Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

"Serious Rider"

3 views
Skip to first unread message

JD

unread,
Sep 17, 1999, 3:00:00 AM9/17/99
to
What are people referring to when the say these two words?
I have seen these words placed together on this NG many
times and have wondered. What do they mean by "serious"?
Is this a reference to racers? Is this someone who does
not smile when riding? I do believe that there are several
interpretations involved here, all of which, I care not to
know. The only consistency I see in use of this term is
when someone is (pathetically) attempting to convey
superiority. Get a clue. It's not how you play the game,
it's whether you ride or not.

JD

* Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network *
The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!


Roger Buchanan

unread,
Sep 17, 1999, 3:00:00 AM9/17/99
to
JD wrote:

> What are people referring to when the say these two words?

[Snart] [Hack]

Aheb...!

I dink but dey been by da derm "serious riber" is dat dey hab a goal, be it:

a) Bosing, derbye luging cool (Dot!)
b) Racig, dey feel nobody is baying addention do dem so de say dey are "serious
ribers", lige wed somebudy doden't beleeb you about someding, and you say "Do!
I'b serious!" Maybe racers who feel idadekwet feel bedder if dey use da terb
"serious riber"
c) Dey don't lige do hab fud...so dey are a "serious riber"

> I do believe that there are several
> interpretations involved here, all of which, I care not to
> know.

Oh shur! dow you dell be dat it wudz a rhedorical quesdjun...<snib>

> It's not how you play the game,
> it's whether you ride or not.

Aben doo dat brudder! [hack]

--

Rog,
Agodizingly drying to becub a bedder boundain biker,
ad baking shareholders ub Kleedex stogs ridch beyod dare wildest dreabs

Bay obbage do be ad da fawdowig...
Kleedex URL: http://www.kimberly-clark.com/what/family/

Bike Boy

unread,
Sep 17, 1999, 3:00:00 AM9/17/99
to
According to one poster, a serious rider is one who is too dumb to wear a
helmet.

Bubba

unread,
Sep 17, 1999, 3:00:00 AM9/17/99
to
JD wrote in message <164c000c...@usw-ex0108-057.remarq.com>...

>What are people referring to when the say these two words?
>I have seen these words placed together on this NG many
>times and have wondered. What do they mean by "serious"?
>Is this a reference to racers? Is this someone who does
>not smile when riding? I do believe that there are several

>interpretations involved here, all of which, I care not to
>know. The only consistency I see in use of this term is
>when someone is (pathetically) attempting to convey
>superiority. Get a clue. It's not how you play the game,

>it's whether you ride or not.
<tagline snipped>

Here! here! JD!!!

I'm NOT a serious rider. I enjoy it too much to be serious.

Bubba

ET

unread,
Sep 17, 1999, 3:00:00 AM9/17/99
to
I think it's the people who
1) Don't just ride every-once-in-a-while.
2) Ride more than 3 times per week off-road.
3) Are into what ever helps them ride better (Not "Faster")
4) Write on bike newsgroups.

Sorni

unread,
Sep 17, 1999, 3:00:00 AM9/17/99
to
OK, let's all join hands and say a little prayer for Roger. It's apparent
his cold has entered his brain stem (120 mm, 90-degree rise?) and rendered
him batty...out there...fudgesicle (4th attempt at spelling!)...

Our Father, Who Art On Singletrack, Hollowed Ti Thy Components...

Bill S., Always Nice to Start Day Spiritually in SUNNY San Diego :)


Roger Buchanan <rbuc...@wpcusrgrp.org> wrote

> I dink but dey been by da derm "serious riber" is dat dey hab a goal, be
it:
>
> a) Bosing, derbye luging cool (Dot!)
> b) Racig, dey feel nobody is baying addention do dem so de say dey are
"serious
> ribers", lige wed somebudy doden't beleeb you about someding, and you say
"Do!
> I'b serious!" Maybe racers who feel idadekwet feel bedder if dey use da
terb
> "serious riber"

> c) Dey don't lige do hab fud...so dey are a "serious riber" {sned}


Pete Fagerlin

unread,
Sep 17, 1999, 3:00:00 AM9/17/99
to
ET <ethomas...@hitachi-hkis.com> wrote in message
news:022dacf6...@usw-ex0107-052.remarq.com...

> I think it's the people who
<snip>

> 4) Write on bike newsgroups.

This has absolutely nothing to do with being any kind of "rider."

--
Pete Fagerlin
Cycling pictures, videos, and unopinionated diatribes can
usually be found at: http://www.petefagerlin.com

Matt Plum

unread,
Sep 17, 1999, 3:00:00 AM9/17/99
to
I thought it was a person who rode a serious bike on serious trails all the
while looking as serious as possible...... What a seriously stupid thread
Matt

Pete Fagerlin <pe...@petefagerlin.com> wrote in message
news:3OsE3.628$Rn.6...@typhoon-sf.snfc21.pbi.net...

Blaine Bauer

unread,
Sep 17, 1999, 3:00:00 AM9/17/99
to
Well, I guess everybody has to have SOME pet peeve, JD, and
this is yours.

Blaine

Pete

unread,
Sep 17, 1999, 3:00:00 AM9/17/99
to

ET <ethomas...@hitachi-hkis.com> wrote

> I think it's the people who

> 1) Don't just ride every-once-in-a-while.
> 2) Ride more than 3 times per week off-road.

So someone who rides 150 miles/week onroad, and offroad only on saturday
morning is not a "serious rider"?

Pete

Pete Fagerlin

unread,
Sep 17, 1999, 3:00:00 AM9/17/99
to
JPoulos451 <jpoul...@aol.comnospam> wrote in message
news:19990917135821...@ng-da1.aol.com...
<snip>

:Those that need to wear a helmet should look in
: their trousers and see whats missing.

Thanks for the tip!

I just checked my trousers and lo and behold, 4 of my piercings had fallen
out.

--

Pete "studly" Fagerlin

JPoulos451

unread,
Sep 17, 1999, 3:00:00 AM9/17/99
to
>According to one poster, a serious rider is one who is too dumb to wear a
>helmet.
>

Or a serious rider is one man enough to ride without one. Last time I looked, I
had two testicles. That makes me a man. Men are not afraid of pain or injury or
even death. We thrive on it. Those that need to wear a helmet should look in

JimN0OCT

unread,
Sep 17, 1999, 3:00:00 AM9/17/99
to
********** wrote:

> ...death. We thrive on it.


Hmmm.

Chico, where's my helmet?

J'm


To reply direct, remove clothes.
...-.-

James M. Lane

unread,
Sep 17, 1999, 3:00:00 AM9/17/99
to
That makes you male. Being a man is a different kettle
of men. Your definition is similar to that of
masochist. Any connection?

jim

ET

unread,
Sep 17, 1999, 3:00:00 AM9/17/99
to
You can't be serious....

Bubba

unread,
Sep 17, 1999, 3:00:00 AM9/17/99
to

JPoulos451

>a serious rider is one man enough to ride without one. Last time I looked,
I
>had two testicles. That makes me a man. Men are not afraid of pain or
injury or
>even death. We thrive on it. Those that need to wear a helmet should look
in
>their trousers and see whats missing.

Oh what's the point . . . ride without a helmet, dumbass. I'll look for you
in the
obituaries . . . on second thought, why bother? I don't give a ratzass
whether
you live to pollute the gene pool or not.

Bubba

"Brontosaurus, tired of waging battles of wit with unarmed opponents"

ET

unread,
Sep 17, 1999, 3:00:00 AM9/17/99
to
No, but has a serious bike addition on the weekends, like
some weekend alcholics (sp?)

Chico

unread,
Sep 17, 1999, 3:00:00 AM9/17/99
to
On 17 Sep 1999 18:14:47 GMT, jimn...@aol.com.clothes (JimN0OCT)
wrote:

>********** wrote:
>
>> ...death. We thrive on it.
>
>
>Hmmm.
>
>Chico, where's my helmet?

<picking myself off the floor again>

Uh, sorry. It's dented now. I hope you don't mind?

Chico

Chico

unread,
Sep 17, 1999, 3:00:00 AM9/17/99
to
JD, I have never considered the term 'serious' to convey a degree of
superiority.

I think the definition should mean a person who considers mtn-biking
to be one of the higher priorities of his weekly schedule.

Another poster mentioned, "Someone who rides more than 3 times per
week." Well, if I ride more than 3 times per week, I will tire myself
out, and won't be able to ride for a week. That's not my goal. I
want to ride as often as I physically can. My weekly schedule
generally is defined with mtn-biking in mind. Big ride one day. Day
off. Small ride next day. Big ride next day. Day off. Big ride
Sunday morning, therefore don't get hammered Sat night. Night ride
Thursday night, therefore use thursday as a day to stay at work later
and catch up. etc etc. Even my meals are planned around biking. Big
ride on Sunday, so eat like a horse on Sat night. Night ride, eat
early.

Everything I do during my week usually has a biking consequence. I
consider myself a serious rider. I may not have the best bike, I may
not do well in races, I don't care how I look, and I don't try to look
'serious' on the trail. I want to enjoy my riding. I want to know
how to take care of my bike. I was to know how to manage my biking so
that I don't tire myself out.

I think I am a serious rider, but not according to most of the
definitions I've seen here so far.

Chico

On Fri, 17 Sep 1999 01:57:55 -0700, JD <dijcctN...@hotmail.com>
wrote:

>What are people referring to when the say these two words?
>I have seen these words placed together on this NG many
>times and have wondered. What do they mean by "serious"?
>Is this a reference to racers? Is this someone who does
>not smile when riding? I do believe that there are several
>interpretations involved here, all of which, I care not to
>know. The only consistency I see in use of this term is
>when someone is (pathetically) attempting to convey
>superiority. Get a clue. It's not how you play the game,
>it's whether you ride or not.
>

>JD

ERPaul

unread,
Sep 17, 1999, 3:00:00 AM9/17/99
to
Traumatic Brain Injury Model System www.tbims.org


JimN0OCT

unread,
Sep 17, 1999, 3:00:00 AM9/17/99
to
Chico wrote:

>Uh, sorry. It's dented now. I hope you don't mind?

Ugh. I fell off of the chair *onto* the helmet! Now *that* hurt!

I'm still laughing, though! ;-)

Bubba

unread,
Sep 17, 1999, 3:00:00 AM9/17/99
to

Chico wrote in message <37e292c0...@news1.ns.sympatico.ca>...
<some pretty well thought out stuff>

I am most decidedly NOT a "serious" rider. My life is too full of
work, family, and a thousand other things to dedicate my life to
riding. OTOH, I love to ride, and do it every chance I get. Some
weeks that's 6 or 7 times, others only once or twice. Most weeks
I try and ride trails as much as possible, other weeks I'm on the
slicks flying along the asphalt and mild trails.

No point here . . . just putting my two cents in.

Bubba

natman

unread,
Sep 17, 1999, 3:00:00 AM9/17/99
to
I looked in my pants. With all the assholes running around the ng, I was afraid
mine might have escaped! But mine was there. They gotta be coming from
somewhere! Some of you guys (and girls) must be missing yours.

Nat

JPoulos451 wrote:

> >According to one poster, a serious rider is one who is too dumb to wear a
> >helmet.
> >
>

> Or a serious rider is one man enough to ride without one. Last time I looked, I

natman

unread,
Sep 17, 1999, 3:00:00 AM9/17/99
to
I have a t-shirt that says "Not tonight, I gotta ride in the morning". I also
gave up beer on Friday nights because it affected my ride on Saturday am. I
think that makes me a "serious rider". Either that or just seriously stupid.
(Or maybe I'm just pissed off about giving up the beer and nookie!) Then
again, since I ALWAYS wear a helmet, I apparently don't have any testicles with
which to get nookie anyway, so maybe it wasn't such a sacrifice!

On a more serious note, who gives a shit who's a serious rider and who's not.
Unless you're permanently manacled to someone, their riding philosophy and
abilities should mean little to you. If someone's a poser, they're not likely
to be riding the trails you are unless you're a poser too! And the the more
people who buy bikes and don't ride them on "serious" trails the LESS your bike
costs you and the more room you have on the trail. In closing I have two things
to say..."Can't we all just get along?" and "Shut up and ride your damned
bike!"

Keith Lukaszek

unread,
Sep 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM9/18/99
to
A serious "manly" rider, knowing that his brain is really his largest sex
organ, will not hesitate to take such simple, inexpensive measures as
wearing a helmet to protect it.


By the way, God told me to keep right on wearing a helmet again the other
day. At the minimum, His advice allowed me to continue my ride without a
mind clouded by pain.


But then again maybe you really do think
JPoulos451 wrote in message
<19990917135821...@ng-da1.aol.com>...

Brian

unread,
Sep 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM9/18/99
to
Keith Lukaszek wrote:
>
> A serious "manly" rider, knowing that his brain is really his largest sex
> organ, will not hesitate to take such simple, inexpensive measures as
> wearing a helmet to protect it.

For some people it's not worth the price of the helmet.;)

Thomas Letherby

unread,
Sep 22, 1999, 3:00:00 AM9/22/99
to
In article <19990917135821...@ng-da1.aol.com>, JPoulos451
<jpoul...@aol.comnospam> communicated thus:

>>According to one poster, a serious rider is one who is too dumb to wear a
>>helmet.
>>
>
>Or a serious rider is one man enough to ride without one. Last time I looked, I
>had two testicles. That makes me a man. Men are not afraid of pain or injury or
>even death. We thrive on it. Those that need to wear a helmet should look in
>their trousers and see whats missing.

Your brain: you opened your flies and your brain fell out!
Aren't you man enough to admit that you might not be completely
invulnerable? Or did you never get past the 'I'm 14, 10' tall and
bombproof' stage?
--
Thomas Letherby
The views expressed above are mine and not anyone else's. That includes my
employers Cyclesurgery (www.cyclesurgery.com) and my college, friends, family
etc.


Joe Bloggs

unread,
Sep 24, 1999, 3:00:00 AM9/24/99
to
I think he winding us up eh?

Mike

0 new messages