Yeah - get baptised or Christened by a preist with enough watts to cut
you off from the divine presence. Then you're be in the half light,
and dependant upon ... well - you'll be dependant and vulnerable to
something you'd rather not be
(I've replied here, since this thread seemed more to the point.)
What kind of information do the voices give you? Please could you give me
some examples, just for interest? If they won't answer questions or give a
clear answer, then they aren't going to be much use. Do they sound like
real sounds, or just like thinking about sounds? Either way they must be a
pain.
I'm afraid I haven't got any books about clairaudience. Have you read
anything by Sonia Choquette? She is clairaudient, but properly, i.e. she
calls the shots. I read one of hers and it was very good, but I can't
remember whether she said anything about getting rid of voices that won't go
when they're asked. Unfortunately I haven't got the book any more.
Hope this helps,
A. B.
starve them of energy and attention, distract yourself with other
things, and dont ascribe any subjective reality to them and you will
find that the voices will go away
*Chuckle* i dont know about "clairaudience/Clarvoyance" but thats great
advice for dealing with this group of "voices."
--
Mr. Joseph Littleshoes Esq.
Domine, dirige nos.
Let the games begin!
http://fredeeky.typepad.com/fredeeky/files/sf_anthem.mp3
Yes indeed. The best way to avoid having the consider what I say is
to stop paying attention to what I say. However, as many people have
learned, it doesn't work if you only *pretend* not to be paying
attention. As for distracting yourself as a means to solve your
problems, that's what got a lot of you into trouble in the first
place, trying to distract yourself from unpleasant aspects of reality
by diving headlong into juvenile comic book fantasies, like imagining
that the intrusive thoughts brought on by severe stress are some sort
of developing psychic power.
Tom wrote:
> On Oct 10, 7:00ÔøΩpm, "Mr. Joseph Littleshoes Esq." <jpsti...@isp.com>
> wrote:
>
>>Voyd wrote:
>>
>>>if you stop paying attention to them, the inner voices will fade. but
>>>the more you pay attention to them, the more you listen to them and for
>>>them, the stronger and louder they will become.
>>
>>>starve them of energy and attention, distract yourself with other
>>>things, and dont ascribe any subjective reality to them and you will
>>>find that the voices will go away
>>
>>*Chuckle* i dont know about "Clairaudience/Clarvoyance" but thats great
>>advice for dealing with this group of "voices."
>
>
> Yes indeed. The best way to avoid having the consider what I say is
> to stop paying attention to what I say.
Tsk, really "Tom", your not all that and a bag of chips. And even if you
are one of the few saner "voices" here you are not without your own
issues that have caused more than a few people to tune you out. With
good reason, legitimately, no matter what you may think of a person not
agreeing whole heartedly with your assumptions.
> However, as many people have
> learned, it doesn't work if you only *pretend* not to be paying
> attention.
And of course you would "clarivoyently' know this? or your much vaunted
inductive reasoning would cause you to believe a person is only
"pretending"?
> As for distracting yourself as a means to solve your
> problems, that's what got a lot of you into trouble in the first
> place,
What are you on about now? If you are NOT talking to me, then edit your
postings in such a way as it is clear to whom you address your remarks.
> trying to distract yourself from unpleasant aspects of reality
> by diving headlong into juvenile comic book fantasies,
You prefer adult, literary fantasies:)
> like imagining
> that the intrusive thoughts brought on by severe stress are some sort
> of developing psychic power.
Perhaps "you" need to reconsider how "you" phase such statements.
And whether you are right or wrong your headstrong rush to judgment is
just one example of why I as well as any one else may "tune you out"
along with the rest of the noise here.
And physical stress is a traditional route to 'awaken' such "psychic power."
Actually most of the world tunes us all out. If I were to take that
personally, I'd hardly have any fun at all. So it really doesn't
matter to me who *isn't* listening. I speak only to those who are
interested, who are tuning in, if not always very well or very
happily. There are certain people who can't actually bring themselves
to tune me out, despite the fact that they wish they could. One of
the common ways they express this frustrated desire is to pretend
they're ignoring me and announcing the pretense over and over.
> > However, as many people have
> > learned, it doesn't work if you only *pretend* not to be paying
> > attention.
>
> And of course you would "clarivoyently' know this? or your much vaunted
> inductive reasoning would cause you to believe a person is only
> "pretending"?
I always find it amusing when people think their feelings and
motivations are invisible when they communicate in chats or message
boards. As if nobody is ever going to figure out anything about
them. Look, it's simple to observe the pretense of not paying
attention to me. The person who is supposedly ignoring me keeps
responding to my posts by telling me yet again that he's ignoring me
and what I've done lately that has prompted him to tell me yet again
that he's ignoring me. The mere act of telling me you're ignoring me
while you addressing me is self-contradictory.
> > As for distracting yourself as a means to solve your
> > problems, that's what got a lot of you into trouble in the first
> > place,
>
> What are you on about now?
Read before you react, Joe. I explain exactly what I'm "on about" in
the next couple of sentences.
> > trying to distract yourself from unpleasant aspects of reality
> > by diving headlong into juvenile comic book fantasies,
>
> You prefer adult, literary fantasies:)
They are more varied and nuanced. ;) Yet, it's the distraction itself
that is the problem, not the quality of the fantasy used to achive the
distraction.
> > like imagining
> > that the intrusive thoughts brought on by severe stress are some sort
> > of developing psychic power.
>
> Perhaps "you" need to reconsider how "you" phase such statements.
Upon reconsideration, I think I phrased that statement pretty well the
first time.
> And whether you are right or wrong your headstrong rush to judgment is
> just one example of why I as well as any one else may "tune you out"
> along with the rest of the noise here.
Just too much of a buzzkill, even it it's true. So, rather than
finding out whether or not it's true by careful experiment, you'd
prefer to tune the whole notion out. Another dive back into the
shelter of fantasy.
> And physical stress is a traditional route to 'awaken' such "psychic power."
The traditional way to get comic book super powers is by being exposed
to intense gamma radiation or by coming in contact with something that
has been bombarded by intense gamma radiation. In some cases, it's
hereditary, like if you came from another planet or were a mutant, but
if you're not lucky enough to be born a demi-god, you have to undergo
some kind of physical stress in order to develop super powers.
Same thing. And same objection: Nobody really has superpowers. It's
just a story. People who get bombarded with intense gamma radiation
die. They do not become the Hulk. And nobody really has psychic
powers no matter how nervous they get before job interviews. it's
just a story too.
yawn
nothing of value here, just self-serving verbiage
go away
--
Voyd