All comments/experiences appreciated.
? - looks and feels like plastic to me.
bloocow - no i'm not putting my time atacs back on yet, just wondering for
future reference.
Almost every non-carbon MTB shoe I've seen DOES have a plastic sole. There's
just rubber tread on the bottom. A rubber-only sole would be about as
supportive as a pair of Vans, which, in turn, is about as supportive as a
deadbeat dad.
what I was told is that the stiffer soles (as compared to sskate shoe type
rubber soles) hold up much better, and give better support which = less
foot fatigue.
penny
>
aka, hot feet probs...
A stiffer sole (plastic/carbon) effectively increases the surface area of the
pedal, so the pressure is distibuted across as much of the foot as possible
when peddling (try ride around for a while barefoot or swith slops to see
what I mean). There is also a more effective/efficient transfer of power
from your legs to the pedal with a stiffer sole..
My SPD sandals, while not exactly MTB shoes, seem to have metal soles
under the rubber/plastic (I think plastic) tread. And I assume that my
rockhoppers have fibreglass inserts although I'm not sure
I had an old pair of Diadora Jalepenos rip out a the heel once, and,
IIRC, found that under the footbed there's a strip of cardboard, then
a 2/3" wide steel shank running from the heel to where the cleat is
installed. This provided the stiffness. Under that was a somewhat
compliant plastic sole.
The only rubber soled bike shoes I've had are an old pair of Answers.
The knobs are coming off here and there, but I hot glue them back on.
They're great. They don't fit as well, but provide WAY more traction
in the wet and rocky than my Sidi's.
/s