Learn about stormhole here:
http://www.theinformationminister.com/press.php?ID=612123698
http://www.apa.org/journals/psp/psp7761121.html
Classic description of stormhole from 'Ann':
"It may be that his role is that of 'whipping boy'.. someone to take
out daily frustrations on. The classic whipping boy lacks basic
verbal self defense skills and suffered from neglect as a child."
Stormhole's Greatest Hits!
Retreating in humiliation:
"I've said all I'm going to say"
Back for another retreat:
"your bullshit is lame and I refuse to waste my time on it"
Checking in with his views on race relations:
"Yeah. go ahead and castigate me, but she's a fucking nigger lover...
the bitch."
Going down in flames, yet again:
"and that is all I will say in the matter"
Race relations, part Deux:
"Yeah, I remember those idiots that actually married the
gooks"
Promises, promises:
"This is the only reply you'll get"
Yet another retreat, this time with Drama Queen
sprinkles, and combined with RL threats:
"Actually, I'll address this post and ignore the rest as immaterial as
you are. I am here despite you... and maybe to spite you as well. You
see, bacchass, you are an inferior individual when it comes to
"fishing" or "flaming". I don't care to put the time or effort into
lighting a fire under your lard ass simply because you are a minor
player, an insignificant pustule unworthy of a great deal of effort.
For months now I have replied to you in a very dry and indifferent
manner -- toying with you -- but it all comes down to entertainment
value, and you rank way down there. If I wished to put forth the
effort to bitchslap you, whether it be here or in RL, rest assured, it
would be done."
Diversity training, part three:
"I didn't realize you were a fucking Jew (something new
for your sig tribute)"
Yet another humiliating retreat:
"There is no further need to
discuss those particular issues with you"
Why must you persist in behaving in such a manner?
Because I can.
Ohhhhhh...why ya gotta be that way. Right. Take care now. Bye bye then.
I believe you misspelled 'Master Usenet Flycaster Bacchus'
HTH.
Nonsense, silly bigot. It is exactly the 'traditional standard' for
evidence that you fail to follow.
> If you challenge his/their accuracy, he/they question
>your integrity.
Balderdash, silly bigot. It is your own contradictory statements that
bring your integrity into question.
> If you ask him/them for evidence, he/they will insult
>you.
Poppycock, silly bigot. I provide evidence of your bigotry, misogyny,
anti-semitsim, homophobia, and lack of veracity from your very own
Usenet postings. If you find that insulting, then, perhaps, you
shouldn't have posted your bigoted, misogynistic, anti-semiteic,
homophobic, lying posts.
> If you challenge his/their sources,
Nonsense, silly bigot. My sources are your Usenet postings. While I
can understand that any normal person would question the veracity of
that source, I contend that the source is adequate for proving your
bigotry, misogyny, anti-semitsim, homophobia, and lack of veracity.
> he/they will demand you prove
>the absolute certainty of your sources.
So far, the only 'source' you've tried to provide is an invalid
message ID. If you wish to be credible, provide verifiable evidence.
>You may have the evidence and
>the arguments on your side,
You have neither. You have provided no verifiable evidence, and you
can't argue your way out of a wet paper bag with a machete.
>but baccus and his bonobo cousins do not
>care about the evidence
You have provided no evidence for anyone to 'care about'.
>and are not interested in your arguments.
You have not offered a compelling argument. All you have is baseless
allegations.
>He/they already know the truth, and that truth is their own hypocrisy.
Ask any law klerq, truth and evidence are not necessarily the same
thing.
>
>It is a seemingly unsolvable circuitous problem,
Easily solvable. Provide proof of your allegations.
> not unlike the
>'chicken/egg' enigma... is the "inner chimp" responsible for the
>hypocrisy, or is the hypocrisy responsible for the "inner chimp"? In
>other words, what came first, "inner-chimpdom" or their hypocrisy?
>
>His getting in touch with his "inner chimp" does seem to come later in
>existence, when the pre-pubescent "chimp" finds that acting like a
>baboon brings seeming acceptance from his circle of hoot-n-holler
>bonobos... it is the tribe mentality in its most obvious
>manifestation: fit in or be an outcast.
Who wrote that for you?
Perhaps, but nothing you can do would compel me to change.
Ding! Fries are done!
>Storm <st...@xeric.de> posted message
>ID<jvr0cvou651kdmko4...@4ax.com>on Mon, 12 May 2003
>23:17:19 -0500
>>On Mon, 12 May 2003 09:49:25 -0400, Todd Klondike
>><Sir...@FanaticLegions.mil> wrote:
>>
>>>Yup, a Nevada AMS field agent managed to capture this graphic evidence
>>>that stormhole is actually gainfully employed. And there's not a mop
>>>in sight. Bet they're in the broom closet.
>>
>>baccus, in his attempt to get a reply, any reply, from BW/Storm,
>>flails about excitedly. Here ya go, baccus, I'll toss a line in your
>>direction. Bon appetit.
>
>I believe you misspelled 'Master Usenet Flycaster Bacchus'
>
>HTH.
Master Usenet Flycaster doc would piss his pants laughing at you.
--
The ledgible creditable inevitable Storm.
Kid Rock -- "Forever"
>Storm <st...@xeric.de> posted message
>ID<d9s0cvo8n8dqbltcc...@4ax.com>on Mon, 12 May 2003
>23:17:48 -0500
>>On 12 May 2003 10:29:47 -0700, magi...@witches.zzn.com (Magister)
>>wrote:
>>
>>>Todd Klondike <Sir...@FanaticLegions.mil> wrote in message news:<3ec0a5ce...@FanaticLegions.mil>...
>>>> Yup, a Nevada AMS field agent managed to capture this graphic evidence
>>>> that stormhole is actually gainfully employed. And there's not a mop
>>>> in sight. Bet they're in the broom closet.
>>>>
>>>> http://tinyurl.com/36fd
>>>
>>>Why must you persist in behaving in such a manner?
>>
>>Because he has no higher calling. Just like his ascribed origin, the
>>bonobo, baccus is striving to get in touch with his "inner chimp".
In your hasty arrogance, you overlooked this part, guppy baccus.
--
>Storm <st...@xeric.de> posted message
>ID<2cs0cvs98a6ftskr2...@4ax.com>on Mon, 12 May 2003
>23:17:52 -0500
>>On Mon, 12 May 2003 13:43:14 -0400, Todd Klondike
>><Sir...@FanaticLegions.mil> wrote:
>>
>>>magi...@witches.zzn.com (Magister) posted message
>>>ID<75bbf78c.03051...@posting.google.com>on 12 May 2003
>>>10:29:47 -0700
>>>>Todd Klondike <Sir...@FanaticLegions.mil> wrote in message news:<3ec0a5ce...@FanaticLegions.mil>...
>>>>> Yup, a Nevada AMS field agent managed to capture this graphic evidence
>>>>> that stormhole is actually gainfully employed. And there's not a mop
>>>>> in sight. Bet they're in the broom closet.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://tinyurl.com/36fd
>>>>
>>>>Why must you persist in behaving in such a manner?
>>>
>>>Because I can.
>>
>>Perhaps you'll grow out of it some day.
>
>Perhaps, but nothing you can do would compel me to change.
That is entirely *your* problem with which to deal.
>Ding! Fries are done!
--
Now you claim to speak for doc? Liar.
Why shouldn't I overlook discussion of your family? Ironically, you
overlooked the entire post.
>
>>>We may have mistakenly believed we have entered an arena where all
>>>sides are in quest of the same truth. Baccus and his bonobo cousins do
>>>not follow traditional standards of evidence in his/their arguments
>>>and diatribes.
>>
>>Nonsense, silly bigot. It is exactly the 'traditional standard' for
>>evidence that you fail to follow.
Note: No response.
>>
>>> If you challenge his/their accuracy, he/they question
>>>your integrity.
>>
>>Balderdash, silly bigot. It is your own contradictory statements that
>>bring your integrity into question.
Note: No response.
>>
>>> If you ask him/them for evidence, he/they will insult
>>>you.
>>
>>Poppycock, silly bigot. I provide evidence of your bigotry, misogyny,
>>anti-semitsim, homophobia, and lack of veracity from your very own
>>Usenet postings. If you find that insulting, then, perhaps, you
>>shouldn't have posted your bigoted, misogynistic, anti-semiteic,
>>homophobic, lying posts.
Note: No response.
>>
>>> If you challenge his/their sources,
>>
>>Nonsense, silly bigot. My sources are your Usenet postings. While I
>>can understand that any normal person would question the veracity of
>>that source, I contend that the source is adequate for proving your
>>bigotry, misogyny, anti-semitsim, homophobia, and lack of veracity.
Note: No response.
>>
>>> he/they will demand you prove
>>>the absolute certainty of your sources.
>>
>>So far, the only 'source' you've tried to provide is an invalid
>>message ID. If you wish to be credible, provide verifiable evidence.
Note: No response.
>>
>>>You may have the evidence and
>>>the arguments on your side,
>>
>>You have neither. You have provided no verifiable evidence, and you
>>can't argue your way out of a wet paper bag with a machete.
Note: No response.
>>
>>>but baccus and his bonobo cousins do not
>>>care about the evidence
>>
>>You have provided no evidence for anyone to 'care about'.
Note: No response.
>>
>>>and are not interested in your arguments.
>>
>>You have not offered a compelling argument. All you have is baseless
>>allegations.
Note: No response.
>>
>>>He/they already know the truth, and that truth is their own hypocrisy.
>>
>>Ask any law klerq, truth and evidence are not necessarily the same
>>thing.
Note: No response.
>>
>>>
>>>It is a seemingly unsolvable circuitous problem,
>>
>>Easily solvable. Provide proof of your allegations.
Note: No response.
>>
>>> not unlike the
>>>'chicken/egg' enigma... is the "inner chimp" responsible for the
>>>hypocrisy, or is the hypocrisy responsible for the "inner chimp"? In
>>>other words, what came first, "inner-chimpdom" or their hypocrisy?
>>>
>>>His getting in touch with his "inner chimp" does seem to come later in
>>>existence, when the pre-pubescent "chimp" finds that acting like a
>>>baboon brings seeming acceptance from his circle of hoot-n-holler
>>>bonobos... it is the tribe mentality in its most obvious
>>>manifestation: fit in or be an outcast.
>>
>>Who wrote that for you?
Note: No response.
You erroneously presuppose some problem on my part.
>
>>Ding! Fries are done!
--
Learn about stormhole here:
Because you have prerecorded responses, you worn out idiot.
Damn, I was hoping you would so it would smell better in here.
A. Lucard
>In article <ttp4cvk7ff5rrk6lo...@4ax.com>,
>st...@xeric.de says...
>Suck ass.
Heh, as if doc is even reading this group... it's doubtful doc is even
reading the posts in AR. If he is, he's probably frowning at the
clowning going on in there.
>Storm <st...@xeric.de> posted message
>ID<ttp4cvk7ff5rrk6lo...@4ax.com>on Wed, 14 May 2003
>13:39:50 -0500
>>On Tue, 13 May 2003 07:40:56 -0400, Todd Klondike
>><Sir...@FanaticLegions.mil> wrote:
>>
>>>Storm <st...@xeric.de> posted message
>>>ID<jvr0cvou651kdmko4...@4ax.com>on Mon, 12 May 2003
>>>23:17:19 -0500
>>>>On Mon, 12 May 2003 09:49:25 -0400, Todd Klondike
>>>><Sir...@FanaticLegions.mil> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Yup, a Nevada AMS field agent managed to capture this graphic evidence
>>>>>that stormhole is actually gainfully employed. And there's not a mop
>>>>>in sight. Bet they're in the broom closet.
>>>>
>>>>baccus, in his attempt to get a reply, any reply, from BW/Storm,
>>>>flails about excitedly. Here ya go, baccus, I'll toss a line in your
>>>>direction. Bon appetit.
>>>
>>>I believe you misspelled 'Master Usenet Flycaster Bacchus'
>>>
>>>HTH.
>>
>>Master Usenet Flycaster doc would piss his pants laughing at you.
>
>Now you claim to speak for doc? Liar.
You're becoming boring again, baccus. You've spent too much time
around tinboy and pharton... you three must have gone on a camping
trip this past weekend........
>Storm <st...@xeric.de> posted message
>ID<0l05cv07cdr9r3k0e...@4ax.com>on Wed, 14 May 2003
>13:39:52 -0500
>>On Tue, 13 May 2003 07:41:37 -0400, Todd Klondike
>><Sir...@FanaticLegions.mil> wrote:
>>
>>>Storm <st...@xeric.de> posted message
>>>ID<d9s0cvo8n8dqbltcc...@4ax.com>on Mon, 12 May 2003
>>>23:17:48 -0500
>>>>On 12 May 2003 10:29:47 -0700, magi...@witches.zzn.com (Magister)
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Todd Klondike <Sir...@FanaticLegions.mil> wrote in message news:<3ec0a5ce...@FanaticLegions.mil>...
>>>>>> Yup, a Nevada AMS field agent managed to capture this graphic evidence
>>>>>> that stormhole is actually gainfully employed. And there's not a mop
>>>>>> in sight. Bet they're in the broom closet.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://tinyurl.com/36fd
>>>>>
>>>>>Why must you persist in behaving in such a manner?
>>>>
>>>>Because he has no higher calling. Just like his ascribed origin, the
>>>>bonobo, baccus is striving to get in touch with his "inner chimp".
>>
>>In your hasty arrogance, you overlooked this part, guppy baccus.
>
>Why shouldn't I overlook discussion of your family? Ironically, you
>overlooked the entire post.
I did not write and post it to discuss with you.
--
Yes, you most definitely have a problem. As your "inner chimp" begs
escape from moral and ethical confines, your blind ignorance comes to
the fore. This can most likely be attributed to the fact that the
bonobo carries a much thicker cranium, which obviously means a much
smaller brain than the species in which it attempts to communicate.
This is quite unfortunate for you as you are unlikely to grow out of
this condition. Reverse evolution, in its many forms, has given you a
short straw... my condolences.
>
>"Todd Klondike" <Sir...@FanaticLegions.mil> wrote in message
>news:3ebfdd1e...@FanaticLegions.mil...
>> magi...@witches.zzn.com (Magister) posted message
>> ID<75bbf78c.03051...@posting.google.com>on 12 May 2003
>> 10:29:47 -0700
>> >Todd Klondike <Sir...@FanaticLegions.mil> wrote in message
>news:<3ec0a5ce...@FanaticLegions.mil>...
>> >> Yup, a Nevada AMS field agent managed to capture this graphic evidence
>> >> that stormhole is actually gainfully employed. And there's not a mop
>> >> in sight. Bet they're in the broom closet.
>> >>
>> >> http://tinyurl.com/36fd
>> >
>> >Why must you persist in behaving in such a manner?
>>
>> Because I can.
>
>Because you have prerecorded responses, you worn out idiot.
The dog chasing its tail... I believe there is a bonoboism concerning
this syndrome... yes, there is. The older and more senile bonobo, once
considered an "elder" of sorts, when the "inner chimp" is attempting
to project a voice of authority, knowing full well he no longer has
one, will often repeat himself incessantly. This is often taken
outside of usenet as well. Of course, in both real life and usenet, he
is scoffed at for his obsessive behavior.
What I find so odd is that I laughed at him the first time he posted
his drivel -- he did not get the anticipated response, yet he lamely
continues.
--
>
Time to lay another turd in this joint just to cover the stench of
bacus' posts.
Balderdash, asshat. Until you and your butt-buddy porcupine-boy come
up with new material, there is no need for new responses.
Get your face out of the wooden-headed idiot's stormhole, and you may
notice an improvement.
Yet, here you are. Still.
Balderdash. Occam's Razor would tend to favor the much-simpler
postulate that I just enjoy pointing out your stupidity. Still, I
think I'd prefer your incorrect assumptions to being a bigoted,
misogynistic, homophobic, anti-semite, lying, wooden-headed idiot.
The truth, at last.
--
Learn about stormhole here:
Scatological fixation noted.
You still claim to speak for doc. Liar.
You have that rotting corpse stench that lingers for hours after your
departure. Probably for days, but you keep coming back and stinking up the
place. Oh, look. Your eye fell out again.
A. Lucard
What a lame ass excuse! Jerk.
Even if it were true, you have no room to complain with Iron Lung so far up
your ass.
A. Lucard
For lame-ass guppies.
>Jerk.
No. It would rip the hook out of your lip if I jerked the line.
What do you mean 'if', asskisser?
>you have no room to complain with Iron Lung so far up
>your ass.
Nonsense. Ironman slaps you and the wooden-headed idiot around for
his own pleasure. You, on the other hand, spend all your time trying
to defend the lying bigot.
You used a very similar joke at me not too long ago, Princess.
Wrong. Dead wrong.
A. Lucard
Then you must have used the same fLame not too long ago, asshat.
Feel free to provide evidence of your allegation, buttmunch. If you
think you can.
It may be lame, but trust me, you're worth every noneffort of it, buttplug.
A. Lucard
"Go Fetch Something"
How ORIGINAL!
You want me to prove that I don't spend all my time trying to defend him?
Prove my innocence, in a way? Nah. It would be far more entertaining to
watch you go phuck yourself.
A. Lucard
Go phuck yourself, you fscking idiot.
A. Lucard
'May'? You're not certain?
>but trust me,
No.
>you're worth every noneffort of it,
Sure. You're getting hammered because you don't want to try.
Yeah...they'll buy *that* one.
>buttplug.
Check with stormhole. He may have a spare.
It would be easy. Provide a valid message ID to a post that you made
somewhere else, on another topic, and predating my claim that you do
nothing but fight the moron bigot's battles for him. It would be
easy, unless I'm right.
>Nah.
Can't do it, eh? No surprise there.
>It would be far more entertaining to
>watch you go phuck yourself.
Anatomically impossible.
>"Alex Lucard" <pa...@yourblood.com> posted message
>ID<aa89a3124f0f74318dfe3ef34c66ae55@TeraNews>on Fri, 16 May 2003
>01:16:32 GMT
>>
>>"Todd Klondike" <Sir...@FanaticLegions.mil> wrote in message
>>news:3ebfdd1e...@FanaticLegions.mil...
>>> magi...@witches.zzn.com (Magister) posted message
>>> ID<75bbf78c.03051...@posting.google.com>on 12 May 2003
>>> 10:29:47 -0700
>>> >Todd Klondike <Sir...@FanaticLegions.mil> wrote in message
>>news:<3ec0a5ce...@FanaticLegions.mil>...
>>> >> Yup, a Nevada AMS field agent managed to capture this graphic evidence
>>> >> that stormhole is actually gainfully employed. And there's not a mop
>>> >> in sight. Bet they're in the broom closet.
>>> >>
>>> >> http://tinyurl.com/36fd
>>> >
>>> >Why must you persist in behaving in such a manner?
>>>
>>> Because I can.
>>
>>Because you have prerecorded responses, you worn out idiot.
>
>Balderdash, asshat. Until you and your butt-buddy porcupine-boy come
>up with new material, there is no need for new responses.
In other words, you don't have any new material.
>"Alex Lucard" <pa...@yourblood.com> posted message
>ID<6e1a1be3dc47323c15b06a0e3d119afc@TeraNews>on Fri, 16 May 2003
>01:17:32 GMT
>>
>>"Todd Klondike" <Sir...@FanaticLegions.mil> wrote in message
>>news:3ecfd8b5...@FanaticLegions.mil...
>>but nothing you can do would compel me to change.
>>
>>Damn, I was hoping you would so it would smell better in here.
>
>Get your face out of the wooden-headed idiot's stormhole, and you may
>notice an improvement.
You seem to have a sick fascination with men's asses.
Here we go again...
And?
Ho hum... same tired old lame from you.
>Storm <st...@xeric.de> posted message
>ID<ier6cvkbfvg4l32m1...@4ax.com>on Thu, 15 May 2003
>05:54:09 -0500
>>On Fri, 16 May 2003 01:17:32 GMT, "Alex Lucard" <pa...@yourblood.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Todd Klondike" <Sir...@FanaticLegions.mil> wrote in message
>>>news:3ecfd8b5...@FanaticLegions.mil...
>>>but nothing you can do would compel me to change.
>>>
>>>Damn, I was hoping you would so it would smell better in here.
>>>
>>>A. Lucard
>>
>>Time to lay another turd in this joint just to cover the stench of
>>bacus' posts.
>
>Scatological fixation noted.
Where did you note it? on a 3x5 card, or did you write it on your
hand?
To be factual, *you* claim I speak for doc.
>
>"Todd Klondike" <Sir...@FanaticLegions.mil> wrote in message
>news:3ec5ebbe....@FanaticLegions.mil...
>> "Alex Lucard" <pa...@yourblood.com> posted message
>> ID<aa89a3124f0f74318dfe3ef34c66ae55@TeraNews>on Fri, 16 May 2003
>> 01:16:32 GMT
>> >
>> >"Todd Klondike" <Sir...@FanaticLegions.mil> wrote in message
>> >news:3ebfdd1e...@FanaticLegions.mil...
>> >> magi...@witches.zzn.com (Magister) posted message
>> >> ID<75bbf78c.03051...@posting.google.com>on 12 May 2003
>> >> 10:29:47 -0700
>> >> >Todd Klondike <Sir...@FanaticLegions.mil> wrote in message
>> >news:<3ec0a5ce...@FanaticLegions.mil>...
>> >> >> Yup, a Nevada AMS field agent managed to capture this graphic
>evidence
>> >> >> that stormhole is actually gainfully employed. And there's not a
>mop
>> >> >> in sight. Bet they're in the broom closet.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> http://tinyurl.com/36fd
>> >> >
>> >> >Why must you persist in behaving in such a manner?
>> >>
>> >> Because I can.
>> >
>> >Because you have prerecorded responses, you worn out idiot.
>>
>> Balderdash, asshat. Until you and your butt-buddy porcupine-boy come
>> up with new material, there is no need for new responses.
>
>What a lame ass excuse! Jerk.
I'd bet the idiot is as miserable in RL as he is here.
--
>"Alex Lucard" <pa...@yourblood.com> posted message
>ID<5b8fbea10aa124b2517d10b685ec7dee@TeraNews>on Fri, 16 May 2003
>23:41:45 GMT
>>
>>"Todd Klondike" <Sir...@FanaticLegions.mil> wrote in message
>>news:3ec6ec33....@FanaticLegions.mil...
>>> "Alex Lucard" <pa...@yourblood.com> posted message
>>> ID<6e1a1be3dc47323c15b06a0e3d119afc@TeraNews>on Fri, 16 May 2003
>>> 01:17:32 GMT
>>> >
>>> >"Todd Klondike" <Sir...@FanaticLegions.mil> wrote in message
>>> >news:3ecfd8b5...@FanaticLegions.mil...
>>> >but nothing you can do would compel me to change.
>>> >
>>> >Damn, I was hoping you would so it would smell better in here.
>>>
>>> Get your face out of the wooden-headed idiot's stormhole, and you may
>>> notice an improvement.
>>
>>Even if it were true,
>
>What do you mean 'if', asskisser?
>
>>you have no room to complain with Iron Lung so far up
>>your ass.
>
>Nonsense. Ironman slaps you and the wooden-headed idiot around for
>his own pleasure. You, on the other hand, spend all your time trying
>to defend the lying bigot.
The time spent seems to cause your very vapid replies to continue
unabated.
Nope. You're just very limited in both material and imagination.
>
He's used it a number of times already... in the past two weeks I've
seen that or a similar variation six times.
--
So let us look at what we have here... barcus makes an allegation,
Alex denies the allegation, then barfus demands evidence. It appears
the bonobo barcus' "inner chimp" is ooking and eeking in an attempt to
deflect his allegation by thumping his chest and making demands where
no demands need be met. You, bacus, have no cause to demand or request
anything. You made an allegation, the onus of proof rests with you.
They don't, but I do, fuckhead.
Don't flip me off again. The skin is off your finger, rot bucket.
A. Lucard
You're not up on the latest anything.
A. Lucard
Ewwww. Bad bait.
A. Lucard
Sorry, braindead. You just don't catch on that you're not worth a whole
helluva lot of effort.
A. Lucard
In the original words: 'Until you and your butt-buddy porcupine-boy
come up with new material, there is no need for new responses.'
Right here on Usenet. You could carve it into your wooden forehead,
if you like. Right next to your 'Don't pull on my ears, I know what
I'm doing' tattoo.
What lame? 'bigoted, misogynistic, homophobic, anti-semite, lying,
wooden-headed idiot' is an accurate assessment of you. Except the
wooden-headed part. Were your head actually made completely out of
wood, you'd be smarter.
What seems to you is irrelevant. Alex Luser has his face stuffed so
far up your stormhole that you can't pull your woodenhead out.
Going somewhere? We've heard that before.
>
>And?
If
To be factual, *I* say that your saying what doc would do is *you*
claiming to speak for doc. Attributing that which you cannot know to
doc is merely a lame attempt on your part to attach doc's prestige to
your untenable position.
You are the only one who can say if your misery here equals your
misery in RL.
What seems to you is irrelevant.
>cause your very vapid replies to continue
>unabated.
Yet, you continue to be obsessed with me.
Yet beyond your ability to counter, bigot. I will not abandon a
successful strategy until you somehow compel me to do so.
Proof, please.
Yet, here you are. Again.
The movie's over. You get your yuks by answering all of my posts. And all of
Storm's. And all of anyone else's. That tell you something?
You wish you could find the shore, Rust Monster. Wade a minute and quit
carping. You lost, you boat know it yet. Sea?
>
> --
> ironman
>
> Stormhole, yeah, I fucked him. Who hasn't?
> Kid Rock -- "Forever"
It tells me that you don't know the meaning of the word 'all'. All is
not some, nor is all = many. All is not even most. Historically, I
ignore more of your posts than I reply to. Same for stormhole.
>On Sat, 17 May 2003 11:45:06 GMT, "Alex Lucard" <pa...@yourblood.com>
>wrote:
>
>> phuck
>
>Its FUCK!
>
>Geeesh. If you're gonna say it, say it correctly and with meaning.
>
>FUUUUUCK!
>
>Add the 'N A if it helps.
Shut the PHUUUUUCK up!
>"Alex Lucard" <pa...@yourblood.com> posted message
>ID<5f6dc123c8971198def65c399d93284a@TeraNews>on Sat, 17 May 2003
>11:45:06 GMT
>>
>>"Todd Klondike" <Sir...@FanaticLegions.mil> wrote in message
>>news:3ec6a433...@FanaticLegions.mil...
>>> "Alex Lucard" <pa...@yourblood.com> posted message
>>> ID<598e74c4058918f9f3c4684a998f9c9d@TeraNews>on Sat, 17 May 2003
>>> 02:14:28 GMT
>>> >
>>> >"Todd Klondike" <Sir...@FanaticLegions.mil> wrote in message
>>> >news:3ec78c5c....@FanaticLegions.mil...
>>> >> "Alex Lucard" <pa...@yourblood.com> posted message
>>> >> ID<5b8fbea10aa124b2517d10b685ec7dee@TeraNews>on Fri, 16 May 2003
>>> >> 23:41:45 GMT
>>> >> >
>>> >> >"Todd Klondike" <Sir...@FanaticLegions.mil> wrote in message
>>> >> >news:3ec6ec33....@FanaticLegions.mil...
>>> >> >> "Alex Lucard" <pa...@yourblood.com> posted message
>>> >> >> ID<6e1a1be3dc47323c15b06a0e3d119afc@TeraNews>on Fri, 16 May 2003
>>> >> >> 01:17:32 GMT
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >"Todd Klondike" <Sir...@FanaticLegions.mil> wrote in message
>>> >> >> >news:3ecfd8b5...@FanaticLegions.mil...
>>> >> >> >but nothing you can do would compel me to change.
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >Damn, I was hoping you would so it would smell better in here.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Get your face out of the wooden-headed idiot's stormhole, and you
>>may
>>> >> >> notice an improvement.
>>> >> >
>>> >> >Even if it were true,
>>> >>
>>> >> What do you mean 'if', asskisser?
>>> >>
>>> >> >you have no room to complain with Iron Lung so far up
>>> >> >your ass.
>>> >>
>>> >> Nonsense. Ironman slaps you and the wooden-headed idiot around for
>>> >> his own pleasure. You, on the other hand, spend all your time trying
>>> >> to defend the lying bigot.
>>> >
>>> >Wrong. Dead wrong.
>>>
>>> Feel free to provide evidence of your allegation, buttmunch. If you
>>> think you can.
>>
>>You want me to prove that I don't spend all my time trying to defend him?
>>Prove my innocence, in a way?
>
>It would be easy. Provide a valid message ID to a post that you made
>somewhere else, on another topic, and predating my claim that you do
>nothing but fight the moron bigot's battles for him. It would be
>easy, unless I'm right.
You made the claim, you provide the proof. As the accuser, the burden
of proof rests with you.
>>Nah.
>
>Can't do it, eh? No surprise there.
>
>>It would be far more entertaining to
>>watch you go phuck yourself.
>
>Anatomically impossible.
You tried though.
>On Sat, 17 May 2003 12:54:13 GMT, "Alex Lucard" <pa...@yourblood.com>
>wrote:
>
>>
>>"Moonbug" <la...@budweiser.com> wrote in message
>>news:gp8ccvsn1tt04d9nb...@4ax.com...
>>> On Sat, 17 May 2003 11:45:06 GMT, "Alex Lucard" <pa...@yourblood.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > phuck
>>>
>>> Its FUCK!
>>>
>>> Geeesh. If you're gonna say it, say it correctly and with meaning.
>>>
>>> FUUUUUCK!
>>>
>>> Add the 'N A if it helps.
>>>
>>
>>Go phuck yourself, you fscking idiot.
>
>Awww. You're afraid, arent ya? I can tell.
Awww. You're stupid, aren't ya? I can tell.
Uh, yeah. Whatever. The sheer volume of your replies has nothing to do with
it. Right. Gotcha.
<snicker>
>In article <20030517074353...@mb-m21.aol.com>,
>coriolu...@aol.com.au says...
>> >Subject: Re: stormhole on the job!
>> >From: ironman iro...@paranoid.com
>> >Date: 5/16/2003 8:35 AM Eastern Standard Time
>> >Message-id: <MPG.192e96ea4...@news.central.cox.net>
>> >
>> >In article <aa89a3124f0f74318dfe3ef34c66ae55@TeraNews>,
>> >pa...@yourblood.com says...
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Because you have prerecorded responses, you worn out idiot.
>> >
>> >Calm down, baldy. You are a good lap dawg. Go fetch something.
>> >
>>
>> "Go Fetch Something"
>>
>> How ORIGINAL!
>
>It's what he does. Don't make fun of lap dogs, cause *you* are
>one too.
By virtue of your statement, *you* are a 'freethinker'... BWAHAHAHA!!!
>On Sat, 17 May 2003 13:56:09 GMT, ironman <iro...@paranoid.com>
>wrote:
>
>>> > phuck
>>>
>>> Its FUCK!
>>>
>>> Geeesh. If you're gonna say it, say it correctly and with meaning.
>>>
>>> FUUUUUCK!
>>>
>>> Add the 'N A if it helps.
>>
>>But, LL, monks don't tawk that way.
>
>Oh. Im not up on the latest Monk
That's a surprise. You are usually up on anything with a dick.
>
>"Moonbug" <la...@budweiser.com> wrote in message
>news:2udccv0v23gtb33f5...@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 17 May 2003 12:54:13 GMT, "Alex Lucard" <pa...@yourblood.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >"Moonbug" <la...@budweiser.com> wrote in message
>> >news:gp8ccvsn1tt04d9nb...@4ax.com...
>> >> On Sat, 17 May 2003 11:45:06 GMT, "Alex Lucard" <pa...@yourblood.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > phuck
>> >>
>> >> Its FUCK!
>> >>
>> >> Geeesh. If you're gonna say it, say it correctly and with meaning.
>> >>
>> >> FUUUUUCK!
>> >>
>> >> Add the 'N A if it helps.
>> >>
>> >
>> >Go phuck yourself, you fscking idiot.
>>
>> Awww. You're afraid, arent ya? I can tell.
>
>Ewwww. Bad bait.
>
>A. Lucard
When she closes her legs the smell isn't so bad.
You're wearing out the PeeWee Herman defense.
>Storm <st...@xeric.de> posted message
>ID<4f7ccvopkjuvtfkna...@4ax.com>on Sat, 17 May 2003
>06:33:27 -0500
>>On Fri, 16 May 2003 11:06:13 -0400, Todd Klondike
>><Sir...@FanaticLegions.mil> wrote:
>>
>>>"Alex Lucard" <pa...@yourblood.com> posted message
>>>ID<6e1a1be3dc47323c15b06a0e3d119afc@TeraNews>on Fri, 16 May 2003
>>>01:17:32 GMT
>>>>
>>>>"Todd Klondike" <Sir...@FanaticLegions.mil> wrote in message
>>>>news:3ecfd8b5...@FanaticLegions.mil...
>>>>but nothing you can do would compel me to change.
>>>>
>>>>Damn, I was hoping you would so it would smell better in here.
>>>
>>>Get your face out of the wooden-headed idiot's stormhole, and you may
>>>notice an improvement.
>>
>>You seem to have a sick fascination with men's asses.
>
>What seems to you is irrelevant.
Yet you reply to it anyway.
You've yet to prove your mysogynistic, homophobic, or lying
allegations as they are merely your opinion, which has already been
noted as worthless. I'm cool with the other two, though anti-semite
should be classified under "bigot".
>Storm <st...@xeric.de> posted message
>ID<if7ccv8ciu910i3ef...@4ax.com>on Sat, 17 May 2003
>06:33:49 -0500
>>On Fri, 16 May 2003 11:06:28 -0400, Todd Klondike
>><Sir...@FanaticLegions.mil> wrote:
>>
>>>Storm <st...@xeric.de> posted message
>>>ID<ier6cvkbfvg4l32m1...@4ax.com>on Thu, 15 May 2003
>>>05:54:09 -0500
>>>>On Fri, 16 May 2003 01:17:32 GMT, "Alex Lucard" <pa...@yourblood.com>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"Todd Klondike" <Sir...@FanaticLegions.mil> wrote in message
>>>>>news:3ecfd8b5...@FanaticLegions.mil...
>>>>>but nothing you can do would compel me to change.
>>>>>
>>>>>Damn, I was hoping you would so it would smell better in here.
>>>>>
>>>>>A. Lucard
>>>>
>>>>Time to lay another turd in this joint just to cover the stench of
>>>>bacus' posts.
>>>
>>>Scatological fixation noted.
>>
>>Where did you note it? on a 3x5 card, or did you write it on your
>>hand?
>
>Right here on Usenet. You could carve it into your wooden forehead,
>if you like. Right next to your 'Don't pull on my ears, I know what
>I'm doing' tattoo.
I do not have a tattoo on my head... you must be confusing me with
pharton.
Then it still boils down to *you* claiming I speak for doc. Since when
is what you say the law of the land?
Counter? Who gives a shit about that? Watching you flail about is
hilarious. What was your post count for 5-17, barcus? Compare that to
5-14 when I was too busy to post any bait for you.
Disprove it.
>Storm <st...@xeric.de> posted message
>ID<4l7ccvsrjc23gqil2...@4ax.com>on Sat, 17 May 2003
>06:36:45 -0500
>>On Fri, 16 May 2003 23:01:39 -0400, Todd Klondike
>><Sir...@FanaticLegions.mil> wrote:
>>
>>>"Alex Lucard" <pa...@yourblood.com> posted message
>>>ID<598e74c4058918f9f3c4684a998f9c9d@TeraNews>on Sat, 17 May 2003
>>>02:14:28 GMT
>>>>
>>>>"Todd Klondike" <Sir...@FanaticLegions.mil> wrote in message
>>>>news:3ec78c5c....@FanaticLegions.mil...
>>>>> "Alex Lucard" <pa...@yourblood.com> posted message
>>>>> ID<5b8fbea10aa124b2517d10b685ec7dee@TeraNews>on Fri, 16 May 2003
>>>>> 23:41:45 GMT
>>>>> >
>>>>> >"Todd Klondike" <Sir...@FanaticLegions.mil> wrote in message
>>>>> >news:3ec6ec33....@FanaticLegions.mil...
>>>>> >> "Alex Lucard" <pa...@yourblood.com> posted message
>>>>> >> ID<6e1a1be3dc47323c15b06a0e3d119afc@TeraNews>on Fri, 16 May 2003
>>>>> >> 01:17:32 GMT
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> >"Todd Klondike" <Sir...@FanaticLegions.mil> wrote in message
>>>>> >> >news:3ecfd8b5...@FanaticLegions.mil...
>>>>> >> >but nothing you can do would compel me to change.
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> >Damn, I was hoping you would so it would smell better in here.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Get your face out of the wooden-headed idiot's stormhole, and you may
>>>>> >> notice an improvement.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >Even if it were true,
>>>>>
>>>>> What do you mean 'if', asskisser?
>>>>>
>>>>> >you have no room to complain with Iron Lung so far up
>>>>> >your ass.
>>>>>
>>>>> Nonsense. Ironman slaps you and the wooden-headed idiot around for
>>>>> his own pleasure. You, on the other hand, spend all your time trying
>>>>> to defend the lying bigot.
>>>>
>>>>Wrong. Dead wrong.
>>>
>>>Feel free to provide evidence of your allegation, buttmunch. If you
>>>think you can.
>>
>>So let us look at what we have here... barcus makes an allegation,
>>Alex denies the allegation, then barfus demands evidence. It appears
>>the bonobo barcus' "inner chimp" is ooking and eeking in an attempt to
>>deflect his allegation by thumping his chest and making demands where
>>no demands need be met. You, bacus, have no cause to demand or request
>>anything. You made an allegation, the onus of proof rests with you.
>
>Here ya go, retard:
>Message-ID: <e630c31d4f7478573e29c94dea646b88@TeraNews>
>Message-ID: <5a4513973647bb47b3fefb13513bb518@TeraNews>
>Message-ID: <598e74c4058918f9f3c4684a998f9c9d@TeraNews>
>Message-ID: <c885cde81a800974c2ec023d39c6de3c@TeraNews>
>Message-ID: <f6abe0ace853b50d7de1a560b70b93fe@TeraNews>
>Message-ID: <9c2b370757ee75e4feecd891ff791fb3@TeraNews>
>Message-ID: <83aa3db54a6744502a9dbef1de1219f2@TeraNews>
>Message-ID: <ce41bac36ce99bf71927a43756b1f05c@TeraNews>
>Message-ID: <4fd0b81b991d9a0d3231030beb344870@TeraNews>
>Message-ID: <5b8fbea10aa124b2517d10b685ec7dee@TeraNews>
>Message-ID: <31208494db1b576ca28a569889f4aeab@TeraNews>
>Message-ID: <d180118793ddc357e08e013bcbf3e28a@TeraNews>
>Message-ID: <edf5232bd47f619a392c59f9f111376c@TeraNews>
>Message-ID: <f1d4c5c4c17f4e11410961e9493ec1f2@TeraNews>
>Message-ID: <32b0e57f30b7054e4b8dfef6c4a011dc@TeraNews>
>Message-ID: <a5084c2e9e5f7ebe6e4c32775ba969a8@TeraNews>
>Message-ID: <982aeaa3320d5d94c9b68f0362665d02@TeraNews>
>Message-ID: <cf838f7d4298d23e883981a4fa2422f2@TeraNews>
>Message-ID: <8a9b28d9975c26ebd5f675fa007c4d9f@TeraNews>
>Message-ID: <83ae2cc6cf6aa1551db50874de80c72b@TeraNews>
>Message-ID: <b952b6cb21cb63a7ee795faf0d921d82@TeraNews>
>Message-ID: <6e1a1be3dc47323c15b06a0e3d119afc@TeraNews>
>Message-ID: <aa89a3124f0f74318dfe3ef34c66ae55@TeraNews>
>Message-ID: <ff17e887b6311eeb9c7eb7a79b98456e@TeraNews>
>Message-ID: <2ab4a2869020c962eb4f67e07344545c@TeraNews>
>Message-ID: <096a4dffd472573620083525fec4572c@TeraNews>
>Message-ID: <d9df8bc5308faa8637e4646288d14de1@TeraNews>
>Message-ID: <b6015b04fa7147707566071be9abbb8b@TeraNews>
>Message-ID: <0fb13353c48f435d8dd8ef9064925361@TeraNews>
>Message-ID: <f86a045f6833a16be4ced8c97a1882a5@TeraNews>
>Message-ID: <437803a4d6a1a77eb6dda93d1db11faa@TeraNews>
>Message-ID: <25c81026875e3632c53d24658e56ab44@TeraNews>
>Message-ID: <fa39cbbdd6c841a3736b9d265bc7dda4@TeraNews>
>Message-ID: <95c11e596e2f6163d527ac13d0b8b6a2@TeraNews>
>Message-ID: <29aec99727bac1ba5993df10fb000d5e@TeraNews>
>
>Each message authored by "Alex Lucard" <pa...@yourblood.com>.
>Each message posted to AMS.
>And, each message attacking somebody you don't like, or defending you
>outright.
>
>This here is what you'd call 'credible evidence'.
No it isn't.
He'll swallow any hook that's reeled in front of him.
>"Thor" <thu...@hammer.com> posted message
>ID<6c59685190eca28c651905dfe7de4eb4@TeraNews>on Sun, 18 May 2003
>02:33:18 GMT
>>
>>"Todd Klondike" <Sir...@FanaticLegions.mil> wrote in message
>>news:3ec9623c...@FanaticLegions.mil...
>>> "Alex Lucard" <pa...@yerblood.com> posted message
>>> >> >you're worth every noneffort of it,
>>> >>
>>> >> Sure. You're getting hammered because you don't want to try.
>>> >> Yeah...they'll buy *that* one.
>>> >
>>> >Sorry, braindead. You just don't catch on that you're not worth a whole
>>> >helluva lot of effort.
>>>
>>> Yet, here you are. Again.
>>
>>The movie's over. You get your yuks by answering all of my posts. And all of
>>Storm's. And all of anyone else's. That tell you something?
>>
>
>It tells me that you don't know the meaning of the word 'all'. All is
>not some, nor is all = many. All is not even most. Historically, I
>ignore more of your posts than I reply to. Same for stormhole.
Liar.
>On Sat, 17 May 2003 10:04:34 -0400, Moonbug <la...@budweiser.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 17 May 2003 13:56:09 GMT, ironman <iro...@paranoid.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>> > phuck
>>>>
>>>> Its FUCK!
>>>>
>>>> Geeesh. If you're gonna say it, say it correctly and with meaning.
>>>>
>>>> FUUUUUCK!
>>>>
>>>> Add the 'N A if it helps.
>>>
>>>But, LL, monks don't tawk that way.
>>
>>Oh. Im not up on the latest Monk
>
>That's a surprise. You are usually up on anything with a dick.
heh, except you, eh?
LMAO
--
Phaet
"Somewhere in the swamps of Jersey"
Exactly. As long as the number of your posts > the number of my
replies, then your claim that I answer 'all' your posts is incorrect.
Same with the wooden-headed bigot idiot. His post count is much
greater than mine, so I could not possibly be answering 'all' his
posts. Do you make a habit out of using small words that you do not
understand?
Here ya go again, retard:
Message-ID: <3ee76403...@FanaticLegions.mil>
There is the credible evidence. Refute it, if you think you can.
Which explains why she isn't up on you.
Nonsense, silly bigot. I am merely pointing out that, as long as you
try the same fLames, you will get the same responses. Psychosis is
often defined by the victim endlessly repeating the same action,
hoping for a different outcome. Think about that when you start your
next posting frenzy. And, by the way, it is apparent that you don't
even *understand* the Pee Wee Herman defense that you use so
frequently.
Of course, else you would think it relevant.
Poppycock, idiot porcupine-boy.
Misogyny = incarceration for violent misogyny. Nobody does hard time
for slapping his wife once. Either you have a history of hitting
women, or you really messed the poor girl up.
Homophobic = countless references to 'faggot' and hysterical
hand-waving whenever anyone questions your masculinity.
Lying = your constantly landing on both sides of any issue. You
contradict your own words almost every time you post.
Evidence, please. Your prison daddy says you do.
>you must be confusing me
Then I shall try to type slower.
Reading comprehension problems? Every time you attempt to claim that
doc would do or think, you are trying to speak for him. Stick to your
own perceptions, idiot.
>Since when
>is what you say the law of the land?
Since when did doc give you permission to speculate on his thoughts?
Apparently not you. You enjoy the humiliation.
>Watching you flail about is
>hilarious. What was your post count for 5-17, barcus? Compare that to
>5-14 when I was too busy to post any bait for you.
Better yet, I'll compare the entire month of May. Since May 1st.
you've made 429 posts to AMS and AIBWH. In the same peroid, I've made
269 posts to AMS and AIBWH. What, exactly, were you trying to prove
here? Other than your own obsession, that is.