Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.

Dismiss

Re: FTL is a fact, relativity is dead.

0 views

Skip to first unread message

Vilas Tamhane

unread,

Jul 30, 2012, 12:14:59 PM7/30/12

On Jul 29, 1:33 pm, "Androcles" <j...@2012.org> wrote:
> "Dirk Van de moortel" wrote in messagenews:jv422h$t37$1...@speranza.aioe.org...
>
> Uwe Hayek <haye...@nospam.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
>
> 5015803a$0$6972$e4fe5...@news2.news.xs4all.nl
>
> [snip]
>
> > Yes, I am a perfectionist, in my videos and my theories :-)
>
> > Uwe Hayek.
>
> Too bad you never heard of an electromagnetic field:
> http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/NeverHeard.html
> =====================================
> I know what a magnetic field is from experience, and I know what
> an electric field is too, but an electromagnetic field? Is that some kind
> of faggot, like you?
> Add me to your fumbles, Dork, I've never heard of an electromagnetic
> field either, ya fucking moron.
> -- Androcles

If you see a naked woman from the front side, it is an electric field.
When you look at her from the back, it is magnetic field.
If you run along with the woman, you don’t see any field. If you run
faster you will see electric field. If you run slower you will see
magnetic field. Thus relative motion decides nature of the filed.
Wasn’t Einstein correct?

Vilas Tamhane

unread,

Jul 30, 2012, 11:29:15 PM7/30/12

When you look at her from the back, it is a magnetic field.

If you run along with the woman, you don’t see any field. If you run
faster you will see electric field. If you run slower you will see
magnetic field. Thus relative motion decides nature of the filed.

So electromagnetic field is one and the same object. It all depends on
how you view it.
Wasn’t Einstein correct?

0 new messages