Clear images of another Martian fossil with a terrestrial one side by side
for comparison.
Could that shape be formed by some natural, geological process?
No. That would be like finding a fossil skull complete with teeth and
insisting that erosion or mineral growth made it. But I have found not one,
but hundreds of these, and the landscape is covered by them. So whatever
process made them has the ability to make multiple copies- and life is
exactly that process.
Look at the gallery page with other organisms here:
http://www.xenotechresearch.com/marsgal2.htm
Then look at this: http://www.xenotechresearch.com/spicrin1.htm
Try this: http://www.xenotechresearch.com/murchins.htm
And this: http://www.xenotechresearch.com/marscurl.htm
And finally: http://xenotechresearch.com/shells01.htm
There is no way that geology made all those forms that are duplicates of
fossil forms, simply through random erosion. This is the finding of a
fossilized ocean floor, and many of the creatures you would expect in that
fossil record. NASA admits that Mars had oceans, and here are the remains
of the animals in those oceans.
--
Anon
"Sir Charles W. Shults III" <aichip...@cfl.rr.com> wrote in message
news:1wKlg.25211$7G2....@tornado.tampabay.rr.com...
>
> "Memnoch" <mem...@nospampleaseimbritish.ntlworld.com> wrote in message
> news:176e925d723fe4qig...@4ax.com...
>> Could that shape be formed by some natural, geological process?
>
> No. That would be like finding a fossil skull complete with teeth and
> insisting that erosion or mineral growth made it. But I have found not
> one, but hundreds of these, and the landscape is covered by them. So
> whatever process made them has the ability to make multiple copies- and
> life is exactly that process.
> Look at the gallery page with other organisms here:
> http://www.xenotechresearch.com/marsgal2.htm
>
> Then look at this: http://www.xenotechresearch.com/spicrin1.htm
This looks like an octapus.