IQ Test
James Stewart
quite anxious to see how I would do. Much to my surprise....it was much
higher than I thought it would be! I scored a 54! Here is the link to it
for those who want to see for themselves:
http://www2.iqtest.com/view/iqtest/options/990817/9349327003954
I am not bragging about this, I just wanted to share it with the group!
And, to whoever posted the test, THANKS! It was very interesting!
Jeremy Wright
>share it with the group! And, to whoever
>posted
>the test, THANKS! It was very interesting!
There's no need to brag, because the test is horseshit. I had five
separate people take the test, and not one of them scored lower than a
130 (I scored a 154). Which would mean, apparently, that ALL of us are
geniuses! You, me and everyone else who took the test!
I sincerely doubt it.
-Jeremy
Drew
guess. Those that are geniuses have a total different look on life.
You do not share these views jeremy. Way too anal. If you want to know
your IQ jeremy take a Binet-Simon test, the most recent revision. I
would also suggest a Wechsler also. i changed my mind take both the
Wichsler and the Stanford-Binet tests. the both of them will give you a
mean.
Group: alt.movies.blair-witch-project Date: Tue, Aug 17, 1999, 8:15pm
(CDT+1) From: good...@webtv.net (Jeremy Wright) Re: IQ Test
bartender
Drew <Drew...@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:6382-37B...@newsd-211.iap.bryant.webtv.net...
Jeremy Wright
>I doubt you are too jeremy. your probably
>average, about 95 would be my guess.
No, 100 is average... roughly 50 points higher than your IQ, based on
the things you write.
-Jeremy
Drew
average is 1 standard deviation from the mean, which is 85-115
not 100
Group: alt.movies.blair-witch-project Date: Wed, Aug 18, 1999, 12:38am
(CDT+1) From: good...@webtv.net (Jeremy Wright) Re: IQ Test
Angie & Dave
Actually, those with genius IQ's are usually social retards. That's one reason that so many *really* smart doctors do
medical research, not practice.
Angie
Drew
Group: alt.movies.blair-witch-project Date: Tue, Aug 17, 1999, 11:32pm
From: bart...@bartenderofamerica.com (bartender) Re: IQ Test
But didn't you say you had an IQ of 200? Drew <Drew...@webtv.net>
wrote in message news:6382-37B...@newsd-211.iap.bryant.webtv.net...
I doubt you are too jeremy. your probably average, about 95 would be my
guess. Those that are geniuses have a total different look on life. You
do not share these views jeremy. Way too anal. If you want to know your
IQ jeremy take a Binet-Simon test, the most recent revision. I would
also suggest a Wechsler also. i changed my mind take both the Wichsler
and the Stanford-Binet tests. the both of them will give you a mean.
Group: alt.movies.blair-witch-project Date: Tue, Aug 17, 1999, 8:15pm
(CDT+1) From: good...@webtv.net (Jeremy Wright) Re: IQ Test I am not
Drew
A standard deviation is used to measure if somtething is significant
enough. It ussually is used by scientists in their observations to see
if something is significant enough to actually cause a difference. It
is used in a lot of drug research to see if something is really working
compared to the placebo group.
The mean is a type of average that is used to base the standard
deviation off of.
Most tests produce a bell curve which in the center is the mean. Those
that are way off toward either end are considered exceptions, hence the
word exceptional.
Actually a strong arguement to the use of IQ testing is that they are
culturally biased, and that they do not test all aspects of
intelligence. There are also cultural differences. Here in the US
people think the use of jargon actually makes a person looks smarter as
well as how long they take to say a simple sentence. Other cultures
value how little you can say and still be understood.
Drew
bartender
> So jeremy you didn't have a clue obviously waht a standard deviation is.
Drew <Drew...@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:7950-37B...@newsd-212.iap.bryant.webtv.net...
bartender
posts, I don't believe you. Sorry.news:7949-37B...@newsd-212.iap.bryant.webtv.net...
Drew
ability to spell?
I'm sure I could find some grammatical errors in yr posts.
so I misspelled WHAT
big deal
I thought u didn't like the movie?
Must of liked it enough to make u come here couple times a week.
Group: alt.movies.blair-witch-project Date: Thu, Aug 19, 1999, 4:41pm
bartender
> ability to spell?
about how smart I am. And I do think that if I had an IQ as high as you
say,being the key word, you have then I do believe I would proofread before
I send.news:1967-37B...@newsd-213.iap.bryant.webtv.net...
Drew
just b/c I miss a key does that really matter
check this out
http://www2.iqtest.com/view/iqtest/options/990822/9353730984248
lata
Drew
David Glidden
Just b/c I kiss a key does that really matter?
bartender
like you would write your know to proof your letters. I mean, if I had an IQ
of 200+, then I wouldn't want people calling me out on my spelling.news:5953-37C...@newsd-213.iap.bryant.webtv.net...
good...@webtv.net
>check this out
>http://www2.iqtest.com/view/iqtest/options/990
>22/9353730984248
>lata
>Drew
Go ahead, check out the URL....
Now, a quote from the site's FAQ:
>4. What is the highest score possible?
>The highest for persons under 16 years of age
>is 230. The highest adult score possible is
>170.
Here are the FACTS:
1) Drew is in his twenties, therefore technically an ADULT--(a term I
use *very* loosely).
2) The HIGHEST POSSIBLE SCORE an adult can receive on this test is 170.
3) Drew lied about his age when filling out the forms to take the
test--probably lied about how long it took him, too.
4) In conclusion, Drew LIED about his IQ--which should come as a
surprise to no one. The results are FALSE, and could be obtained by
*anybody* using simple trial and error.
I'm not even a firm believer in these tests, The fact that he had to lie
about his results, however, is pretty sad.... and pretty stupid.
Over and out.
-Jeremy
bartender
Damn, Drew that was easy, huh, wonder how I did that? Guess if anyone knows
its you.
lmao @ Drew. haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Griffen
that 160 is qualification for MENSA...so 200+, I think we'd be hearing about
you in the news) would not be bragging about their surplus in mental
ability. Most super-intelligent people do not know they are "that"
intelligent, therefore they have nothing to brag about.
--
Angie & Dave <I.am....@inetport.com> wrote in message
news:IvWu3.11082$x04.6...@typ11.nn.bcandid.com...
>
> |Drew <Drew...@webtv.net> wrote in message
> |news:6382-37B...@newsd-211.iap.bryant.webtv.net...
> |I doubt you are too jeremy. your probably average, about 95 would be my
> |guess. Those that are geniuses have a total different look on life.
>
>
Griffen
test. Now, how reliable are these things!? Geez......I scored a 250 on one
once, I'm not walking around saying I'm a genius........I hold no weight in
*any* test that is online. Hmph.
(runs away to drink my brain juice and debate the socio-economic status of
cheese. And then I'm going to watch South Park! Whoo!)
good...@webtv.net
>ok Jeremy I think I'll do the same to your
>posts.
>People all I see is a little punk boy who is
>intimidated by me. I will mess with you Jeremy
>for months.
>lol
>And I'll have fun, actually every time I respond
>to your stupid ignorant fuck that lies about his
>IQ, I laugh.
Having been made aware of the true nature of this situation, the reader
is invited to ponder the great irony found in the preceding post.
I'm sorry, I know I promised to stop bashing this imbecile. I was just
so incensed when I read the FALSE results of his IQ test, I couldn't
resist exposing him for the liar he is.
-Jeremy
good...@webtv.net
>I also noticed that Drew here took an "on-line"
>IQ test. Now, how reliable are these things!?
>Geez......I scored a 250 on one once, I'm not
>walking around saying I'm a genius........I hold
>no weight in *any* test that is online. Hmph.
Many people would argue that IQ tests in general aren't an accurate
measure of intelligence. I tend to agree. Although, I can see why you'd
be indignant of the fact that Drew seems to have scored higher than
you--don't be. His score is complete bullshit.
For this test, if we follow Drew's link we find his IQ test "results",
which give a very impressive score of 210. See below:
http://www2.iqtest.com/view/iqtest/options/990822/9353730984248
However, as I already stated, it's literally impossible for an "adult"
to score higher than 170 on this test without cheating. The highest
score a child under sixteen years of age can receive is 230 (I got this
information for the site's FAQ). The results are formulated using
several factors, including age and the amount of time it took to
complete the test.
I took the test using legitimate information. I used my real age (25),
and the ACTUAL time it took to complete the test (roughly ten minutes).
The score I received was 154--this is probably inaccurate, despite the
test's claim that it comes within five points of being accurate. Just
out of curiosity, I asked some friends of mine to take this same test,
and ever one of them scored very well.
We all knew that Drew was full of shit when he began trumpeting his
"over 200 IQ" to anyone who would listen. Check out some of the smug
things he said about me in this very thread--I mean, this is a guy
that's just begging to be made an example of. If anyone else had posted
these fake results, I would have let it go. But Drew has always made a
point of claiming his intelligence is superior to everyone else's. We
now have concrete proof that this claim isn't even close to being true.
So, why did you LIE to us, Drew? There was no need for it--none of us
believed you were anywhere near being a genius, anyway! It must be
embarrassing to be so ignorant--is that why you did it?
By the way, before Drew can claim he made an honest mistake in filling
out information for the test, consider this.
1) On the test, you are CLEARLY asked to state your age before you
begin. Anyone under sixteen is considered a child. Drew may very well
claim that he just "forgot" to fill in his age--well, if that were the
case, the default in the program automatically lists you as an adult. I
checked it out.
2) If you don't enter the time it took you to complete the test, the
default lists your time at thirteen minutes (the average time it takes).
3) Just to see what would happen, I took the test a second time--this
time, I listed my age at thirteen years and listed my time at eight
minutes. My "new"" score shot up to a 194. It's now easy to see how Drew
got his fictional results. After two or three tries, I was able to come
up with a score of 213--anyone want to see the link?
I'm not a genius, despite what this test says. I am, however, smarter
than Drew--not that it's a great feat.
-Jeremy
Hey, Drew... do you have anything else to say about *my* IQ?
Ha ha!
good...@webtv.net
http://www2.iqtest.com/view/iqtest/options/990822/9353814053036
Bartender continues laughing at Drew:
>Damn, Drew that was easy, huh, wonder how I
>did that? Guess if anyone knows its you.
>lmao @ Drew.
>haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhaaaaaaaaaaaa
>aaaaaaaa
Yeah, some "genius" Drew turned out to be... he wasn't even smart enough
to *cheat* correctly!
Come on, EVERYBODY take the test! It's easy to be a "genius" when you
use the Drew Method! Also, keep watching for details on how to join the
"Friends of Drew Society." Here are the qualifications you must have to
be considered for membership:
1) You must constantly proclaim your intelligence, but not be able to
construct a simple sentence.
2) You must misspell easy words (like "what") on a regular basis.
3) You must make frequent use of the abbreviation "LOL" when posting on
Usenet, especially when making a fool of yourself.
4) You must type "b/c" as opposed to "because."
5) If you don't like what a male poster has written, start calling him a
"faggot."
6) If you don't like what a female poster has written, start calling her
a "cunt."
7) You must be a moronic bigot (see #5).
8) If you piss people off, try to appease them by giving out insincere
apologies.
9) You must have an IQ no higher than 70, but claim that it's "over
200."
10) Whatever you do, DON'T MAKE USE OF A SPELLCHECK.
Unfortunately, I think *everyone* who posts here is too smart to join
(except, of course, Proklon-Star and Pat Diggler).
-Jeremy
bartender
<good...@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:15014-37...@newsd-103.iap.bryant.webtv.net...
Drew
jeremy, you need to get a life, really. To spend that much time check
out the stats on someone else is, well, sad, very sad. You need to get
out more jeremy.
actually the first time I took the test it was 160. I thought there was
something wrong so I checked the faq and saw that the highest that an
adult could score was a 170. Not wanting to post that I took it again.
If you really want to know. Are you really smarter than jeremy? Who
cares. I don't. I thought you were going to be nice.
I still can't believe that you went through all that trouble. I think
I'll paste a link on my homepage also. LMAO
see how many other people check it.
Thank you for posting that cut n paste article, that was nice of you.
Seriously jeremy, you need to do other things with your life rather than
checking all I say. Your time is limited. You only live so many years,
so many days, so many minutes. Why don't you try to make each one
count. Think about how much of your finite time on earth you have spent
responding to me and others about attacks on your character. Does it
really matter? Will you ever meet any of these people? Does their
opinion of you really affect your life?
Actually if you really want to know, I could enter mensa on my act
score.
lata
Drew
(still LMAO)
Drew
Here are the qualifications you must have to be considered for
membership:
1) You must constantly proclaim your intelligence, but not be able to
construct a simple sentence.
Tell people that you are intelligent and Type as fast as you can and use
word economy whenever possible
2) You must misspell easy words (like "what") on a regular basis.
if you misstype a word don't bother going back to change it b/c it
really doesn't matter
3) You must make frequent use of the abbreviation "LOL" when posting on
Usenet, especially when making a fool of yourself.
use as many abbreviations as possible
4) You must type "b/c" as opposed to "because."
see # 3
5) If you don't like what a male poster has written, start calling him a
"faggot."
only call someone else a fagot after they have insulted your sexualiy,
example, jeremie called my fiancee a man
6) If you don't like what a female poster has written, start calling her
a "cunt."
feel free to use all words to make a point, especially trigger words if
someone upsets you, to show them what it feels like
7) You must be a moronic bigot (see #5).
all are free to join including jeremie
8) If you piss people off, try to appease them by giving out insincere
apologies.
my apology was sincere, if you don't think so, get over it, ...
9) You must have an IQ no higher than 70, but claim that it's "over
200."
any IQ is welcome, I have worked at a home for the mentally challenged
before ( they like being called that jeremie not moron and idiot, you
bigot) and some of their ideas really surprised me
10) Whatever you do, DON'T MAKE USE OF A SPELLCHECK.
spellcheck is a waste of time unless you are really anal and have to
have everything perfect. Don't use it for posting here or in email.
people should get what your saying from the outer content of the
misspelled word.
Unfortunately, I think *everyone* who posts here is too smart to join
(except, of course, Proklon-Star and Pat Diggler).
-Jeremy
11. be nice
membership is free
once again jeremie thank you for that nice cut n paste post you made
Lata
Drew
jeremie you really need to get all this stuff off your mind. if I knew
you were going to waste this much of your life on this...
Please do not waste all your great mental facilities on me all day. It
really is a waste of your time, go out side once in awhile ok.
rocke...@webtv.net
Drew
lol
so what age did you put you "big cheater" (jeremie wight)
lol
at least you have a sense of humor too.
seems jeremie takes things way too seriously
Drew
bartender
is going to be ''LMAO" @ U. So we finally hear the truth. About time.news:17521-37...@newsd-212.iap.bryant.webtv.net...
bartender
bartender
rules. Guess with such a high IQ it's hard for you to think of things on
your own huh? hehehehehenews:17522-37...@newsd-212.iap.bryant.webtv.net...
bartender
<rocke...@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:15651-37...@newsd-251.iap.bryant.webtv.net...
dirlnk
<bart...@bartenderofamerica.com> wrote:
>For some reason, could it be how much your spelling is off in allot of your
>posts, I don't believe you. Sorry.
Even intelligent people have to be motivated to think. For a long
time, Einstein didn't bother learning to tie his shoes. He thought it
was a waste of mental energy.
good...@webtv.net
>only call someone else a fagot after they have
>insulted your sexualiy, example, jeremie called
>my fiancee a man
Okay--this sentence doesn't even make sense, but I think I caught the
gist of it. Drew claims I insulted his sexuality by calling his fiancee'
a man, is that it?
Not even a half-truth.
I was responding to yet another one of Drew's rambling missives, in
which he continued to assert his superior intellect. He was, as usual,
failing miserably.
In it, he wrote something like:
"no, I have more fun with my fiance, she's alot more fun."
I simply stated that based on what he'd written, his significant other
was a man. Drew, being the seasoned writer that he is, had used the
masculine form of fiancee'. I was only trying to make a point about his
stupidity--and I succeeded. I wasn't "insulting" his sexuality, I was
insulting his intelligence.
>any IQ is welcome, I have worked at a home
>for
>the mentally challenged before ( they like
>being
>called that jeremie not moron and idiot, you
>bigot) and some of their ideas really surprised
>me
Wow, you've worked for a suicide hotline AND a home for the mentally
challenged--Jesus has *nothing* on you, dude.
>spellcheck is a waste of time unless you are
>really anal and have to have everything
>perfect.
>Don't use it for posting here or in email. people
>should get what your saying from the outer
>content of the misspelled word.
No comment.
-Jeremy
good...@webtv.net
>LMAO
Believe me, I was laughing too when I saw what a pathetic stunt you
pulled.
>jeremy, you need to get a life, really. To
>spend
>that much time check out the stats on
>someone
>else is, well, sad, very sad. You need to get
>out
>more jeremy.
It took about two minutes to uncover your stupid ruse. I saw your
"score" of 210 and knew immediately that it was utter bullshit, so I
clicked on the FAQ and figured out what you had done in a matter of
seconds. Anyone with a half a brain could have done it (which excludes
you).
>actually the first time I took the test it was 160.
>I
>thought there was something wrong
Of course there was something wrong! That score is at least one hundred
points too high!
>so I checked the faq and saw that the highest
>that an adult could score was a 170. Not
>wanting to post that I took it again. If you really
>want to know.
Right--but you forgot to mention a few things.You took it again and made
FALSE claims when you filled out the information. You thought you'd
impress us all with your amazing intellect, even if you had to lie to do
it. How fucking "sad" is that?
Which brings me to another point--why would you post it in the first
place, you buffoon??? Does anybody give a shit?? Would anybody even
believe it??? It's so obvious that you wanted to impress everyone--you
even wrote "Check this out." Meanwhile, you tell *me* to get a life when
you aren't even content enough to exist in your own warped reality! You
aren't a genius. You aren't even clever. Face it.
>Think about how much of your finite time on
>earth you have spent responding to me and
>others about attacks on your character. Does
>it
>really matter? Will you ever meet any of these
>people? Does their opinion of you really affect
>your life?
Think about what you just wrote. You tried to make a point about how the
people's opinions on this newsgroup don't matter, isn't that correct?
Okay--THEN WHY DID YOU FIND IT NECESSARY TO LIE IN ORDER TO IMPRESS
THEM?
God, you're *so* stupid. You can't even make a valid argument.
>Actually if you really want to know, I could
>enter
>mensa on my act score.
>lata
>Drew
>(still LMAO)
Really? Do you have any links to false test results that we can check
out?
Laughing *my* ass off,
-Jeremy
good...@webtv.net
>I am amazed kevin, how did you do that?
>lol
>so what age did you put you "big cheater"
>(jeremie wight)
>lol
>at least you have a sense of humor too.
>seems jeremie takes things way too seriously
>Drew
I don't even need to add anything--this post speaks for itself.
Drew, why do you bother responding? I've been saying for weeks now that
you're a moron. Now, I've proved it. Give it up. You're too stupid to
continue arguing with me.
Say what you want, but these are the facts:
You're a liar. You're an imbecile.
You're a FRAUD--and I exposed you.
There's nothing more to discuss. However, if you continue posting
responses, we'll continue to make you look bad.
-Jeremy
good...@webtv.net
>Even intelligent people have to be motivated
>to
>think. For a long time, Einstein didn't bother
>learning to tie his shoes. He thought it was a
>waste of mental energy.
Are you giving Drew the benefit of the doubt? You must be new around
here!
Seriously though, you bring up an interesting point--it just have no
relevance to Drew (although he might not know how to tie his shoes,
either). Drew doesn't have any "mental energy" to waste. Read some of
his posts and see for yourself.
As for Einstein--I'll bet *he* never had to cheat on an IQ test just to
impress people.
Right, Drew?
-Jeremy
Drew
everyone was claiming I was 12
now your saying im in my 20s
oh thank you for the nice comments you made about my daughter
you talk about how your above stuff when you really aren't. your way
below me jeremie. you have resorted to insulting my daughter and my
fiancee. so how intelligent are you jeremie? having to resort to
personal character attacks and attacks against my family
as to all the rest of you excluding one
I could care less what you sorry excuse for beings have to say.
to go along with a bigotted child molester as he insults my child and
not even respond to him is cowardice
so do I care what your opinion is no.
so which was I lying about? my age or my IQ?
Jeremie is something special, he goes to my website and looks at the
pics on it and then insults my child and my fiancee
such a great man jeremie
also I have not insulted you in the majority of my posts, everyone of
your posts has some sort of degrading comment in it
big fraud, whatever
the test actually wouldn't test someones IQ
it goes more on educational level more than anything else
half the concepts in the test a person with a ged wouldn't understand
as to argumentation, jeremie, you have never taken logic have you?
b/c if you had you would see that your argumentation styles are
fraudulent
as a matter of fact jeremie, people have asked me just to ignore your
responses all together, saying I need to be better than you, did any one
ask you that? no b/c everyone thinks your a troll
at least you concede that I am in my 20s now or are you going to take
that back after you have used it for your big discovery,
you talk about me jeremie and attack me in every one of your posts, and
you have no argumentation skills at all jeremie
none
you only use fallacy arguments
straw house, etc
jeremie your....................
fill in what ever you want
oh and thank you for that nice cut n paste post. at least I got you to
do something nice
good...@webtv.net
>But how do you really know I cheated on the
>test jeremie? before everyone was claiming I
>was 12
>now your saying im in my 20s
I visited that pathetic webpage of yours. By the way, I noticed on the
page that you still refer to your significant other as your "fiance."
You might want to change that.
I've already PROVEN how you cheated on the IQ test.
>you talk about how your above stuff when you
>really aren't. your way below me jeremie. you
>have resorted to insulting my daughter and my
>fiancee. so how intelligent are you jeremie?
>having to resort to personal character attacks
>and attacks against my family
Where did I insult your daughter? All I said is that I feel sorry for
her, having to have a complete moron for a daddy. As for your fiancee',
she's getting married to you--'nuff said. Go on, keep making shit up!
Loser.
>so which was I lying about? my age or my IQ?
Your IQ, no doubt about it.
>Jeremie is something special, he goes to my
>website and looks at the pics on it and then
>insults my child and my fiancee
That statement has just as much truth to it as your IQ test
results--NONE.
>big fraud, whatever
>the test actually wouldn't test someones IQ it
>goes more on educational level more than
>anything else
Still doesn't change the fact that you cheated, you FRAUD!
>half the concepts in the test a person with a
>ged
>wouldn't understand
Oh, so THAT'S why you did it!
>as to argumentation, jeremie, you have never
>taken logic have you? b/c if you had you would
>see that your argumentation styles are
>fraudulent
If my logic is so flawed, tell me how. I'd love to hear your pitiful
analysis.
>as a matter of fact jeremie, people have asked
>me just to ignore your responses all together
Sounds like pretty good advice. All you're doing is allowing me to
continue making a fool out of you.
>you talk about me jeremie and attack me in
>every one of your posts, and you have no
>argumentation skills at all jeremie none
>you only use fallacy arguments
>straw house, etc
Really? How? I don't hear you disputing anything I said--maybe because
you can't, eh?
Poor Drew--will you ever learn?
-Jeremy
-----------------------------------------------------
"You are beaten. It is useless to resist. Don't make me destroy you..."
DARTH VADER, 1980.
David Glidden
have everything perfect.>>
Actually, spellcheck is a waste of time if you paid attention in
elementary school
and didn't have crappy teachers who just kept advancing you to the next
level so that they wouldn't have to deal with you for another year. If
you think I'm kidding,
look at the number of illiterate adults who
went though grade school in the 60s,70s, and 80s. I doubt this decade is
any different.
FWIW, I don't think bad spellers are stupid. Lazy, maybe, but not
stupid.
bartender
is about as harsh as one can be. You brought your IQ into this and when you
got called out on it got embarrassed. I think if anyone has the right to
call someone a sorry excuse for a human being then it's you, cause if you
lie to us just makes me wonder what kind of morals are you teaching your
young daughter. That it is ok to lie to some people that you don't know.
HUH? Makes you think doesn't it. And for the question which was I lying, I
think you were lying about both, your age and IQ. But that's just my
opinion, which I know you don't care about, so if you don't care about my
opinion, then I guess you won't respond to this letter then. Cause if you do
respond then that proves you to be a liar also, cause you said, you don't
care what people think.news:19582-37...@newsd-211.iap.bryant.webtv.net...
> But how do you really know I cheated on the test jeremie? before
> everyone was claiming I was 12
> now your saying im in my 20s
>
>
> below me jeremie. you have resorted to insulting my daughter and my
> fiancee. so how intelligent are you jeremie? having to resort to
> personal character attacks and attacks against my family
>
>
> I could care less what you sorry excuse for beings have to say.
> to go along with a bigotted child molester as he insults my child and
> not even respond to him is cowardice
>
> so do I care what your opinion is no.
>
>
> pics on it and then insults my child and my fiancee
>
>
> also I have not insulted you in the majority of my posts, everyone of
> your posts has some sort of degrading comment in it
>
> the test actually wouldn't test someones IQ
> it goes more on educational level more than anything else
>
>
> b/c if you had you would see that your argumentation styles are
> fraudulent
>
> ask you that? no b/c everyone thinks your a troll
>
> at least you concede that I am in my 20s now or are you going to take
> that back after you have used it for your big discovery,
>
> you have no argumentation skills at all jeremie
> none
>
> you only use fallacy arguments
> straw house, etc
>
>
Drew
I miss spell words all the time at work and have to have my secretary
proof read my stuff for grammatical mistakes before isend anything out.
They never really taught that at my high school. I had to memorize a
bunch of lists such as adjetives, object modifiers, and other stuff but
they don't teach application of these things, just a bunch of lists to
memorize and then write book reports, which I excelled at, but never how
to use any of the stuff I had to memorize. i guess my high school
sucked.
By the way you forgot to mention that Albert Einstein was also learning
disabled and one of his teachers actually suggested that school just
wasn't for him.
Thank you though for contributing to the post, it is quite refreshing to
here someones opion without personal attacks against my character(the
dumbass wrote, etc)
I look forward to reading more of your posts
lata
Drew
Group: alt.movies.blair-witch-project Date: Tue, Aug 24, 1999, 4:47pm
(CDT+1) From: jbu...@webtv.net (David Glidden) Re: IQ Test
Drew
I never claimed that was my IQ score or anything else
All I said was check this out
I never even said that the score was mine
this is my post
"
Group: alt.movies.blair-witch-project Date: Sun, Aug 22, 1999, 8:57pm
From: Drew...@webtv.net (Drew) Re: IQ Test
why should I proof read?
just b/c I miss a key does that really matter
check this out
http://www2.iqtest.com/view/iqtest/options/990822/9353730984248
lata
Drew
"
Did I ever say that my IQ was that presented?
See jeremie, I am not the real fraud you say I was. I just wrote check
this out and you have read so much into that little statment
I never knew "check this out" could have so many implications as you
have given it jeremie.
Lata
Drew
bartender
tracks. What do you say about the name, "IT WAS SOMEONE ELSE". Makes me
wonder about younews:19419-37...@newsd-212.iap.bryant.webtv.net...
good...@webtv.net
>I never even said that the score was mine.
>Did I ever say that my IQ was that presented?
>See jeremie, I am not the real fraud you say I
>was. I just wrote check this out and you have
>read so much into that little statment
>I never knew "check this out" could have so
>many implications as you have given it
>jeremie.
Well, let's see--you wrote "check this out" and put up a link. When you
click on the link, you see an IQ score. The name on the score is DREW.
By using the power of deduction, it's reasonable to think that since
your name is DREW, the results are for... gee, I don't know... YOU???
Yet another pathetic argument from Drew the pseudo genius. Give it up,
dummy. You're a FRAUD, and everyone knows it.
-Jeremy
good...@webtv.net
>Actually my spelling has always been bad. I
>miss spell words all the time at work and have
>to have my secretary proof read my stuff for
>grammatical mistakes before isend anything
>out. They never really taught that at my high
>school.
Gee, I learned all that stuff in elementary school--but then again, Drew
was a "special" child.
*chuckle*
>I had to memorize a bunch of lists such as
>adjetives, object modifiers, and other stuff but
>they don't teach application of these things,
>just
>a bunch of lists to memorize and then write
>book reports, which I excelled at.
Look, everybody! Drew is talking about how smart he is again! As if his
"IQ test" didn't tell us enough.
>By the way you forgot to mention that Albert
>Einstein was also learning disabled and one of
>his teachers actually suggested that school
>just
>wasn't for him.
That's true, Einstein *did* have a learning disability. You, on the
other hand, are just plain stupid.
Give it up, Drew.
-Jeremy
Drew
your so pathetic.
you don't even know what an argument is.
I never said it was my score and what abouut the other stuff you ignored
in my post.
Since you ignored them jeremie, I win this argument b/c you conceded all
the other positions and don't know what the hell your talking about.
lata
Drew
Group: alt.movies.blair-witch-project Date: Tue, Aug 24, 1999, 9:38pm
(CDT+1) From: good...@webtv.net Re: IQ Test
Well, let's see--you wrote "check this out" and put up a link. When you
click on the link, you see an IQ score. The name on the score is DREW.
By using the power of deduction, it's reasonable to think that since
your name is DREW, the results are for... gee, I don't know... YOU???
-Jeremy
Drew
you can go. Whats the matter jeremie? your little feelings get hurt.
You have continued to post your trollish posts.
I see how jeremie really is, he can dish it out but he can't take it.
Now he wants to take his ball home.
And jeremie is a liar. He said to stop making stuff up about his
insults to my family, but go to my jeremie is a liar thread and see his
lie.
lata
Drew
ps jeremy,
why do you have to post using other names?
Group: alt.movies.blair-witch-project Date: Tue, Aug 24, 1999, 7:35pm
From: bart...@bartenderofamerica.com (bartender) Re: nice comments
Angie & Dave
Drew wrote in message <19419-37...@newsd-212.iap.bryant.webtv.net>...
<<Actually my spelling has always been bad.
I miss spell words all the time at work and have to have my secretary
proof read my stuff for grammatical mistakes before isend anything out.
Time to grow up and quit blaming other people for what you don't know. Take responsibility for your life, and set an
example for your kid. Take a damned junior college class, and learn to write on an 8th grade level. Get your company
to pay for it. Then you won't be such an embarrassment to your boss or your secretary.
Angie
good...@webtv.net
>ps jeremy,
>why do you have to post using other names?
I don't, "pseudo genius." I have always posted here under the same email
address--
good...@webtv.net.
I removed my name from the postings because it was something you can do
with the new WebTV upgrade--before the upgrade, it didn't allow you to
do that. I never was all that crazy about posting my full name on
newsgroups (here, or anywhere else). Apparently, neither are you--unless
your name is "Drew Dude."
Besides, I have always signed "Jeremy" to the end of my posts. How is it
that I'm "changing" my name, Drew?
Sounds like another failed attempt to question my character...
-Jeremy
good...@webtv.net
test result he posted were his:
>Well, let's see--you wrote "check this out" and
>put up a link. When you click on the link, you
>see an IQ score. The name on the score is
>DREW. By using the power of deduction, it's
>reasonable to think that since your name is
>DREW, the results are for... gee, I don't
>know...
>YOU???
Drew's witty response:
>It is induction you dumbass jeremie.
>your so pathetic.
>you don't even know what an argument is. I
>never said it was my score and what abouut
>the
>other stuff you ignored in my post.
>Since you ignored them jeremie, I win this
>argument b/c you conceded all the other
>positions and don't know what the hell your
>talking about.
Ah yes, I should have used the power of INDUCTION--is that what you're
saying, Drew?
Because that makes NO SENSE at all, you mindless dolt! Oh, and *I'm*
the who who doesn't know what I'm talking about, eh?
*laughter*
My God, Drew, are you for real?
-Jeremy
bartender
IT WAS HIS OWN. Did it or did it not have your name on it? I think it did.
Why don't you just admit that. Do you really think we are all so stupid that
you just so randomly found this score with someone else named ''DREW" on it.
Please give me a break. Just goes to show that you can't even admit when you
are caught in a lie.news:19583-37...@newsd-211.iap.bryant.webtv.net...
> It is induction you dumbass jeremie.
> your so pathetic.
> you don't even know what an argument is.
> I never said it was my score and what abouut the other stuff you ignored
> in my post.
> Since you ignored them jeremie, I win this argument b/c you conceded all
> the other positions and don't know what the hell your talking about.
> Drew
>
>
> Group: alt.movies.blair-witch-project Date: Tue, Aug 24, 1999, 9:38pm
> (CDT+1) From: good...@webtv.net Re: IQ Test
> click on the link, you see an IQ score. The name on the score is DREW.
> By using the power of deduction, it's reasonable to think that since
> your name is DREW, the results are for... gee, I don't know... YOU???
>
bartender
Angie & Dave <I.am....@inetport.com> wrote in message
news:PhUw3.23802$x04.1...@typ11.nn.bcandid.com...