Yale F. Edeiken Attorney - Allentown, PA (Supreme Court ID# 40290) Recent Lies Documented UPGRADED R 2
Doc Tavish
Yale F. Edeiken Supreme Court ID# 40290
Who is an associate for:
Walker & Miller, P.C.
ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW
41 North Fifth Street
Allentown, Pennsylvania 18105
(610) 434-1533
Fax (610) 434-6440
Specializing in Litigation
BOYD H. WALKER
TODD S. MILLER
FRANK G. PROCYK
YALE F. EDEIKEN
---------------------------------------
http://x72.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=665426344
Subject: -- Yale F. Edeiken Attorney - Allentown, PA (Supreme Court ID#
40290) Recent Lies Documented (For The DejaCom Archives)--
Date: 09/02/2000
Author: Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMscottsmail.com>
---------- Forwarded Message Follows ----------
On 1 Sep 2000 05:23:35 GMT, Coot...@yahoo.com (Cooter) wrote:
(I will remove CooterBob's responses to make my responses easier to read.)
>On Thu, 31 Aug 2000 04:45:43 GMT, "Yale "Tubby" Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net> wrote:
>
>>Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMscottsmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:jn5rqs0ft4u7cjum9...@4ax.com...
>>> To all who have been aware of Tubby Edeiken's frivolous lawsuit
>>> against me here is an extract from an e-mail dialog that he had with my
>>> Allentown attorney. Tubby Edeiken and his poltroons who listen to him and
>>> believe him deny "disciplinary rules" exist
[See footnote at the very bottom to see two Edeikenites also deny
Discpilinary Rules exist.]
>> A lie. I stated that there are no "Disciplinary Rules" which you
>>continaully claimed exist.
Labor and Employment Law Section Quarterly, Vol. 13, #1
...Rule 5.4 of the Pennsylvania Disciplinary Rules; Rule...
...violates ethical canons and disciplinary rules governing a...
www.calbar.org/2sec/3lab/4qtly/v13n104.htm - 23k - Cached - Similar pages
Annotated Links to Legal Ethics Web Sites
...Pennsylvania Disciplinary Rules of...
...of the Chief Disciplinary Counsel. Montana Rules of...
www.abanet.org/cpr/links.html - 45k - Cached - Similar pages
(The results above are from www.google.com using search words:
Pennsylvania Disciplinary Rules. Thousands of returns resulted!)
http://www2.law.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/foliocgi.exe/pa-code/query=*/doc/{t2}?
"Pennsylvania Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct (1999 edition)"
(Would Cornell University lie about the existence of Pennsylvania
Disciplinary Rules? NO but Yale F. Edeiken has!)
See also: http://x54.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=705969332
Lie # 1 Exposed! Yale said disciplinary rules don't exist!
>>> I have said before that I do have in my possession the hardcopy of
>>> the e-mailings between my attorney and Tubby Edeiken. I'd imagine that
>>> all of Tubby's snail mails I've FWD to my attorney will be presented
>>> to court within a day or so showing Tubby Edeiken agreeing to not
>>> make direct contact with me.
>> Read it again, Bradshit. It says nothing of the kind.
If the e-mail doesn't exist and never transpired why would Yale be telling
me to read it again? Isn't he "admitting" now that it exists? (Later on in
this post he denies the existence of such e-mail!)
>>> From: Yale F. Edeiken <ya...@enter.net>
>>> Message ID: <001501bfc9d5$2ddae340$d99c10cf!oemcomputer>
>>> To: xxx...@aol.com <(just deleted my attorney's e-mail address)
Why would Tubby put my attorney's e-mail address back in after I deleted
it which I did again above if he didn't want him harassed. How ethical is
this? I guess that's another Tubby admission my attorney does exist as
well that this e-mailing exists! If I don't have an attorney why would
Tubby be posting his e-mail address!?! More deception exposed!
>>> References: <e8.501626...@aol.com
>>> Subject: Re: Edeiken v. Bradbury
>>> Date: Mon, May 29 2000 21:20:00 -0400
>>>
>>> [...]
My attorney did in fact say:
>>> > Finally as you know the disciplinary rules prohibit you from having
>>> > any direct contact with my client as long as he has an attorney.
>>> > Please refrain from having any contact with Mr. Bradberry.
Yale did in fact reply:
>>> If this confirms your representation I certainly will.
>> You will note that I make no such promise. I stated that I would IF
>>there wsa confirmation of such representation. Xxxxxx Xxxxxx replied
>>in the negative. There wsa, therefore, no undertaking on my p[part.
If the e-mail did NOT exist then why is Yale saying now: "You will note
that I make no such promise. I stated that I would IF there wsa
confirmation of such representation. Xxxxxx Xxxxxx replied in the
negative. There wsa, therefore, no undertaking on my p[part." (Also if I
don't have an attorney why would Yale be posting his name which I "X" out
in the text above? Yale lies big time!) [If the attorney I mentioned was
not representing me then why would he refer to me as his "client"?]
Lie # 2 Exposed! Yale denied existence of e-mail but now shows that he did
read it and he made comment on it! {Yale has also violated a written
agreement he made with my attorney about his agreeing to no longer making
direct contact with me in the e-mail being discussed.)
What was Yale's motive in naming my attorney? There is absolutely not one
reason he would name him other than to have him subjected to harassment.
I'll bet my attorney will really clean Tubby's clock if he gets nut case
calls and he finds out what Tubby did! How ethical is it for Tubby to do
such? How ethical is it for Tubby to distribute subpoenaed information to
his mailing list (my address and telephone number)?
Why did Tubby lie about the e-mail being forged. If it was forged that
meant he never received and therefore read it-- yet he does say above: "I
stated that I would IF there wsa confirmation of such
representation.."-- seems to me he's authenticating the e-mail as being
real despite accusing me (thus telling more lies) that I forged it as the
liar's own words CONVICT him here:
Jeffrey G. Brown had falsely accused: "Mr. Edeiken doesn't have to say a
thing. You're a forger. Your claims are worthless."
Message-ID: <jg_brown-300...@cvg-27-166-171.cinci.rr.com>
Pat Blakely said: "And as usual, Brown presents zero proof of Tavish
forging Criminal Edeiken."
Yale F. Edeiken replied: "He has already admitted that he has."
Message-ID: <dglr5.3384$V67.1...@newshog.newsread.com>
I say to Yale's reply: "You're caught in another lie! Why would I admit
that I forged an e-mail that I have a hard copy of from my attorney?"
Pat Blakely had asked: "When did Bradbury admit to forging your name
convicted criminal? Show some proof boy."
Yale F. Edeiken replied: "Sure. Be in court when the assessment of damges
hearing is held."
Message-ID: <v8mr5.3394$V67.1...@newshog.newsread.com>
Again above Tubby Edeiken lied when he implied that I forged the e-mail he
now has shown through his own bunglings that he actually received! How
many lies is Tubby now caught in?! Tubby is a pathological liar!
Lie # 3 Exposed! Yale initially implied I forged the e-mail!
Continuation of Tubby's reply to my attorney:
>>> If so I expect to hear an explanation of why you advised
>>> a client to defy a court order. As you well know that constitutes
>>> a flagrant violation of the disciplinary rules, Furter, should you
>>> actually be representing this creature, I expect a check for the
>>> sanctions already imposed to be forwarded to me immediately.
>> Note that there was no response to this.
I wonder how Tubby COULD get a response to the above if it was just a
forgery I invented to post! See how easy it is to expose this slob lying
criminal bastard? How many lies is this now Tubby aka Yale F. Edeiken Esq.
attorney Allentown, PA Supreme Court ID# 40290 has told so far? {Yale said
at the beginning of this post: "I stated that there are no "Disciplinary
Rules" which you continaully claimed exist." YET in his reply above he
mentions what he claims doesn't exist with: "As you well know that
constitutes a flagrant violation of the disciplinary rules..." Looks like
Edeiken can't keep his story straight!)
Continuation of Lies # 1 and # 2!
>>> Please God in the Heavens above let Yale deny publicly the authenticity
>>> of the above communication! I will be a very good boy too!
>> Why should I deny it. It proves you have been lying.
(Notice that Yale has called me a liar from the beginning concerning an
e-mail communication between my attorney and him and how he denied such
e-mail existed and Yale even suggested that I forged it BUT now he admits
it exists and at the same time calls me the liar!? Does the term
pathological liar ring a bell?)
>>> Yale F. Edeiken has denied in very recent postings that "disciplinary
>>> rules" exist
>> A kue. I denied that there was any such document as "Disciplianry
>>Rules" exist.
You said above: "I stated that there are no "Disciplinary Rules" which you
continaully claimed exist." Still another lie you're caught in you sleazy
shyster because you've established the above e-mail exists and in it you
said yourself: "As you well know that constitutes a flagrant violation of
the disciplinary rules.." Truth is just not your way is it Tubby!?
Continuation of Lie # 1!
>>> He has since filled my snail mail box with his
>>> "demands" and threats as well as making an obscene harassment telephone
>>> call!
>> Since Defendant Bradshit has no attory of record,
What does it say of an attorney who would speak to someone in public in
the manner you do? In the e-mail that you have now established the
existence of you read these words my attorney wrote to you: "Finally as
you know the disciplinary rules prohibit you from having any direct
contact with my client as long as he has an attorney. Please refrain from
having any contact with Mr. Bradberry." To which you replied in a written
agreement: "If this confirms your representation I certainly will."
Lie # 4 Exposed! I have an attorney and in the e-mail Yale just
acknowledged as being real Yale acknowledged in it that I had
representation! [The attorney that contacted Yale referred to me as his
client which establishes I DO have representation!]
Since making the above written agreement on May 29, 2000
Yale F. Edeiken Esq. attorney Allentown, PA Supreme Court ID# 40290 has
flooded my snail mail box with over 30 pieces of mail and he has made one
obscene harassment call to my residence which has been call traced and is
now with one District Attorney and various law enforcement authorities
telling me: "for as long as I live I will make your life a living hell..
go stick your head in the toilet and flush it because that's what your
life is worth for now on.." I ask-- what sort of an attorney behaves in
such a deplorable manner?
[...]
Yale will get his clock cleaned in court soon! He must be removed from the
legal profession if the profession is to retain professionalism, honesty,
and integrity!
I ask any attorney reading this-- Would you want Yale F. Edeiken as your
legal partner?
Did all of you see Yale's four major lies?
Doc Tavish
Here is the e-mail Yale now "admits" exists uncut:
From: Yale F. Edeiken <ya...@enter.net>
Message ID: <001501bfc9d5$2ddae340$d99c10cf!oemcomputer>
To: Dxxx...@aol.com
References: <e8.501626...@aol.com
Subject: Re: Edeiken v. Bradbury
Date: Mon, May 29 2000 21:20:00 -0400
[...]
> Finally as you know the disciplinary rules prohibit you from having
> any direct contact with my client as long as he has an attorney.
> Please refrain from having any contact with Mr. Bradberry.
If this confirms your representation I certainly will.
If so I expect to hear an explanation of why you advised
a client to defy a court order. As you well know that constitutes a
flagrant violation of the disciplinary rules, Furter, should you actually
be representing this creature, I expect a check for the sanctions already
imposed to be forwarded to me immediately.
-- Yale F. Edeiken
<End of EXACT copy of a small portion of the e-mail>
~~End of DejaCom Archive~~
Also see:
http://x72.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=664516757
Subject: Disciplinary Rules and a Bold Faced Pathological Liar -- Yale F.
"Tubby" Edeiken
Date: 08/30/2000
Author: Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMscottsmail.com>
FOOTNOTE:
Here are two Edeikenites who chose to run their mouths rather than do
simple research. They actually believe what Edeiken says!
http://x60.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=663390235
Subject: Re: Attn Pat Blakely - Please Read and Send Reply if One is Made
by The Liar and Miscreant
Date: 08/28/2000
Author: John Morris <John....@UAlberta.CA>
[...]
I had stated:
>2) He made a written agreement via e-mail to my attorney dated
>May 29, 2000 under "Disciplinary Rules" to not make any more direct
>contact with me. (My attorney sent me a printout of the e-mail
>dialogue and Yale's agreement.)
There are no such rules.
(If that is so John then why did Yale make a legally binding written
agreement with my attorney and then he said himself: "..you well know that
constitutes a flagrant violation of the disciplinary rules.."? I want Yale
to publicly deny the authenticity to the above quoted e-mail at the top.
I'll FWD it to Allentown so damned quick it will make his head spin like
Reagan in the movie The Exorcist!)
~~~End of DejaCom Archival Snippet~~~
http://x60.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=663425455
Subject: Re: Attn Pat Blakely - Please Read and Send Reply if One is Made
by The Liar and Miscreant
Date: 08/28/2000
Author: Patrick L. Humphrey <pat...@eris.io.com>
[...]
>2) He made a written agreement via e-mail to my attorney dated
>May 29, 2000 under "Disciplinary Rules" to not make any more direct
>contact with me. (My attorney sent me a printout of the e-mail dialogue
>and Yale's agreement.)
Ain't no such animal as "disciplinary rules", Scottie.
~~~End of DejaCom Archival Snippet~~~
Also see:
http://x69.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=665060615
Subject: Re: Edeiken caught lying yet again. Bradbury right again.
Date: 09/01/2000
Well folks-- did you count all the obvious lies? Remember Yale is an
attorney too! What does Yale's style in USENET say of his ability to be an
attorney?
---------------------------------
For the record here is an on the moment (8:12pm December 30, 2000 return
from www.google.com using search words: Pennsylvania Disciplinary Rules:
Searched the web for Pennsylvania Disciplinary Rules. Results 1 - 10 of
about 12,800.
Document - Folio Infobase
This browser doesn't support frames. For best results,
update to Netscape 3 or Internet Explorer 3.
www2.law.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/foliocgi.exe/Pa-code
Legal Information Institute
This browser doesn't support frames.
www2.law.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/foliocgi.exe/pa-code/query=*/doc/{t2}
[ More results from www2.law.cornell.edu ]
PA Bulletin, Doc. No. 00-283
... [204 PA. CODE CH. 83]. Amendment of Rule 531 of the Pennsylvania Rules
of Disciplinary
Enforcement; No. 6 Disciplinary Rules Doc. No. 1. [30 Pa.B. 865]. Order.
www.pabulletin.com/secure/data/vol30/30-8/283.html
PA Bulletin, Doc. No. 00-416
... [204 PA. CODE CH. 83]. Amendment of Rule 514(b) of the Pennsylvania
Rules of Disciplinary
Enforcement; No. 7 Disciplinary Rules Doc. No. 1. [30 Pa.B. 1357]. Order.
www.pabulletin.com/secure/data/vol30/30-11/416.html
[ More results from www.pabulletin.com ]
In Re Amendment of Rule 531, Disciplinary Enforcement
... 1. Rule 531 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Disciplinary Enforcement
is amended as set forth in the attached form;. ...
www.palawnet.com/notices/note680.htm - 3k - Cached - Similar pages
Pennsylvania Code
CHAPTER 83. PENNSYLVANIA RULES OF DISCIPLINARY ENFORCEMENT.
Subchap. Rule. A. PRELIMINARY PROVISIONS ...
www.pacode.com/secure/data/204/chapter83/chap83toc.html
Annotated Links to Legal Ethics Web Sites
... Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct
as provided
by the Legal Information Institute. Also included at the Legal Information
www.abanet.org/cpr/links.html
Trumka - Pa. Bar Complaint
... This is a formal complaint under the Pennsylvania Rules of
Disciplinary Enforcement
of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania to request that the Disciplinary ...
www.nlpc.org/olap/AFLCIO/rlt-pabar.htm
Labor and Employment Law Section Quarterly, Vol. 13, #1
... 5.04 of the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct; Rule 5.4
of the Pennsylvania
Disciplinary Rules; Rule 5.4(a) of the District of Columbia Rules of ...
www.calbar.org/2sec/3lab/4qtly/v13n104.htm
LegalEthics.com:State Ethics Resources
... Rules of Conduct. Pennsylvania Disciplinary Rules of Professional
Conduct as provided by the Legal Information Institute. ...
www.legalethics.com/ethics.law?state=Pennsylvania
----------------------------------
REMEMBER FOLKS Yale F. Edeiken has claimed:
From my previous post:
http://x56.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=671083421
"Disciplinary Rules of the State of Pensylvania and Oh So Many Lies!
(Fully Documented)"
http://x56.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=667124433
Subject: Re: NOTICE TO YALE EDEIKEN
Date: 09/08/2000
Author: Yale F. Edeiken <ya...@enter.net>
[...]
>YOU are still in violation of the disciplinary rules which
>you have denied exist and caught in a lie about their existence!
Faklse. No such document as yje "Discipplainary Rules"exists..
~~~End of DejaCom Archival Snippet #1 ~~~
http://x56.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=664616664
Subject: Re: Disciplinary Rules and a Bold Faced Pathological Liar -- Yale
F. "Tubby" Edeiken <Corrections Made Release 2>
Date: 08/31/2000
Author: Yale F. Edeiken <ya...@enter.net>
Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMscottsmail.com> wrote in message
news:jn5rqs0ft4u7cjum9...@4ax.com...
> To all who have been aware of Tubby Edeiken's frivolous lawsuit
> against me here is an extract from an e-mail dialog that he had with my
> Allentown attorney. Tubby Edeiken and his poltroons who listen to him and
> believe him deny "disciplinary rules" exist
A lie. I stated that there are no "Disciplinary Rules" which you
continaully claimed exist.
~~~End of DejaCom Archival Snippet #2 ~~~
http://x56.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=663768955
Subject: Re: Attn Pat Blakely - Please Read and Send Reply if One is Made
by The Liar and Miscreant
Date: 08/29/2000
Author: Yale F. Edeiken <ya...@enter.net>
> 2) He made a written agreement via e-mail to my attorney dated
> May 29, 2000 under "Disciplinary Rules" to not make any more direct
> contact with me. (My attorney sent me a printout of the e-mail dialogue
> and Yale's agreement.)
Dirst, thre is no such document as the "Disciplinary Rules."
~~~End of DejaCom Archival Snippet #3 ~~~
See how Yale denies Disciplinary Rules exist yet he refered to them in
the post at the top < http://x72.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=665426344> by his
words: "As you well know that constitutes a flagrant violation of the
disciplinary rules..." Strange that an attorney who has repeatedly denied
such rules exist refers to them! Would YOU want this shyster as YOUR law
partner?
Doc Tavish
--
"For I will give you a mouth and wisdom, which none of your adversaries
will be able to withstand or contradict." Son of Man {Luke 21:15 RSV}