Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
WHOOPS! Mountain biker seriously injured
61 views
Skip to first unread message
Mike Vandeman
Aug 30, 2012, 9:15:11 PM8/30/12
to
Evolution in action!
Mike
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-19416059
Mountain biker seriously injured
A cyclist from Wales has been airlifted to hospital after suffering serious injuries in a mountain bike crash in Scotland.
The 40-year-old man was in a group of three riders in the Dalbeattie Forest, near Dumfries, when he came off his bike near the end of a trail.
He was airlifted to Dumfries and Galloway Royal Infirmary with head, back and possible spinal injuries.
It is not known at present where in Wales the man is from.
The three men were riding the Dalbeattie Forest mountain bike trail, one of the 7stanes centres in south Scotland.
The injured man's two friends managed to call the emergency services using their mobile phones, but because of the remoteness of the area the ambulance was unable to get to the scene.
Paramedics had to walk to the victim, and he was given pain killing injections as they waited for the Sea King rescue helicopter.
A Dumfries and Galloway Police spokesman said: "The man fell off his mountain bike and suffered head and back injuries.
"Because the ambulance was unable to get to the scene it was decided to call in the rescue helicopter."
Mike
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-19416059
Mountain biker seriously injured
A cyclist from Wales has been airlifted to hospital after suffering serious injuries in a mountain bike crash in Scotland.
The 40-year-old man was in a group of three riders in the Dalbeattie Forest, near Dumfries, when he came off his bike near the end of a trail.
He was airlifted to Dumfries and Galloway Royal Infirmary with head, back and possible spinal injuries.
It is not known at present where in Wales the man is from.
The three men were riding the Dalbeattie Forest mountain bike trail, one of the 7stanes centres in south Scotland.
The injured man's two friends managed to call the emergency services using their mobile phones, but because of the remoteness of the area the ambulance was unable to get to the scene.
Paramedics had to walk to the victim, and he was given pain killing injections as they waited for the Sea King rescue helicopter.
A Dumfries and Galloway Police spokesman said: "The man fell off his mountain bike and suffered head and back injuries.
"Because the ambulance was unable to get to the scene it was decided to call in the rescue helicopter."
shrag...@hotmail.com
Sep 3, 2012, 3:00:43 PM9/3/12
to
On Thursday, August 30, 2012 9:15:11 PM UTC-4, Mike Vandeman wrote:
> Evolution in action!
>
>
>
> Mike
In June 2010, Michael J. Vandeman was arrested for assault with a deadly weapon against a mountain biker.
http://police.berkeley.edu/crimealerts/2010/10-052810-37NC.htm
He was subsequently found guilty of exhibiting a deadly weapon and battery.
> Evolution in action!
>
>
>
> Mike
In June 2010, Michael J. Vandeman was arrested for assault with a deadly weapon against a mountain biker.
http://police.berkeley.edu/crimealerts/2010/10-052810-37NC.htm
He was subsequently found guilty of exhibiting a deadly weapon and battery.
Mike Vandeman
Sep 7, 2012, 4:58:21 PM9/7/12
to
Blackblade
Sep 10, 2012, 1:34:13 PM9/10/12
to
On Friday, September 7, 2012 9:58:22 PM UTC+1, Mike Vandeman wrote:
> > He was subsequently found guilty of exhibiting a deadly weapon and battery.
>
>
>
> You know that's a lie, just like the mountain bikers who lied in court under oath. Mountain bikers don't know how to tell the truth. You proved it by not giving your real name.
You really have no comprehension of truth do you ? The public record clearly states that you WERE convicted of exhibiting a deadly weapon and battery. So, by your own words, you prove yourself a liar. (unknown) is not lying ... you are !
> > He was subsequently found guilty of exhibiting a deadly weapon and battery.
>
>
>
> You know that's a lie, just like the mountain bikers who lied in court under oath. Mountain bikers don't know how to tell the truth. You proved it by not giving your real name.
Mike Vandeman
Sep 10, 2012, 8:08:24 PM9/10/12
to
shrag...@hotmail.com
Sep 11, 2012, 12:32:40 PM9/11/12
to
On Friday, September 7, 2012 4:58:22 PM UTC-4, Mike Vandeman wrote:
> On Monday, September 3, 2012 12:00:43 PM UTC-7, (unknown) wrote:
>
> > On Thursday, August 30, 2012 9:15:11 PM UTC-4, Mike Vandeman wrote:
>
> >
>
> > > Evolution in action!
>
> On Monday, September 3, 2012 12:00:43 PM UTC-7, (unknown) wrote:
>
> > On Thursday, August 30, 2012 9:15:11 PM UTC-4, Mike Vandeman wrote:
>
> >
>
> > > Evolution in action!
>
> > In June 2010, Michael J. Vandeman was arrested for assault with a deadly weapon against a mountain biker.
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > http://police.berkeley.edu/crimealerts/2010/10-052810-37NC.htm
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > He was subsequently found guilty of exhibiting a deadly weapon and battery.
>
>
>
> You know that's a lie, just like the mountain bikers who lied in court under oath. Mountain bikers don't know how to tell the truth. You proved it by not giving your real name.
The public record proves otherwise.
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > http://police.berkeley.edu/crimealerts/2010/10-052810-37NC.htm
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > He was subsequently found guilty of exhibiting a deadly weapon and battery.
>
>
>
> You know that's a lie, just like the mountain bikers who lied in court under oath. Mountain bikers don't know how to tell the truth. You proved it by not giving your real name.
http://police.berkeley.edu/crimealerts/2010/10-052810-37NC.htm
Mike Vandeman
Sep 11, 2012, 1:39:04 PM9/11/12
to
On Tuesday, September 11, 2012 9:32:41 AM UTC-7, (unknown) wrote:
> On Friday, September 7, 2012 4:58:22 PM UTC-4, Mike Vandeman wrote: > On Monday, September 3, 2012 12:00:43 PM UTC-7, (unknown) wrote: > > > On Thursday, August 30, 2012 9:15:11 PM UTC-4, Mike Vandeman wrote: > > > > > > > Evolution in action! > > > In June 2010, Michael J. Vandeman was arrested for assault with a deadly weapon against a mountain biker. > > > > > > > > > > > > http://police.berkeley.edu/crimealerts/2010/10-052810-37NC.htm > > > > > > > > > > > > He was subsequently found guilty of exhibiting a deadly weapon and battery. > > > > You know that's a lie, just like the mountain bikers who lied in court under oath. Mountain bikers don't know how to tell the truth. You proved it by not giving your real name. The public record proves otherwise. http://police.berkeley.edu/crimealerts/2010/10-052810-37NC.htm
All that proves is that the mountain bikers LIED. The assault charge was DISMISSED. DUH! Do your homework. And use your real name, coward.
> On Friday, September 7, 2012 4:58:22 PM UTC-4, Mike Vandeman wrote: > On Monday, September 3, 2012 12:00:43 PM UTC-7, (unknown) wrote: > > > On Thursday, August 30, 2012 9:15:11 PM UTC-4, Mike Vandeman wrote: > > > > > > > Evolution in action! > > > In June 2010, Michael J. Vandeman was arrested for assault with a deadly weapon against a mountain biker. > > > > > > > > > > > > http://police.berkeley.edu/crimealerts/2010/10-052810-37NC.htm > > > > > > > > > > > > He was subsequently found guilty of exhibiting a deadly weapon and battery. > > > > You know that's a lie, just like the mountain bikers who lied in court under oath. Mountain bikers don't know how to tell the truth. You proved it by not giving your real name. The public record proves otherwise. http://police.berkeley.edu/crimealerts/2010/10-052810-37NC.htm
Blackblade
Sep 12, 2012, 9:07:07 AM9/12/12
to
On Tuesday, September 11, 2012 6:39:05 PM UTC+1, Mike Vandeman wrote:
> All that proves is that the mountain bikers LIED. The assault charge was DISMISSED. DUH! Do your homework. And use your real name, coward.
You really are losing it ... (unknown) didn't mention assault ... he stated, quite correctly, that you were convicted of exhibiting a deadly weapon and battery. That is a 100% true statement of the facts.
> All that proves is that the mountain bikers LIED. The assault charge was DISMISSED. DUH! Do your homework. And use your real name, coward.
Mike Vandeman
Sep 13, 2012, 8:08:04 PM9/13/12
to
On Wednesday, September 12, 2012 6:07:07 AM UTC-7, Blackblade wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 11, 2012 6:39:05 PM UTC+1, Mike Vandeman wrote: > All that proves is that the mountain bikers LIED. The assault charge was DISMISSED. DUH! Do your homework. And use your real name, coward. You really are losing it ... (unknown) didn't mention assault ... he stated, quite correctly, that you were convicted of exhibiting a deadly weapon and battery. That is a 100% true statement of the facts.
Yes, he did:
> On Tuesday, September 11, 2012 6:39:05 PM UTC+1, Mike Vandeman wrote: > All that proves is that the mountain bikers LIED. The assault charge was DISMISSED. DUH! Do your homework. And use your real name, coward. You really are losing it ... (unknown) didn't mention assault ... he stated, quite correctly, that you were convicted of exhibiting a deadly weapon and battery. That is a 100% true statement of the facts.
"The public record proves otherwise.
http://police.berkeley.edu/crimealerts/2010/10-052810-37NC.htm"
shrag...@hotmail.com
Sep 14, 2012, 11:11:54 AM9/14/12
to
I did not, in fact, mention assault. I alluded to the fact that there is a public record that A) you have a police record and B) 2 convictions in a court of law.
There's no lie there.
In addition I posted a link including your mugshot and the details of your arrest, which, in this glorious age of personal histories stored permanently on the Internet, is to be your legacy.
Here it is again:
http://police.berkeley.edu/crimealerts/2010/10-052810-37NC.htm
Mike Vandeman
Sep 14, 2012, 5:29:06 PM9/14/12
to
On Friday, September 14, 2012 8:11:55 AM UTC-7, (unknown) wrote:
> On Thursday, September 13, 2012 8:08:05 PM UTC-4, Mike Vandeman wrote: > On Wednesday, September 12, 2012 6:07:07 AM UTC-7, Blackblade wrote: > > > On Tuesday, September 11, 2012 6:39:05 PM UTC+1, Mike Vandeman wrote: > All that proves is that the mountain bikers LIED. The assault charge was DISMISSED. DUH! Do your homework. And use your real name, coward. You really are losing it ... (unknown) didn't mention assault ... he stated, quite correctly, that you were convicted of exhibiting a deadly weapon and battery. That is a 100% true statement of the facts. > > > > Yes, he did: > > > > "The public record proves otherwise. > > > > http://police.berkeley.edu/crimealerts/2010/10-052810-37NC.htm" > > > > Learn how to read. Oh, I forgot: you aren't capable. An illiterate like you has no business telling anyone what I intended to write. As usual, your overwhelming bias is preventing you from being objective. I did not, in fact, mention assault. I alluded to the fact that there is a public record that A) you have a police record and B) 2 convictions in a court of law. There's no lie there. In addition I posted a link including your mugshot and the details of your arrest, which, in this glorious age of personal histories stored permanently on the Internet, is to be your legacy. Here it is again: http://police.berkeley.edu/crimealerts/2010/10-052810-37NC.htm
I guess your memory is weak: You first posted "In June 2010, Michael J. Vandeman was arrested for assault with a deadly weapon against a mountain biker."
> On Thursday, September 13, 2012 8:08:05 PM UTC-4, Mike Vandeman wrote: > On Wednesday, September 12, 2012 6:07:07 AM UTC-7, Blackblade wrote: > > > On Tuesday, September 11, 2012 6:39:05 PM UTC+1, Mike Vandeman wrote: > All that proves is that the mountain bikers LIED. The assault charge was DISMISSED. DUH! Do your homework. And use your real name, coward. You really are losing it ... (unknown) didn't mention assault ... he stated, quite correctly, that you were convicted of exhibiting a deadly weapon and battery. That is a 100% true statement of the facts. > > > > Yes, he did: > > > > "The public record proves otherwise. > > > > http://police.berkeley.edu/crimealerts/2010/10-052810-37NC.htm" > > > > Learn how to read. Oh, I forgot: you aren't capable. An illiterate like you has no business telling anyone what I intended to write. As usual, your overwhelming bias is preventing you from being objective. I did not, in fact, mention assault. I alluded to the fact that there is a public record that A) you have a police record and B) 2 convictions in a court of law. There's no lie there. In addition I posted a link including your mugshot and the details of your arrest, which, in this glorious age of personal histories stored permanently on the Internet, is to be your legacy. Here it is again: http://police.berkeley.edu/crimealerts/2010/10-052810-37NC.htm
Now explain why you just LIED: "I did not, in fact, mention assault." It doesn't take any brains at all to see that you are a LIAR -- like ALL mountain bikers! You can't even tell the truth about your own name! QED
shrag...@hotmail.com
Sep 16, 2012, 4:02:32 PM9/16/12
to
We were discussing YOUR post *where you quoted me*, in which I absolutely did not mention assault (see above, where you quoted me, idiot). Typical of you... When you lose an argument, you stop responding or change the subject.
Wonder which you'll do now...
Mike Vandeman
Sep 17, 2012, 12:32:30 PM9/17/12
to
On Sunday, September 16, 2012 1:02:32 PM UTC-7, (unknown) wrote:
> On Friday, September 14, 2012 5:29:06 PM UTC-4, Mike Vandeman wrote: > On Friday, September 14, 2012 8:11:55 AM UTC-7, (unknown) wrote: > > > On Thursday, September 13, 2012 8:08:05 PM UTC-4, Mike Vandeman wrote: > On Wednesday, September 12, 2012 6:07:07 AM UTC-7, Blackblade wrote: > > > On Tuesday, September 11, 2012 6:39:05 PM UTC+1, Mike Vandeman wrote: > All that proves is that the mountain bikers LIED. The assault charge was DISMISSED. DUH! Do your homework. And use your real name, coward. You really are losing it ... (unknown) didn't mention assault ... he stated, quite correctly, that you were convicted of exhibiting a deadly weapon and battery. That is a 100% true statement of the facts. > > > > Yes, he did: > > > > "The public record proves otherwise. > > > > http://police.berkeley.edu/crimealerts/2010/10-052810-37NC.htm" > > > > Learn how to read. Oh, I forgot: you aren't capable. An illiterate like you has no business telling anyone what I intended to write. As usual, your overwhelming bias is preventing you from being objective. I did not, in fact, mention assault. I alluded to the fact that there is a public record that A) you have a police record and B) 2 convictions in a court of law. There's no lie there. In addition I posted a link including your mugshot and the details of your arrest, which, in this glorious age of personal histories stored permanently on the Internet, is to be your legacy. Here it is again: http://police.berkeley.edu/crimealerts/2010/10-052810-37NC.htm > > > > I guess your memory is weak: You first posted "In June 2010, Michael J. Vandeman was arrested for assault with a deadly weapon against a mountain biker." > > > > Now explain why you just LIED: "I did not, in fact, mention assault." It doesn't take any brains at all to see that you are a LIAR -- like ALL mountain bikers! You can't even tell the truth about your own name! QED My memory is fine, much unlike yours. We were discussing YOUR post *where you quoted me*, in which I absolutely did not mention assault (see above, where you quoted me, idiot). Typical of you... When you lose an argument, you stop responding or change the subject. Wonder which you'll do now...
Liar (which is all mountain bikers' middle name).
> On Friday, September 14, 2012 5:29:06 PM UTC-4, Mike Vandeman wrote: > On Friday, September 14, 2012 8:11:55 AM UTC-7, (unknown) wrote: > > > On Thursday, September 13, 2012 8:08:05 PM UTC-4, Mike Vandeman wrote: > On Wednesday, September 12, 2012 6:07:07 AM UTC-7, Blackblade wrote: > > > On Tuesday, September 11, 2012 6:39:05 PM UTC+1, Mike Vandeman wrote: > All that proves is that the mountain bikers LIED. The assault charge was DISMISSED. DUH! Do your homework. And use your real name, coward. You really are losing it ... (unknown) didn't mention assault ... he stated, quite correctly, that you were convicted of exhibiting a deadly weapon and battery. That is a 100% true statement of the facts. > > > > Yes, he did: > > > > "The public record proves otherwise. > > > > http://police.berkeley.edu/crimealerts/2010/10-052810-37NC.htm" > > > > Learn how to read. Oh, I forgot: you aren't capable. An illiterate like you has no business telling anyone what I intended to write. As usual, your overwhelming bias is preventing you from being objective. I did not, in fact, mention assault. I alluded to the fact that there is a public record that A) you have a police record and B) 2 convictions in a court of law. There's no lie there. In addition I posted a link including your mugshot and the details of your arrest, which, in this glorious age of personal histories stored permanently on the Internet, is to be your legacy. Here it is again: http://police.berkeley.edu/crimealerts/2010/10-052810-37NC.htm > > > > I guess your memory is weak: You first posted "In June 2010, Michael J. Vandeman was arrested for assault with a deadly weapon against a mountain biker." > > > > Now explain why you just LIED: "I did not, in fact, mention assault." It doesn't take any brains at all to see that you are a LIAR -- like ALL mountain bikers! You can't even tell the truth about your own name! QED My memory is fine, much unlike yours. We were discussing YOUR post *where you quoted me*, in which I absolutely did not mention assault (see above, where you quoted me, idiot). Typical of you... When you lose an argument, you stop responding or change the subject. Wonder which you'll do now...
0 new messages