10,000 miles too much
Simpledog
miles, but it looks mint....is 10k miles too much for the honda engine to
stay reliable?
Kevin
with 32k on it, it runs as good as my 954 with 13k. You can't wrong for 4k
on a superhawk.
"Simpledog" <simpl...@mminternet.com> wrote in message
news:f5adnTQqYOa...@mminternet.net...
Jamin Kortegard
A 1998 with 10k miles? That's what... 2k miles per year on average? I
wouldn't be at all concerned, provided it's been given regular oil changes
and in general taken care of. I've got a 2002 bike in the garage with over
13k miles. I had a 2001 with 26k miles. These modern engines will last for a
LONG time if properly cared for.
--
Jamin Kortegard
2002 YZF-R1
2003 WRX
Saddlebag
>These modern engines will last for a
>LONG time if properly cared for.
Cough, sputter, clear the flem.
Daniel Bannon
That one was too easy, dude.
What I believe he meant was, "go faster, young'in!"
'-----------------------------------------------------
' Daniel Bannon
' NW WA State, U.S.A.
' 2003 ZX636B Hercusaki, 1999 CBR1100XX
'-----------------------------------------------------
Daniel Bannon
If it bothers you, have a compression check done as a sale
precondition. I wouldn't, but it's an option (not particularly
expensive, either).
Damn, those things are indeed a bargain, if you can live with the
carbs and (alleged) wonky behavior on race-rubber.
The dealer around the corner has a '98 for six big ones. Seems high
to me. Mileage unknown.
Steve
news:f5adnTQqYOa...@mminternet.net:
> I have found an immaculate 98 Superhawk nearby, 4,000 bucks. It has
> 10,000 miles, but it looks mint....is 10k miles too much for the honda
> engine to stay reliable?
Here's my one experience with a 98 Superhawk:
A friend bought his at around 8K miles and used it for primary
transportation for a couple years. Around 34K miles, he started having a
lot of trouble with the transmission - missed shifts, slipping out of gear,
etc... nearly unrideable due to its unpredictability.
$2000 and 6 weeks later, it was fixed. Just about everything in the tranny
was toast. The gears themselves were still functional, but they had
pitting beyond limits - not really abnormal - but they had to be replaced
as the dealer isn't going to do anything else.
The real culprits (no offense, Kelly) were the shifting forks and the drum.
My fried exploited the wheelying capability of the Superhawk quite
frequently and made several 1st to 2nd clutchless shifts mid-wheelie. That
sort of thing is particularly hard on the forks and drum.
IMHO, had he not engaged in this activity, the tranny would be fine. The
gear wear would still be there and as bad as ever, but it would likely not
be cause for rebuild for some time. So, if you're confident that this bike
wasn't ridden by a jackass, then you probably can't go wrong.
Steve
--
Steve Keith - in reverse order of procurement:
2002 Blue Daytona
1983 GS1100ED (GS2) - eBay, rode it to PHX from San Jose via the PCH -
sweet!
1993 GSX1100F Fat Kat
1990 GSX600F Lil' Puss
1983 GS1100ED (GS1)
My wife says: "Buell rhymes with Stool"
Ka'avik BearCat
news:efi8qvss7cb7abk3j...@4ax.com:
> The dealer around the corner has a '98 for six big ones. Seems high
> to me. Mileage unknown.
The dealer around here (portland, OR) had a '00, no miles, for "six big
ones" (plustaxandlicensingandapplicablefees). Was _really_ hard to walk
away from, but have two sportbikes now, albeit both inline-4's.
I hear (prob'ly on this NG) that the superhawk gets pretty bad fuel
economy, like just over 100mi/tank (~3.5gal?). But, they're much cheaper
than the RC-51, and still kinda cute (would _love_ to ride an RC51!)
Ka'avik BearCat
Simpledog
The local Zuki dealer had up until recently, a 01' TL1000S that he was
trying to part with for 6500 bucks, and I was tempted until the SV1000 came
out. Not that there is much of a difference for me, but, resale wise, there
is a huge difference. Something I wasn't willing to swallow.
I'm waiting to see what Zuki is doing in 04' with the SV line. It can't be
just a paint job change, why is it taking so long to come out with that
model on the web?
"Ka'avik BearCat" <Net...@tacraeb.reverse> wrote in message
news:Xns9426D039B83...@205.238.26.150...
he...@dahouse.com
<simpl...@mminternet.com> wrote:
Concerning the sv-1000 ,,
I am a sales rep at a suz,kaw,yam dealer and my 2004 books do not list
the sv650 or 1000.
I do not know if this means no sv line or just no info.
The 650 v-strom looks rather peculiar.
Andrew
"Ka'avik BearCat" <Net...@tacraeb.reverse> wrote in message
news:Xns9426D039B83...@205.238.26.150...
I'm pretty sure they share nothing in common Engine wise. The RC is
completely different.
--
Andrew
00 Daytona
00 Speed Triple
http://ultrasupercool.com
Coleman E. Howard
-----
Sheesh, I picked up my 2003 RC51 on the July the 3rd, and already have 9500
miles carefree miles. I would say 50,000, and the engine would still be
reliable.
ceh
2001 GSX R1000
2003 RC51
(63 & don't bit more care)
Jim Stinnett
10,000
Mine hasn't had a hiccup in 53K miles.
--
Jim Stinnett
R1100RS
VTR1000
http://www.moto-rama.com