Obama's mandated healthcare premium - $5,000 per person per year
Major Debacle
Thank god I was drafted and get to suck the govt VA health care teat.
--
When asked, years afterward, why his charge at Gettysburg failed,
General Pickett said: "I've always thought the Yankees had something to
do with it."
Patriot Games
<major_debacle@The_Pentagon.invalid> wrote:
>Sounds like a tax hike to me.
>Thank god I was drafted and get to suck the govt VA health care teat.
Another FAKE VET surfaces...
From: Major Debacle <Major_Debacle@the_pentagon.mil>
From: TigerLuck <TigerLuck@the_wild_kingdom.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.127.137.150
Oops! YOU'RE A FRAUD! That's NOT a good start, Brownhole!
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics/msg/f08eb173c1dd8309?hl=en
On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 12:44:00 -0800, Major Debacle
<major_debacle@The_Pentagon.invalid> wrote:
>Allahu Akbar!!
>...er, I mean "God is Great!!"
Oops! YOU'RE A Muslim! That's NOT a good start, Brownhole!
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.127.137.150
68.127.137.150 = San Jose, CA
Oops! San Francisco Bay Area - The FAGGOT Capital of America!
EVERY SINGLE posting location of your is:
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.125.48.118
68.125.48.118 = San Francisco, CA
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.125.50.18
68.125.50.18 = Diablo, CA.
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.125.51.212
68.125.51.212 = San Mateo, CA.
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.126.148.128
68.126.148.128 = South San Francisco, CA.
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.127.107.69
68.127.107.69 = San Francisco, CA.
NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.105.118.143
69.105.118.143 = Fremont, CA.
Oops! San Francisco Bay Area - The FAGGOT Capital of America!
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:05:33 -0700, Major Debacle
<Major_Debacle@the_pentagon.mil> wrote:
>In a very catty move, which we LOVE, Lewis and Moakler confirmed to
>Access Hollywood that the Miss California pageant paid for Carrie
>Prejean to get breast implants six weeks before the Miss USA competition.
>http://perezhilton.com/2009-04-29-jesus-loves-fake-titties
A FAGGOT quoting a FAGGOT Website! How precious!
Oops! But its NOT a good start, Choad Boy!
On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 17:15:53 -0700, Tiger Cluck
<Tiger_Cluck@nature_preserve.afr> wrote:
>He's the white guy:
>http://us-p.vclart.net/vcl/Artists/Borni/newtricks.jpg
Oops! You posted a cartoon depicting YOU as a FAGGOT. That's REALLY
NOT a good start, Cock Boy. HOLD THE PRESSES! Maybe, just maybe that
was a mistake on your part.... Let's dig deeper...
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 15:35:04 -0700, Major Debacle
<Major_...@pentagon.mil> wrote:
>http://www.cuteboylinks.com/old-man-young-boy/teen-boy-older-men/old-man-pics/12-sexy-teen-twink-with-a-big-dick-having-gay-sex-video.jpg
Oops! Posting FAGGOT pics, visiting FAGGOT websites...
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 14:20:34 -0700, Major Debacle
<Major_...@pentagon.mil> wrote:
>http://www.oogleman.com/gay-exit/gay-leather.jpg
Oops! Posting FAGGOT pics, visiting FAGGOT websites...
Let's dig deeper...
On Sun, 02 Nov 2008 14:43:30 -0700, TigerLuck
<TigerLuck@wild_kingdom.com> wrote:
>MONTREAL � In an over-the-top accent, one half of a notorious Quebec
>comedy duo claims to be the president of France as he describes sex with
>his famous wife, the joy of killing animals and Hustler magazine.
>At the other end of the line? Me wacking off thinking of George Michael.
>I am so gay!
OH NO!!! You ARE a FAGGOT!!!
So. Let's summarize:
You're a Proven FRAUD.
You're a Muslim.
You're a CONFESSED Faggot.
That pretty much renders ANY opinion you may have on ANYTHING
completely WORTHLESS.
Bwahahahahahahaha!!
Now go fist-fuck yourself, CockLip.
Major Debacle
> On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:01:49 -0800, Major Debacle
> <major_debacle@The_Pentagon.invalid> wrote:
>> Sounds like a tax hike to me.
>> Thank god I was drafted and get to suck the govt VA health care teat.
>
> Another FAKE VET surfaces...
Kiss my ass, faggot
SilentOtto
Proof you're a closet homosexual, Queer Boy.
http://www.holysmoke.org/temp/homophobia_and_homosexual_arousal.pdf
"The authors investigated the role of homosexual arousal in
exclusively heterosexual men who admitted negative affect toward
homosexual individuals. Participants consisted of a group of
homophobic men (n = 35) and a group of nonhomophobic men (n = 29);
they were assigned to groups on the basis of their scores on the Index
of Homophobia (W. W. Hudson & W. A. Ricketts, 1980). The men were
exposed to sexually explicit erotic stimuli consisting of
heterosexual, male homosexual, and lesbian videotapes, and changes in
penile circumference were monitored. They also completed an Aggression
Questionnaire (A. H. Buss & M. Perry, 1992 ). Both groups exhibited
increases in penile circumference to the heterosexual and female
homosexual videos. Only the homophobic men showed an increase in
penile erection to male homosexual stimuli. The groups did not differ
in
aggression. Homophobia is apparently associated with homosexual
arousal that the homophobic individual is either unaware of or
denies."
Heh heh...
Insane lying racist rightard closet queer sheep fucking coprophile
shit eating posing snip bitch gay porn faggots...
Batshit crazy and dogshit stupid, every single last one of you.
I ORDER you to paste a reply, Shit Eater.
Show me you're my bitch again, Faggot.
Patriot Games
<major_debacle@The_Pentagon.invalid> wrote:
>Patriot Games wrote:
>> On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:01:49 -0800, Major Debacle
>> <major_debacle@The_Pentagon.invalid> wrote:
>>> Sounds like a tax hike to me.
>>> Thank god I was drafted and get to suck the govt VA health care teat.
>> Another FAKE VET surfaces...
>Kiss my ass, faggot
From: Major Debacle <Major_Debacle@the_pentagon.mil>
From: TigerLuck <TigerLuck@the_wild_kingdom.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.127.137.150
Oops! YOU'RE A FRAUD! That's NOT a good start, Brownhole!
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics/msg/f08eb173c1dd8309?hl=en
Patriot Games
<silen...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Nov 25, 3:26�pm, Patriot Games <Patr...@America.Com> wrote:
>Proof you're a closet homosexual, Queer Boy.
>http://www.holysmoke.org/temp/homophobia_and_homosexual_arousal.pdf
>"The authors investigated the role of homosexual arousal in
>exclusively heterosexual men who admitted negative affect toward
>homosexual individuals. Participants consisted of a group of
>homophobic men (n = 35) and a group of nonhomophobic men (n = 29);
>they were assigned to groups on the basis of their scores on the Index
>of Homophobia (W. W. Hudson & W. A. Ricketts, 1980). The men were
>exposed to sexually explicit erotic stimuli consisting of
>heterosexual, male homosexual, and lesbian videotapes, and changes in
>penile circumference were monitored. They also completed an Aggression
>Questionnaire (A. H. Buss & M. Perry, 1992 ). Both groups exhibited
>increases in penile circumference to the heterosexual and female
>homosexual videos. Only the homophobic men showed an increase in
>penile erection to male homosexual stimuli. The groups did not differ
>in
>aggression. Homophobia is apparently associated with homosexual
>arousal that the homophobic individual is either unaware of or
>denies."
>Heh heh...
>
<silen...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On May 7, 10:32�am, Patriot Games <Patr...@America.Com> wrote:
>> On Wed, 6 May 2009 20:39:57 -0700 (PDT), SilentOtto
>> You're not a homophobe BECAUSE you're a homo...
>> We get it...
>> The authors said:
>> "Another explanation of these data is found in Barlow, Sakheim, and
>> Beck's ( 1983) theory of the role of anxiety and attention in sexual
>> responding. It is possible that viewing homosexual stimuli causes
>> negative emotions such as anxiety in homophobic men but not in
>> nonhomophobic men. Because anxiety has been shown to enhance arousal
>> and erection, this theory would predict increases in erection in
>> homophobic men. Furthermore, it would indicate that a response to
>> homosexual stimuli is a function of the threat condition rather than
>> sexual arousal per se. Whereas difficulties of objectively evaluating
>> psychoanalytic hypotheses are well-documented, these approaches would
>> predict that sexual arousal is an intrinsic response to homosexual
>> stimuli, whereas Barlow's (1986 ) theory would predict that sexual
>> arousal to homosexual stimuli by homophobic individuals is a function
>> of anxiety. These competing potions can and should be evaluated by
>> future research."
>> Excerpted �from Henrey E. Adams, Lester W. Wright Jr., and Bethany A
>> Lohr, Is Homophobia Associated With Homosexual Arousal? in the Journal
>> of Abnormal Psychology, Vol. 105., No. 3 (1996), pp. 440-445.
>> Additional references:http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/assault/roots/freud.html
>> The American Psychological Associationhttp://www.philosophy-religion.org/handouts/homophobia.htm
>None of that changes the observation that homophobic men show signs of
>sexual arousal when they view homoerotic material
Sorry, your urban nigger education has FAILED you, again.
You've had MONTHS to read the cites below.
You FAILED to read the cites below.
I will NOW humiliate you in public as the under-educated nigger that
we ALL NOW KNOW that you are.
What part of "Another explanation of these data IS found in" don't you
understand?
They didn't say maybe.
They didn't say could be.
They didn't say might be.
They said "IS found..."
Case closed. Game over...
Your ONLY SUCH REFERENCE has been DEBUNKED.
>All it does is offer a possible alternative that has in no way been
>substantiated.
What part of "Another explanation of these data IS found in" don't you
understand?
They didn't say maybe.
They didn't say could be.
They didn't say might be.
They said "IS found..."
Case closed. Game over...
Your ONLY SUCH REFERENCE has been DEBUNKED.
>Signs of sexual arousal mean sexual arousal until it's shown to be
>something else.
And NOW we find that your urban nigger education has FAILED you.
You've had MONTHS to read the cites below.
You FAILED to read the cites below.
I will NOW humiliate you in public as the under-educated nigger that
we ALL NOW KNOW that you are.
What part of "The homophobic group reported significantly more
negative affect, anxiety..." don't you understand?
They didn't say maybe "anxiety."
They didn't say could be "anxiety."
They didn't say might be "anxiety."
They said "The homophobic group reported significantly more negative
affect, anxiety..."
Case closed. Game over...
Your ONLY SUCH REFERENCE has been DEBUNKED AND ALTERNATIVELY
EXPLAINED.
Homophobia and physical aggression toward homosexual and heterosexual
individuals.
Bernat, Jeffrey A.; Calhoun, Karen S.; Adams, Henry E.; Zeichner, Amos
Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 2001 Feb Vol 110(1) 179-187
http://psycnet.apa.org/index.cfm?fa=search.displayRecord&uid=2001-17627-019
This study examined the relationship between homophobia (defined as
self-reported negative affect, avoidance, and aggression toward
homosexuals) and homosexual aggression. Self-identified heterosexual
college men were assigned to homophobic (n = 26) and nonhomophobic (n
= 26) groups on the basis of their scores on the Homophobia Scale (HS;
L. W. Wright, H. E. Adams, & J. A. Bernat, 1999). Physical aggression
was examined by having participants administer shocks to a fictitious
opponent during a competitive reaction time (RT) task under the
impression that the study was examining the relationship between
sexually explicit material and RT. Participants were exposed to a male
homosexual erotic videotape, their affective reactions were assessed,
and they then competed in the RT task against either a heterosexual or
a homosexual opponent. The homophobic group reported significantly
more negative affect, anxiety, and anger-hostility after watching the
homosexual erotic videotape than did the nonhomophobic group.
Additionally, the homophobic group was significantly more aggressive
toward the homosexual opponent, but the groups did not differ in
aggression toward the heterosexual opponent.
------------------------------------------
Sissies and Tomboys: Gender Role Behaviors and Homophobia
Robert D. Schope PhD, Assistant Professor of Social Work, University
of Iowa
Michele J. Eliason PhD, Associate Professor of Nursing, University of
Iowa
Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services:
. . . Issues in Practice, Policy, and Research
The official journal of the Caucus of the LGBT Faculty & Students in
Social Work
Volume: 16 Issue: 2
ISSN: 1053-8720 Pub Date: 12/16/2003
This paper examines whether prejudice by heterosexuals against
homosexuals is associated with violations of socially determined
gender role behaviors. Respondents were given questionnaires which
included either gay-acting or straight-acting vignettes and asked to
indicate their attitudes and behaviors in specific situations. While
gender role characteristics were found to be an important aspect of
negative attitudes and behaviors toward gay men and lesbians, the most
important predictor of homophobia is the mere fact that an individual
is known to be homosexual.
------------------------------------------
Journal of Applied Social Psychology
Volume 38 Issue 3 Page 647-683, March 2008
Amelia E. Talley, B. Ann Bettencourt (2008)
Evaluations and Aggression Directed at a Gay Male Target: The Role of
Threat and Antigay Prejudice
This research was designed to understand heterosexual men's
interpersonal reactions toward a gay male individual and to examine
how threat and pre-existing antigay prejudice impact these encounters.
In one experiment, we manipulated the ostensible sexual orientation of
an assigned work partner and assessed participants' perceptions of
threat indirectly, using a measure of psychological distancing.
Results revealed that, regardless of antigay prejudice, participants
psychologically distanced more from the gay male than from the
heterosexual male. In the second experiment, we manipulated threat and
the sexual orientation of the work partner to examine aggressive
responding toward the work partner. Participants exposed to a threat
to their masculinity behaved more aggressively toward the gay work
partner, regardless of their level of antigay prejudice.
SilentOtto
Your rebuttal was bullshit when you first posted it and it's still
bullshit now.
Nothing else need be said.
Proof you're a closet queer, Queer Boy.
http://www.holysmoke.org/temp/homophobia_and_homosexual_arousal.pdf
"The authors investigated the role of homosexual arousal in
exclusively heterosexual men who admitted negative affect toward
homosexual individuals. Participants consisted of a group of
homophobic men (n = 35) and a group of nonhomophobic men (n = 29);
they were assigned to groups on the basis of their scores on the Index
of Homophobia (W. W. Hudson & W. A. Ricketts, 1980). The men were
exposed to sexually explicit erotic stimuli consisting of
heterosexual, male homosexual, and lesbian videotapes, and changes in
penile circumference were monitored. They also completed an Aggression
Questionnaire (A. H. Buss & M. Perry, 1992 ). Both groups exhibited
increases in penile circumference to the heterosexual and female
homosexual videos. Only the homophobic men showed an increase in
penile erection to male homosexual stimuli. The groups did not differ
in
aggression. Homophobia is apparently associated with homosexual
arousal that the homophobic individual is either unaware of or
denies."
Heh heh...
Insane lying racist rightard closet queer sheep fucking coprophile
shit eating posing snip bitch gay porn faggots...
Batshit crazy and dogshit stupid, every single one of you.
I ORDER you to do a paste job, Shit Eater.
Show me you're my bitch again, Faggot.
> On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 19:05:05 -0800 (PST), SilentOtto
> Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 2001 Feb Vol 110(1) 179-187http://psycnet.apa.org/index.cfm?fa=search.displayRecord&uid=2001-176...
Patriot Games
<silen...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Nov 27, 4:44�pm, Patriot Games <Patr...@America.Com> wrote:
>Your rebuttal was bullshit when you first posted it and it's still
>bullshit now.
It isn't MY rebuttal, it is the ORIGINAL AUTHOR'S rebuttal to HIS OWN
STUDY...
hahahahahahahaha!!!
>Nothing else need be said.
Of course it does. Obviously you're in a bad mood. No watermelon on
Thanksgiving? Awwwww....
Here's a movie to cheer you up:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qSfGvptL_TY&feature=related
SilentOtto
> On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 18:28:39 -0800 (PST), SilentOtto
>
> >On Nov 27, 4:44 pm, Patriot Games <Patr...@America.Com> wrote:
> >Your rebuttal was bullshit when you first posted it and it's still
> >bullshit now.
>
> It isn't MY rebuttal, it is the ORIGINAL AUTHOR'S rebuttal to HIS OWN
> STUDY...
The author suggested a possibility that has not yet been investigated,
Queer Boy.
Until it is investigated, the original finding stands.
Homophobes, like you, show signs of sexual arousal when exposed to
homoerotic material.
It's OK, Queer Boy...
You can admit that you get aroused when you're watching two hot,
sweaty guys doing what ever it is hot, sweaty guys do in homoerotic
material.
We already knew...
The rest of your links, as you full well know, have nothing to do with
homophobia and homosexual arousal. Rather, they attempt to determine
if there is a link between homophobia and violence.
Judging from you, there certainly seems to be a link between
homophobia and violent fantasy, but you're too big of a puss to
actually follow through on your fantasy.
Heh heh...
Insane lying racist rightard closet queer sheep fucking coprophile
shit eating posing snip bitch gay porn faggots...
Batshit crazy and dogshit stupid, every single last one of you.
I ORDER you to paste a reply, Shit Eater.
Show me you're my bitch again, Faggot.
>
Patriot Games
<silen...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Nov 29, 2:20�pm, Patriot Games <Patr...@America.Com> wrote:
>> On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 18:28:39 -0800 (PST), SilentOtto
>> <silento...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Nov 27, 4:44�pm, Patriot Games <Patr...@America.Com> wrote:
>> >Your rebuttal was bullshit when you first posted it and it's still
>> >bullshit now.
>> It isn't MY rebuttal, it is the ORIGINAL AUTHOR'S rebuttal to HIS OWN
>> STUDY...
>The author suggested a possibility that has not yet been investigated
The "original finding" is NOT a "finding" SO SAID THE ORIGINAL AUTHOR.
hahahahahahah!!!
>> hahahahahahahaha!!!
>> >Nothing else need be said.
>> Of course it does. �Obviously you're in a bad mood. �No watermelon on
>> Thanksgiving? �Awwwww.... �
>> Here's a movie to cheer you up:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qSfGvptL_TY&feature=related
See above.
SilentOtto
> On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 20:49:13 -0800 (PST), SilentOtto
>
> >On Nov 29, 2:20 pm, Patriot Games <Patr...@America.Com> wrote:
> >> On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 18:28:39 -0800 (PST), SilentOtto
> >> <silento...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >On Nov 27, 4:44 pm, Patriot Games <Patr...@America.Com> wrote:
> >> >Your rebuttal was bullshit when you first posted it and it's still
> >> >bullshit now.
> >> It isn't MY rebuttal, it is the ORIGINAL AUTHOR'S rebuttal to HIS OWN
> >> STUDY...
> >The author suggested a possibility that has not yet been investigated
> >Until it is investigated, the original finding stands.
>
> The "original finding" is NOT a "finding" SO SAID THE ORIGINAL AUTHOR.
Liar.
The author said no such thing.
http://www.holysmoke.org/temp/homophobia_and_homosexual_arousal.pdf
"The authors investigated the role of homosexual arousal in
exclusively heterosexual men who admitted negative affect toward
homosexual individuals. Participants consisted of a group of
homophobic men (n = 35) and a group of nonhomophobic men (n = 29);
they were assigned to groups on the basis of their scores on the Index
of Homophobia (W. W. Hudson & W. A. Ricketts, 1980). The men were
exposed to sexually explicit erotic stimuli consisting of
heterosexual, male homosexual, and lesbian videotapes, and changes in
penile circumference were monitored. They also completed an Aggression
Questionnaire (A. H. Buss & M. Perry, 1992 ). Both groups exhibited
increases in penile circumference to the heterosexual and female
homosexual videos. Only the homophobic men showed an increase in
penile erection to male homosexual stimuli. The groups did not differ
in
aggression. Homophobia is apparently associated with homosexual
arousal that the homophobic individual is either unaware of or
denies."
Heh heh...
Insane lying racist rightard closet queer sheep fucking coprophile
shit eating posing snip bitch gay porn faggots...
Batshit crazy and dogshit stupid, every single last one of you.
I ORDER you to paste a reply, Shit Eater.
Show me you're my bitch again, Faggot.
>
Patriot Games
<silen...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Nov 30, 1:33�pm, Patriot Games <Patr...@America.Com> wrote:
>> On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 20:49:13 -0800 (PST), SilentOtto
>> <silento...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Nov 29, 2:20�pm, Patriot Games <Patr...@America.Com> wrote:
>> >> On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 18:28:39 -0800 (PST), SilentOtto
>> >> <silento...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >On Nov 27, 4:44�pm, Patriot Games <Patr...@America.Com> wrote:
>> >> >Your rebuttal was bullshit when you first posted it and it's still
>> >> >bullshit now.
>> >> It isn't MY rebuttal, it is the ORIGINAL AUTHOR'S rebuttal to HIS OWN
>> >> STUDY...
>> >The author suggested a possibility that has not yet been investigated
>> >Until it is investigated, the original finding stands.
>> The "original finding" is NOT a "finding" SO SAID THE ORIGINAL AUTHOR.
Yes, he did. See below. (The WHOLE PLANET knows YOU are a FOOL...)
On Thu, 7 May 2009 16:04:38 -0700 (PDT), SilentOtto
<silen...@hotmail.com> wrote:
They said "IS found..."
Case closed. Game over...
They said "IS found..."
Case closed. Game over...
Case closed. Game over...
http://psycnet.apa.org/index.cfm?fa=search.displayRecord&uid=2001-17627-019
SilentOtto
> On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:34:47 -0800 (PST), SilentSambo
>
>
>
> <silentsa...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >On Nov 30, 1:33 pm, Patriot Games <Patr...@America.Com> wrote:
> >> On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 20:49:13 -0800 (PST), SilentOtto
> >> <silento...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >On Nov 29, 2:20 pm, Patriot Games <Patr...@America.Com> wrote:
> >> >> On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 18:28:39 -0800 (PST), SilentOtto
> >> >> <silento...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >On Nov 27, 4:44 pm, Patriot Games <Patr...@America.Com> wrote:
> >> >> >Your rebuttal was bullshit when you first posted it and it's still
> >> >> >bullshit now.
> >> >> It isn't MY rebuttal, it is the ORIGINAL AUTHOR'S rebuttal to HIS OWN
> >> >> STUDY...
> >> >The author suggested a possibility that has not yet been investigated
> >> >Until it is investigated, the original finding stands.
> >> The "original finding" is NOT a "finding" SO SAID THE ORIGINAL AUTHOR.
> >The author said no such thing.
>
> Yes, he did. See below. (The WHOLE PLANET knows YOU are a FOOL...)
As usual, you're LYING, Queer Boy.
He offered another explanation that hasn't yet been investigated.
Until it -is- investigated, his original finding stands.
Homophobes, like you, show signs of sexual arousal when viewing
homoerotic material.
Further....
I ORDERED YOU, a SHIT EATER, to do a paste a reply.
YOU COMPLIED like the OBEDIENT BITCH YOU ARE.
Thanks for PROVING you're a SHIT EATER, SHIT EATER.
YOU'RE a RIGHTARD CLOSET QUEER -AND- a SHIT EATER.
BAWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAH....
Heh heh...
Insane lying racist rightard closet queer sheep fucking coprophile
shit eating posing snip bitch gay porn faggots...
Batshit crazy and dogshit stupid, every single last one of you.
I ORDER you to do a paste job, Shit Eater.
Show me you're my bitch again, Faggot.
>
> Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 2001 Feb Vol 110(1) 179-187http://psycnet.apa.org/index.cfm?fa=search.displayRecord&uid=2001-176...
Patriot Games
<silen...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Dec 1, 7:18�pm, Patriot Games <Patr...@America.Com> wrote:
>> On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:34:47 -0800 (PST), SilentSambo
>> <silentsa...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Nov 30, 1:33�pm, Patriot Games <Patr...@America.Com> wrote:
>> >> On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 20:49:13 -0800 (PST), SilentOtto
>> >> <silento...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >On Nov 29, 2:20�pm, Patriot Games <Patr...@America.Com> wrote:
>> >> >> On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 18:28:39 -0800 (PST), SilentOtto
>> >> >> <silento...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >On Nov 27, 4:44�pm, Patriot Games <Patr...@America.Com> wrote:
>> >> >> >Your rebuttal was bullshit when you first posted it and it's still
>> >> >> >bullshit now.
>> >> >> It isn't MY rebuttal, it is the ORIGINAL AUTHOR'S rebuttal to HIS OWN
>> >> >> STUDY...
>> >> >The author suggested a possibility that has not yet been investigated
>> >> >Until it is investigated, the original finding stands.
>> >> The "original finding" is NOT a "finding" SO SAID THE ORIGINAL AUTHOR.
>> >The author said no such thing.
>> Yes, he did. �See below. �(The WHOLE PLANET knows YOU are a FOOL...)
Hahahahahahah!!!
The ORIGINAL Study WAS the Investigation...
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!
Poor SilentSambo... Got his nigger ass cornered, can't get it out,
and is forced to be HUMILIATED anytime I choose....
HHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!
SilentOtto
You're lying, Queer Boy.
The study didn't investigate if the signs of sexual arousal were the
result of anxiety.
It suggested it as a possibility.
You made a big deal over the word "is" and totally ignored the really
important word, "another".
You're doing the same thing now as you did when you posted studies
that investigated the link between homophobia and violence.
You know full well they've nothing to do with your homoerotic arousal,
and the only reason you posted them was in a futile attempt to create
a smoke screen you can hide your homosexuality behind.
Nobody fell for it.
Homophobes, like you, show significant signs of sexual arousal when
viewing homoerotic material.
Until the matter is investigated further, signs of sexual arousal are
signs of sexual arousal, not signs of anxiety.
If you want the matter clarified, I suggest you fund a study.
In the meantime, you remain a closet queer, Queer Boy.
http://www.holysmoke.org/temp/homophobia_and_homosexual_arousal.pdf
"The authors investigated the role of homosexual arousal in
exclusively heterosexual men who admitted negative affect toward
homosexual individuals. Participants consisted of a group of
homophobic men (n = 35) and a group of nonhomophobic men (n = 29);
they were assigned to groups on the basis of their scores on the Index
of Homophobia (W. W. Hudson & W. A. Ricketts, 1980). The men were
exposed to sexually explicit erotic stimuli consisting of
heterosexual, male homosexual, and lesbian videotapes, and changes in
penile circumference were monitored. They also completed an Aggression
Questionnaire (A. H. Buss & M. Perry, 1992 ). Both groups exhibited
increases in penile circumference to the heterosexual and female
homosexual videos. Only the homophobic men showed an increase in
penile erection to male homosexual stimuli. The groups did not differ
in aggression. Homophobia is apparently associated with homosexual
arousal that the homophobic individual is either unaware of or
denies."
Heh heh...
Insane lying racist rightard closet queer sheep fucking coprophile
shit eating posing snip bitch gay porn faggots...
Batshit crazy and dogshit stupid, every single last one of you.
I ORDER you to paste a reply, Shit Eater.
Show me you're my bitch again, Faggot.
>
Patriot Games
>result of anxiety.
>It suggested it as a possibility.
No, the ORIGINAL AUTHOR STATED it.
Hahahahahahah!!!
The ORIGINAL AUTHOR DID NOT "suggest" it.
Hahahahahahah!!!
>If you want the matter clarified, I suggest you fund a study.
I don't need to, the ORIGINAL AUTHOR DEBUNKED YOU!
Hahahahahahah!!!
See below:
SilentOtto
> On Wed, 2 Dec 2009 22:12:40 -0800 (PST), SilentSambo
>
The ORIGINAL AUTHOR STATED IT AS A POSSIBILITY, you mean, Queer Boy.
That's why he wrote "another".
The study didn't investigate if the signs of sexual arousal were the
result of anxiety.
It suggested it only as a possibility.
You made a big deal over the word "is" and totally ignored the really
important word, "another".
You're doing the same thing now as you did when you posted studies
that investigated the link between homophobia and violence.
You know full well they've nothing to do with your homoerotic arousal,
and the only reason you posted them was in a futile attempt to create
a smoke screen you can hide your homosexuality behind.
Nobody fell for it.
Homophobes, like you, show significant signs of sexual arousal when
viewing homoerotic material.
Until the matter is investigated further, signs of sexual arousal are
signs of sexual arousal, not signs of anxiety.
If you want the matter clarified, I suggest you fund a study.
In the meantime, you remain a closet queer, Queer Boy.
http://www.holysmoke.org/temp/homophobia_and_homosexual_arousal.pdf
"The authors investigated the role of homosexual arousal in
exclusively heterosexual men who admitted negative affect toward
homosexual individuals. Participants consisted of a group of
homophobic men (n = 35) and a group of nonhomophobic men (n = 29);
they were assigned to groups on the basis of their scores on the Index
of Homophobia (W. W. Hudson & W. A. Ricketts, 1980). The men were
exposed to sexually explicit erotic stimuli consisting of
heterosexual, male homosexual, and lesbian videotapes, and changes in
penile circumference were monitored. They also completed an Aggression
Questionnaire (A. H. Buss & M. Perry, 1992 ). Both groups exhibited
increases in penile circumference to the heterosexual and female
homosexual videos. Only the homophobic men showed an increase in
penile erection to male homosexual stimuli. The groups did not differ
in aggression. Homophobia is apparently associated with homosexual
arousal that the homophobic individual is either unaware of or
denies."
Heh heh...
Insane lying racist rightard closet queer sheep fucking coprophile
shit eating posing snip bitch gay porn faggots...
Batshit crazy and dogshit stupid, every single last one of you.
I ORDER you to paste a reply, Shit Eater.
Show me you're my bitch again, Faggot.
>
Patriot Games
>> The ORIGINAL AUTHOR DID NOT "suggest" it.
>> Hahahahahahah!!!
>> >If you want the matter clarified, I suggest you fund a study.
>> I don't need to, the ORIGINAL AUTHOR DEBUNKED YOU!
>> Hahahahahahah!!!
See above...
SilentOtto
Proof you're a closet queer, Poof boy.
http://www.holysmoke.org/temp/homophobia_and_homosexual_arousal.pdf
"The authors investigated the role of homosexual arousal in
exclusively heterosexual men who admitted negative affect toward
homosexual individuals. Participants consisted of a group of
homophobic men (n = 35) and a group of nonhomophobic men (n = 29);
they were assigned to groups on the basis of their scores on the Index
of Homophobia (W. W. Hudson & W. A. Ricketts, 1980). The men were
exposed to sexually explicit erotic stimuli consisting of
heterosexual, male homosexual, and lesbian videotapes, and changes in
penile circumference were monitored. They also completed an Aggression
Questionnaire (A. H. Buss & M. Perry, 1992 ). Both groups exhibited
increases in penile circumference to the heterosexual and female
homosexual videos. Only the homophobic men showed an increase in
penile erection to male homosexual stimuli. The groups did not differ
in aggression. Homophobia is apparently associated with homosexual
arousal that the homophobic individual is either unaware of or
denies."
Heh heh...
Insane lying racist rightard closet queer sheep fucking coprophile
shit eating posing snip bitch gay porn faggots...
Batshit crazy and dogshit stupid, every single last one of you.
I ORDER you to paste a reply, Shit Eater.
Show me you're my bitch again, Faggot.
> On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 07:46:50 -0800 (PST), SilentOtto
Patriot Games
Calm down, Silent Sambo.
You want a banana?
SilentOtto
> On Sun, 6 Dec 2009 13:26:44 -0800 (PST), SilentSambo
>
>
>
> <silentsa...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >On Dec 6, 2:11 pm, Patriot Games <Patr...@America.Com> wrote:
> >> On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 07:46:50 -0800 (PST), SilentOtto
> >> <silento...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >On Dec 4, 12:06 pm, Patriot Games <Patr...@America.Com> wrote:
> >> >> On Wed, 2 Dec 2009 22:12:40 -0800 (PST), SilentSambo
> >> >> <silentsa...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >On Dec 2, 4:43 pm, Patriot Games <Patr...@America.Com> wrote:
> >> >> >> On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 21:16:58 -0800 (PST), SilentSambo
> >> >> >> <silentsa...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >On Dec 1, 7:18 pm, Patriot Games <Patr...@America.Com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:34:47 -0800 (PST), SilentSambo
> >> >> >> >> <silentsa...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >On Nov 30, 1:33 pm, Patriot Games <Patr...@America.Com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 20:49:13 -0800 (PST), SilentOtto
> >> >> >> >> >> <silento...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> >On Nov 29, 2:20 pm, Patriot Games <Patr...@America.Com> wrote:
http://www.holysmoke.org/temp/homophobia_and_homosexual_arousal.pdf
Heh heh...
> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 18:28:39 -0800 (PST), SilentOtto
Patriot Games
See above.
SilentOtto
http://www.holysmoke.org/temp/homophobia_and_homosexual_arousal.pdf
Heh heh...
> On Tue, 8 Dec 2009 05:06:11 -0800 (PST), SilentOtto
>