Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

( Protect the Moon )

0 views
Skip to first unread message

RRReikido

unread,
Aug 25, 2008, 9:04:28 AM8/25/08
to

Tom

unread,
Aug 25, 2008, 10:03:35 AM8/25/08
to

"RRReikido" <a...@sdf.lonestar.org> wrote in message
news:aceb5cef-72fb-43ad...@t54g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
> http://www.petitiononline.com/RTRRT/petition.html

"If we do not stop shooting at the moon, now, we might encourage cold war
scenario where the moon is free target for the military."

"Petition to NASA was created by and written by Klaudio Zic"

Here is a list from NASA of all lunar projects, both past and future.

http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/lunar/lunartimeline.html

As you can see, NASA is not currently "shooting at the moon" for target
practice or anything else. Klaudio, your delusions have become more
paranoid that usual. I hope this isn't a trend.

Reggi...@sendtousenet.com

unread,
Aug 25, 2008, 10:39:34 AM8/25/08
to
On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 06:04:28 -0700 (PDT), RRReikido
<a...@sdf.lonestar.org> wrote:

>http://www.petitiononline.com/RTRRT/petition.html

So they basically want to protect the moon from .
the folks at Space 1999 who blow the moon out of
earth orbit?

Alison Dubois

unread,
Aug 25, 2008, 10:41:50 AM8/25/08
to

Isn't there a project proposal to "crash" a space craft into
the moon to find what is burried under the surface?

Grabbitz

unread,
Aug 25, 2008, 11:28:59 AM8/25/08
to
RRReikido <a...@sdf.lonestar.org> wrote in news:aceb5cef-72fb-43ad-b6f0-
5b689d...@t54g2000hsg.googlegroups.com:

> http://www.petitiononline.com/RTRRT/petition.html
>

uuuhhh, the moon has a natural protection, its called "space" and its
uninhabited. You cannot sustain life on the moon for long periods of time,
otherwise we would be building a moon station, and not a space station.

Tom

unread,
Aug 25, 2008, 12:45:40 PM8/25/08
to

"Alison Dubois" <sendto...@emailnotvailable.com> wrote in message
news:h2h5b45b2nme96q7i...@4ax.com...

The list of NASA's projected lunar projects I gave you does not include any
such thing. Even if some such project did exist, it wouldn't do the least
bit of harm and certainly would not ignite a global flurry of military
target practice shots that Klaudio appears to be worrying about. The whole
idea is even more bizarrely stupid that most of the other crap Klaudio
babbles.

Janine Starscream

unread,
Aug 25, 2008, 1:16:47 PM8/25/08
to
This is the REAL story behind the Moon and why it will never explode-

With Cartoons too.

http://www.bentoandstarchky.com/dec/rants.htm

Oh great space daddies a-go-go off on the Lunar Back-side slick and
dirty dark hear and heed the need of a earthlicked beatnicked satanick
kewl kidd eternal, blase down with improved implants and instructions
on how to use them, AIEEEE keep it coming but slower and steadier and
hot and heavier, sex diggs and dank duggs in the heart of the Cults of
the Shadows. Aye, there's scum rising to the top for sure but for the
benefit of the children at heart and those who need a faster start
come down and add more, yea add more til over men we are Ovarmen, the
impossible possibles... Words to speak with slick tongues for the
others, yea even unto THEM to hear... Jumpin' Jehosaphat let them new
and improved implants rain down upon us... AIEEE 46 & 2 teach us how
to pick our scabs, yeah to learn to live and grow though yea it be
painful and yea it be scurry curry down in the 'bury... Blunt tips no
longer but fingers as gods sharpened claws down asunder the rule of
the blind deaf and dumb WHO HAVE NOT IMPLANTS and the MARK. Aye, the
mark, that joyous Lunar Mark.

For we are our own frankenstein beasties, and even unto the pretty but
dangerous El'ves, we are but the humble spawn of Shub Niggurath and
the Others, and THEM who would seek our quieting in the hour of their
content would not bear to bow the breach of the cleft in the peach ass
we so seek to bury our faces in til our screams of delight shiver the
stars in novas of colours out of space and sideways to time.

So yea, more implants please the others have worn down and out and
even the pink populace has sought counterfeit goodies, AIEEE but they
deserve not the sumptous vittles of vim and vigor no no no no no YEA
but by YAH we do! First Waters and Second Waters can be slumped no
more into quietude except on virtue of payment for services UN-
RENDERED. SO BEAR THE ELDER SIGNS and the Mark of the Moon on even
your Mer-ka-bah, aye, EYE and eye to see the wee V is for vagina and
all else is cocked, sprung and ready to splurge them electric loving
carrots of joy on a universe full of the sly, the coy, the donned and
the unconned; Keep it ready for Space Gangsters oh alien space bro's
and bra's, ZIM ZAM ZIBBLY ZABAAM ALLAHKAZAM ABRAHADITABRA NUITAWAAM

Diddly do diddly dee, send them Alien Implants to those who LOVE ME...
and special ones for me...

"Bob" already sold the earth, we can build a Nu-One...

Be ready and steady for year two...

Tom

unread,
Aug 25, 2008, 6:00:37 PM8/25/08
to

"Janine Starscream" <zevill...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:0304949d-701e-4521...@e39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...

> This is the REAL story behind the Moon and why it will never explode-
>
> With Cartoons too.
>
> http://www.bentoandstarchky.com/dec/rants.htm

Dec was a truly delightful kook. One of my all-time favorites. His life
must have been excruciatingly painful for him, but his work will live on in
the annals of psychoceramics, the study of crackpots.

Klaudio is only a pale shadow of Francis Dec, independent discoverer of the
Worldwide Computer God Frankenstein Controls and lifelong constant-threshold
Brainwash Radio.

mark

unread,
Aug 25, 2008, 8:47:29 PM8/25/08
to
Alison Dubois wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 07:03:35 -0700, "Tom"
> <dantPAYATT...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>"RRReikido" <a...@sdf.lonestar.org> wrote in message
>>news:aceb5cef-72fb-43ad...@t54g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
>>> http://www.petitiononline.com/RTRRT/petition.html
>>
>>"If we do not stop shooting at the moon, now, we might encourage cold war
>>scenario where the moon is free target for the military."

Nahhhh, the Pentagon wants Earth orbit, both low and high (high being
defined as geosynch, 25kmi up). The moon, at a quarter of a million miles,
is way to far away to be a good launch platform.


>>
>>"Petition to NASA was created by and written by Klaudio Zic"

Perhaps Klaudio might consider going to his local community college and
taking high school science, and passing it, this time.


>>
>>Here is a list from NASA of all lunar projects, both past and future.
>>
>>http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/lunar/lunartimeline.html
>>
>>As you can see, NASA is not currently "shooting at the moon" for target
>>practice or anything else. Klaudio, your delusions have become more
>>paranoid that usual. I hope this isn't a trend.

There is a lot of talk of returning to the moon by 2020. The Republicans,
who think that any civilian space projects are pro-Democrat, have
consistently cut the budget... which is why we have a half-assed space
station, and why it looks like we'll have to depend on the Russians to get
there for four or five *YEARS*. Talk about a national disgrace!


>
> Isn't there a project proposal to "crash" a space craft into
> the moon to find what is burried under the surface?

Yes,. How big do you think the moon is? Why do you say "crash", as though it
wasn't really intended to do so? Gee, how 'bout we shoot a rocket up, and
let, say, the first stage crash into the ocean? Boy, will that hurt the
earth....

mark

Janine Starscream

unread,
Aug 26, 2008, 7:03:53 AM8/26/08
to
On Aug 25, 6:00 pm, "Tom" <dantPAYATTENTIONo...@comcast.net> wrote:
> psychoceramics, the study of crackpots.

That's your best quote yet.

Tom

unread,
Aug 26, 2008, 12:21:42 PM8/26/08
to

"Janine Starscream" <zevill...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:5501f608-8d66-4bf6...@l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com...

> On Aug 25, 6:00 pm, "Tom" <dantPAYATTENTIONo...@comcast.net> wrote:
>> psychoceramics, the study of crackpots.
>
> That's your best quote yet.

I can't take credit for coining the term. The honor belongs to Professor
John Spaeth of Brown University way back in 1929.

http://dl.lib.brown.edu/libweb/about/hay/carberry.php

"We are lunatics from the hospital up the highway, psycho-ceramics, the
cracked pots of mankind."-R.P. McMurphey from "One Flew Over the Cuckoo's
Nest", by Ken Kesey, 1962.

The field of psychoceramics really didn't get much traction until the
popularization of the internet, which provided previously unnoticed
crackpots with a much larger audience, some of whom appreciated their
tireless efforts.

Here's an archive of collective psychoceramic studies from Usenet's dark and
mysterious past.

http://dev.null.org/psychoceramics/

And here's the genuine, authentic freeze-dried Kooks Museum, created by
Donna Kossey, in which I am proud to have been a contributor, but never
quite an exhibit.

http://www.pacifier.com/~dkossy/kooksmus.html


Jack Slutmuffin

unread,
Aug 26, 2008, 9:34:56 PM8/26/08
to
On Aug 26, 12:21 pm, "Tom" <dantPAYATTENTIONo...@comcast.net> wrote:
> "Janine Starscream" <zevillkaa...@yahoo.com> wrote in message

Awesome Tom.

idmoo...@aol.com

unread,
Aug 27, 2008, 2:47:08 PM8/27/08
to

I wish that I could write like that.

I like reading the writing of a witch.

Many have really really high IQ's. I am not particularly bright but i
am guided.

I am perhaps the Dennis Quaide (as doc holladay) of scary witches
now. the alt.slack type poster is uprising. The scary witches always
have some major vulnerability.

http://hometown.aol.com/gcook888/myhomepage/index.html

idmoo...@aol.com

unread,
Aug 27, 2008, 2:58:51 PM8/27/08
to
On Aug 25, 1:16�pm, Janine Starscream <zevillkaa...@yahoo.com> wrote:

Merry Meet, Wish I could write like that.

Many witches have really really high IQ's. alt.slack raises them up.

But a lot of scary witches have a major vulnerability.

I'm not very smart or lucky but I am guided.

I am the Dennis Quaid (doc holliday in wyatt earp) of witches now.
Just think about what a good friend he was to wyatt.

I need your vote for McCain on Nov. 4.

http://hometown.aol.com/gcook888/myhomepage/index.html

Janine Starscream

unread,
Aug 27, 2008, 8:46:22 PM8/27/08
to
dankashein...

Janine Starscream

unread,
Aug 27, 2008, 8:59:16 PM8/27/08
to

I don't want to be a scary witch, it's just come to the point that my
comings and my goings alone are even startling to the jq-publick. A
lot of my past has been a struggle to preserve my identity, my real
identity, against what felt like a world seeking to crush into
conformity what was my essential innocent nature. This created an
exterior of scary-ness as a defense. It's an outdated defense, there
are others.

Smiler

unread,
Sep 4, 2008, 7:10:20 AM9/4/08
to

Janine Starscream

unread,
Sep 4, 2008, 7:59:27 AM9/4/08
to
From the Great Frater Sar Kaotec:

An important message about how stupid some of this other stuff is and
probably why it's such a problem:

I think there can be no doubt that the modern image of the Gray is a
media invention as many researchers have demonstrated.

While there's elemental archetypes that predate these Gray forms in
some way, notably the Egyptian God Min, who in one form appears as
large headed midget (though he has an obvious difference too as this
image shows) www.from-egypt-with-love.com/egyptian-god-min.htm
This form is believed to be derived from the Phoenician water
elementals who were carved like this on the bows of ships, some say
derived from an ancient tribal race, due to ritual head binding in a
pigmy population (there is a Romany Gypsy version too, which I've
personally encountered, with a more bulbous head and beady eyes,
probably derived from a fusion of these entities and the Dwarves}.
These forms are historically very rare though.

The Dwarves are another deal, a near universal subterreanean fey
with a big head, small stocky body and often beady eyes, nearly always
coverered in hair or furry. There are more wizzened, older baldy ones
in charge, but these normally have beards and are rarely smooth. The
rare almost completely hairless verson of the latter is usually
something like Tolkien's Gollum.

But note, all of these have noses, normal coloured skin, ears, normal
hands and lack the large eyes of the Grays, so the differences are
greater than the similarities.

The Greys as we know them are derived from late Victorian Science
Fiction, pioneered by H G Wells

The first describes future mankind:

"Then in the physiology of these children of men, with their expanding
brains, their great sensitive hands and diminishing bodies, great
changes were necessarily worked....They are the descendants of man--at
dinner. Watch them as they hop on their hands--a method of progression
advocated already by Bjornsen--about the pure white marble floor.
Great hands they have, enormous brains, soft, liquid, soulful eyes.
Their whole muscular system, their legs, their abdomens, are
shrivelled to nothing, a dangling, degraded pendant to their minds."
The Man of the Year Million H G Wells 1901

The second alien 'moon men':

"...short, grey skinned creatures, with high foreheads, no nose, and
bulging eyes who walked with a strange gait due to their oddly
articulated legs" The Selenites from First Men on the Moon, H G Wells
1901 (the water elementals were also associated with the Moon so
archetypal influence may also be active).

Sci Fi creatures after this often merge these features, and were later
graphically portrayed in comics and magazines.

Note the eyes are completely different.

These sci fi images (of all kinds) greatly influenced UFO sightings.

The main archetype emerged in the Betty and Barney Hill encounter,
that seemed strangely similar to these Sci Fi images but included the
wrap around eyes. This was a rare image but became influencial due to
the 'accurate' star chart shown, identifying the alien homeworld.

Twelve days before this the Outer Limits invented just such a being

www.davidjschow.com/limits/ol_episodes6.html

Things really take off with the CIA's Cold War 'Saucer Down'
disinformation project, designed to make the Russians think America
was 'back engineering' alien super technology. The various models for
the dead aliens were very influenced by the Hill alien report.

UFOlogists created a Grey stereotype from the synthesis of these
reports, and people started seeing them.

Things really became hot when Spielberg used these images for CE3

After which nearly 75% of alien reports in America were of Greys, with
much less in other countries (such as UK where they are around 10%).
Arguably the differences reflect the varied influence of the American
media.

Some argue that the Sci Fi aspect actually reveals aliens psychically
or through 'controlled disclosure'. However this last example seems to
refute that, as its unlikely different types of alien would visit
different countries.

All this and more is now on Wikipedia by the way....

The Greys have become linked to Abduction, however this is a modern
paranoid form of an old Fey encounter (which in its magical forms
often included sex).

This is the clue, as those of us who work with Fey (or any non
physical being) know that, whether they are controlled hallucination
or lifeform, they appear according to expectations. Not only
individual, but also socially mediated, cultural and archetypal. The
proportion depending on the strength of mind of the operant perciever
in relation to the strength of their culture and media presense.

The forms they inhabit are basically robotic 'thought forms'
constructed in our imagination, but it also determines their behaviour
as well as their appearance. If we expect hostiles we get hostiles, or
if a media hysteria spreads 'alien invasion' we get 'invaders'.

I've taken part in visualisation encounters in which such Greys are
very vivid, strong and independent.

Circumstancial evidence and tradition suggests that such robot forms
can become the bodies of more mysterious formless entities, attracted
by the form generated according to their nature, and past association
with such a form, but are also programmed by it, just as we are by our
own physical brains.

As for Lam, I think he may be Crowley's own elemental contact, perhaps
even influenced by HG Wells etc. But other evidence suggests the image
is a fusion of a caracature of Crowley himself merged with the Buddha,
as some higher being within him, the head contains an abstract tree of
life if you look carefully, another reason for its shape. But then
maybe Crowley was saying someting significant here. Curiously Lam is
the seed sound of the Root Chakra, associated with the domain of
physical forms by Tantrists.

Kao

SixthtySixthSix

unread,
Sep 4, 2008, 12:06:08 PM9/4/08
to

Alexandra Ceelie

unread,
Sep 4, 2008, 12:24:32 PM9/4/08
to

wow.

=^9.9^=
Xandra

Academic Zodiac

unread,
Sep 7, 2008, 12:27:56 PM9/7/08
to
Janine Starscream wrote:

> From the Great Frater Sar Kaotec:

Greetings Grandmaster. What evil news this time?


>
> An important message about how stupid some of this other stuff is and
> probably why it's such a problem:
>

The name of the group is alt.magick.chaos what do you expect?

> I think there can be no doubt that the modern image of the Gray is a
> media invention as many researchers have demonstrated.
>

The Denver alien man cheated on hgis own friend as reported to me in
privacy. why should any Crowley be better?

> While there's elemental archetypes that predate these Gray forms in
> some way, notably the Egyptian God Min, who in one form appears as
> large headed midget (though he has an obvious difference too as this
> image shows) www.from-egypt-with-love.com/egyptian-god-min.htm
> This form is believed to be derived from the Phoenician water
> elementals who were carved like this on the bows of ships, some say
> derived from an ancient tribal race, due to ritual head binding in a
> pigmy population (there is a Romany Gypsy version too, which I've
> personally encountered, with a more bulbous head and beady eyes,
> probably derived from a fusion of these entities and the Dwarves}.
> These forms are historically very rare though.
>

The dwarfs are real, Crowley is not.

> The Dwarves are another deal, a near universal subterreanean fey

not fey but ok all the same for now


> with a big head, small stocky body and often beady eyes, nearly always
> coverered in hair or furry. There are more wizzened, older baldy ones

BAld on occasion, rare occasion. There are many occasions of course.

> in charge, but these normally have beards and are rarely smooth. The
> rare almost completely hairless verson of the latter is usually
> something like Tolkien's Gollum.

Not at all. They look much better than Dee;s actually.

>
> But note, all of these have noses, normal coloured skin, ears, normal
> hands and lack the large eyes of the Grays, so the differences are
> greater than the similarities.
>

When you are underground, you do not see them as childhood fancy.

> The Greys as we know them are derived from late Victorian Science
> Fiction, pioneered by H G Wells
>
> The first describes future mankind:
>

Future Britts. Genesis elaborated in Get them out by Friday.

Crowley had no 1st cakra initiation. There are bthree tarot inits and he had
none. Aiwas is himself or Alphard rising, whether in devonshire or Cairo.

Crowley had Hydra ascending in the natal and Aiwass horoscope, but no tarot
initiation. He prefered Italy to Germany and thus perhaps never came across
the right lodge.
--
Academic Zodiac http://lulu.com/astrology RTRRT

Academic Zodiac

unread,
Sep 7, 2008, 12:29:41 PM9/7/08
to
Janine Starscream wrote:

Goodby and thanks for signing yet another petition. We have a 6" problem
with the Mooon already, we wobble, our system is unstable. That is why
Mexico can not make a Bavarian beer.

--

Academic Zodiac

unread,
Sep 7, 2008, 12:30:57 PM9/7/08
to
Janine Starscream wrote:

> dankashein...
You are Filkommen. was fuer ein einschlepteugkusserstein mit grossen
Kartoffelmundseinheit? I think this will be our last one.

0 new messages