Re: Progress.
FJ
alt.bonehead.james-koput added
alt.lamers.james-koput added
alt.limpdick.james-koput added]
subRo...@mmx.ca wrote:
> On Tue, 24 May 2005 20:18:47 +0200, in alt.flame FJ
> <fjH...@SPAMbuzzing-bumblebee.com> wrote:
>
> >[alt.usenet kooks removed
> > alt.bonehead.james-koput added
> > alt.lamers.james-koput added]
>
> "MY DICK IS BIGGER THAN YOURS, JAMES. I'M TAKING MY PLACE AMONGST THE
> SPAM IN ***YOUR*** NGS TO PROVE IT!"
> [...] "My dick is bigger than yours, James!"
> [...] "My dick is bigger than yours, James, and I have
> the typo pounce to prove it!!!"
> [...] "My dick is bigger than yours, James. Look it's bigger, I swear!"
> Is your dick bigger than mine, Jereon?
> [...] "Is anyone bored of my bleating yet?"
> [...] The "My Dick Is Bigger Than Yours, James!"
> by Jereon Von Weasel. Absolutely Craptacular!!
Apart from being an atrociously bad writer, an abysmal flamer, a whining
crybaby and a sore loser, is everything alright, James? [Koput is a moron].
> >> Really, as a dual citizen of France,
> >
> >James, you daft dunderhead, how can someone be a dual citizen of France?
>
> Canada and France. But that would be too obvious even for you.
Well, you said you were a dual citizen of France. It was fairly obvious
that you were, in your own ham-fisted way, referring to the fact that
more than one nation was unfortunate enough to have you as one of its nationals.
> [...] "My Dick Is Bigger Than Yours, James!" Encore. Encore.
N'ayez pas peur des mots, James. [Koput est un imbécile].
> >> I will be voting YES in the French Referendum as is the consensus.
> >
> >The consensus, James? Polls indicate the French electorate is leaning
> >towards a 'no' by 52%. FJ's corollary to previous assertions: James,
> >don't read things into media reports that aren't there. [Koput is a
> >moron].
>
> According to a recent poll that I have just only read now, the "No" camp
> has widened somewhat. 52% is marginal.
The French 'No' is by no means in the bag, but I didn't mention the
percentage to claim such a thing. I mentioned it to shoot down your
blathering about a consensus. [Koput is a moron].
> I doubt out of country votes were included in this poll.
That is probably because their impact on the results is statistically
marginal. If you can come up with one shred of evidence that the voting
intentions of expatriates differ significantly from the voting intentions of
French residents, I'll listen. Until then, it would be wise not to debate
this with me as it would only further your image as an ignorant dolt.
[Koput is a moron].
> >> You are speaking about the TRAITÉ ÉTABLISSANT UNE CONSTITUTION POUR
> >> L'EUROPE, non?
> >
> >C'est vrai, mon cher imbécile.
> >
> >> Too bad my vote will have a canceling effect on yours this 29 Mai 2005.
> >
> >Heehee. James, your ignorance is simply so -amusing-! Please explain to
> >your curious readers how exactly the vote of some talentless Canuck in a
> >*French* referendum, will cancel out the vote of an accomplished
> >wordsmith in a *Dutch* referendum?
>
> It's simple math really. You vote NO, I vote YES = 0.
Your stupidity defies belief. There are two referenda, James; I will take
part in one, you will take part in the other. Our votes, regardless of our
voting intentions, cannot possibly cancel each other out. [Koput is a moron].
> Regardless of bloodlines, I'm voting in FAVOUR of it.
Most ignorant, authority pleasing lapdogs do, so I won't act as if I am
surprised. [Koput is a moron].
> This means more support for the OVERALL Yes camp.
The OVERALL Yes Camp is not relevant, you inept statistical amateur. [Koput
is a moron].
> When the final numbers are in, you will be forced to live with the
> results.
>
> Remember:
>
> ====================
> "If France says 'No', the Netherlands and Britain will say 'No'. I expect
> the (EU) leaders will have to respond. They will have to take measures to
> remedy the social crisis that threaten us," said Henri Emmanuelli of the
> opposition Socialist Party.
> ===================
>
> Which leads one to conclude that the French will determine the outcome of
> how the Dutch will vote.
Not at all. Mister Emmanuelli claims that a French 'No' will strengthen the
Dutch and UK 'No' camps. I believe he is right in this. But at no point
has Mister Emmanuelli, or anyone else for that matter, claimed that a French
'Yes' would strengthen the Dutch or UK 'Yes' camps (-- or weaken the Dutch
or UK 'No' camps). *Again*, you are reading too much into words and drawing
conclusions that logically cannot be drawn based on what was said. This
only further demonstrates what an ignorant buffoon you are, James. [Koput
is a moron].
[...] (http://news.independent.co.uk/europe/story.jsp?story=640630)
Excuse me for not accepting pieces, based on anecdotal and statistically
insignificant evidence, in the Independent as authoritative. [Koput is a
moron].
> Seems to me France will have a much more profound effect on the descision
> then you've been lead to believe.
The latest Dutch polls show voting intentions of 64% against, James. Do you
wish to explain in your own words how a French 'Yes' will swing this? (We
have already established that a French 'No' will strengthen the Dutch 'No'
camp after all). [Koput is a moron].
> >> Too bad though, between the two of us, you'll be the one who'll have to
> >> live with it.
> >
> >You'll have to live with it too, James, you silly little man. You will
> >not, however, be touched by the consequences. Do you see now what I mean
> >when I refer to your weak prose as an object to be poked fun at? [Koput
> >is a moron].
>
> The dick-posturing is getting tired, Jereon.
The word you are groping for is 'tiresome', James. If you can't write or
if you simply do not know what words mean, don't post. Until then I will
poke fun at you as much as I desire, and there's nothing you can do about it
except snipping all the offending paragraphs and talking about penises more
than is good for you. [Koput is a moron].
--
FJ - alt.flame Mobile Infantry
"I put out the apology as it was the right thing to do in a sense beyond
this group. Sure anything goes here but it doesn't make anything you do
right in a wider moral sense.", -- James Benzeleski.
<20020713143325...@mb-fv.aol.com>
FJ
alt.usenet kooks removed
alt.bonehead.james-koput added
alt.lamers.james-koput added
alt.limpdick.james-koput added]
subRo...@mmx.ca wrote:
> On Tue, 24 May 2005 22:58:00 +0200, in alt.flame FJ
> <fjH...@SPAMbuzzing-bumblebee.com> wrote:
[...]
>> Apart from being an atrociously bad writer, an abysmal flamer, a
>> whining crybaby and a sore loser, is everything alright, James? [Koput
>> is a moron].
>
> How nice of you to make a summary.
Your approval means ever so much to me, James. [Koput is a moron].
>> Well, you said you were a dual citizen of France. It was fairly
>> obvious that you were, in your own ham-fisted way, referring to the
>> fact that more than one nation was unfortunate enough to have you as
>> one of its nationals.
>
> Which begs the question: I wonder if my European citizenship will allow
> me the right to abode in the Netherlands if I so choose?
Ignoring the fact that you couldn't make up your mind between "right of
abode" or "right to abide", I'd say 'Yes'. [Koput is a moron].
>> N'ayez pas peur des mots, James. [Koput est un imbécile].
>
> Would I possibly be pushing your xenophobic nonistes-voting buttons
Ah, the old "If you're against the EU, then you're a xenophobe" straw man.
It was just a matter of time before a master debater such as yourself
inserted this 'argument' into the debate. [Koput is a moron].
> if I said to you that I really don't speak the language
Out of interest, is there any language that you *do* speak well? [Koput is
a moron].
> while maintaining full voting rights as a member of the French expatriate
> community? I would just like to help do my part in determining the
> future role of bazillions of native Europeans like yourself... Perhaps
> one day, instead of your job going to a Pole or a Hindu, it just might go
> to a real Canadian instead!
Without government interference, jobs tend to go to the persons most
qualified, so excuse me for not being overly worried by your sudden interest
in the job market. [Koput is a moron].
>> The French 'No' is by no means in the bag, but I didn't mention the
>> percentage to claim such a thing. I mentioned it to shoot down your
>> blathering about a consensus. [Koput is a moron].<----NANNY NANNY BOO
>> BOO!
^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
There really is no need to express your displeasure by using allcaps, James.
[Koput is a moron].
> The consensus here, according to my other expatriate friends, is an
> overwhelming Yes.
Heehee. You and "your friends". Some consensus you have there, James. I
am really, really impressed now. (Who would have thought it? James has
friends). Statistically, of course, you and your friends do not matter
worth a damn, you do realize that, don't you, James? [Koput is a moron].
> So I gather I may erred on the side of subconsciously hinting at it
> without fully explaining myself.
We can't all be masters of tone and inflection, eh, James? [Koput is a moron].
> At the time it didn't seem necessary anyway. I had no idea that the polls
> were shifting. Regardless, as I have said, expatriates tend to lean on
> the Yes side for obvious reasons:
As I have said before, unless you can come up with a credible source
corroborating your claims about the leanings of expatriates, you had better
be quiet. But if you insist on parading your ignorance... [Koput is a moron].
> since we live in a multicultural society
So do I. [Koput is a moron].
> we don't share your xenophobic 'values'.
You are sadly mistaken then on what this constitution is about. (Not that
*that* is a big surprise of course). For your information, James, the
constitution is not about immigration, but about control and
(re)distribution of power. As a libertarian I am generally wary of
government and prefer it to assume the smallest possible role in society.
To superimpose and legitimize an additional layer of control on top of
already faltering national bureaucracies is destructive, dangerous and
superfluous. Hence one reason for my 'no' vote. If this makes me a
xenophobe in your book, then I'll happily take it as another confirmation
that you do not know what words mean. [Koput is a moron].
>> That is probably because their impact on the results is statistically
>> marginal.
>
> [shrugs] So is the 52% of the decided 'no' vote in France.
You're confusing "statistically marginal" with "margin of error", James. It
makes you look foolish. [Koput is a moron].
>> If you can come up with one shred of evidence that the voting
>> intentions of expatriates differ significantly from the voting
>> intentions of French residents, I'll listen. Until then, it would be
>> wise not to debate this with me as it would only further your image as
>> an ignorant dolt. [Koput is a moron].<----NANNY NANNY BOO BOO!
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
There really is no need to express your displeasure by using allcaps, James.
[Koput is a moron].
> Expatriates living in multi-cultural societies like North America will
> more than likely lean towards the Yes side.
Prove it. Give me sources, a poll conducted amongst French expatriates
living in Canada for instance. Right now, all you have are your own idiotic
assertions that aren't backed by a single shred of evidence. [Koput is a
moron].
> The numbers aren't clear yet, but I believe they may be tallied for some
> further insight on how the electorate decides regionally.
If the numbers aren't clear yet, then how can you make such claims as
"expatriates will generally vote in favor"? [Koput is a moron].
>> Your stupidity defies belief. There are two referenda, James; I will
>> take part in one, you will take part in the other. Our votes,
>> regardless of our voting intentions, cannot possibly cancel each other
>> out. [Koput is a moron].<----NANNY NANNY BOO BOO!
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
There really is no need to express your displeasure by using allcaps, James.
[Koput is a moron].
> Two referenda, one outcome. Yes or No. The French will determine how the
> Dutch vote.
Just because John Lichfield of the Independent says so, does not make it
true, James. [Koput is a moron].
>> Most ignorant, authority pleasing lapdogs do, so I won't act as if I am
>> surprised. [Koput is a moron].<----NANNY NANNY BOO BOO!
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
There really is no need to express your displeasure by using allcaps, James.
[Koput is a moron].
> I believe in a United Europe. You believe in a stagnant one.
Ah, the "If you're against the constitution, you're in favor of a stagnant
Europe" straw man. Have you read the constitution, James? Of course you
haven't. I actually took the trouble of plowing through that lengthy
abomination. It lists such gems as "full employment is the goal of the EU",
"we strive towards social justice" and other socialist and interventionist
nonsense. If you're serious about destroying an economy, *this* is the way
to go about it. [Koput is a moron].
Free trade is good. EFTA (http://www.efta.int/) is a perfectly reasonable
alternative to the EU. The proposed constitution (together with the
combined effect of treaties that we were never allowed to vote on) is a
collective economical suicide pact. [Koput is a moron].
> Either way you may one day lose your job to a Pole or a Hindu, or worse,
> a CANADIAN!!!!
Not likely, since I'm self employed and despite government interference
(high taxes, too much regulation and active attempts to remove the
elasticity from the job market) I'm doing pretty much okay. [Koput is a moron].
>> The OVERALL Yes Camp is not relevant, you inept statistical amateur.
>> [Koput is a moron].<----NANNY NANNY BOO BOO!
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
There really is no need to express your displeasure by using allcaps, James.
[Koput is a moron].
> How is it not relevant, considering there's only a 2% lead in favour of
> the No?
It is not relevant in the sense that you cannot add French 'Yes' votes to
Dutch 'Yes' votes as they are part of two separate referenda. [Koput is a
moron].
>> Not at all. Mister Emmanuelli claims that a French 'No' will
>> strengthen the Dutch and UK 'No' camps. I believe he is right in this.
>> But at no point has Mister Emmanuelli, or anyone else for that matter,
>> claimed that a French 'Yes' would strengthen the Dutch or UK 'Yes'
>> camps (-- or weaken the Dutch or UK 'No' camps). *Again*, you are
>> reading too much into words and drawing conclusions that logically
>> cannot be drawn based on what was said. This only further demonstrates
>> what an ignorant buffoon you are, James. [Koput is a
>> moron].<----NANNY NANNY BOO BOO!
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
There really is no need to express your displeasure by using allcaps, James.
[Koput is a moron].
> The Netherlands will follow France's lead.
I'll make you a deal, James: If the French vote 'Yes' *and* the Dutch vote
'Yes', I'll eat humble pie and will leave alt.flame forever. If the French
vote 'Yes' *and* the Dutch vote 'No', you'll eat humble pie and leave
alt.flame forever. If the French vote 'No', all bets are off. Deal?
--
FJ - alt.flame Mobile Infantry
"I put out the apology as it was the right thing to do in a sense beyond
this group. Sure anything goes here but it doesn't make anything you do
right in a wider moral sense.", -- James "I get no respect" Benzeleski.
<20020713143325...@mb-fv.aol.com>
FJ
> On Wed, 25 May 2005 01:07:12 +0200, in alt.flame FJ
> <fjH...@SPAMbuzzing-bumblebee.com> wrote:
>
> Welcome to the funnyfarm!
>
> Jereon finally admits to brokering a peace deal with the Snuhtards:
> <4293b827$0$15820$c88...@newsreader15.eweka.nl>
> Dean, Jason, Bill and Soapy have been members of the super secret server for
> more than a year now. Ari brokered the deal. Elvis is in charge of
> strategy. We spend about 16 hours each day plotting against Koput. The
> remaining time we sing and dance with bunnies (-- except for Jason, who
> hates bunnies --) in the woods.
> -----
>
> Proving that there's always some truth behind those whacky rumours, even some of
> the more outlandish ones!
*swoosh*
[...] (Brave Sir James has a pressing engagement elsewhere).
> :> The Netherlands will follow France's lead.
> :
> :I'll make you a deal, James: If the French vote 'Yes' *and* the Dutch vote
> :'Yes', I'll eat humble pie and will leave alt.flame forever. If the French
> :vote 'Yes' *and* the Dutch vote 'No', you'll eat humble pie and leave
> :alt.flame forever. If the French vote 'No', all bets are off. Deal?
>
> Jereon is a snuhtard.
Unsurprisingly, James prefers to run away instead of putting his money where
his mouth was.
--
FJ "Film at eleven" - alt.flame Mobile Infantry
"I put out the apology as it was the right thing to do in a sense beyond
this group. Sure anything goes here but it doesn't make anything you do
right in a wider moral sense.", -- James Benzeleski.
<20020713143325...@mb-fv.aol.com>
±
>
> On Wed, 25 May 2005 01:07:12 +0200, in alt.flame FJ
> <fjH...@SPAMbuzzing-bumblebee.com> wrote:
>
> Welcome to the funnyfarm!
>
> Jereon finally admits to brokering a peace deal with the Snuhtards:
> <4293b827$0$15820$c88...@newsreader15.eweka.nl>
> Dean, Jason, Bill and Soapy have been members of the super secret server for
> more than a year now. Ari brokered the deal. Elvis is in charge of
> strategy. We spend about 16 hours each day plotting against Koput. The
> remaining time we sing and dance with bunnies (-- except for Jason, who
> hates bunnies --) in the woods.
> -----
>
> Proving that there's always some truth behind those whacky rumours, even some of
> the more outlandish ones!
>
> nitty-gritty, as Jereon likes to put 'em...
>
> :[Koput is a moron].
>
> Jereon is a snuhtard.
>
> :[Koput is a moron].
>
> Jereon is a snuhtard.
>
> :[Koput is a moron].
>
> Jereon is a snuhtard.
>
> :[Koput is
> :a moron].
>
> Jereon is
> a snuhtard.
>
> :[Koput is a moron].
>
> Jereon is a snuhtard.
>
> :[Koput is a moron].
>
> Jereon is a snuhtard.
>
> :[Koput is a moron].
>
> Jereon is a snuhtard.
>
> :[Koput is a moron].
>
> Jereon is a snuhtard.
>
> :[Koput is a moron].
>
> Jereon is a snuhtard.
>
> :[Koput is a moron].
>
> Jereon is a snuhtard.
>
> Whew, that was fun, wasn't it bois and grrls?
>
> Oh wait a sec. Incoming transmission. I'm detecting a rant.
>
> Hang on.
>
> Hang on.
>
> Hang on.
>
> ...
>
> ...
>
> ...
>
> :> we don't share your xenophobic 'values'. [echo]
>
> We are receiving, here it goes...
>
> :You are sadly ..*taken then on what this const*t**ion is about. (Not that
> :*####* is . bi. s.rp#ise of course). For y##r information, James, &#*...
>
> I'm sorry you're breaking up. Could you please try that again?
>
> :co)st#*ut(on *s n_t _bou_ imm_gr$ti#n, but a***t control &$#
>
> You'll do whatever the French tell you to do, you puny little dutch pipsqueak!
>
> _*%(&#^(Q)__
>
> [We've lost him.]
>
> ...
>
> :::
>
> Oh no. He's back!
>
> Wait for it.
>
> >>>>
>
> :[Koput is a moron].
>
>
> :[Koput is a moron].
>
> Jereon is a snuhtard.
>
> :[Koput is a moron].
>
> Jereon is a snuhtard.
>
> :[Koput is a moron].
>
> Jereon is a snuhtard.
>
> :[Koput is a
> :moron].
>
> Jereon is
> a snuhtard.
>
> :[Koput is a moron].
>
> Jereon is a snuhtard.
>
> :[Koput is a moron].
>
> Jereon is a snuhtard.
>
> :[Koput is a moron].
>
> Jereon is a snuhtard.
>
> :[Koput is a moron].
>
> Jereon is a snuhtard.
>
> :[Koput is a moron].
>
> Jereon is a snuhtard.
>
> :[Koput is a moron].
>
> Jereon is a snuhtard.
>
> :[Koput is a moron].
>
> Jereon is a snuhtard.
>
> :[Koput is a moron].
>
> Jereon is a snuhtard.
>
> :[Koput is a moron].
>
> Jereon is a snuhtard.
>
> :[Koput is a
> :moron].
>
> Jereon is
> a snuhtard.
>
> :[Koput is a moron].
>
> Jereon is a snuhtard.
>
> :[Koput is a moron].
>
> Jereon is a snuhtard.
>
> *()&%)Q(#&%(Q%&#(
>
> :> The Netherlands will follow France's lead.
> :
> :I'll make you a deal, James: If the French vote 'Yes' *and* the Dutch vote
> :'Yes', I'll eat humble pie and will leave alt.flame forever. If the French
> :vote 'Yes' *and* the Dutch vote 'No', you'll eat humble pie and leave
> :alt.flame forever. If the French vote 'No', all bets are off. Deal?
>
Isn't lithium covered by socialized medicine?
>
> _-
> -_
> subRoutine <http://www.softtargets.com>
> Overunity Energy Mechanism
> 0,0,1
--
http://www.bedoper.com/snuh
k00kologist Kimberly Kay Barnard (Bachelor of Science, Psychology &
longtime support group troll) tells an alt.support.depression.medication
poster what the alt.usenet.kooks awards are all about:
From: Kali <Ka...@lart.meow>
Newsgroups: alt.support.depression.medication,alt.usenet.kooks
Subject: Linda Gore's Speech, was: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards,
December 2004
Message-ID: <MPG.1c4aeaa1...@news.east.earthlink.net>
The awards granted by alt.usenet.kooks are the official Usenet kook
awards, Linda. They were not created for the purpose of devaluing acts
of kindness. They were created, and are maintained, for the purpose of
recognizing abusive posters. Your fellow nominees are liars, bigots,
frauds, forgers, defamers, screed spammers, people who falsely accuse
others of stalking when they themselves are the stalkers, etc. You get
the picture. If you don't, return to the above link and read.
Not just anyone can be nominated; there are standards that must be
upheld. No one may be nominated for purposes of revenge or a joke. Not
all nominations are accepted. There must be evidence of abuse. You have
generated a lot of it. You are an abuser.
> Stooge confirms it's all about "some retribution":
From: spooge <spo...@petitmorte.net>
Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks, alt.flame, sci.psychology.psychotherapy
Subject: Re: Jet: Chickenshit
Message-ID: <Xns9622E1E68EB...@petitmorte.net>
It's just Usenet. It's just words. But when someone, kook, idiot, fool
or dumbshit, takes it to r/l measures as has happened to Kali, then
there is going to be some retribution. If that retribution amounts to a
Kook of the Month Award, so the fuck what?
_ _ _ _ _
| | | | | | | | |
__ _| | |_ _ _ ___ ___ _ __ ___| |_ | | _____ ___ | | _____
/ _` | | __|| | | / __|/ _ \ '_ \ / _ \ __| | |/ / _ \ / _ \| |/ / __|
| (_| | | |_ | |_| \__ \ __/ | | | __/ |_ _| < (_) | (_) | <\__ \
\__,_|_|\__(_)__,_|___/\___|_| |_|\___|\__(_)_|\_\___/ \___/|_|\_\___/
C
MMl
MMMM
6MMMM
MMMMMM
MMMMMMM
:MMMMMMMM
MMMMMMMMM
,MMMMMMMMM
MMMMMMMMMM
,MMMMMMMMMM
MMMMMMMMMMMC
MMMMMMMMMMMMC
8MMMMMMMMMMMMMMS
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
CMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMQ
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM6
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMx
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMx
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMQ
EMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMW
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
M8 6MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
WMMMMMMMMW BMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
MMBMMM EMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMB
MMMMM MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMl
6 . MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
M. MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMz MMMMMMM
.M: MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM MMMMM
MM MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM MMMM8
MM, iMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM M,MMC
WM MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM , M
MW MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMB C
M MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM BM
M MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM M:
M MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMl M,
MC MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMQCE QM
E MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM M MM
:M : MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM8 M Mz
MM8WMWCMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMr MMMMM M Mx
@i MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM. MMx M M
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM. C 8, wM
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM MMwMQM zM
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM C @MM
MMMMx MMMMMMEMMMMMMM Q M
MMMM MMMM MMMMMMM lM iM
M@B MMMM MMMMMMM M WM8
:M MMM MMM CMM MWWWM W
MMM MMM M x M
MMMMMMMM BM
MMMMMMMM
xMMMMMMMMMMMMM
.MMMMMMMMMMMwMM
.MMB: @BMM
_ _ _ _ _ _
| | | | | \ | | | | ( )
| | | |___ ___| \| | ___| |_|/ ___
| | | / __|/ _ \ . ` |/ _ \ __| / __|
| |_| \__ \ __/ |\ | __/ |_ \__ \
\___/|___/\___\_| \_/\___|\__| |___/
___ _ _____ _ _ _
/ _ \| | | __ \ | (_) |
/ /_\ \ |__ _ _ | | \/ |__ _ __ __ _ _| |__
| _ | '_ \| | | | | | __| '_ \| '__/ _` | | '_ \
| | | | |_) | |_| | | |_\ \ | | | | | (_| | | |_) |
\_| |_/_.__/ \__,_| \____/_| |_|_| \__,_|_|_.__/
From: John Henry <j...@inNOSPAMsurgent.orgy>
Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks, alt.fan.art-bell, alt.flame
Subject: Re: NOM: Sn*htards (collectively) for GK (was Re: NOMINATION:
HL&S -> Re: WARNING: -> Re: THE OUTING OF USENET GANGS-AUK MORONS)
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 23:10:03 -0000
Message-ID: <Xns9619B8D73D390jo...@216.168.3.44>
X-No-Archive: yes
The Sn*h collective is a worthless garbage dump of tired lames, impotent
wretches, losers, and WOMBATs. In the years I've been on Usenet, I've
managed to find common ground and even comraderie with literally
*hundreds* of individuals and groups with whom I, in a former state of
cluelessness, once butted heads. The Sn*htards stand out bright and
clear among a very, very small group of folks with whom I can find no
common ground, in whom I can find no redeeming value, and for whom I
have absolutely no respect whatsoever.
I wouldn't feed Dean Humphries a handful of my own shit if he showed up
starving on my doorstep and begged for it. And I wouldn't put it past
him to do so.
> D'oh!:
From: Lionel <n...@alt.net>
Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks, alt.flame, alt.snuh,
alt.auktards.spank-spank-spank, alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk
Subject: Re: NOMINATION: Bill Cleere for BUSTED URINAL
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 18:10:50 +1000
Message-ID: <d5v2pe$i6k$2...@pita.alt.net>
The only people who actually like 'UPA' are the ones who do it.
-------
/ \
/ \ /-----\
| (@) | | SnuH |
| (O) | \_ ___/
| / | ||
| \ /_ / //
\ \____/ / /
\ /
\_____,