The Unforgivable "Blasphemy" Against the Holy Spirit?
Miguel Alberto
average normal person may believe that he is going to paradise after
death, or, believe he is worthy of Hell.
But, a person who knows that when over 50% of the brain believes
something it becomes his reality, he knows that he had better watch his
P's and his Q's, thoughtwise.
Progression after death from "ethreal body" to "astral body" to "mental
body" has been compared to the three chapters of the Bardo Thadol, which
in actuality correspond to perinatal matrices one, two, and three (see
http://www.holotropic.com ), degrees of brain awakening.
First, rituals and symbols will get you what you want. Then, speech will
get you what you want. "If you have the faith of a mustard seed and say
to this mountain move it shall be moved". You have gone to the time line
where the mountain is elsewhere."
That's how it's done. It becomes easier and easier to travel to other
timelines. Finally, every thought manifests as your reality. Can you
abstain from thinking about purple cow, for example, if it's
recommended? Can you abstain from thinking what it would be like to
burst into flames?
Usually the first thing that happens, when in trouble with too much
power to handle, is that you wish you were someone else; and, 'zap", you
body switch into the body of that someone else.
You end up body switching backward and forward in time for about a
hundred years before you can get one of your own duplicate bodies back,
on "terra firma", Malcuth Ha Assiah, the Ten of Diamonds.
This has been called the "aioniu amartaematos", aeon of failure,
translated "eternal damnation" in the Bible. Only theory? I've done it
thirty-six times.
Is "the unforgivable blasphemy against the Holy Spirit" contageous? Now
you know.
Tom
>
> But, a person who knows that when over 50% of the brain believes
> something it becomes his reality,
Reality is what doesn't go away when you stop believing it. It's not
a fucking democracy where your brain cells all get a vote.
Miguel Alberto
with people and gifts and someone said, "It's so stuffed in there, it
looks like there is no room for God".
The girl said, "God can ride in the trunk". There was soon a fatal
accident. Everyone in the car was killed. The car was a total mess,
except the trunk wasn't touched.
And, there was a package of eggs in the trunk, and not a single egg was
broken.
Tom
> There was this girl who was going to a party.
There was this psychotic asshole who posted bogus stories about
miraculous egg-saving along with all the other ridiculous shit he
spewed.
The difference between my story and yours, Miguel, is that people can
actually check mine and see that it's true. Not a single one of your
claims can stand that sort of challenge. That's because, not only are
you an abject coward and a total failure, you're a lying sack of shit,
too.
Meltdarok
Actually Tom, that is an *old* Parable.
--
Meltdarok
Tom
The age of the lie does not make it less a lie. Nor does calling it a
"parable".
All those stories about God killing people because he was insulted are
lies, bald-faced and blatant lies, intended to terrify and intimidate
the gullible. Pseudo-christians are notorious for this sort of
vicious fear-mongering. It's no wonder that cowardly paranoids like
Miguel are drawn to them.
Meltdarok
It's more that God being "insulted," but by "not being 'right' with God."
That it isn't God that killed them, but they allowed themselves to slip
into a state of mind where the probability of such an accident could
take place. But of course when you are "'right' with God," your thought
processes somehow allow a more collective "good luck" to have better
probabilities of occurring. In the West, they like them to be gentle,
just, chaste, and Christian to be "'right' with God."
--
Meltdarok
Meltdarok
It's more that God being "insulted," but by "not being 'right' with God."
Tom
> On 1/2/2010 9:45 AM, Tom wrote:
>
> > All those stories about God killing people because he was insulted are
> > lies, bald-faced and blatant lies, intended to terrify and intimidate
> > the gullible. Pseudo-christians are notorious for this sort of
> > vicious fear-mongering. It's no wonder that cowardly paranoids like
> > Miguel are drawn to them.
>
> It's more that God being "insulted," but by "not being 'right' with God."
Not according to that "parable", which, you should admit is completely
made up and not to be construed as a real event.
> That it isn't God that killed them, but they allowed themselves to slip
> into a state of mind where the probability of such an accident could
> take place.
The fictional girl's comment was clearly meant as a joke and not as a
serious representation of her attitude towards God. And God chose to
save the eggs instead of the people because of light-hearted banter.
Har de har har. Some sense of humor. That's the old Testament
sourpuss who not even most Jews believe in any more, mostly because
he's obnoxious, overbearing, capriciously vicious, and dumb as a bag
of hammers. Only the nastiest and most hateful fundie bigots like
that asshole, simply because he's a lot like them.
> But of course when you are "'right' with God," your thought
> processes somehow allow a more collective "good luck" to have better
> probabilities of occurring.
I now refer you to the "parable" of Job, where God inflicts all manner
of bad luck on someone who is clearly and admittedly "right with
God". So what you say is not true, according to scripture or
according to the day-to-day experience of Christians. You continue to
make up your own batty version of Christianity which, as far as anyone
can tell, does not agree with that of anybody else on the entire
planet, past or present.
Meltdarok
> You continue to
> make up your own batty version of Christianity which, as far as anyone
> can tell, does not agree with that of anybody else on the entire
> planet, past or present.
>
That's the problem. You *insist* on calling it my version of "Christianity".
Geo-centrism is passe. Period.
--
Meltdarok
Miguel Alberto
of dangerous knowledge of the Holy Spirit.
If you don't know the magickal power you have in the globally bent
timespaces of "spirit", and you have submitted, "every thought in the
service of Christ", also, knowing that you deserve Paradise, you will
have Paradise.
But, now, knowing how easy you can realize your ideations into your
reality in the globally bent timespaces of "spirit", can you control
every thought? I doubt it. And, then it becomes Hell. Been there, done
that. I speak from experience.
The secrets of spirit have been profaned. You know. If this is the
'blasphemy against the Holy Spirit", it's contagious, you got it.
Anger makes one foolishly brave and uncautious. Love is exactly opposite
hate, but, fear is certainly a close second.
By the way, did you ever see how "cowardly" cats are? "Scardie cats".
Fear is a cat's primary emotion. That's how lion tamers can control the
big cats. You'll never see them doing that with wolves.
Tom
> On 1/3/2010 12:15 AM, Tom wrote:
>
> > You continue to
> > make up your own batty version of Christianity which, as far as anyone
> > can tell, does not agree with that of anybody else on the entire
> > planet, past or present.
>
> That's the problem. You *insist* on calling it my version of "Christianity".
You've described it that way yourself. Of course, if you now want to
deny that you're a Christian, that's OK with me.
> Geo-centrism is passe. Period.
I suppose you feel that way because it's in competition with your
egocentrism. But you still don't know what "geo-centrism" means, if
you're trying to apply it to my views.
Tom
>
>
> By the way, did you ever see how "cowardly" cats are? "Scardie cats".
You can't even spell it right, you brain-damaged jerkoff.
> Fear is a cat's primary emotion. That's how lion tamers can control the
> big cats. You'll never see them doing that with wolves.
You're neither a lion nor a wolf. You're a weenie. And a cowardly
racist bigot. And totally fucking nuts.
Meltdarok
> On Jan 2, 11:03 pm, Meltdarok<meltda...@aol.com> wrote:
>> On 1/3/2010 12:15 AM, Tom wrote:
>>
>>> You continue to
>>> make up your own batty version of Christianity which, as far as anyone
>>> can tell, does not agree with that of anybody else on the entire
>>> planet, past or present.
>>
>> That's the problem. You *insist* on calling it my version of "Christianity".
>
> You've described it that way yourself. Of course, if you now want to
> deny that you're a Christian, that's OK with me.
1) This is so funny. How come I can't be just a human being?
>
>> Geo-centrism is passe. Period.
>
> I suppose you feel that way because it's in competition with your
> egocentrism. But you still don't know what "geo-centrism" means, if
> you're trying to apply it to my views.
2) This is so sad about you.
>
--
Meltdarok
Mr. Joseph Littleshoes Esq.
Miguel Alberto wrote:
> The actual "blasphemy against the Holy Spirit" is the profanation
> of dangerous knowledge of the Holy Spirit.
!?!
>
> If you don't know the magickal power you have in the globally bent
> timespaces of "spirit", and you have submitted, "every thought in the
> service of Christ", also, knowing that you deserve Paradise, you will
> have Paradise.
Isn't that a non sequitar? i mean in the sentence construction?
And that aside from the use of the term "globally bent time spaces of
"spirit"
It seems to me as if M. Albrto is saying that not knowing is the same as
accepting one do not know? and i don't know if i agree with that
particular variation on the cloud of unknowing.
Im not saying that many people are not in denial about their own
ignorance, are extraordinarily reluctant to admit it to anyone else, but
they know.
All our bare ass evergreen Tommy's:) know just precisely how ignorant
they are, everybody does. While it is easier to fool oneself than it is
anybody else, it is harder to hide from oneself than anybody else,
though in the case of the bare ass evergreen JerK's of the net i give
them credit for succeeding at this rather dubious distinction.
U go gurl! pile on that delusional persecution till you are drowning in
your own bile.
>
> But, now, knowing how easy you can realize your ideations into your
> reality in the globally bent timespaces of "spirit", can you control
> every thought? I doubt it. And, then it becomes Hell. Been there, done
> that. I speak from experience.
>
> The secrets of spirit have been profaned.
The "Spirit" can be profaned?
Who knew?
And it keeps secrets that nobody knows about? hidden things are more
easily profaned than obvious things? at least in the delusional, fear
based, knee jerk, instinctual response to fill the void as it is
perceived at any given moment, the same ignorance can manifest in one
moment as loving, generous compassion and the next as vile, animalistic
fear based brutality. "The probability for an event that can happen in
two indistinguishable ways is the sum of the probability for each way
considered separately."
> You know. If this is the
> 'blasphemy against the Holy Spirit", it's contagious, you got it.
OIC you M. Alberto are going to enlighten us as to what constitutes or
demonstrates or is an example of this hypothetical 'blasphemy' of this
equally hypothetical 'spirit'.
Been there, done that,
>
> Anger
Fear leads to anger...
> makes one foolishly brave and uncautious. Love is exactly opposite
> hate, but, fear is certainly a close second.
Again with the non sequiturs!
>
> By the way, did you ever see how "cowardly" cats are? "Scardie cats".
> Fear is a cat's primary emotion. That's how lion tamers can control the
> big cats. You'll never see them doing that with wolves.
Well, your no alpha dog ... obviously:)
Cringing cur that you are, thy cringing carrion coward and crawled to
find itself a chance cast clod, whose pain was purposeless, appalled, it
trod its vain agony across the void sky!
--
Mr. Joseph Littleshoes Esq.
Domine, dirige nos.
Let the games begin!
http://fredeeky.typepad.com/fredeeky/files/sf_anthem.mp3
Mr. Joseph Littleshoes Esq.
Miguel Alberto wrote:
> By the way, did you ever see how "cowardly" cats are? "Scardie cats".
> Fear is a cat's primary emotion. That's how lion tamers can control the
> big cats. You'll never see them doing that with wolves.
Well, your no alpha dog ... obviously:)
Cringing cur that you are, thy cringing carrion coward and crawled to
find itself a chance cast clod, whose pain was purposeless, appalled, it
trod its vain agony across the void sky!
Thy feet in mire, thine head in murk,
O man, how piteous thy plight,
The doubts that daunt, the ills that irk,
Thou hast nor wit nor will to fight ---
How hope in heart, or worth in work?
No star in sight!
Thy gods proved puppets of the priest.
"Truth? All's relation!" science sighed.
In bondage with thy brother beast,
Love tortured thee, as Love's hope died
And Lover's faith rotted. Life no least
Dim star descried.
Thy cringing carrion cowered and crawled
To find itself a chance-cast clod
Whose Pain was purposeless; appalled
That aimless accident thus trod
Its agony, that void skies sprawled
On the vain sod!
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
All souls eternally exist,
Each individual, ultimate,
Perfect --- each makes itself a mist
Of mind and flesh to celebrate
With some twin mask their tender tryst
Insatiate.
Some drunkards, doting on the dream,
Despair that it should die, mistake
Themselves for their own shadow-scheme.
One star can summon them to wake
To self; star-souls serene that gleam
On life's calm lake.
That shall end never that began.
All things endure because they are.
Do what thou wilt, for every man
And every woman is a star.
Pan is not dead; he liveth, Pan!
Break down the bar!
To man I come, the number of
A man my number, Lion of Light;
I am The Beast whose Law is Love.
Love under will, his royal right ---
Behold within, and not above,
One Star In Sight.
Tom
> On 1/3/2010 12:09 PM, Tom wrote:
>
> > On Jan 2, 11:03 pm, Meltdarok<meltda...@aol.com> wrote:
> >> On 1/3/2010 12:15 AM, Tom wrote:
>
> >>> You continue to
> >>> make up your own batty version of Christianity which, as far as anyone
> >>> can tell, does not agree with that of anybody else on the entire
> >>> planet, past or present.
>
> >> That's the problem. You *insist* on calling it my version of "Christianity".
>
> > You've described it that way yourself. Of course, if you now want to
> > deny that you're a Christian, that's OK with me.
>
> 1) This is so funny. How come I can't be just a human being?
You are, but you don't want to be. Human beings are mortal; they live
and they die. You claim you aren't mortal. So you "can't" be a human
being, by your own proclamation. Never mind that it's pure
bullshit.
> >> Geo-centrism is passe. Period.
>
> > I suppose you feel that way because it's in competition with your
> > egocentrism. But you still don't know what "geo-centrism" means, if
> > you're trying to apply it to my views.
>
> 2) This is so sad about you.
It's not a surprise to anyone that my refusal to buy into your
bullshit makes you sad. You apparently invest a lot of importance in
your empty and ignorant posturing.
Meltdarok
So do you.
--
Meltdarok
Miguel Alberto
reality. This can happen in ordinary life by enough saturation of faith,
or by waking up the brain.
When your brain is woken to over 50% every thought will manifest as your
reality. This is done by being drawn, by inductive resonance, to the
timeline corresponding to the thought or faith.
"If you have the faith of a mustard seed and say to this mountain move
it shall be moved." You go to the timeline where the mountain is
elsewhere.
This is the primary mechanism of magick.
Tom
Nice to see you admit it about yourself, even as you falsely accuse me
in yet another of your fits of empty and ignorant posturing.
What really galls you is that it's not just me who's not taken in.
Nobody is buying into your bullshit. I'm just the one calling you on
it.
Tom
> If over 50% of your brain believes something, it will become your
> reality.
If you keep repeating the same stupid lies over and over, you can
eventually make yourself think you believe them. Your whole life is
an example of the truthfulness of this point as well as of the falsity
of what you have convinced yourself to believe.
Meltdarok
Nah, you rarely discuss sincerely.
--
Meltdarok
Tom
You never "discuss" anything at all. You proclaim, often in the face
of blatantly contradictory evidence, but you never, ever discuss. You
don't know what "sincere discussion" means any more than you knew what
"geocentric" or "existential" meant. You just mouth the words and
hope you'll be mistaken for someone who knows what he's talking
about. By now, though, those making that error are few and far
between.
Meltdarok
This is what I mean. You can't stop now.
--
Meltdarok