here, you took one little
> comment and blew it out of proportion, spiraling yourself out of control.
You do your own research, go to April of '99 to see how things started.
>
> <snip>
>
> >I raisedmy niece for 18 mos. with love, respect and I did it soberly,<snip>so
> OBSSESSED ONE, go research what a vile person Miracle has been to
> me, see why I feel like I do about her. She has spewed more hatred than
> good. Do research or shut up about what you dont know about.
>
> I certainly see why she was concerned about your niece being in the same
> home as you. You are certifiably nuts. Your sister must have been one
> horrible mother to have had her kids taken from her and given to YOU. What
> demons are in your family history to make your sister turn out the way she
> did?
>
> --K
There you go again, lying about things you dont know about. Reply when
you know truth.