When is an area overpopulated? It's time to consider world control of population
Raymond
It's time to consider world control of population...or else......
Obviously, controlling the population is the answer. If nothing is
done within the next 25 years, to bring down the rate of human
increase, even the affluent Americans will find themselves living in
an environment charged with miseries and an urgency to invent new
ways to provide for not only the necessities but also the decencies
of
life. We, in America, do not need more illegals to add to our already
struggling economy.
THE POPULATION EXPLOSION
"People fuckee too much."
--- Confucius
While the annual population growth seems to have reached a plateau,
still the world has added 85 to 90 million people every year for the
last decade. Each month the world adds another new York City and
though some 300.000 Somalis died of starvation in 1992, they were
replaced in 29 hours.
The United States poses the most serious threat of all to human life
support systems. It already has a gigantic population, the third
largest on Earth, more than a quarter of a billion people. Americans
are superconsumers, and use inefficient technologies to feed their
appetites. Each, on average, uses 11 kW of energy, twice as much as
the average Japanese, more than three times as much as the average
Spaniard, and over 100 times as much as an average Bangladeshi.
Clearly, achieving an average family size of 1.5 children in the
United States (which would still be larger than the 1.3 child average
in Spain) would benefit the world much more than a similar success in
Bangladesh
The key to understanding overpopulation is not population density but
the numbers of people in an area relative to its resources and the
capacity of the environment to sustain human activities; that is, to
the area's carrying capacity. When is an area overpopulated? When its
population can't be maintained without rapidly depleting nonrenewable
resources (or converting renewable resources into nonrenewable ones)
and without degrading the capacity of the environment to support the
population. In short, if the long-term carrying capacity of an area
is
clearly being degraded by its current human occupants, that area is
overpopulated. *35
By this standard, the entire planet and virtually every nation is
already vastly overpopulated. Africa is overpopulated now because,
among other indications, its soils and forests are rapidly being
depleted—and that implies that its carrying capacity for human beings
will be lower in the future than it is now. The United States is
overpopulated because it is depleting its soil and water resources
and
contributing mightily to the destruction of global environmental
systems. Europe, Japan, the Soviet Union, and other rich nations are
overpopulated because of their massive contributions to the carbon
dioxide buildup in the atmosphere, among many other reasons.
Almost all the rich nations are overpopulated because they are
rapidly
drawing down stocks of resources around the world. They don't live
solely on the land in their own nations. Like the profligate son of
our earlier analogy, they are spending their capital with no thought
for the future.
The idea of worldwide population control is not new to society. Even
Aristotle discussed the subject:
"For the proper administration of justice and for the distribution
of authority it is necessary that the citizens be acquainted with
each others character, so that, where this cannot be, much mischief
ensues, both in the use of authority and the administration of
justice; for
it is not just to decide arbitrarily, as must be the case with
excessive
population."
And in 1967, the United Nations addressed the potential need to
include population control in long range planning:
"We believe that the population problem must be recognized as a
principal element in long-range planning if governments are to
achieve their economic goals and fulfill the asperations of their
people...."
Retired US Senator Dale Bumpers, in a New York Times op-ed article
(Jan.3,1999) said, "... While I'm not apocalyptic about our future,
I'm greatly troubled by Congress's unwillingness to confront our
long- range problems, like global warming, population growth, loss of
arable land to development and depletion and pollution of our water
supplies. If we continue to ignore these problems, or only deal with
them
superficially, our future will be bleak indeed."
"The [government] must put the most modern medical means in the
service of this knowledge.... Those who are physically and mentally
unhealthy and unworthy must not perpetuate their suffering in the
body of their children.... The prevention of the faculty and
opportunity
to procreate on the part of the physically degenerate and mentally
sick,
over a period of only 600 years, would free humanity from an
immeasurable misfortune.''
``The per capita income gap between the developed and the developing
countries is increasing, in large part the result of higher birth
rates in the poorer countries.... Famine in India, unwanted babies in
the United States, poverty that seemed to form an unbreakable chain
for millions of people--how should we tackle these problems?.... It
is quite clear that one of the major challenges of the 1970s ... will
be
to curb the world's fertility.''
Guess who said the above?
These two quotations are alike in their mock show of concern for
human suffering, and in their cynical remedy for it:
Let us now further inquire into the family background of our
Presidents, so as to help illustrate how the second quoted author,
George Herbert Walker Bush came to share the outlook of the first,
Adolf Hitler
The spending for birth control in the non-white countries is one of
the few items that was headed upwards in the Bush administration
budget. As its 1992 budget was being set, USAID said its Population
Account would receive $300 million, a 20 percent increase over the
previous year. Within this project, a significant sum is spent on
political and psychological manipulations of target nations, and
rather blatant subversion of their religions and governments.
These activities might be expected to cause serious objections from
the victimized nationalities, or from U.S. taxpayers, especially if
the program is somehow given widespread publicity.
MORE ON BUSH
SEE;
http://www.the7thfire.com/bush3.htm
Since at least 1969, through the United Nations Population Fund
(UNFPA), the UN has steadfastly been a leading voice in attempting to
fund projects that provide contraception and gynecological services
to prevent teen-pregnancy and HIV/AIDS prevention in 142 countries.
UNFPA is the world's largest multionational source of population
assistance, with programs in countries around the planet. Since it
became operational in 1969, the Fund has provided some $5.6 billion
to developing countries to meet reproduction health needs and support
substantial development.
Unbelievably, on July 22, 2002, GW Bush announced that the United
States would not grant (UNFPA) the $34 million dollars appropriated
by Congress for 2002. The decision will cost thousands of women and
children their lives. The $34 million from the United States would
have allowed the agency to prevent two million unwanted pregnancies
and more than 77,000 infant and child deaths, UNFPA estimates.
The politically confused Bush Administration, in withholding
funds,accepted allegations that the UNFPA gives tacit support to
China's one-child policy just by working in China.
[The United States is the only country ever to deny fundung to UNFPA
for non-budgetary reasons.]
While the annual population growth seems to have reached a plateau,
still the world has added 85 to 90 million people every year for the
last decade. Each month the world adds another new York City and
though some 300.000 Somalis died of starvation in 1992, they were
replaced in 29 hours.
Obviously, controlling the population is the answer. If nothing is
done within the next 25 years, to bring down the rate of human
increase, even the affluent Americans will find themselves living in
an environment charged with miseries and an urgency to invent new
ways to provide for not only the necessities but also the decencies
of
life. We, in America, do not need more illegals to add to our already
struggling economy.
"We have been God-like in our planned breeding of our domesticated
plants and animals, but we have been rabbit-like in our unplanned
breeding of ourselves."
--- Toynbee, Arnold Joseph
"People fuckee too much."
--- Confucius
--- Overpopulation---
http://dieoff.org/page27.htm
Population Control, New World Order Style -Educate Yourself
By Ken Adachi <Edi...@educate-yourself.org>
http://educate-yourself.org/nwo/nwopopcontrol.shtml
---------------------------------