Could anyone shed any light on the Wikipedia statement about Aleister
Crowley having allegedly made some comment about Arthur Machen's
fiction containing elements of magical truth? I was planning to
mention it in a review but I thought it best to check first since Wiki
isn't a source I'm inclined to trust it to any great length.
(The only volume of Crowley's I'm able to lay my hands on at the
moment is Confessions and I know its not in that)
Thanks for your time.
Off hand I couldn't tell you exactly what and where Crowley commented
on Machen, but, since both were members of the Golden Dawn and
Machen's "The Great God Pan" was a vision along the same lines as
Crowley's, it would not be at all surprising to hear Crowley say that
Machen's work contained "elements of magical truth".
The article you reference says itself that Crowley "put [Machen's
works] on the reading list for his students", so that would be the
logical place to start. You can find this list in the Equinox and in
the back of Magick in Theory and Practice. Section 2 of "Curriculum of
A.A." - headed "Other books, principally fiction, of a generally
suggestive and helpful kind" - lists most of "The Works of Arthur
Machen" as being "of great magical interest", along with Dracula,
Alice in Wonderland, The Arabian Nights, various plays by Shakespeare
and "Books of Fairy Tales generally", amongst others, so you can
decide for yourself how much weight to put on such a statement. Note
that, unlike the article states in its only direct quotation on the
matter, Crowley would not have specified these or any other works as
containing "Magickal" truths, on account of "Magickal" not being a
real word; Crowley uniformly used the correct adjective, "magical".
Erwin Hessle, 8=3