Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: FAT32 vs NTFS, can Linux be used under NTFS?

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Phil....@familynet-international.net

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 7:48:00 PM11/26/09
to
Re: Re: FAT32 vs NTFS, can Linux be used under NTFS?
By: J.O. Aho to Aragorn on Sun Nov 15 2009 09:26:18

> >> You should never use vfat as the file system to install Linux on (even

I do not use vfat any more because its so out dated!

--- SBBSecho 2.12-Win32
* Origin: bbs.cyberchatnet.com Vienna, VA 8:8/703.0 (8:8/703)

Phil....@familynet-international.net

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 7:43:20 PM11/26/09
to
Re: FAT32 vs NTFS, can Linux be used under NTFS?
By: RodMcKay to All on Thu Nov 12 2009 07:09:28

> From: RodMcKay <NoJun...@No.com>

>

> I'm confused, I was told initially that Linux had to be put on a system

> that was formatted to FAT32. Yet I've seen posts about Linux under NTFS.

> One of the main reasons I've not switched from Windows to Linux, besides

> tons of Windows programs I use and learning curve, was precisely because of

> the file size issue re FAT32. I now have a hdd of 200 gigs and an attached

> external drive of 500 gigs so that was a huge deterrent.

>

> But I can't get a definitive answer when googling, it seems. Can Linux be

> used with NTFS so that we can have our large drives?

>

Why do you use ext2 or ext3?

0 new messages