Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

7G Rainbow Colony Hindi Movie Download

769 views
Skip to first unread message

Karla Ganger

unread,
Dec 25, 2023, 8:32:27 PM12/25/23
to
If you walk along the streets of KK Nagar in Chennai, you will witness all that you will see in his film. I have made it in such a way that you should not feel that it was a movie. You should feel as if you are walking in a housing colony which you are familiar with.


I have lived in KK Nagar for nearly 10 years, and it is from all those experiences that I wrote the script. Almost 75 percent of the characters you see in the film still live there. My friends are all there as characters. Some of my friends wrote to me, 'Don't show that incident. See, I am going to get married!' It was all the fun that we had as youngsters in a colony.



7G Rainbow Colony hindi movie download

Download https://t.co/0hyXlsyP2Q






When the producer heard the title first, he was shocked. 7-G is the number of the heroine Anita's house, and the colony is Rainbow Colony. I managed to make the producer see my point of view about the title. I never expected it to create such excitement. I have done my job honestly.


Kathir is a young underachiever who frequently vents his frustrations through public outbursts. When Anitha, a North Indian girl whose family has fallen on hard times, moves into his housing colony, he soon decides to pursue her with his love, but she keeps rejecting his advances.


strange, upsetting epic in miniature from selvaraghavan, who treats his simple set-up (apparently "75% autobiographical" - young lower middle class failure falls hopelessly in love with the once upper class northern girl who moves into his colony) with near operatic stylization on the one hand and clear-eyed, granular attention class, place, language and texture on the other.


The M-CSF and its receptor (M-CSFR, CSF-1R or c-fms proto-oncogene) system were initially implicated as essential in mammals for normal monocyte development as well as for pregnancy. To allow a comparison with the M-CSF and M-CSFR system of an oviparous animal, we cloned a M-CSFR-like gene from rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). The gene was cloned from a cDNA library of head kidney. It contained an open reading frame encoding 967 amino acids with a predicted size of 109 kDa. The putative amino acid sequence of rainbow trout M-CSFR showed 54% amino acid identity to fugu (Takifugu rubripes) M-CSFR, 52% to zebrafish (Danio rerio) M-CSFR and 40% to mouse (Mus musculus) and human (Homo sapiens) M-CSFR. The M-CSFR-like gene was constitutively expressed in head kidney, kidney, intestine, spleen and blood. The gene was detected especially in the ovary of immature female rainbow trout. These results suggest that a M-CSFR-like receptor may be involved in female reproductive tracts even in an oviparous animal like fish.


Technical Abstract: Oogenesis is characterized by a series of developmentally regulated events, which result in the matured oocyte that can give rise to a new organism after fertilization. Oocyte-specific genes play critical roles in oogenesis; however, the molecular details of oocyte-specific genes are poorly defined. Through analysis of expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from a rainbow trout oocyte cDNA library, we identified and characterized a novel oocyte-specific gene coding for an F-box protein (Fbos, F-box oocyte-specific). F-box proteins are components of ubiquitin-ligase complexes, which bind substrates for uiquitin-mediated proteolysis. F-box proteins have also been associated with cellular functions such as signal transduction and regulation of the cell cycle. To define the molecular mechanisms of Fbos-dependent biological processes during oogenesis in rainbow trout, we used Fbos as bait in a yeast two-hybrid screen system, along with a rainbow trout ovary cDNA library. More than 300 yeast colonies were able to grow on nutritional selective plates; 18 clones displayed strong LacZ activity as shown by colony lift filter assay for '-galactosidase activity. After verifying the interactions by reintroduction of the candidate prey plasmids into yeast reporter strain containing Fbos plasmid, 8 plasmids were rescued successfully and subjected to DNA sequence analysis. The sequencing data demonstrated that Fbos protein interacts with a number of proteins including histone H3.3, adenylate kinase 2, ribosomal protein L36, oocyte protease inhibitor 1, zona pellucida protein 2 (ZP2) and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 2 (TIMP-2). All 5 proteins showed significant '-galactosidase activities at different levels compared to the control in a quantitative ß-galactosidase assay, indicating different binding affinities of these proteins with Fbos protein. Some of these proteins like ZP2 and TIMP-2 are known to play critical roles in oocyte development in various species. Our results suggest that through protein-protein interactions, the novel oocyte-specific F-box protein may play an important role in early oocyte development by regulating other critical proteins involved in oogenesis in rainbow trout.


Patterns of between-year (re-)occupation of 82 individually recognized nesting burrows in a southern German colony of the European bee-eater Merops apiaster. Black coloration denotes occupation, white coloration nonoccupation, and X that a burrow had not yet or not any more existed in the respective year. Black and white colored cells sum up to a total of 424 burrow-year observations made across the study period.






Results from generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) with binomial error structure and logit link function estimating the effect of the age of the breeding wall on between-year burrow re-occupation probability in a German colony of the European bee-eater Merops apiaster (N = 342 observations of 75 individually recognized burrows which were occupied for the first time between 2003 and 2012). Note that parameter estimates are given on the logit scale. (a) GLMM including study year and burrow identity as random intercept effects and a random slope effect for age of the breeding wall. (b) GLMM including study year and burrow identity as random intercept effects and a random slope effect for the within-burrow predictor of the age of the breeding wall. Within-burrow effect: within-burrow effect after within-burrow centering of the focal covariate age of the breeding wall. Between-burrow effect: between-burrow effect after within-burrow centering of the focal covariate age of the breeding wall (see Methods for details on statistical procedures).


Sunflower plot of the between-year burrow re-occupation probability in a southern German colony of the European bee-eater Merops apiaster as a function of the age of the breeding wall (N = 342 observations of 75 individually recognized burrows). Sunflower petals indicate number of multiple raw data points, the solid lines show predicted re-occupation probabilities from binomial generalized linear mixed models with burrow identity and study year as random effects, and the dotted lines reflect 95% confidence intervals.


Sunflower plot of the between-year burrow re-occupation probability in a southern German colony of the European bee-eater Merops apiaster as a function of the age of the breeding wall restricted to the first year after burrow establishment (N = 75 observations of 75 individually recognized burrows). Sunflower petals indicate number of multiple raw data points, the solid lines show predicted re-occupation probabilities from binomial generalized linear mixed models with study year as random effect, and the dotted lines reflect 95% confidence intervals.


Declining burrow reuse probability over time was not attributable to the selective disappearance of high-quality burrows (burrow quality hypothesis). Thus, it seems not to be the case that high-quality burrows with an associated higher reuse probability were built early during colony establishment. Still, the first burrows in newly established breeding walls of burrowing birds are usually built along the upper margin, whereas lower burrows follow only later (Ursprung 1984; Smalley et al. 2013a). While the predation risk arising from beech martens (Martes foina) and European badgers (Meles meles) is indeed higher when burrows are located in closer proximity to the ground (Sieber 1980; Persson 1987), red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) excavate burrows from the top (Heneberg 2005). Besides the risk of predation, especially at the margins of the wall, physical properties such as substrate composition (Smalley et al. 2013b) or rainwater permeability (Smalley et al. 2013a) should play a role in burrow positioning within the wall, too. In the study colony, predation was considered to be very low due to the fact that across the whole study period, nestlings were observed in nearly all active breeding burrows and only one brood loss due to predation was evident (Bastian & Bastian, personal observations). Differences in quality due to a higher predation pressure in later established burrows are therefore unlikely. This fits well to our finding that burrows build in later years seem just as suitable for reuse as those build early on. Given the local conditions with a number of other breeding walls present in close proximity of the study site and the fact that colony growth starts to decline toward the end of our study period with birds starting to disperse to other breeding walls in 2009, birds may just use the wall as long as good positions with regard to physical properties are available and then successively switch to other, new walls in the surrounding area.

0aad45d008



0 new messages