Ghostbusters In Hell?
Mottola/w Snakes On A Plane And Mickie James
By: News Editor
Source: InFocus magazine
Well, if you like math then that title was fun for you. I hate math, and
hate myself for writing such garbage. I could go on writing dribble, but I
figure it is best to just give you the news before you cry for my head.
To be fair, this was all a sorry attempt to get you to mosey on to another
story. If you are still with me, please know that reading any further will
prove that God ... does in fact ... not exist. You have been warned.
InFocus Magazine has posted an interview of sorts with actor-filmmaker
Harold Ramis. In the interview, Ramis had some sad news to report about the
possibility of a third Ghostbusters. The report claims the movie would be
titled Ghostbusters in Hell.
The script for the possible sequel is written by Dan Aykroyd and features a
hell that looks like New York City. The Ghostbusters transport themselves to
this Hell via a portal located in a warehouse. Are you sorry you read this
yet? Wait ... it gets much worse.
"What Danny had originally conceived was sending us to a special-effects
hell, a netherworld full of phenomenal visual environments and boiling
pits," Ramis revealed. "But what works so well about the first two (films)
is the mundane-ness of it all. So my notion was that hell exists in the same
place as our consensus reality, but it's like a film shutter. It's the
darkness between the 24 frames."
Yes Harold. Yes it is.
Ramis continued, "So we create a device to do it, and it's in a warehouse in
Brooklyn. When we step out of the chamber, it looks just like New York, but
it's hell. Everything's grid-locked; no cars are moving and all the drivers
are swearing at each other in different foreign languages. No two people
speak the same language. It's all the worst things about modern urban life,
just magnified."
Sigh. I have done all I can. I have held off as long as possible. If you are
still reading ... then you simply asked for it.
Reports are saying Ramis wants vets Aykroyd, Moranis and Murray to reprise
their roles. Murray refuses to, probably because he got a whiff of the
script's smell. In his place Ramis is reportedly trying to cast Ben Stiller
to star as the new Ghostbuster.
I am going to the corner to cry. I just want to thank Tim, who sent me this
scoop, for ruining my life. Just kidding, I appreciate it ... really.
Smart Ape - proud member of the Anti-Bear Coaltion
<motherfuckingsnakesof...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:126mgmp...@news.supernews.com...
The author of this artcile should know that
a) this has been news for like a decade.
b) Columbia Pictures never wanted to greenlight the picture
c) Bill Murray didn't even want to do GB2 because he hates sequels.
d) he's a dick
--
--- "Damn dirty fleas..."
--- Proud loser of TWO 2004 RSPW Poster Awards and several in 2005.
--- 3rd Highest Vote-Getter in KORSPW 2005
--- In the Final Four of the 2006 RSPW Rumble
--- Ranked 4th on Lvubun's Top 127 RSPW Posters of 2005
JannettyFan (still a RockerFan!)
Sounds like his crusade against them ends with the paycheck he'll be
getting for Garfield 2. Glad he has standards that can be bought off.
SyVyN11
"Mottola/w Snakes On A Plane And Mickie James"
<motherfuckingsnakesof...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:126mgmp...@news.supernews.com...
> By: News Editor
> Source: InFocus magazine
>
first is Ghostbusters
second is The Real Ghostbusters cartoon first season on ABC
then, The Real Ghostbusters syndicated show
then, the following seasons of TRG on ABC,
then finally, ExtremeGhostBusters.
SyVyN11
"SyVyN11" <711rob...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:LoMag.1593$921....@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
I, of course, excluded Ghostbusters 2, because it still sucks like Farva at
a bath house.
>
>
>
Matthew W. Miller
> The author of this artcile should know that
> a) this has been news for like a decade.
> b) Columbia Pictures never wanted to greenlight the picture
> c) Bill Murray didn't even want to do GB2 because he hates sequels.
> d) he's a dick
f) People who "hate math" are lame
g) People who write an entire article's worth of snarky whining are even
more lame
--
Matthew W. Miller <mwmi...@columbus.rr.com>
Om mani padme sum.