Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

La Rouille, by Herbert Le Porrier in English

74 views
Skip to first unread message

Clutterfreak

unread,
Jul 12, 2022, 2:20:58 AM7/12/22
to
Is there an English translation of the book "La Rouille" by
Herbert Le Porrier made and available?


--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

Jeffrey Rubard

unread,
Aug 25, 2022, 7:46:13 PM8/25/22
to
"Made and available"?

Jeffrey Rubard

unread,
Aug 25, 2022, 7:46:50 PM8/25/22
to
"I mean, has it been prepared?"
A little time-sensitive, are we?

Jeffrey Rubard

unread,
Aug 26, 2022, 7:24:16 PM8/26/22
to
"I don't think you understand..."
I suppose. Could this be at all important, then?
"It could."
It could? Hmm!

Jeffrey Rubard

unread,
Aug 27, 2022, 6:14:36 PM8/27/22
to
"You're an ignoramus."
You think I don't know enough about the real details of this matter, then?
("Click" sound)

Jeffrey Rubard

unread,
Aug 30, 2022, 12:02:49 PM8/30/22
to
Often thought:
"They are robbing you blind."
"Are you sure there's not a comma in that sentence, somewhere?"

Jeffrey Rubard

unread,
Sep 4, 2022, 6:33:17 PM9/4/22
to
That is to say, people spread "folderol" with the purpose of self-aggrandizement so widely that they no longer "see the forest for the trees".

Jeffrey Rubard

unread,
Sep 6, 2022, 5:25:21 PM9/6/22
to
Have you heard of "hair-splitting" or "logic-chopping"?

Jeffrey Rubard

unread,
Sep 7, 2022, 3:37:00 PM9/7/22
to
They've heard of you, kind of, haven't they?

Jeffrey Rubard

unread,
Sep 10, 2022, 7:10:52 PM9/10/22
to
"No, like it really says something, talking about this obscure text and how it could have a new translation but..."
This is intended to be "informative", then?

Jeffrey Rubard

unread,
Sep 14, 2022, 11:26:07 AM9/14/22
to
Okay, then it's just a "crock", it's a red herring to imply you have greater knowledge of the field and topic than you do.

Jeffrey Rubard

unread,
Sep 15, 2022, 4:43:06 PM9/15/22
to
"Oh, but..."
No, but the "presuppositions" you smuggle into the routine may tremendously undermine it. Helper words like "oh, but" are really to lull *you* about this.

Jeffrey Rubard

unread,
Sep 16, 2022, 6:03:17 PM9/16/22
to
"No, I think you don't see that..."
All of us are by now familiar with this "folderol" approach to stringing people along, never "deviating from a script"
such that questions about its legitimacy or utility could arise (including in the minds of the people "playing a long game").

Jeffrey Rubard

unread,
Sep 17, 2022, 5:57:20 PM9/17/22
to
"Whatever."
I'll take you up on that!

Jeffrey Rubard

unread,
Sep 30, 2022, 5:33:51 PM9/30/22
to
Define: "Sophistry".

Jeffrey Rubard

unread,
Oct 1, 2022, 6:43:52 PM10/1/22
to
"I swear, it's..."
No, that's "fraudulence". Try "sophistry". Explain "sophistry" to us.

Jeffrey Rubard

unread,
Oct 2, 2022, 6:41:06 PM10/2/22
to
Is it anything like *As a Man Thinketh*?

Jeffrey Rubard

unread,
Oct 3, 2022, 9:51:32 PM10/3/22
to
"Crackpot theory"

Jeffrey Rubard

unread,
Oct 19, 2022, 7:05:41 PM10/19/22
to
*Deus ex machina*, etc.

Jeffrey Rubard

unread,
Oct 20, 2022, 9:51:53 PM10/20/22
to
"Brummagem"?

Jeffrey Rubard

unread,
Oct 23, 2022, 7:38:20 PM10/23/22
to
Backstage:
"I'm telling you, it doesn't go wrong..."
Maybe "can't-miss" really means "never lands", though.

Jeffrey Rubard

unread,
Oct 26, 2022, 3:40:14 PM10/26/22
to
"Isn't this a tiresome 'hobby-horse' con? Isn't that what your 'special new translation' amounts to?"

Jeffrey Rubard

unread,
Sep 1, 2023, 3:37:12 PM9/1/23
to
Wider World: "Yeah, that's what 'La Rouille' is."

Jeffrey Rubard

unread,
Sep 2, 2023, 11:31:26 AM9/2/23
to
"Do you call it 'rambling rose' talk?"
"Only sometimes would that be a normal locution. 'Spinning people yarn', etc., etc."

Jeffrey Rubard

unread,
Sep 2, 2023, 3:41:22 PM9/2/23
to
"What does it accomplish, doing this?"
"Not conveying useful information, that's not a thing it does."

Jeffrey Rubard

unread,
Sep 2, 2023, 4:05:30 PM9/2/23
to
"But perhaps it could be used to fool people."
"It doesn't *categorically* fool people, and the practitioners of it hardly remember to keep this in mind."

Jeffrey Rubard

unread,
Sep 3, 2023, 4:43:31 PM9/3/23
to
"Maybe it does, though."
"That seems like 'wishful thinking' in its entirety."

Jeffrey Rubard

unread,
Sep 3, 2023, 4:48:05 PM9/3/23
to
This "blurb" is well-known as announcing a ruse, I believe.

Jeffrey Rubard

unread,
Sep 4, 2023, 2:45:02 PM9/4/23
to
"Yeah, it's pretty cheap and stupid. Do you think you can get away from these people?"

Jeffrey Rubard

unread,
Sep 5, 2023, 11:38:10 AM9/5/23
to
Hmm.

Jeffrey Rubard

unread,
Sep 10, 2023, 4:35:58 PM9/10/23
to
Perhaps I could see about that, etc.

Jeffrey Rubard

unread,
Sep 11, 2023, 11:24:47 AM9/11/23
to
Portland doesn't really suit me anymore, somehow.

Jeffrey Rubard

unread,
Sep 30, 2023, 5:09:51 PM9/30/23
to
Update: However, "La Rouille" is similar to the "traditional" version of this "I'm not sure..." scam.

Jeffrey Rubard

unread,
Oct 1, 2023, 11:15:22 AM10/1/23
to
("It'll all seem new to you." Perhaps, instead, it is relatively newer to you.)

Jeffrey Rubard

unread,
Oct 2, 2023, 11:31:23 AM10/2/23
to
No, really. What if I was 'having game run' on me when you were not yet even alive, say in the 1990s?

Jeffrey Rubard

unread,
Oct 3, 2023, 2:38:59 PM10/3/23
to
...so that I actually had a fuller, more 'comprehensive' sense of it than you?

Jeffrey Rubard

unread,
Oct 4, 2023, 3:06:17 PM10/4/23
to
...and other people would too? 'Cause it's a 'stock scam'?

Jeffrey Rubard

unread,
Dec 14, 2023, 3:30:19 PM12/14/23
to
Wider World: "Yeah, 'La Rouille' says 'we are joking' just generally..."
0 new messages