Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Rittenhouse walks. Small Ball Canoza on suicide watch

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Ash

unread,
Nov 22, 2021, 3:10:02 AM11/22/21
to
In article <42faef00-e2a3-4c57-b7d1-
382ea8...@googlegroups.com>
bigdog <geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sunday, November 21, 2021 at 8:34:21 PM UTC-5, Rudy Canoza wrote:
> > On 11/21/2021 5:19 PM, David Hartung wrote:
> > > On 11/21/21 1:16 PM, ! Kurt Nicklas wrote:
> > >> On Sun, 21 Nov 2021 11:08:33 -0800, Rudy Canoza <notg...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> On 11/21/2021 5:57 AM, David Hartung wrote:
> > >>>> On 11/21/21 6:53 AM, Yak wrote:
> > >>>>> On 11/20/21 9:39 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
> > >>>>>> On 11/20/2021 6:18 PM, Yak wrote:
> > >>>>>>> On 11/20/21 12:12 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
> > >>>>>>>> On 11/20/2021 4:04 AM, Yak wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>> On 11/19/21 10:36 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>> On 11/19/2021 6:07 PM, Yak wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, November 19, 2021 at 5:05:46 PM UTC-5, Siri Cruise wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> In article <sn93h8$a4n$1...@dont-email.me>, Yak <y...@inbox.com>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I celebrate the rule of law. Conversely, triggered woke whores like
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> you
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> get to suck on defeats like you agonizingly suffered today. Being a
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> I wasn't defeated today because I don't live in Wisconsin. What
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> was defeated was the rule of law.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> The rule of law is exactly what won.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> If he had been convicted, the rule of law still would have won.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> 'Still'? So, you admit that the rule of law won.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> You are only saying the rule of law won because you like the verdict. If
> > >>>>>>>> he had been convicted, you'd say it didn't win. You're a fucking Nazi.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>> You are only saying the rule of law won because you like the verdict. If
> > >>>>> he had
> > >>>>> been convicted, you'd say it didn't win. You're a fucking Nazi.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> becuase [sic]
> > >>>
> > >>> You are only saying the rule of law won because you like the verdict. If he had
> > >>> been convicted, you'd say it didn't win. You're a fucking Nazi.
> > >>
> > >> Rudy is
> > 100% correct on this. Gak, the SSDI chiseling dole scrounger (it's fraud), only
> > says that "the rule of law won" because he likes the verdict. Same with you and
> > Hartung. The rule of law did *not* win. The murdering punk was able to game
> > the system, thanks to 12 white supremacist jurors.
> >
> > >
> > > In Rudy's superb intellect, anyone who disagrees with him is either a Nazi or a
> > > Fascist.
> >
> > No, all the leftists disagree with me, too, at least on what /should/ be done.
> > Lee and Holman and Hasselbeck and davej and perhaps even "wydell" agree with me
> > on the evil that is Trump and the Republiscum/QAnon party, but they don't agree
> > with me on my ultra libertarian views on what *ought* to be done, and I
> > certainly don't call them "Nazi or 'Fascist' [sic]" over it, because I know that
> > isn't the basis of their disagreement.
> >
> The dwarf thinks that pleading self defense is gaming the system. Self defense is a natural right which the law recognizes in every state in the union plus DC and all US territories. The
> jury, by way of videos, were witnesses to the acts in question and ruled Kyle Rittenhouse
> acted within the laws concerning the use of deadly force for the purpose of self defense.
> They reached that decision unanimously. Common sense won the day.

Indeed they did.

Rudy has difficulty resolving a left wing nut shooting up a
theatre in Colorado to basic self defense.

0 new messages