Now the AMERICAN CHOISE to the new monstreus bill: NO
Me
KNOW THAT OVERGROWN POLICIES
DO NOLT WORK AND THEY ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS SSON AS THE PROCESS IS
"ALLOWED"
ITS DEMOCRATIC ACCSESS.
(hackers still matter in this post)
2. It does not provide emergency tretment toa ll Americans ANYWAY
3. Heath needs are specialized and individualized; the idea to
midicritized all,
when we are no a socialist country it is intrinsically conflicted
- what about the speciality treatment that middle class will not be
able to access no matter what they do - THAT INSURENCE FOR ALL IS MORE
THAN MIDIOCRACY FOR ALL; IT IS KILLING THE AMERICAN ACHIEVEMNTS IN
MEDICINE PRIRTTY SOON,
IF BY ANY CHANCE WAS IMPLEMENTABLE.
4. Mr President ovwerdid that twist on EGALITARIAN medicall access.
It is not by its veruy definiston of health need - SOME MNMEVER NEED
IT AND NATUARALY AGE AND SOME NEED TO BE A STATE AND OR PRIOVATE
CHARGE BY THE VIRTUE OF BITH DEFEBCT OR ACCIDENT. ALMOST NO OTHER
HUMAN NEED IT THAT NON-EGALIRTARIAN. WHEN PRESIDENT EGALITETE IT WE
BE .. DYING
VERY FAST MORE EVENLY( if he were to get that going)
5. More consideration ocf unfit to start up - the existing patterns of
provideig medical care be standing on the way while specialisst be
empty unlerss private pay ( what the pity for the President's basic
argument -
having rich only access to specialty care and nopt tehse that need it)
IS THERE ALTERNATIVE - APPARENTLY! IT SI BUILD IN OUR CULTURE
SEE HOW ACCESS DRIVEN IS THSI PROPOSAL:
A.To have base hospitalization and emergency treatment no matter how
much it cost on the goverment plus charity
( kind of as it is now except scatered, beurocraric and unconmfortable
wjhen someone becaonmes charity case).
THE CURRENT PROPOSAL DOES NOT PREVENT FORCDED RELEASE FROM HIOSPITAL
WEHEN ONE RFUMS OVER $1000 A DAY IN BGILLS AND OR TOSSING SICK AROUND;
NOT AT ALL;
BUT THE ACCESS BY THE NEED TO THE BASIC HUMANITARIAN NEED AND RIGHT
IN CASE OF BASE EFFECT, ACCIDENT AND OR WAR INMJUTY - UNCONDITIONAL.
B. CONDITIONAL - TO FUNCY NEEDS AND/ OR SPECIAL NEED, AND / OR
EXPERIMENTING AND /OR
BEING ABLE TO ALLOW SELF ( and other includi ng confiodential
causes) - VERY HIGHT PRIVATE INSEURENCE SHORT ONLY OF THESE THAT CAN
REFUSE THE THIRD PART PAYER
ORGANS IN THIS OPTION WILL BE PROPERLY PRIZED AND BE THE PROPERTY OF
THE
OWNER AND NOLT PRESIDENT DOCTOR ( offshore) OBAMA AND OTHER AGENTS
THAT WE DID NOT AUTHORIZED IN ANY WAY. you all saw that bushland
claime4d the false medical authority to run after half dead tio give
them o0rgans - THAT IS LEGALLY / ETHICALLY AND CULTURALY COMPLETELY
UNACCEPTABLE.
THE AGENT THAT DECIDED TO BUY THE OPTION THAT IT NEEDS IS THE MEDICAL
HEALTH CONSUMER AND NOT ANY COMMI STYLE REGULATER OR LENDED TO CHAOS
LOW OPTION CHANCE ALONE.
NOT ALL PEOPLE HAVE TO EDICATE THEMSELVES IN ALL MEDICAL OPTIONS AS
THEY VERY BUSY WITH THEIR LIVES THAT TEHY HAVE ( and as we have so
many of them that we use the propofessional to educate us insted to
argue all in non- p[ropfessional fashon) ; BUT IT IS INTRINSICALLY UN-
AMERICAN TO FORBID THE VARIETY IN HEALTH IMPROVEMENT ( that peopel
lost due to above and maybe even to own health mangemnt mistakes; but
this one be on the actor and not on other ciotuizen that loses the
choises)
Got it?
More to argue here.
MOST IMPORTANTLY THE ALTERNATIVE WILL BE IMPLEMENTGABLE; WHILE
CURRENT BILL IS NOT.