On 4/15/21 8:42 PM, Dave Garrett wrote:
> In article <
hIidnQvyWqMMOu79...@giganews.com>,
>
weary...@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On 3/25/21 7:02 PM, Dave Garrett wrote:
>>> In article <
e849e57d-86e2-4f01...@googlegroups.com>,
>>>
tommie....@gmail.com says...
>>>
>>>> I found this link in an old back-up and was saddened to see this corpse. This was such a place of fellowship and learning and now its gone. It's interesting how things change. I wonder if the spammers here make any money on their ads?
>>>>
>>>> Rest in peace old friend and a salute to the old sincere contributors.
>>>>
>>>> Tommie Hicks
>>>>
>>>> P.S. Does anyone know where I can get a cloned ATM card so I can steal some money?
>>>
>>> It's not just a.m.s, but Usenet in general. There used to be no shortage
>>> of newsgroups that were equally lively and informed, although a.m.s was
>>> certainly one of the best in that regard.
>>>
>>> At least many of the folks who used to be regulars here migrated over to
>>> Nitrateville, which I don't check nearly as often as I should. It sure
>>> beats Facebook, which I can't stand but maintain a presence at in order
>>> to keep in touch with folks I care about for whom it's the preferred
>>> online platform.
>>>
>>
>> Is there anything wrong with continuing to post
>> about silent movies right here at alt.movies.silent
>
> Absolutely not, but it's kinda difficult to sustain when the number of
> people actively reading it can probably be counted on one hand.
>
There's always many more readers ("lurkers") than posters.
I'll add rec.arts.movies.past-films to this post, just
for the "hey" of it.
>> The last silent I watched was The Mystery of the
>> Leaping Fish (1916) short from an Alpha DVD. It's
>> watchable but I didn't like it too much with the
>> coke shooting and opium eating. Opium is called
>> "hop" so to eat great gobs of it causes one to "hop"!
>> That sort of drug silliness. It'd be easier to watch
>> if there was a source better than Alpha.
>
> Ah, the infamous "Coke Ennyday". Quite the memorable role for Fairbanks.
> It's included in Flicker Alley's DVD set Douglas Fairbanks: A Modern
> Musketeer, and without having seen the Alpha DVD I'd bet the Flicker
> Alley version beats it handily in terms of quality.
>
I see at
https://silentera.com/video/mysteryLeapingFishHV.html
there's a choice of DVDs between Kino and a box set from
Flicker Alley, which is a bit much for just one short.
I'm not interested in Fairbanks himself.
It could happen that someone will make a compilation
of old drug shorts, maybe licensing Leaping Fish from Kino
or Flicker Alley. I bought the recent Blu-rays of talkie
drug movies from Kino: Marijuana (1936) etc.
>> It seems the mystery with the defective Slapstick
>> Encyclopedia reissue by Madacy, why some can play
>> the DVDs while others can't. It turns out that
>> these discs can only play in a pure DVD player,
>> they cannot play through in a Blu-ray/DVD player.
>> Check the "A Rare Charlie Chaplin Snippet" on Disc 4,
>> the most sensitive error I've found on more than one
>> copy, to test a player to see whether it can play it.
>> DVD players can, Blu-Ray players cannot.
>
> I wasn't aware Madacy had reissued Slapstick Encyclopedia, but that's
> pretty odd that Blu-ray players have trouble with it. The typical Blu-
> ray player can handle CDs and DVDs as well as Blu-rays, and the optical
> pickup in such players houses lasers of three different wavelengths, one
> for each format (780, 650, and 405nm, for CD, DVD, and Blu
> respectively). Given that Madacy has never exactly been a trademark of
> quality, I'd guess that either something in these particular DVDs
> deviates from the format standards just enough to cause problems, or the
> disc replication facility screwed up somewhere and caused the discs to
> exceed most players' ability for effective error correction.
>
The Passport DVD company hates the producer of the Slapstick
Encyclopedia set, because he publicly complained that Passport
was stealing his property so I suspect Madacy purposely wrecked
the DVDs as a favor to Passport. Madacy also reportedly
refused to pay the fee promised to the producer for it's reissue,
also suggesting bad faith.