we come to the concept of a clone universe
marques de sade
so that life could also evolve as it did here in a similar if not
exact way... it can if it is A CLONE UNIVERSE....
--
``In the Babylonian legends of creation the seven associate-gods, who are the creators in the Egyptian mythos, have been converted into the seven evil spirits of a later theology. And ... it is said of these seven evil spirits, 'The woman from the loins of the man they bring forth.' Thus the creation of woman is made to be the work of seven evil spirits,...'' -Gerald Massey
dh
>could the conditions on earth ever be replicated in another world,
_________________________________________________________
. . .
The Sun's current main sequence age, determined using computer models
of stellar evolution and nucleocosmochronology, is thought to be about
4.57 billion years.[26]
It is thought that about 4.59 billion years ago, the rapid collapse of a hydrogen
molecular cloud led to the formation of a third generation T Tauri Population I
star, the Sun. The nascent star assumed a nearly circular orbit about 26,000
light-years from the centre of the Milky Way Galaxy.[27]
The Sun is about halfway through its main-sequence evolution,
. . .
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun
ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ
_________________________________________________________
. . .
The next generation of stars was born out of those materials left by the death
of the first. The oldest observed stars, known as Population II, have very low
metallicities;[2] as subsequent generations of stars were born they became more
metal-enriched, as the gaseous clouds from which they formed received the
metal-rich dust manufactured by previous generations. As those stars died, they
returned metal-enriched material to the interstellar medium via planetary nebulae
and supernovae, enriching the nebulae out of which the newer stars formed ever
further. These youngest stars, including the Sun, therefore have the highest metal
content, and are known as Population I stars.
. . .
Population I or metal-rich stars are those young stars whose metallicity is highest.
The Earth's Sun is an example of a metal-rich star. These are common in the spiral
arms of the Milky Way galaxy.
Generally, the youngest stars, the extreme Population I, are found farther in and
intermediate Population I stars are farther out, etc. The Sun is considered an
intermediate Population I star.
. . .
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metallicity
ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ
_________________________________________________________
. . .
The most luminous population I stars are blue giants. Population I stars, of which
the sun is typical, are young stars that still lie mostly on the main sequence of the
Hertzsprung-Russell diagram. They are particularly concentrated in the interstellar
dust of the spiral arms, where new stars are continually being formed. The very
brightest population I stars are not distributed at random, but are grouped in loose
associations of several hundred stars that partake in the general galactic rotation
and are believed to have a common origin. The categories population I and
population II were first introduced by Walter Baade as a result of his studies of
the Andromeda Galaxy.
. . .
http://freepages.misc.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~mturner/women/app_e.htm
ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ
>so that life could also evolve as it did here
_________________________________________________________
. . .
From the hundreds of galaxies we can see in this very small patch of sky, we can
estimate that there are about 50 billion galaxies in the universe.
The 3-D model below will show you the structure of about 1,800 nearby galaxies.
Our data sets have good 3-D positions for about 35,000 galaxies. Large galaxy
surveys are attempting to measure millions of galaxies and map their distribution
in space. We are only beginning to learn and explore the geography of the universe.
Let's get going.
. . .
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/universe/tour_ggs.html#n05
ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ
_________________________________________________________
http://www.spacetelescope.org/images/screen/opo0416a.jpg
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/universe/images/tour_ggs_hdf_l.jpg
ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ
>in a similar if not exact way...
In how many similar ways? In how many disimilar ways? Where?
How often? How many still survive? How many (still) are capable
of space travel? Etc?
>it can if it is A CLONE UNIVERSE....
Getting familiar with the possibilities associated with the one
we're aware of might be better for you than inventing some other
idea to go on about.
marques de sade
dh
>thank wikipedia for their input for me...
But could it have done you any good? Is there any chance that you'll
ever be able to grow to that point?
marques de sade
>On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 12:03:36 GMT, jesuc...@netscape.net (marques de sade) wrote:
>
>>thank wikipedia for their input for me...
>
> But could it have done you any good?
since it's not a source i trust, doubtful... any idiot can edit
that and make it say some crazy ass shit...
Malik J.J. Jubilee
what about gigantic intergalactic designer planet "corporations"? i
wouldn't outright rule it out just because it's from "fiction".
Fiction is a weird thing when you really meditate on it.
dh
Good science fiction is very much like theoretical physics.
Poor "science fiction" is just human drama set in supposedly
sci fi environments. Fantasy is whatever a person comes up
with regardless of how it conflicts with what has been learned
from scientific investigation.
Malik J.J. Jubilee
> On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 16:18:04 -0700 (PDT), "Malik J.J. Jubilee" <zevillkaa...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >GREAT INFO, Thanks.
>
> >what about gigantic intergalactic designer planet "corporations"? i
> >wouldn't outright rule it out just because it's from "fiction".
> >Fiction is a weird thing when you really meditate on it.
>
> Good science fiction is very much like theoretical physics.
> Poor "science fiction" is just human drama set in supposedly
> sci fi environments. Fantasy is whatever a person comes up
> with regardless of how it conflicts with what has been learned
> from scientific investigation.
prove that none of us DON'T exist in either the VR reality of a
computer or the dreams of some "god". You do that and I'll let up on
my Luciferianism.
Malik J.J. Jubilee
>
> >GREAT INFO, Thanks.
>
> >what about gigantic intergalactic designer planet "corporations"? i
> >wouldn't outright rule it out just because it's from "fiction".
> >Fiction is a weird thing when you really meditate on it.
>
> Good science fiction is very much like theoretical physics.
> Poor "science fiction" is just human drama set in supposedly
> sci fi environments. Fantasy is whatever a person comes up
> with regardless of how it conflicts with what has been learned
> from scientific investigation.
maybe Fantasia would be BETTER?
marques de sade
<zevill...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>maybe Fantasia would be BETTER?
hell, alice in wonderland, the original... why mess around with
minor leagues...
dh
Those are possibities. We each have to decide how
likely we think they are, and why.