Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

My life is now complete

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Lumpy

unread,
Dec 2, 2009, 1:42:21 PM12/2/09
to
After Tiger admitted to "transgressions".

He's a golfer, right?


Lumpy

In Your Ears for 40 Something Years
www.LumpyMusic.com


Kris Baker

unread,
Dec 2, 2009, 2:23:04 PM12/2/09
to

"Lumpy" <lu...@digitalcartography.com> wrote in message
news:7nnqrjF...@mid.individual.net...

> After Tiger admitted to "transgressions".
>
> He's a golfer, right?
>
>
> Lumpy

But at least we know he didn't mess with Mrs Keaton.

Kris

Lumpy

unread,
Dec 2, 2009, 2:22:42 PM12/2/09
to
Lump:

> > After Tiger admitted to "transgressions".
> >
> > He's a golfer, right?

Kris:


> But at least we know he didn't mess with Mrs Keaton.

Damn you Kris. I don't know who Mrs Keaton is.
Now my life is back to being incomplete.

Kris Baker

unread,
Dec 2, 2009, 2:37:29 PM12/2/09
to

"Lumpy" <lu...@digitalcartography.com> wrote in message
news:7nnt79F...@mid.individual.net...

> Lump:
>> > After Tiger admitted to "transgressions".
>> >
>> > He's a golfer, right?
>
> Kris:
>> But at least we know he didn't mess with Mrs Keaton.
>
> Damn you Kris. I don't know who Mrs Keaton is.
> Now my life is back to being incomplete.
>
> Lumpy

Alex Keaton's mom.

Kris

SwitchedTeams

unread,
Dec 2, 2009, 2:48:47 PM12/2/09
to
In article <7nntvqF...@mid.individual.net>, Kris Baker says...

The lesbo.

Alex Clayton

unread,
Dec 2, 2009, 5:58:59 PM12/2/09
to
"Lumpy" <lu...@digitalcartography.com> wrote in message
news:7nnqrjF...@mid.individual.net...

Since every time I go to my home page (Yahoo) there is a picture of him and
yet "more info" on this I have to assume someone gives a shit.
I know I don't.
I had not really been watching it. MY Wife who watches several shows I
don't, called me to say he was doing some girl from one of those stupid
shows she watches. This made me go and take a look.
It claims he has made about a Billion dollars.
It seems to show his wife is drop dead gorgeous.
It seems to show the girl from the show is not even in the same league.
Makes me tend to wonder if people who make the kind of money he does,
somehow get brain damaged by it? I mean does he get hit in the head a lot by
stray golf balls? <shrug>
In any case I suspect his wife will soon be single, and rich.
He can then go bang the girls from reality shows all day I guess.
I guess maybe there is some truth in the old line about for every woman who
is a 10, there is some guy who is tired of banging her.
I for the life of me do not see how this is "news" but I guess I am in the
minority there. I had better things to do anyway. Re did a new Dell PC from
Vista to Win. 7. Do to the mistake of calling the Dell "support" over a
minor issue, I got to do it twice, since the "support" screwed things up so
bad I had to format and start over. Second time I around I got pretty good
at it, and will live with the DVD eject button no longer working.
--
Inside every older person is a younger person wondering, 'What the hell
happened?'

JessicaG

unread,
Dec 3, 2009, 9:37:13 AM12/3/09
to
> I for the life of me do not see how this is "news" but I guess I am in
> the minority there. I had better things to do anyway. Re did a new Dell PC
> from Vista to Win. 7. Do to the mistake of calling the Dell "support" over
> a minor issue, I got to do it twice, since the "support" screwed things up
> so bad I had to format and start over. Second time I around I got pretty
> good at it, and will live with the DVD eject button no longer working.

Yup, the eject button seems to be a common issue with our Dells and W7. Our
workaround it to disable/re-enable the DVD drive and then it works fine.
Sometimes after a reboot it crops up again. It's probably some kind of
driver issue (by driver, I'm not referring to Tiger's motor vehicle skills
nor his wife's timely use of a golf club).


Alex Clayton

unread,
Dec 3, 2009, 11:09:05 AM12/3/09
to
"JessicaG" <jjj...@jotjail.com> wrote in message
news:hf8ier$m87$1...@news.eternal-september.org...

The new one has what they call a slot drive, so I would not be willing to
take the entire thing apart. That was the first problem I had with the
support guy in India. He kept asking me about the tray, while I was trying
to tell him there was no tray. What the hell it's working now so I left well
enough alone.
At least the upgrade was free. I had read earlier a lot of bitching from
people saying they were offering the disc for free but were raping people on
shipping. Mine was shipped free. It did also let me use it to do a clean
install, so it wiped out all the bloatware. The damn thing does boot up very
fast now. I will try e-mailing them and see if they have a simple answer to
why the eject button no longer does anything. If they have an answer that
does not include letting them have remote access again I will try. If not I
can live with having to do it from the drive. Damn thing does have a nice
screen. Took a little while to get use to the HD wide screen, but now this
one looks funny to me.
--
There are three kinds of men: The ones that learn by reading. The few who
learn by observation. The rest of them have to pee on the electric fence and
find out for themselves.
Will Rogers

BrotherBart

unread,
Dec 3, 2009, 12:16:31 PM12/3/09
to
Alex Clayton wrote:
>I for the life of me do not see how this is "news" but I guess I am in
> the minority there. I had better things to do anyway. Re did a new Dell
> PC from Vista to Win. 7. Do to the mistake of calling the Dell "support"
> over a minor issue, I got to do it twice, since the "support" screwed
> things up so bad I had to format and start over. Second time I around I
> got pretty good at it, and will live with the DVD eject button no longer
> working.

Usually I think celebrity scandals are boring. But I have to admit that
I find a rich black celeb fucking half the good looking white women in
the country a hell of a lot more interesting than the installation
travails of Windows 7.

I think YOUR eject button is no longer working.

Kris Baker

unread,
Dec 3, 2009, 12:34:10 PM12/3/09
to

"BrotherBart" <noth...@nomail.net> wrote in message
news:hf8rq9$ce6$1...@news.eternal-september.org...

>
> Usually I think celebrity scandals are boring. But I have to admit that I
> find a rich black

You still believe in the "one drop rule"?

Woods is half Oriental (25% Thai, 25% Chinese), one-fourth
black, one-eighth Dutch and one-eighth Native American.


Ygnoramus1909

unread,
Dec 3, 2009, 12:42:09 PM12/3/09
to
So, Kris, please tell me how you came to your conclusion that the
email posted by me, was sent in 2008?

You seem to be avoiding the question, how come that is so?

i

Kris Baker

unread,
Dec 3, 2009, 1:04:06 PM12/3/09
to

"Ygnoramus1909" <chewed@off> wrote in message
news:B9-dncuyo7nsZYrW...@giganews.com...

> So, Kris, please tell me how you came to your conclusion that the
> email posted by me, was sent in 2008?
>
> You seem to be avoiding the question, how come that is so?
>
> i

I have you killfiled because I hate nymshifters.
Why do you think I'd answer you now?

All the clues were in my original post.
Use your brain, Mr Computer Genius.

Kris

Lumpy

unread,
Dec 3, 2009, 1:10:29 PM12/3/09
to
Kris Baker wrote:

> You still believe in the "one drop rule"?
>
> Woods is half Oriental (25% Thai, 25% Chinese), one-fourth
> black, one-eighth Dutch and one-eighth Native American.

Chicks dig Dutchmen.

Kris Baker

unread,
Dec 3, 2009, 1:18:07 PM12/3/09
to

"Lumpy" <lu...@digitalcartography.com> wrote in message
news:7nqd8rF...@mid.individual.net...

> Kris Baker wrote:
>
>> You still believe in the "one drop rule"?
>>
>> Woods is half Oriental (25% Thai, 25% Chinese), one-fourth
>> black, one-eighth Dutch and one-eighth Native American.
>
> Chicks dig Dutchmen.
>
>
> Lumpy

It's the Woodsen shoes.

Kris

clams_casino

unread,
Dec 3, 2009, 1:20:37 PM12/3/09
to
Lumpy wrote:

>Kris Baker wrote:
>
>
>
>>You still believe in the "one drop rule"?
>>
>>Woods is half Oriental (25% Thai, 25% Chinese), one-fourth
>>black, one-eighth Dutch and one-eighth Native American.
>>
>>
>
>Chicks dig Dutchmen.
>
>
>

I dig clams.

Ignoramus1909

unread,
Dec 3, 2009, 1:25:27 PM12/3/09
to
On 2009-12-03, Kris Baker <paralle...@ggmail.com> wrote:
>
> "Ygnoramus1909" <chewed@off> wrote in message
> news:B9-dncuyo7nsZYrW...@giganews.com...
>> So, Kris, please tell me how you came to your conclusion that the
>> email posted by me, was sent in 2008?
>>
>> You seem to be avoiding the question, how come that is so?
>>
>> i
>
> I have you killfiled because I hate nymshifters.

It is a very surprising coincidence that you suddenly "killfiled" me
just when I questioned veracity of your statement that the email I
quoted, was dated 2008.

But please, keep me "killfiled".

> Why do you think I'd answer you now?

I would think that you could substantiate your statement, for
starters. I did not expect this, necessarily, but this would be a
sensible thing to do.

i

Kris Baker

unread,
Dec 3, 2009, 1:57:18 PM12/3/09
to
On Dec 3, 11:25 am, Ignoramus1909 <ignoramus1...@NOSPAM.1909.invalid>
wrote:

> On 2009-12-03, Kris Baker <parallelcoo...@ggmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > "Ygnoramus1909" <chewed@off> wrote in message
> >news:B9-dncuyo7nsZYrW...@giganews.com...
> >> So, Kris, please tell me how you came to your conclusion that the
> >> email posted by me, was sent in 2008?
>
> >> You seem to be avoiding the question, how come that is so?
>
> >> i
>
> > I have you killfiled because I hate nymshifters.
>
> It is a very surprising coincidence that you suddenly "killfiled" me
> just when I questioned veracity of your statement that the email I
> quoted, was dated 2008.
>
> But please, keep me "killfiled".

(Answering through Google, just to prove the point)

What do you mean "suddenly"?

I only saw your post when rjn replied to him, and if you'll
check Google, you'll that my reply was to rjn, not to you.

Here's what I told rjn:
Yup. This one looks to be from December 2008.
It's obviously a follow-up to a one-time buyer....who
later did get feedback. Look at who it's from.

Why can't you figure it out? Like I said, all the clues
are there....IF you can correct spell the user's name.

Kris

BrotherBart

unread,
Dec 3, 2009, 2:26:21 PM12/3/09
to
The parts that stick out of his golf shirts are the black parts.

Lumpy

unread,
Dec 3, 2009, 2:29:31 PM12/3/09
to
BrotherBart wrote:

> The parts that stick out of his golf shirts are the black parts.

Redneck Father to Daughter:
"I don't care how much money he makes,
I don't want you hanging around any
of those Thai/Dutch/Native American guys"

Pogonip

unread,
Dec 3, 2009, 4:03:10 PM12/3/09
to
Lumpy wrote:
> BrotherBart wrote:
>
>> The parts that stick out of his golf shirts are the black parts.
>
> Redneck Father to Daughter:
> "I don't care how much money he makes,
> I don't want you hanging around any
> of those Thai/Dutch/Native American guys"

I do not understand people's obsession with other people's sex lives.
The chances of them ever even meeting face-to-face is minimal, much less
that they should ever find themselves in an intimate situation. Who the
fuck cares who is screwing whom? How does it affect your life? Please
'splain to me, Unca Lumpy.
--
Joanne
stitches @ singerlady.reno.nv.us.earth.milky-way.com
http://members.tripod.com/~bernardschopen/

Lumpy

unread,
Dec 3, 2009, 4:21:11 PM12/3/09
to
Pogonip wrote:
> ...Please 'splain to me, Unca Lumpy.

I don't understand either. I've always been very
confused about how we view sex. On one hand it's the most
wonderful, fulfilling part of life "Oh congratulate
me, my daughter had sex and I'm going to be a
grandmother" - "Oh congratulations, I see you
had sex and are now pregnant" - "I'm happy to announce
that Tiger and I had sex and are now expecting".

On the other hand, it's dirty and evil "Oh my! We
can't have Rob and Laura sleeping in the same bed!
That would suggest that they have sex" - "We don't want
our kid's teachers discussing sex in school" - "This movie
has language that suggests people have sex. Parental
guidance is advised"

I think it has to do with people being generally stupid.
Or people being stupid generally. Or being generally
stupid people.

Ignoramus1909

unread,
Dec 3, 2009, 4:25:30 PM12/3/09
to
On 2009-12-03, Kris Baker <paralle...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 3, 11:25?am, Ignoramus1909 <ignoramus1...@NOSPAM.1909.invalid>

> wrote:
>> On 2009-12-03, Kris Baker <parallelcoo...@ggmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > "Ygnoramus1909" <chewed@off> wrote in message
>> >news:B9-dncuyo7nsZYrW...@giganews.com...
>> >> So, Kris, please tell me how you came to your conclusion that the
>> >> email posted by me, was sent in 2008?
>>
>> >> You seem to be avoiding the question, how come that is so?
>>
>> >> i
>>
>> > I have you killfiled because I hate nymshifters.
>>
>> It is a very surprising coincidence that you suddenly "killfiled" me
>> just when I questioned veracity of your statement that the email I
>> quoted, was dated 2008.
>>
>> But please, keep me "killfiled".
>
> (Answering through Google, just to prove the point)
>
> What do you mean "suddenly"?

I mean, you seem to be selectively reponding to me (like now) and
not responding.

> I only saw your post when rjn replied to him, and if you'll
> check Google, you'll that my reply was to rjn, not to you.
>
> Here's what I told rjn:
> Yup. This one looks to be from December 2008.
> It's obviously a follow-up to a one-time buyer....who
> later did get feedback. Look at who it's from.
>
> Why can't you figure it out? Like I said, all the clues
> are there....IF you can correct spell the user's name.

For your convenience, I am including the same headers as I posted
originally, so that you can see that your original followup was
a lie.

The headers all consistently indicate the date as being Friday,
Nov. 2009.

The headers are here:

>From ebay_AT_ebay.com Fri Nov 27 12: 0:08 2009
Return-Path: <ebay_AT_ebay.com>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on bling.mydomain.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-24.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12,
ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH,HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI,HTML_MESSAGE,INVALID_DATE,
RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL
autolearn=ham version=3.2.5
Received: from mxphxpool20.ebay.com (mxphxpool25.ebay.com [66.211.161.25])
by bling.mydomain.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9ubuntu1) with ESMTP id nARIe6f3008036
for <myuserid_AT_mydomain.com>; Fri, 27 Nov 2009 12:40:08 -0600
Received: from sjcbat109.sjc.ebay.com (phxlb132.phx.ebay.com [10.14.183.203])
by mxphxpool20.ebay.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nARIdSKv015892
for <myuserid_AT_mydomain.com>; Fri, 27 Nov 2009 11:40:01 -0700 (GMT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=dksm28; d=ebay.com; c=nofws; q=dns;
h=x-ebay-mailtracker:to:from:mime-version:content-type:subject:date:
message-id:reply-to:x-ebay-mailversiontracker;
b=HuHZW9rZNDB1yy0kRICOG1WF7CrzDTqc1S+8dKhGdfB1de162MPnnIvd+AYUGys65
35S/CtLKSJ+A27C3mMDxw==
X-eBay-MailTracker: 11402.639.0.0
To: myuserid_AT_mydomain.com
From: eBay <ebay_AT_ebay.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=19677431.1259347078246.JavaMail.ebba.sjcbat109
Subject: Please pay for your Plummers Routing Cable
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 09 11:37:58 GMT-0700
Message-ID: <16869803.1259347078252.JavaMail.ebba_AT_sjcbat109>
Reply-To: ebay_AT_ebay.com
X-eBay-MailVersionTracker: 639.10224357

Kris Baker

unread,
Dec 3, 2009, 4:46:21 PM12/3/09
to

"Lumpy" <lu...@digitalcartography.com> wrote in message
news:7nqoedF...@mid.individual.net...

> Pogonip wrote:
>> ...Please 'splain to me, Unca Lumpy.
>
> I don't understand either.

It's 'cos this one started out with such a bunch of BS
coverups.

Kris

Alex Clayton

unread,
Dec 3, 2009, 4:49:16 PM12/3/09
to
"BrotherBart" <noth...@nomail.net> wrote in message
news:hf8rq9$ce6$1...@news.eternal-september.org...

LOL, while I know little about computers, although having a couple from Dell
has taught me a LOT more than I used to know, even I do know how to use a
filter. Have your Mom show you how and you can be happily computing again,
at least until she makes you turn it off for bed.
--
"Everything in excess! To enjoy the flavor of life, take big bites.
Moderation is for monks."

[Lazarus Long]

Alex Clayton

unread,
Dec 3, 2009, 4:50:40 PM12/3/09
to
"Kris Baker" <paralle...@ggmail.com> wrote in message
news:7nqb4iF...@mid.individual.net...
I knew he was mixed race, but had never heard this breakdown. He actually
checked his family tree for all that?

Alex Clayton

unread,
Dec 3, 2009, 4:52:52 PM12/3/09
to
"Kris Baker" <paralle...@ggmail.com> wrote in message
news:7nqcsmF...@mid.individual.net...

Is this that same nut who was posting stuff about you and your O/H a while
back? Or is this a new fan club member?

Pogonip

unread,
Dec 3, 2009, 4:57:28 PM12/3/09
to
Thank you for answering my questions. I just thought of another reason.
Maybe that's as close as they ever get to the real thing?

JessicaG

unread,
Dec 3, 2009, 5:19:50 PM12/3/09
to
>> Yup, the eject button seems to be a common issue with our Dells and W7.
>> Our workaround it to disable/re-enable the DVD drive and then it works
>> fine. Sometimes after a reboot it crops up again. It's probably some kind
>> of driver issue (by driver, I'm not referring to Tiger's motor vehicle
>> skills nor his wife's timely use of a golf club).
>>
>
> The new one has what they call a slot drive, so I would not be willing to
> take the entire thing apart. That was the first problem I had with the
> support guy in India. He kept asking me about the tray, while I was trying
> to tell him there was no tray. What the hell it's working now so I left
> well enough alone.

I meant disable it within Win7 then re-enable it; no fiddling with hardware
required.


BrotherBart

unread,
Dec 3, 2009, 6:10:51 PM12/3/09
to
Alex Clayton wrote:
>Have your Mom show you how and you can be happily
> computing again, at least until she makes you turn it off for bed.

Whoosh.

I think I would have to get a court order to dig her up after all these
years. Too much trouble.

Kris Baker

unread,
Dec 3, 2009, 6:16:13 PM12/3/09
to

"BrotherBart" <noth...@nomail.net> wrote in message
news:hf9gim$n79$1...@news.eternal-september.org...

And I've been accused of lame spelling flames.

"living in your mama's basement' is from the 1980s.

Kris

Pogonip

unread,
Dec 3, 2009, 6:26:49 PM12/3/09
to

All his base are now belong to us, eh?

Lumpy

unread,
Dec 3, 2009, 6:32:56 PM12/3/09
to
Pogonip wrote:
> ... Maybe that's as close as they ever get to the real thing?

Maybe they got there but then thought
"Oh I'm so dirty but it feels so good".

Kris Baker

unread,
Dec 3, 2009, 6:42:48 PM12/3/09
to

"Pogonip" <nob...@nowhere.org> wrote in message
news:4b184935$1...@news.bnb-lp.com...

> Kris Baker wrote:
>>
>> "BrotherBart" <noth...@nomail.net> wrote in message
>> news:hf9gim$n79$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
>>> Alex Clayton wrote:
>>>> Have your Mom show you how and you can be happily
>>>> computing again, at least until she makes you turn it off for bed.
>>>
>>> Whoosh.
>>>
>>> I think I would have to get a court order to dig her up after all these
>>> years. Too much trouble.
>>
>> And I've been accused of lame spelling flames.
>>
>> "living in your mama's basement' is from the 1980s.
>>
>> Kris
>
> All his base are now belong to us, eh?
> --
> Joanne

Ment.

Kris

Kris Baker

unread,
Dec 3, 2009, 6:48:24 PM12/3/09
to
On Dec 3, 2:25 pm, Ignoramus1909 <ignoramus1...@NOSPAM.1909.invalid>
wrote:
> X-eBay-MailVersionTracker: 639.10224357- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

<whoosh>

The headers don't matter. The email obviously was *sent* (by a
seller) in 2008, was "lost in the system" and popped out to bedevil
you for several weeks because you misspelled the buyer's name
in your post.

Get it now? Reread your original post, find your error, and
then check that buyer's feedback. Hell, email that seller
and ask them what they sold to that buyer.

I didn't want to embarrass you, but geez. You reported
erroneous information (misspelled seller's name) and then
are pissed off because someone else figured out, and it's
still stumping you.

Grow up.

Kris

Kris Baker

unread,
Dec 3, 2009, 6:52:04 PM12/3/09
to
On Dec 3, 2:52 pm, "Alex Clayton" <Alexx1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "Kris Baker" <parallelcoo...@ggmail.com> wrote in message
> [Lazarus Long]-

I wouldn't be surprised. He's a self-proclaimed "computer
genius" who munges his screen name and email address
16 times a day (using some lame generated numeric code).

He does that, to get around killfiles (with the lame excuse
that he doesn't want anyone to see his Usenet history).

Kris

clams_casino

unread,
Dec 3, 2009, 7:11:14 PM12/3/09
to
Pogonip wrote:

> Lumpy wrote:
>
>> BrotherBart wrote:
>>
>>> The parts that stick out of his golf shirts are the black parts.
>>
>>
>> Redneck Father to Daughter:
>> "I don't care how much money he makes,
>> I don't want you hanging around any
>> of those Thai/Dutch/Native American guys"
>
>
> I do not understand people's obsession with other people's sex lives.
> The chances of them ever even meeting face-to-face is minimal, much
> less that they should ever find themselves in an intimate situation.
> Who the fuck cares who is screwing whom? How does it affect your
> life? Please 'splain to me, Unca Lumpy.


You'd like growing up in KY.

Ignoramus1909

unread,
Dec 3, 2009, 7:26:49 PM12/3/09
to
On 2009-12-03, Kris Baker <paralle...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 3, 2:25?pm, Ignoramus1909 <ignoramus1...@NOSPAM.1909.invalid>

> wrote:
>> On 2009-12-03, Kris Baker <parallelcoo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Dec 3, 11:25?am, Ignoramus1909 <ignoramus1...@NOSPAM.1909.invalid>
>> > wrote:
>> >> On 2009-12-03, Kris Baker <parallelcoo...@ggmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> > "Ygnoramus1909" <chewed@off> wrote in message
>> >> >news:B9-dncuyo7nsZYrW...@giganews.com...
>> >> >> So, Kris, please tell me how you came to your conclusion that the
>> >> >> email posted by me, was sent in 2008?
>>
>> >> >> You seem to be avoiding the question, how come that is so?
>>
>> >> >> i
>>
>> >> > I have you killfiled because I hate nymshifters.
>>
>> >> It is a very surprising coincidence that you suddenly "killfiled" me
>> >> just when I questioned veracity of your statement that the email I
>> >> quoted, was dated 2008.
>>
>> >> But please, keep me "killfiled".
>>
>> > (Answering through Google, just to prove the point)
>>
>> > What do you mean "suddenly"?
>>
>> I mean, you seem to be selectively reponding to me (like now) and
>> not responding.
>>
>> > I only saw your post when rjn replied to him, and if you'll
>> > check Google, you'll that my reply was to rjn, not to you.
>>
>> > Here's what I told rjn:
>> > Yup. ? ?This one looks to be from December 2008.

>> > It's obviously a follow-up to a one-time buyer....who
>> > later did get feedback. ? Look at who it's from.
>>
>> > Why can't ?you figure it out? ? Like I said, all the clues

>> > are there....IF you can correct spell the user's name.
>>
>> For your convenience, I am including the same headers as I posted
>> originally, so that you can see that your original followup was
>> a lie.
>>
>> The headers all consistently indicate the date as being Friday,
>> Nov. 2009.
>>
>> The headers are here:
>>
>> >From ebay_AT_ebay.com ?Fri Nov 27 12: 0:08 2009

>>
>> Return-Path: <ebay_AT_ebay.com>
>> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on bling.mydomain.com
>> X-Spam-Level:
>> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-24.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12,
>> ? ? ? ? ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH,HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI,HTML_MESSAGE,INVALID_DATE,
>> ? ? ? ? RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL
>> ? ? ? ? autolearn=ham version=3.2.5

>> Received: from mxphxpool20.ebay.com (mxphxpool25.ebay.com [66.211.161.25])
>> ? ? ? ? by bling.mydomain.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9ubuntu1) with ESMTP id nARIe6f3008036
>> ? ? ? ? for <myuserid_AT_mydomain.com>; Fri, 27 Nov 2009 12:40:08 -0600

>> Received: from sjcbat109.sjc.ebay.com (phxlb132.phx.ebay.com [10.14.183.203])
>> ? ? ? ? by mxphxpool20.ebay.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nARIdSKv015892
>> ? ? ? ? for <myuserid_AT_mydomain.com>; Fri, 27 Nov 2009 11:40:01 -0700 (GMT)

>> DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=dksm28; d=ebay.com; c=nofws; q=dns;
>> ? ? ? ? h=x-ebay-mailtracker:to:from:mime-version:content-type:subject:date:
>> ? ? ? ? message-id:reply-to:x-ebay-mailversiontracker;
>> ? ? ? ? b=HuHZW9rZNDB1yy0kRICOG1WF7CrzDTqc1S+8dKhGdfB1de162MPnnIvd+AYUGys65
>> ? ? ? ? 35S/CtLKSJ+A27C3mMDxw==

>> X-eBay-MailTracker: 11402.639.0.0
>> To: myuserid_AT_mydomain.com
>> From: eBay <ebay_AT_ebay.com>
>> Mime-Version: 1.0
>> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=19677431.1259347078246.JavaMail.ebba.sjcbat109
>> Subject: Please pay for your Plummers Routing Cable
>> Date: Fri, 27 Nov 09 11:37:58 GMT-0700
>> Message-ID: <16869803.1259347078252.JavaMail.ebba_AT_sjcbat109>
>> Reply-To: ebay_AT_ebay.com
>> X-eBay-MailVersionTracker: 639.10224357- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
><whoosh>
>
> The headers don't matter.

Of course, they do. The email was sent in 2009, but read on.

> The email obviously was *sent* (by a seller) in 2008, was "lost in
> the system" and popped out to bedevil you for several weeks because
> you misspelled the buyer's name in your post.

Wrong again.

http://cgi6.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?MfcISAPICommand=ViewBidItems&userid=godzukiplus&completed=1&sort=3&all=0&rows=200&hc=1&hm=um.re%60j45733

This user bought this starting solenoid on Nov. 25, 2009.


> Get it now? Reread your original post, find your error, and
> then check that buyer's feedback. Hell, email that seller
> and ask them what they sold to that buyer.

No need to email the seller, it is obvious from the above link.

> I didn't want to embarrass you, but geez. You reported
> erroneous information (misspelled seller's name) and then
> are pissed off because someone else figured out, and it's
> still stumping you.

I did not want to embarrass you either, but geez, you did it yourself.

Both the email header dates, the item in the subject, as well as
the "STARTER SOLENIOD TL1000R TLR TL 1000R SUZUKI" date in November
2009 (ebay item 110455535382).

This is obviously some screwup of ebay, where they sent me a reminder
that was completely messed up.

i

> Grow up.
>
> Kris

Kris Baker

unread,
Dec 3, 2009, 7:36:46 PM12/3/09
to
On Dec 3, 5:26 pm, Ignoramus1909 <ignoramus1...@NOSPAM.1909.invalid>
> http://cgi6.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?MfcISAPICommand=ViewBidItems&us...

>
> This user bought this starting solenoid on Nov. 25, 2009.
>
> > Get it now?   Reread your original post, find your error, and
> > then check that buyer's feedback.  Hell, email that seller
> > and ask them what they sold to that buyer.
>
> No need to email the seller, it is obvious from the above link.
>
> > I didn't want to embarrass you, but geez.  You reported
> > erroneous information (misspelled seller's name) and then
> > are pissed off because someone else figured out, and it's
> > still stumping you.
>
> I did not want to embarrass you either, but geez, you did it yourself.
>
> Both the email header dates, the item in the subject, as well as
> the "STARTER SOLENIOD TL1000R TLR TL 1000R SUZUKI" date in November
> 2009 (ebay item 110455535382).
>
> This is obviously some screwup of ebay, where they sent me a reminder
> that was completely messed up.
>
> i
>
>
>
> > Grow up.
>
> > Kris- Hide quoted text -
>

The very first thing I did, was to look for purchases by the
actual eBay ID (NOT the misspelled ID you reported).
eBay showed no purchases for the past 30 days.

The second thing, was to look at feedback:

http://feedback.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewFeedback2&userid=godzukiplus&ftab=AllFeedback

If Occam's Razor failed, blame Occam.

Kris

Ignoramus1909

unread,
Dec 3, 2009, 7:42:30 PM12/3/09
to
On 2009-12-03, Kris Baker <paralle...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Dec 3, 2:52?pm, "Alex Clayton" <Alexx1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> "Kris Baker" <parallelcoo...@ggmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:7nqcsmF...@mid.individual.net...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > "Ygnoramus1909" <chewed@off> wrote in message
>> >news:B9-dncuyo7nsZYrW...@giganews.com...
>> >> So, Kris, please tell me how you came to your conclusion that the
>> >> email posted by me, was sent in 2008?
>>
>> >> You seem to be avoiding the question, how come that is so?
>>
>> >> i
>>
>> > I have you killfiled because I hate nymshifters.
>> > Why do you think I'd answer you now?
>>
>> > All the clues were in my original post.
>> > Use your brain, Mr Computer Genius.
>>
>> > Kris
>>
>> Is this that same nut who was posting stuff about you and your O/H a while
>> back? Or is this a new fan club member?
>>
>> [Lazarus Long]-
>
> I wouldn't be surprised. He's a self-proclaimed "computer
> genius" who munges his screen name and email address
> 16 times a day (using some lame generated numeric code).
>
> He does that, to get around killfiles (with the lame excuse
> that he doesn't want anyone to see his Usenet history).

Something is strange here.

You claim that you have killfiled me. I will give you the benefit of
the doubt on this. Sure, you have me killfiled.

This means, obviously, that you know how to killfile someone, like me,
who changes a number in his username but keeps everything else unchanged.
It is called a "wildcard" and is an easy to use feature, available to
many, if not all, newsreaders.

Then, why would you claim that I change this number in my username, to
avoid killfiles? How could this possibly be true to say that I do
something to avoid being killfiling, and claiming that *you* have me
killfiled?

I would say, Kris, that you are not being completely honest with us
here.

Also...

Since you allege that I proclaimed myself a computer genuis, I would
love to see a cite where I did so.

i

Pogonip

unread,
Dec 3, 2009, 7:49:12 PM12/3/09
to

Yeah! Like this one: http://spedr.com/imgg

Lumpy

unread,
Dec 3, 2009, 7:54:20 PM12/3/09
to
clams_casino wrote:
> You'd like growing up in KY.

Imagine those small town newspaper social columns,
if sex were less taboo.

"Mrs Dorothy Brown, of Rt 2, Big Fork, made dinner
and invited Mr and Mrs Eugene Bates. Mrs Brown
made baked ham, scalloped potatoes, new peas with pearl onions,
cabbage with bacon, lemon merengue and pumpkin pie.
Mr Bates had seconds on the pumpkin pie. After
dinner, they all fondled Mrs Brown's nipples and
then watched 'American Idol' on the Browns' television"

Ignoramus1909

unread,
Dec 3, 2009, 8:05:16 PM12/3/09
to
On 2009-12-04, Kris Baker <paralle...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 3, 5:26?pm, Ignoramus1909 <ignoramus1...@NOSPAM.1909.invalid>

> wrote:
>> > The email obviously was *sent* (by a seller) in 2008, was "lost in
>> > the system" and popped out to bedevil you for several weeks because
>> > you misspelled the buyer's name in your post.
>>
>> Wrong again.
>>
>> http://cgi6.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?MfcISAPICommand=ViewBidItems&us...
>>
>> This user bought this starting solenoid on Nov. 25, 2009.
>>
>> > Get it now? ? Reread your original post, find your error, and
>> > then check that buyer's feedback. ?Hell, email that seller

>> > and ask them what they sold to that buyer.
>>
>> No need to email the seller, it is obvious from the above link.
>>
>> > I didn't want to embarrass you, but geez. ?You reported

>> > erroneous information (misspelled seller's name) and then
>> > are pissed off because someone else figured out, and it's
>> > still stumping you.
>>
>> I did not want to embarrass you either, but geez, you did it yourself.
>>
>> Both the email header dates, the item in the subject, as well as
>> the "STARTER SOLENIOD TL1000R TLR TL 1000R SUZUKI" date in November
>> 2009 (ebay item 110455535382).
>>
>> This is obviously some screwup of ebay, where they sent me a reminder
>> that was completely messed up.
>
> The very first thing I did, was to look for purchases by the
> actual eBay ID (NOT the misspelled ID you reported).
> eBay showed no purchases for the past 30 days.

If you looked for his purchases, you find find the same thing as I
found.

http://cgi6.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?MfcISAPICommand=ViewBidItems&userid=godzukiplus&completed=1&sort=3&all=0&rows=200&hc=1&hm=um.re%60j45733

Here they are!

So you must not have looked at his purchases, contrary to what you
just said.

> The second thing, was to look at feedback:
>
> http://feedback.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewFeedback2&userid=godzukiplus&ftab=AllFeedback
>
> If Occam's Razor failed, blame Occam.

I think that you should, instead, blame your big mouth, and not Occam.

i

Ignoramus1909

unread,
Dec 3, 2009, 8:06:06 PM12/3/09
to
On 2009-12-04, Lumpy <lu...@digitalcartography.com> wrote:
> clams_casino wrote:
>> You'd like growing up in KY.
>
> Imagine those small town newspaper social columns,
> if sex were less taboo.
>
> "Mrs Dorothy Brown, of Rt 2, Big Fork, made dinner
> and invited Mr and Mrs Eugene Bates. Mrs Brown
> made baked ham, scalloped potatoes, new peas with pearl onions,
> cabbage with bacon, lemon merengue and pumpkin pie.
> Mr Bates had seconds on the pumpkin pie. After
> dinner, they all fondled Mrs Brown's nipples and
> then watched 'American Idol' on the Browns' television"

At least they did not have group sex with the pie.

i

Lumpy

unread,
Dec 3, 2009, 8:27:33 PM12/3/09
to
Pogonip wrote:

> Yeah! Like this one: http://spedr.com/imgg

Ok. I gotta know.
What are "Club Accessories"?

Pogonip

unread,
Dec 3, 2009, 8:41:40 PM12/3/09
to

I have no idea. Think it calls for a field trip? Investigative
research? Where is Ty when we need her?

Kris Baker

unread,
Dec 3, 2009, 8:43:00 PM12/3/09
to

"Lumpy" <lu...@digitalcartography.com> wrote in message
news:7nr4u3F...@mid.individual.net...

> clams_casino wrote:
>> You'd like growing up in KY.
>
> Imagine those small town newspaper social columns,
> if sex were less taboo.
>
> "Mrs Dorothy Brown, of Rt 2, Big Fork, made dinner
> and invited Mr and Mrs Eugene Bates. Mrs Brown
> made baked ham, scalloped potatoes, new peas with pearl onions,
> cabbage with bacon, lemon merengue and pumpkin pie.
> Mr Bates had seconds on the pumpkin pie. After
> dinner, they all fondled Mrs Brown's nipples

....and young Master Bates watched fondly, remember
that his mother's maiden name really was Titensor.

Kris

Kris Baker

unread,
Dec 3, 2009, 9:46:33 PM12/3/09
to
On Dec 3, 6:05 pm, Ignoramus1909 <ignoramus1...@NOSPAM.1909.invalid>
wrote:
> http://cgi6.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?MfcISAPICommand=ViewBidItems&us...

>
> Here they are!
>
> So you must not have looked at his purchases, contrary to what you
> just said.
>
> > The second thing, was to look at feedback:
>
> >http://feedback.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewFeedback2&userid=godzuk...

>
> > If Occam's Razor failed, blame Occam.
>
> I think that you should, instead, blame your big mouth, and not Occam.
>

OK.

How about you explain how you obtained all the "facts" you're
spouting?
Like why would someone send a follow-up within two days?
Which end of the transaction was yours?

Lumpy

unread,
Dec 3, 2009, 10:19:07 PM12/3/09
to
Kris Baker wrote:
> How about you explain how you obtained all the "facts" you're
> spouting?
> Like why would someone send a follow-up within two days?
> Which end of the transaction was yours?

And another thing -

Which club did she use to smash out the window?

Kris Baker

unread,
Dec 3, 2009, 10:24:55 PM12/3/09
to

"Lumpy" <lu...@digitalcartography.com> wrote in message
news:7nrddiF...@mid.individual.net...

> Kris Baker wrote:
>> How about you explain how you obtained all the "facts" you're
>> spouting?
>> Like why would someone send a follow-up within two days?
>> Which end of the transaction was yours?
>
> And another thing -
>
> Which club did she use to smash out the window?
>
>
> Lumpy

Night club, of course.

Kris

Ignoramus1909

unread,
Dec 3, 2009, 10:37:00 PM12/3/09
to
On 2009-12-04, Kris Baker <paralle...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 3, 6:05?pm, Ignoramus1909 <ignoramus1...@NOSPAM.1909.invalid>

The first fact in my hand was the email that I received.

The second fact is that I used ebay's "search by bidder" facility,
which I have accessible on my little "all ebay in one page" webpage,
and which may be available elsewhere.

> Like why would someone send a follow-up within two days?
> Which end of the transaction was yours?

I purchased a "Plummers routing cable" (sic) several days prior to
receiving that inane email. This "Plummers routing cable" is a local
pickup lot that I will pick up in person from a local seller. I hope
to make some $$$ from this lot, as it is, in fact, a lot of eighteen
brand new Ridgid routing cables for plumbers, that cost me next to
nothing.

I believe that eBay implemented a new feature to remind buyers to pay
for those purchases. It had some kind of a bug, so instead of
addressing me and reminding me about my purchase, it instead addressed
user godzukiplus and reminded about that "SOLENIOD", which I never
bought but godzukiplus did.

I found that bug to be funny and shared it.

Then you came out and said that "it was obviously an old email from
2008" and were rather sarcastic. You sarcasm was misplaced, as there
was nothing at all, anywhere, to suggest that it was an email from
2008.

i

JessicaG

unread,
Dec 4, 2009, 8:50:53 AM12/4/09
to
> And another thing -
>
> Which club did she use to smash out the window?
>
>
> Lumpy

It was a driver issue, according to Dell customer support.


Lumpy

unread,
Dec 4, 2009, 9:36:43 AM12/4/09
to
JessicaG wrote:

> It was a driver issue, according to Dell customer support.

Bad driver.

Lumpy

unread,
Dec 4, 2009, 9:45:05 AM12/4/09
to
Speaking of Dutch golfers -

Anyone seen photos or maps or googleearth or whatever
of where Tiger's car crash occurred? I got the impression
it was on a residential street, maybe still inside their
gated community. The youtube news footage I see looks
like they're on very residential streets, inside a
subdivision.

I'm a little confused about how the Fl Hwy Patrol has
jusrisdiction and not the local gendarmes. State cops
typically deal with interstates and state highways that
are outside city limits. And it's like pulling teeth
from flying pigs to get them to deal with little
fender benders in people's front yards, unless
the car crash started on a state hwy/interstate.

Pogo, you have any clarification? Maybe FHP deals
with accidents a little differently than other states.

Or maybe it did indeed happen on a state jurisdiction road.

R. Totale

unread,
Dec 4, 2009, 10:09:24 AM12/4/09
to
On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 13:20:37 -0500, clams_casino
<PeterG...@DrunkinClam.com> wrote:

>Lumpy wrote:
>
>>Kris Baker wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>You still believe in the "one drop rule"?
>>>
>>>Woods is half Oriental (25% Thai, 25% Chinese), one-fourth
>>>black, one-eighth Dutch and one-eighth Native American.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>Chicks dig Dutchmen.
>>
>>
>>
>I dig clams.

http://www.317x.com/albums/j/jonahjones2/enlargement.html

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDemon.com<<<<<<------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

BrotherBart

unread,
Dec 4, 2009, 12:43:21 PM12/4/09
to
Shut the fuck up iggy. Quit fucking up a thread that has nothing to do
with what you keep babbling about.

Pogonip

unread,
Dec 4, 2009, 2:46:19 PM12/4/09
to

To the best of my knowledge, you are correct. State troopers, in all
states I know of, are essentially traffic cops who patrol state and
Interstate highways. In rural areas, where there is little in the way
of local law enforcement, they would assist the sheriff's department
when needed. Florida used to have rural areas, not so many anymore. In
the northeast, sheriffs don't generally have patrol divisions, they
operate the jails and do a few other things, but in the south, the High
Sheriff and the sheriffs are local law enforcement except in cities and
towns.

In Florida, there are strange politics, though. It may be that the
locals called in the FHP, or it could be that an FHP trooper was closest
when the call came in, and so responded because of concern about
injuries. Or, it could be that the local COP foresaw a hot potato, and
handed the situation off to the larger agency in an attempt to keep his
skin intact.

Reminds me of the Olde Days when the Florida driver's license was a
strip of cardboard that folded in the middle like a two page book. It
was customary to keep a $20 bill inside the fold for when stopped by FHP
and asked for the license.

PeterD

unread,
Dec 4, 2009, 3:32:05 PM12/4/09
to
On Fri, 4 Dec 2009 07:45:05 -0700, "Lumpy"
<lu...@digitalcartography.com> wrote:

>Speaking of Dutch golfers -
>
>Anyone seen photos or maps or googleearth or whatever
>of where Tiger's car crash occurred? I got the impression
>it was on a residential street, maybe still inside their
>gated community. The youtube news footage I see looks
>like they're on very residential streets, inside a
>subdivision.
>
>I'm a little confused about how the Fl Hwy Patrol has
>jusrisdiction and not the local gendarmes.

Not everywhere is located inside a town's bounds in Florida, some is
'unincorporated' land, subject to either county sheriff or HP.

THat said, there was no auto accident, it was a golf club accident.

Kris Baker

unread,
Dec 4, 2009, 3:43:09 PM12/4/09
to

"Pogonip" <nob...@nowhere.org> wrote in message
news:4b19...@news.bnb-lp.com...

> Lumpy wrote:
>> Speaking of Dutch golfers -
>>
>> I'm a little confused about how the Fl Hwy Patrol has
>> jusrisdiction and not the local gendarmes. State cops
>> typically deal with interstates and state highways that
>> are outside city limits. >
> In Florida, there are strange politics, though. It may be that the locals
> called in the FHP, or it could be that an FHP trooper was closest when the
> call came in, and so responded because of concern about injuries. Or, it
> could be that the local COP foresaw a hot potato, and handed the situation
> off to the larger agency in an attempt to keep his skin intact.
>
> Reminds me of the Olde Days when the Florida driver's license was a strip
> of cardboard that folded in the middle like a two page book. It was
> customary to keep a $20 bill inside the fold for when stopped by FHP and
> asked for the license.
> --
> Joanne

This is lengthy, but kinda explains it:

http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1943684,00.html

It probably has a lot to do with the fact that 911 was called
(which meant the local cops/ambulance would respond),
and the property destruction meant that the private cops
wouldn't be the investigators.

Kris

Pogonip

unread,
Dec 4, 2009, 5:01:44 PM12/4/09
to
Kris Baker wrote:
>
> This is lengthy, but kinda explains it:
>
> http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1943684,00.html
>
> It probably has a lot to do with the fact that 911 was called
> (which meant the local cops/ambulance would respond),
> and the property destruction meant that the private cops
> wouldn't be the investigators.
>
> Kris

Interesting. But FHP does not have jurisdiction in traffic-related
accidents on private property or even in municipalities with police
departments that have traffic divisions.

Windermere is like Rancho Santa Fe near San Diego, where a friend had a
house. When she decided to dry a pair of panties by putting them on a
lampshade and turning on the lamp, and they got a little too hot, and
her smoke alarm sounded, she had RSF firemen at her door within minutes.
She said they were really cute, and it was a little embarrassing
explaining what had caused the alarm. She was a hoot. She died a year
ago last April, and I miss her and her antics.

Kris Baker

unread,
Dec 4, 2009, 6:08:19 PM12/4/09
to

"Pogonip" <nob...@nowhere.org> wrote in message
news:4b19...@news.bnb-lp.com...

Certain streets may be deeded to the city/county/state, or
a compact in place.

I'd miss your friend, too, I'm sure.

Kris

Lumpy

unread,
Dec 4, 2009, 6:35:33 PM12/4/09
to
Pogonip wrote:
> To the best of my knowledge, you are correct. State troopers, in all
> states I know of, are essentially traffic cops who patrol state and
> Interstate highways. In rural areas, where there is little in the way
> of local law enforcement, they would assist the sheriff's department
> when needed...

My experience takes it even further. The state cops
look for every option to NOT investigate an accident,
ESPECIALLY if it's not on their highway. Our County
used to routinely work state accidents because the
on duty troopers didn't want to get out of bed or
they'd already reached "overtime".

I worked a lot of accidents where the driver turned
off a state hwy and then did prop damage on private
property. Troopers refused, claiming "It's on pvt property,
we don't work pvt prop accidents".

We'd even heard troopers, when requested to respond to a state
wreck, come over the county freq and ask "Are you refusing
to work the accident?". Our (county) answer was something like
"Negative. Our agency is not refusing to work an
accident that is not in our jurisdiction. What's your ETA?"

Kris Baker

unread,
Dec 4, 2009, 7:58:26 PM12/4/09
to

"Lumpy" <lu...@digitalcartography.com> wrote in message
news:7ntkmgF...@mid.individual.net...

> Pogonip wrote:
>> To the best of my knowledge, you are correct. State troopers, in all
>> states I know of, are essentially traffic cops who patrol state and
>> Interstate highways. In rural areas, where there is little in the way
>> of local law enforcement, they would assist the sheriff's department
>> when needed...
>
> My experience takes it even further. The state cops
> look for every option to NOT investigate an accident,
> ESPECIALLY if it's not on their highway. Our County
> used to routinely work state accidents because the
> on duty troopers didn't want to get out of bed or
> they'd already reached "overtime".

Yebbut, you weren't being called to an enclave where the
wealthy celebs live. I'm sure they knew who they were
picking up.

I wouldn't walk across the street for Woods....but many would.

Kris

Kris Baker

unread,
Dec 4, 2009, 8:30:18 PM12/4/09
to
Actually, your life would be complete if you had one of
these for sale on eBay:
http://outofbounds.nbcsports.com/2009/12/post-31.html.php

Who knew that Woods was into crackpot science?

Kris

Lumpy

unread,
Dec 4, 2009, 8:47:45 PM12/4/09
to
Kris Baker wrote:

> Yebbut, you weren't being called to an enclave where the
> wealthy celebs live. I'm sure they knew who they were
> picking up.
>
> I wouldn't walk across the street for Woods....but many would.

If there was a difference, it would work the other way.
The "don't you know who I am?" attitude from the
"You know who they are's" is tiring at best.

Kris Baker

unread,
Dec 4, 2009, 9:13:44 PM12/4/09
to

"Lumpy" <lu...@digitalcartography.com> wrote in message
news:7ntsedF...@mid.individual.net...

> Kris Baker wrote:
>
>> Yebbut, you weren't being called to an enclave where the
>> wealthy celebs live. I'm sure they knew who they were
>> picking up.
>>
>> I wouldn't walk across the street for Woods....but many would.
>
> If there was a difference, it would work the other way.
> The "don't you know who I am?" attitude from the
> "You know who they are's" is tiring at best.
>
> Lumpy

Unless you're a fan of whatever they do. You'd go once. ;)

Kris

Message has been deleted

Pogonip

unread,
Dec 5, 2009, 3:53:55 PM12/5/09
to
James E. Morrow wrote:
> In article <6bsih5hgdk0173tqp...@4ax.com>, peter2
> @hipson.net says...
>
> <snip>

>
>>> I'm a little confused about how the Fl Hwy Patrol has
>>> jusrisdiction and not the local gendarmes.
>> Not everywhere is located inside a town's bounds in Florida, some is
>> 'unincorporated' land, subject to either county sheriff or HP.
>>
>> THat said, there was no auto accident, it was a golf club accident.
>
> <snip>
>
> I suspect that the FHP investigates all crimes of this nature. Assault
> on a motor vehicle with sports equipment is serious offense. ;=)
>

This gives new meaning to the term "Vehicular Homicide."

Alex Clayton

unread,
Dec 5, 2009, 4:12:17 PM12/5/09
to
"Kris Baker" <paralle...@ggmail.com> wrote in message
news:7ntrd9F...@mid.individual.net...

There is a great example of what you were talking about. The book is
photographed in his car, so now they are getting a flood of orders for it.
I don't "get it" but there is a large percentage of the country that has a
thing about celebrities. <shrug>
--
I think drug tests are great. Since I have to pass them to earn money to pay
taxes, Everyone on or applying for welfare should have to pass them to get
some of my money.

BrotherBart

unread,
Dec 5, 2009, 4:15:53 PM12/5/09
to
Pogonip wrote:
> James E. Morrow wrote:
>> In article <6bsih5hgdk0173tqp...@4ax.com>, peter2
>> @hipson.net says...
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>>>> I'm a little confused about how the Fl Hwy Patrol has
>>>> jusrisdiction and not the local gendarmes.
>>> Not everywhere is located inside a town's bounds in Florida, some is
>>> 'unincorporated' land, subject to either county sheriff or HP.
>>> THat said, there was no auto accident, it was a golf club accident.
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>> I suspect that the FHP investigates all crimes of this nature. Assault
>> on a motor vehicle with sports equipment is serious offense. ;=)
>>
>
> This gives new meaning to the term "Vehicular Homicide."

And the phrase "His car died.".

Pogonip

unread,
Dec 5, 2009, 5:04:48 PM12/5/09
to

It may call for a postmortem examination, to determine the cause of death.

PeterD

unread,
Dec 5, 2009, 8:00:23 PM12/5/09
to
On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 14:04:48 -0800, Pogonip <nob...@nowhere.org>
wrote:

>BrotherBart wrote:
>> Pogonip wrote:
>>> James E. Morrow wrote:
>>>> In article <6bsih5hgdk0173tqp...@4ax.com>, peter2
>>>> @hipson.net says...
>>>>
>>>> <snip>
>>>>
>>>>>> I'm a little confused about how the Fl Hwy Patrol has
>>>>>> jusrisdiction and not the local gendarmes.
>>>>> Not everywhere is located inside a town's bounds in Florida, some is
>>>>> 'unincorporated' land, subject to either county sheriff or HP.
>>>>> THat said, there was no auto accident, it was a golf club accident.
>>>>
>>>> <snip>
>>>>
>>>> I suspect that the FHP investigates all crimes of this nature.
>>>> Assault on a motor vehicle with sports equipment is serious offense. ;=)
>>>>
>>>
>>> This gives new meaning to the term "Vehicular Homicide."
>>
>> And the phrase "His car died.".
>>
>
>It may call for a postmortem examination, to determine the cause of death.

Severe three iron tramua. Complicated by major fractured glass panels.

Lumpy

unread,
Dec 5, 2009, 8:06:57 PM12/5/09
to

Kris:
> > http://outofbounds.nbcsports.com/2009/12/post-31.html.php

Alex:


> There is a great example of what you were talking about. The book is
> photographed in his car, so now they are getting a flood of orders
> for it. I don't "get it" but there is a large percentage of the
> country that has a thing about celebrities. <shrug>

What kind of bottled water does he drink?


Lumpy

Did you do a lot of those Emergency Broadcast Warnings?
Yes. Had it been an actual emergency I would have hid.

www.LumpyMusic.com

Alex Clayton

unread,
Dec 5, 2009, 9:52:26 PM12/5/09
to
"Lumpy" <lu...@digitalcartography.com> wrote in message
news:7o0ee1F...@mid.individual.net...

If someone could get a brand in a picture like that the stock would
probably go up. I know a lot of the "famous" people get paid to be seen with
different brands of whatever. I guess the book things shows why.
--
Without question, the greatest invention in the history of mankind is beer.
Oh, I grant you that the wheel was also a fine invention, but the wheel does
not go nearly as well with pizza.
--Dave Barry

Kris Baker

unread,
Dec 5, 2009, 10:06:31 PM12/5/09
to

"Alex Clayton" <alex...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:sqKdnWPjBfzxgYbW...@nventure.com...

> "Lumpy" <lu...@digitalcartography.com> wrote in message
> news:7o0ee1F...@mid.individual.net...
>>
>> Kris:
>>> > http://outofbounds.nbcsports.com/2009/12/post-31.html.php
>>
>> Alex:
>>> There is a great example of what you were talking about. The book is
>>> photographed in his car, so now they are getting a flood of orders
>>> for it. I don't "get it" but there is a large percentage of the
>>> country that has a thing about celebrities. <shrug>
>>
>> What kind of bottled water does he drink?
>>
>>
>> Lumpy>>
>
> If someone could get a brand in a picture like that the stock would
> probably go up. I know a lot of the "famous" people get paid to be seen
> with different brands of whatever. I guess the book things shows why.

Or maybe we should just photoshop in our own items.

Too bad my daughter sold the porn book ;)

Kris

Lumpy

unread,
Dec 5, 2009, 11:10:17 PM12/5/09
to
Kris Baker wrote:
> Too bad my daughter sold the porn book ;)

There's a porn book?

Alex Clayton

unread,
Dec 5, 2009, 11:23:54 PM12/5/09
to
"Kris Baker" <paralle...@ggmail.com> wrote in message
news:7o0ldnF...@mid.individual.net...

>>
>> If someone could get a brand in a picture like that the stock would
>> probably go up. I know a lot of the "famous" people get paid to be seen
>> with different brands of whatever. I guess the book things shows why.
>
> Or maybe we should just photoshop in our own items.
>
> Too bad my daughter sold the porn book ;)
>
> Kris

LOL, they would probably start a federal investigation to see who did it.
--
Inside every older person is a younger person wondering, 'What the hell
happened?'

Kurt

unread,
Dec 6, 2009, 12:20:24 PM12/6/09
to
In article <hf8rq9$ce6$1...@news.eternal-september.org>,
BrotherBart <noth...@nomail.net> wrote:

>
> Usually I think celebrity scandals are boring. But I have to admit that
> I find a rich black celeb fucking half the good looking white women in
> the country

I'm not prejudice, I hate everyone equally.

--
To reply by email, remove the word "space"

0 new messages