Sara Salzman Proves She is an Accomplice to Yale! Re: Ken Lewis Admits to Criminal Trespass and Crijminal Breaking and Entering? aika Re: Patrick L Humphrey - you got some bills coming
Dedicated to Yale F. Edeiken
<catamont-09CFDC...@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>You might also note that Mr. Edeiken has not contacted Mr. Bradbury
>on THREE YEARS. In that time, Bradbury has continued to defame and
>harass Mr. Edeiken,
How is exposing him for the liar and perjurer he is defaming him?
>threaten Mr. Edeiken's wife,
How did I threaten his wife other than reporting her false advertising which
evidently got her shut down?!
>post Mr. Edeiken's address, etc.
AFTER he has done such to me and only in reply!
>Now Mr. Bradbury is hysterical because Mr. Edeiken has *gasp* sent
>him poetry in the mail.
See how you just proved you are his accomplice and how you two communicate and
plot!? Where did I state Yale F. Edeiken sent me "poetry in the mail"? How do
you know such? See how you show RICO and Yale did send a threat of violence
against me and.....
Here is all I posted:
"BTW Alien-- your hero is now engaging in acts against me which will surely get
him disbarred! Seems Yale just won't stop and yes I do have the goods on him and
yes law enforcement now has it in their files too! I am quite sure the agency
handling my complaints won't be the least bit pleased when they get statements
from my law enforcement about the latest threats and harassment your hero has
sent my way! I can't tell you more because I don't want to tip your hero off!"
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=6ach309t1a06s414q...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Re: Att: SARA for the 3rd time S_0222
Message-ID: <6ach309t1a06s414q...@4ax.com>
Date: 22 Feb 2004 13:38:12 GMT
Where did I mention poetry?
BTW I will tell you this- your pimp had the stupidity to send me snail mail
on his own letterhead in a law firm's envelope etc. entirely traceable which in
part stated: "To Scotty Bradshit: I wanted to remind you that Purim is
approaching. Some people will play nasty tricks on scum like you at this time
of year..."
The above has been turned over to law enforcement along with the rest of his
harassing intimidations and you can count on it that the people in Pennsylvania
will not be one bit pleased with the reports they will be receiving concerning
an Officer of the Court engaging in such a reprehensible manner! His latest
escapades are icing on the cake and I really don't see why he won't be disbarred
and have his license revoked this time!
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=4n4u10thkq0jntg82...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Patrick L. Humphrey-- A Dangerous Stalker? - How To Identify Stalkers
Info UPDATED LINKS S_0202
Message-ID: <4n4u10thkq0jntg82...@4ax.com>
Date: 3 Feb 2004 03:56:50 GMT
(EXCERPTED)
WHAT IS STALKING?
STALKING - pattern of words or conduct that is intended to cause and does cause
the targeted person to fear death, assault, bodily injury, or CSC upon the
person
HARASSMENT - pattern of intentional substantial and unreason- able intrusion
which causes the targeted person to suffer mental distress
PSYCHOLOGICAL AND BEHAVIORAL PROFILE OF STALKERS
Simple Obsession Stalkers:
Characteristics include:
1 personality disorders.
2 emotional immaturity, jealousy and extreme insecurity.
3 inability to succeed in relationships by socially-accepted means.
4 dominating and intimidating victims in order to bolster own self-esteem.
TYPES OF STALKING BEHAVIOR
1 harassing telephone calls, which includes obscene calls and hang-ups
2 sending threatening mail, which is a federal felony
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Number 2 is going to be reported tomorrow by my Sheriff to the appropriate
agency!!
Yale F. Edeiken has engaged in: "harassing telephone calls, which includes
obscene calls" AND "sending threatening mail, which is a federal felony".
Care to deny it?
Your pal has also engaged in other criminal harassments as well and that is all
I can say for now-- why tip the bastard off!?
>Isn't life wonderful?
Yes it is because you kooks keep running your mouths and giving me essential
proofs!
>Sara
Tavish
--Criminal Yale F. Edeiken's deplorable record:
http://padisciplinaryboard.org/attdiscdcd.php?id=40290
(Link active October 29, 2003. Archived locally as: shyster_censured)
Attorney ID - 40290
Edeiken, Yale F.
^^^^^^^ ^^^^ ^
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Attorney Inquiry
Attorney ID Case County District
40290 122 DB 95 Lehigh II Public Censure Administered 10/20/98
^^^^^^^^^
<STOP>
A PDF file is available which gives a report on the above
122 DB 95 against Shyster Yale Fatso Edeiken:
http://padisciplinaryboard.org/attopinion.php?case=122DB95
^^^^^^^
http://www.courts.state.pa.us/OpPosting/disciplinaryboard/dboardopinions/122DB95.RPT.pdf
(Link active October 28, 2003. Archived locally as: "Edeiken_Gets_His" and
122DB95.RPT)
The Disciplinary Board was content to give Yale F. Edeiken a "private reprimand"
but he continued to act like the psychotic nut case he is and defied them and
refused to appear at his hearing more than once! He was then "forced" to appear
and the "private reprimand" had escalated to "PUBLIC CENSURE" by the highest
court of that bastard's state! Furthermore the Disciplinary Board closed with:
"It is further ORDERED that respondent [Yale F. Edeiken] shall pay costs to the
Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), PaR.D.E." IOW Yale had to pay the
Disciplinary Board to "kick his shyster ass" AFTER the Disciplinary Board of the
Supreme Court of the State of Pennsylvania had to serve numerous notices upon
him and compel him to attend his disciplinary hearing!! Yale also had to pay for
all costs of the investigation too! It's all detailed in that PDF file!! GO
LOOK!!
BTW Yale F. Edeiken had already received one "Private Reprimand" in 1993 and
Yale had received an "Informal Admonition" in 1995! Then the bastard got "PUBLIC
CENSURE" in 1998!!! Looks like Yale F. Edeiken is real shining example of the
legal profession doesn't it? Why that shyster still has his law license is a
mystery to me! His assaulting a Deputy Sheriff should have done him in- in 1990!
I.E.
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=s2hq10drpp50ik59v9litpvrdjr1203099%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Edeikook Follies #6 Yale F. Edeiken Goes on a Rampage at His County
Courthouse V2.1 S_0102
Message-ID: <s2hq10drpp50ik59v...@4ax.com>
Date: 1 Feb 2004 19:02:18 GMT
Yale is also a perjurer who also makes criminal death threats using subpoenaed
information:
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=0neq10177ekocu899...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Sara Salzman Won't Comment on These Forgeries - I Wonder Why!.. V2.0
Message-ID: <0neq10177ekocu899...@4ax.com>
Date: 1 Feb 2004 18:21:27 GMT
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=gsk76vcng7f0cugmimalglbno6bmgmslhk%404ax.com&rnum=2
Subject: Yale F. Edeiken Admits Sending Death Threats Over The Internet is a
Federal Crime (Which He Has Done!)
Message-ID: <gsk76vcng7f0cugmi...@4ax.com>
_______________________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>
Dedicated to Yale F. Edeiken
Alien <al...@msn.net> wrote:
>On 23 Feb 2004 00:31:23 GMT, Dedicated to Yale F. Edeiken
><F...@NO-REPLIES-PLEASE.NET> wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 23 Feb 2004 00:09:23 GMT, <fvgi30puqcrdlqmbv...@4ax.com>
>>Alien <al...@msn.net> wrote:
>>
>>>On 22 Feb 2004 23:31:44 GMT, Dedicated to Yale F. Edeiken
>>><F...@NO-REPLIES-PLEASE.NET> wrote:
>>>(snippage for Bandwidth savings)
>>>
>>>>"BTW Alien-- your hero is now engaging in acts against me which will surely get
>>>>him disbarred!
>>>
>>>Mr. Bradbury, and I have mentioned in the past I don't believe in hero
>>>worship.
>>
>>I must have missed that.
>
>I understand, things get over looked in the maze of posts, not to
>mention that critical thinking may become muddled when posting in
>haste.
>
>>>>Seems Yale just won't stop and yes I do have the goods on him and
>>>>yes law enforcement now has it in their files too! I am quite sure the agency
>>>>handling my complaints won't be the least bit pleased when they get statements
>>>>from my law enforcement about the latest threats and harassment your hero has
>>>>sent my way!
>>>
>>>I must again remind you of my post above.
>
>My response was to once again remind you that I don't have heros.
>I did not post any thing further, as all the rest was from another
>poster.
I understand that- I merely added how I replied to Sara seeing how she had
implicated herself as being a knowledgable accomplice of sorts in a federal
crime namely sending harassing and threatening communications by the United
States Parcel Service. I made no mention of what Yale was doing yet she piped up
with (and my reply shown):
<START>
On Sun, 22 Feb 2004 15:01:50 -0700,
<catamont-09CFDC...@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>You might also note that Mr. Edeiken has not contacted Mr. Bradbury
>on THREE YEARS. In that time, Bradbury has continued to defame and
>harass Mr. Edeiken,
How is exposing him for the liar and perjurer he is defaming him?
>threaten Mr. Edeiken's wife,
How did I threaten his wife other than reporting her false advertising which
evidently got her shut down?!
>post Mr. Edeiken's address, etc.
AFTER he has done such to me and only in reply!
>Now Mr. Bradbury is hysterical because Mr. Edeiken has *gasp* sent
>him poetry in the mail.
See how you just proved you are his accomplice and how you two communicate and
plot!? Where did I state Yale F. Edeiken sent me "poetry in the mail"? How do
you know such? See how you show RICO and Yale did send a threat of violence
against me and.....
Here is all I posted:
<start/quote>
"BTW Alien-- your hero is now engaging in acts against me which will surely get
him disbarred! Seems Yale just won't stop and yes I do have the goods on him and
yes law enforcement now has it in their files too! I am quite sure the agency
handling my complaints won't be the least bit pleased when they get statements
from my law enforcement about the latest threats and harassment your hero has
sent my way! I can't tell you more because I don't want to tip your hero off!"
<end/quote>
>Isn't life wonderful?
>Sara
<STOP>
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=n0di305jhh81fk79u...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
-Subject: Sara Salzman Proves She is an Accomplice to Yale!..
-Message-ID: <n0di305jhh81fk79u...@4ax.com>
-Date: 22 Feb 2004 23:31:44 GMT
All of the above as addressed toward Sara Salzman and NOT you!
>>Which I have answered with:
>>
>>http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=6ach309t1a06s414q...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
>>Subject: Re: Att: SARA for the 3rd time S_0222
>>Message-ID: <6ach309t1a06s414q...@4ax.com>
>>Date: 22 Feb 2004 13:38:12 GMT
Tavish
Special Note: Yale F. Edeiken Esq. of Allentown, Pennsylvania- Supreme Court
ID# 40290 has falsely asserted he was associated with the two law firms
mentioned below-- Todd Miller & Associates and Trainor Law Offices. Both law
firms told me first hand that Yale F. Edeiken was never an attorney at their
firms!! That is fact!
(Archived locally as: YaleTheNut)
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=SH9g7.634%247d....@newshog.newsread.com&lr=&hl=en
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Subject: Re: The Common Thread To All These Cancel Announcements...
Message-ID: <SH9g7.634$7d.2...@newshog.newsread.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 15:06:26 GMT
Defendant Bradshit <rdoc_...@my-deja.cpm, tavi...@ix.netcom,com> wrote
in message news:7lp1otkrsh37k7ioi...@4ax.com...
[...]
> Care to tell all of us why both Todd Miller and Paul Trainor distanced
> themselves from you
Because they were dealing with someone who was "mentally unstable"
(their dscription) and a "crazy man" (again, their description) who they
wanted to go away as quckly as possible.
~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~
Compare what Yale said on August 20, 2001 concerning two law firms attitudes
toward his presence with his own words: "they were dealing with someone who was
"mentally unstable" (their dscription) and a "crazy man" (again, their
description) who they wanted to go away as quckly as possible" to this which was
posted July 4, 2000: "Tubby has no respect from the legal community and as a
whole they wish he'd just waddle away."
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=20000704143439.5399.qmail%40nym.alias.net&rnum=4
From: SoloP...@nym.alias.net
Subject: Yale _Tubby_ Edeiken
Date: 2000/07/04
Message-ID: <200007041434...@nym.alias.net>
Sara Salzman
Hash: SHA1
In article <3rui30lts3c5ibc0u...@4ax.com>,
So, knowing --after the fact-- that Yale sent you a LETTER makes me
an accomplice?
And since when is sending poetry through the mail harassing and
threatening?
> I made no mention of what Yale was doing yet she piped
> up
> with (and my reply shown):
>
Yep. I know Yale saent you a POEM in the mail.
> See how you show RICO and Yale did send a threat of violence
> against me and.....
>
Let's ask all those lawyers you cross-posted to: If Yale sends
Bradbury a LETTER with a poem in it, and I know about it after the
fact, does that equal RICO?
> part stated: "To Scotty Bradshit: I wanted to remind you that Purim
> is approaching. Some people will play nasty tricks on scum like you
> at this time of year..."
>
By the way, Yale also sent me this in response to your moronic
ravings:
"Note the dishonest editing, so typical of Bradshit, which alters
the
meaning of the message. It is clear to any literate or intelligent
person (two groups to which Bradshit has never belonged) that there
is no threat of violence or other illegal action whatsoever. I will
walk into any American court at any time and happily expose Bradshit
as an obnoxious lying criminal who is a hopeless crybaby when his
victims fight back. I will proudly admit that I sent him the
following note and, as long as there is a Constitution in the United
States, I expect that, when he he stops laughing at Bradshit, the
judge's reaction will to be towarn the Morbid Obesity that filing
false reports with the police is a crime:
"I wanted to remind you that Purim is approaching. Some people
will play nasty tricks on scum like you at that time of the year.
Take care and, most important, keep that blood pressure in check. We
wouldn't want you to have a stroke. Unless, of course, we can watch
and laugh.
"Speaking of laughing we thought you would get a chuckle out of
this:
When you listen to Bradbury bellow
You might think he's a very brave fellow
But we all know
That it's easy to show
That his belly's a deep shade of yellow."
He has, of course, proved that once more."
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3 - not licensed for commercial use: www.pgp.com
iQA/AwUBQDn/ECdySwjCuT94EQIcAwCcCk8ULU+V/2HtPctkXhvFg0J2w4sAn3H2
8NBc4N6TMEic/yQGSPqbR1Pi
=Q+em
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
-My name is not "Fatbury Scumbag" you stupid lying Jew bastard. Name call
is all a pathetic loser like you has! You have yet to prove me wrong
you dirty filthy lying Jew bastard!
-I don't rely on personal attacks as my means of posting and
the bulk of my posts prove so! You can't discern the difference.
BTW my name is not Fatboy you stupid kike.
--Scott Bradbury, who completely misses the irony of the above
Dedicated to Yale F. Edeiken
<catamont-800D49...@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
The contents were meant to harass and intimidate and to threaten.
>And since when is sending poetry through the mail harassing and
>threatening?
When it is obviously unwanted and from a person who started a four year long
campaign of criminal harassment against me!
>> I made no mention of what Yale was doing yet she piped up with (and my reply shown):
>
>Yep. I know Yale saent you a POEM in the mail.
>
>
>> See how you show RICO and Yale did send a threat of violence
>> against me and.....
>
>Let's ask all those lawyers you cross-posted to: If Yale sends
>Bradbury a LETTER with a poem in it, and I know about it after the
>fact, does that equal RICO?
Yale is an Officer of the Court who waged an unsuccessful malicious prosecution
against me and any communications from him is considered harassment seeing how
his letters are meant to be demeaning!
As for your: "I know about it after the fact, does that equal RICO?" isn't that
what Yale tried to charge me with for my alleged knowledge of the Nizkor
Phonebook? YES OR NO? I had no knowledge yet in this post you prove to have had
knowledge!
>> part stated: "To Scotty Bradshit: I wanted to remind you that Purim
>> is approaching. Some people will play nasty tricks on scum like you
>> at this time of year..."
>>
>
>By the way, Yale also sent me this in response to your moronic
>ravings:
Thanks for further proof you stupid pig!
> "Note the dishonest editing, so typical of Bradshit, which alters
>the meaning of the message. It is clear to any literate or intelligent
>person (two groups to which Bradshit has never belonged) that there
>is no threat of violence or other illegal action whatsoever. I will
>walk into any American court at any time and happily expose Bradshit
>as an obnoxious lying criminal who is a hopeless crybaby when his
>victims fight back.
Yale isn't a victim! He's the one who harasses people and as for me being a
coward-- why didn't he file his brief for his appeal or re-file in my
jurisdiction? I would be glad to expose his perjury before a jury of my peers!
I.E.
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=0neq10177ekocu899...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Sara Salzman Won't Comment on These Forgeries - I Wonder Why!.. V2.0
Message-ID: <0neq10177ekocu899...@4ax.com>
Date: 1 Feb 2004 18:21:27 GMT
>I will proudly admit that I sent him the following note and, as long
>as there is a Constitution in the United States, I expect that, when he
>he stops laughing at Bradshit,
Harassing a former defendant you lost to is not protected by The Constitution
Yale! Deliberately trying to send unwanted mail and making unwanted telephone
calls aren't protected either and especially when said communications are sent
with the obvious intent to harass people!
>the judge's reaction will to be towarn the
>Morbid Obesity
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
That is another lie Yale started!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=5oimrvs7agr9m92kj3q74a22vba99coeos%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: The $10,000 Challenge to Ken McVay aka Re: Harold Covington & Scott
Bradbury: The Blubberbury Twins
Message-ID: <5oimrvs7agr9m92kj...@4ax.com>
References: <bpe9d...@enews3.newsguy.com>
Date: 19 Nov 2003 11:29:26 GMT
For a fact Yale is the Morbidly Obese slob known as The Waddler by those of
Lehigh County!
~~Yale F. Edeiken is the True Fatboy and Fat Freak~~
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=f78ogvk6b78m28v34...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: My Former Attorney Confirmed Yale F. "Tubby" Edeiken is a Very Obese
Waddler V2.1 Message-ID: <f78ogvk6b78m28v34...@4ax.com>
Date: 9 Jul 2003 13:58:44 GMT
>that filing false reports with the police is a crime:
I have filed not false police reports and the Sheriff even took your
communication as a veiled threat!
Some conduct for an Officer of the Court to engage in and for a bastard to have
to hide behind an ugly obese woman such as yourself to express it!
http://www.westword.com/issues/11209/2/image.gif <Sitting and authoring S&M<
http://www.westword.com/issues/11209/4/image.gif <Standing Medusa look<
No wonder why Yale has been before the Disciplinary Board of the Highest Court
of his State numerous times!
I.E.
> "I wanted to remind you that Purim is approaching. Some people
>will play nasty tricks on scum like you at that time of the year.
Looks like a veiled threat to me as well it did to law enforcement and
especially coming from an unethical bastard who lost his malicious prosecution
against me!
>Take care and, most important, keep that blood pressure in check. We
>wouldn't want you to have a stroke. Unless, of course, we can watch
>and laugh.
>
> "Speaking of laughing we thought you would get a chuckle out of
>this:
>
>When you listen to Bradbury bellow
>You might think he's a very brave fellow
>But we all know
>That it's easy to show
>That his belly's a deep shade of yellow."
>
> He has, of course, proved that once more."
How is any of the above honoring the Rules of Professional Conduct Yale is bound
to adhere to?
I.E.
Xref:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=p8tk205l7dp5r46ps9mk3prisha35qtup7%404ax.com&rnum=1
The Pennsylvania Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct plainly state
in their preamble:
"A lawyer's conduct should conform to the requirements of the law, both in
professional service to clients and in the lawyer's business and personal
affairs. A lawyer should use the law's procedures only for legitimate
purposes and not to harass or intimidate others. A lawyer should
demonstrate respect for the legal system and for those who serve it,
including judges, other lawyers and public officials."
http://www2.law.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/foliocgi.exe/pa-code/query=*/doc/{t2}?
"Pennsylvania Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct (1999 edition)"
<<Tavish comment February 23, 2004: Notice the part which stated: "A lawyer's
conduct should conform to the requirements of the law.. in the lawyer's..
personal affairs"? Is the unethical conduct of harassing a former defendant
adhering to the "Rules of Professional Conduct"?>>
Yale has obviously used "the law's procedures only to harass or intimidate
others!" No wonder why he denies the Disciplinary Rules of Professional
Conduct exist-- he won't observe them!
Here is Yale denying the rules exist:
"I stated that there are no "Disciplinary Rules" which you
continaully claimed exist."
"Dirst, thre is no such document as the "Disciplinary Rules."
HERE IS WHY YALE DENIES SUCH RULES EXIST:
www.dpg-law.com/opinions/pa-suprm/9905/0975-valentino.html
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL,
Petitioner
v.
PHILIP A. VALENTINO,
Respondent
[J-14-1999]
No. 306 Disciplinary Docket No. 3
No. 26 DB 97 Disciplinary Board
Attorney Registration No. 37959
(Philadelphia)
ARGUED: February 2, 1999
DECIDED: MAY 20, 1999
OPINION
MR. JUSTICE ZAPPALA
This disciplinary matter arises from a Petition for Discipline charging
Respondent, Philip Valentino, Jr., with a violation of Pa.R.D.E.
203(b)(1), based upon his conviction of one count of mail fraud, 18 U.S.C.
1341. The Disciplinary Board has recommended that Respondent be disbarred.
[...]
In any disciplinary case arising from a criminal conviction, the events
surrounding the criminal charge must be taken into account when
determining an appropriate measure of discipline. Office of Disciplinary
Counsel v. Eilberg, 497 Pa. 388, 441 A.2d 1193 (1982). Consideration is to
be given to any mitigating factors that are present. Id. Moreover, we
recognize that the sentence imposed by the federal court has already
provided Respondent with punishment for his misconduct. Disciplinary
sanctions, in contrast, are not designed for their punitive effects, but
rather are intended to protect the public from unfit attorneys and
maintain the integrity of the legal system. Office of Disciplinary Counsel
v. Christie, 536 Pa. 394, 639 A.2d 782 (1994).
~~~~~End of Excerpt~~~~~~
The key sentence in the above: "Disciplinary sanctions.. are not designed
for their punitive effects, but rather are intended to protect the public
from unfit attorneys and maintain the integrity of the legal system."
I ask again- Is Yale F. Edeiken Esq. an ethical attorney who brings respect to
the legal system?
In FACT here is Yale F. Edeiken himself referring to "Disciplinary Rules" in his
own e-mail to my attorney which I posted to USENET which he denied at first
existing he accused me of forging it AND then he admitted it was true! How is
this as proof that this attorney has a very major problem with truth and ethics?
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=11a9hvoh7jarecmhd8g1p0fsmgklvb8mfv%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: For a FACT-- Yale F. Edeiken HAS Been Disciplined by The Disciplinary
Board of the Supreme Court of The State of Pennsylvania! aka Re: A Simple
Question for Mr. Bradbury
Message-ID: <11a9hvoh7jarecmhd...@4ax.com>
EXCERPT
Subject: Re: Disciplinary Rules and a Bold Faced Pathological Liar -- Yale F.
"Tubby" Edeiken <Corrections Made Release 2>
Message-ID: <Xplr5.3387$V67.1...@newshog.newsread.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 04:45:43 GMT
Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMscottsmail.com> wrote in message
news:jn5rqs0ft4u7cjum9...@4ax.com...
> To all who have been aware of Tubby Edeiken's frivolous lawsuit
> against me here is an extract from an e-mail dialog that he had with my
> Allentown attorney. Tubby Edeiken and his poltroons who listen to him and
> believe him deny "disciplinary rules" exist
A lie. I stated that there are no "Disciplinary Rules" which you
continaully claimed exist.
> I have said before that I do have in my possession the hardcopy of
> the e-mailings between my attorney and Tubby Edeiken. I'd imagine that all
> of Tubby's snail mails I've FWD to my attorney will be presented to court
> within a day or so showing Tubby Edeiken agreeing to not make direct
> contact with me.
Read it again, Bradshit. It says nothing of the kind.
> From: Yale F. Edeiken <ya...@enter.net>
> Message ID: <001501bfc9d5$2ddae340$d99c10cf!oemcomputer>
> To: Dyali...@aol.com
> References: <e8.501626...@aol.com
> Subject: Re: Edeiken v. Bradbury
> Date: Mon, May 29 2000 21:20:00 -0400
>
> [...]
>
> > Finally as you know the disciplinary rules prohibit you from having
> > any direct contact with my client as long as he has an attorney.
> > Please refrain from having any contact with Mr. Bradberry.
:.
> If this confirms your representation I certainly will.
You will note that I make no such promise. I stated that I would IF
there wsa confirmation of such representation. Daylin Leach replied in the
negative. There wsa, therefore, no undertaking on my p[part.
<<Tavish comment July 15, 2003: How is it your alcohol shriveled brain
interprets: " my client as long as he has an attorney" as being a negative
response? Also why didn't you honor a written agreement you made with my
attorney when he plainly told you: "Finally as you know the disciplinary rules
prohibit you from having any direct contact with my client as long as he has an
attorney. Please refrain from having any contact with Mr. Bradberry [sic]."
Leach referred to me as "my client on May 29, 2000!! YOU CERTAINLY DID NOT HONOR
THAT AGREEMENT AND THAT IS WHY HE TOLD ME TO SEND ALL OF YOU CRAP BACK
UNOPENED.>>
> If so I expect to hear an explanation of why you advised
> a client to defy a court order. As you well know that constitutes
> a flagrant violation of the disciplinary rules, Furter, should you
> actually be representing this creature, I expect a check for the
> sanctions already imposed to be forwarded to me immediately.
<<Tavish comment July 15, 2003: Everyone notice that Yale mentions
"disciplinary rules"?>>
~~End of Extract~~
=========================================================================
Funny thing that I was sued for harassing Yale but look who has actually been
harassing who the whole time!
What Yale admits here best explains his mental state:
Special Note: Yale F. Edeiken Esq. of Allentown, Pennsylvania- Supreme Court
ID# 40290 has falsely asserted he was associated with the two law firms
mentioned below-- Todd Miller & Associates and Trainor Law Offices. Both law
firms told me first hand that Yale F. Edeiken was never an attorney at their
firms!! That is fact!
(Archived locally as: YaleTheNut)
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=SH9g7.634%247d....@newshog.newsread.com&lr=&hl=en
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Subject: Re: The Common Thread To All These Cancel Announcements...
Message-ID: <SH9g7.634$7d.2...@newshog.newsread.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 15:06:26 GMT
Defendant Bradshit <rdoc_...@my-deja.cpm, tavi...@ix.netcom,com> wrote
in message news:7lp1otkrsh37k7ioi...@4ax.com...
[...]
> Care to tell all of us why both Todd Miller and Paul Trainor distanced
> themselves from you
Because they were dealing with someone who was "mentally unstable"
(their dscription) and a "crazy man" (again, their description) who they
wanted to go away as quckly as possible.
~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~
Is someone who admits the above and engages in public brawling in his own county
courthouse elevator, and who harasses a former defendant he lost his kook
lawsuit to acts of a person with a sound mind? Are you, yourself, of a sound
mind when you engage in S&M Bondage and Torture? (All documented below too!)
Is calling me "Bradshit" consistent with being a professional and ethical
attorney:? It is consistent with a bastard who is not a member of the bar
association, who is not a partner in a law firm, who is not in the phone book
under attorneys, who uses legit law firms as drops for his own seedy agendas,
and who has been disciplined numerous times by the highest court of his state.
OTOH my former attorney has a spotless record and had his own law firm and who
is now a successful elected representative of his state whereas all Yale is- is
an ambulance chaser and a third rate attorney and to quote another source:
"Tubby is better known as a third rate lawyer who is only hired by those who
can't get a hearing from more "mainstream" attorneys. Tubby can only represent
those types who will sue their neighbor because the neighbor's dog shits in
their yard. Tubby is also known for filing lawsuits for the most trivial
reasons."
Xref:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=20000704143439.5399.qmail%40nym.alias.net&rnum=4
Subject: Yale _Tubby_ Edeiken
Date: 2000/07/04
Message-ID: <200007041434...@nym.alias.net>
BTW the above has been confirmed by numerous people and Yale's current behavior
also supports the fact Yale is a third rate shyster!
Need I say more?
Tavish
--Criminal Yale F. Edeiken's deplorable record:
http://padisciplinaryboard.org/attdiscdcd.php?id=40290
(Link active October 29, 2003. Archived locally as: shyster_censured)
Attorney ID - 40290
Edeiken, Yale F.
^^^^^^^ ^^^^ ^
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Attorney Inquiry
Attorney ID Case County District
40290 122 DB 95 Lehigh II Public Censure Administered 10/20/98
^^^^^^^^^
<STOP>
A PDF file is available which gives a report on the above
122 DB 95 against Shyster Yale Fatso Edeiken:
http://padisciplinaryboard.org/attopinion.php?case=122DB95
^^^^^^^
http://www.courts.state.pa.us/OpPosting/disciplinaryboard/dboardopinions/122DB95.RPT.pdf
(Link active October 28, 2003. Archived locally as: "Edeiken_Gets_His" and
122DB95.RPT)
Yale F. Edeiken had already received one "Private Reprimand" in 1993 and Yale
had received an "Informal Admonition" in 1995! Then the bastard got "PUBLIC
CENSURE" in 1998!!! Looks like Yale F. Edeiken is real shining example of the
legal profession doesn't it? Why that shyster still has his law license is a
mystery to me! His assaulting a Deputy Sheriff should have done him in- in 1990!
I.E.
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=s2hq10drpp50ik59v9litpvrdjr1203099%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Edeikook Follies #6 Yale F. Edeiken Goes on a Rampage at His County
Courthouse V2.1 S_0102
Message-ID: <s2hq10drpp50ik59v...@4ax.com>
Date: 1 Feb 2004 19:02:18 GMT
Yale is also a perjurer who also makes criminal death threats using subpoenaed
information:
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=0neq10177ekocu899...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Sara Salzman Won't Comment on These Forgeries - I Wonder Why!.. V2.0
Message-ID: <0neq10177ekocu899...@4ax.com>
Date: 1 Feb 2004 18:21:27 GMT
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=gsk76vcng7f0cugmimalglbno6bmgmslhk%404ax.com&rnum=2
Subject: Yale F. Edeiken Admits Sending Death Threats Over The Internet is a
Federal Crime (Which He Has Done!)
Message-ID: <gsk76vcng7f0cugmi...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=hpa1uv0m63koaqbo4...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: V2.0b Sara "The Fist" Salzman's Attempt at Revisionism FAILS- She Wrote
The FIST Postings! Date: 17 Dec 2003 19:40:10 GMT
Message-ID: <hpa1uv0m63koaqbo4...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=ige2uvsjk0bfi54at...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Re: V2.0b Sara "The Fist" Salzman's Attempt at Revisionism FAILS- She
Wrote The FIST Postings! Date: 18 Dec 2003 06:13:32 GMT
Message-ID: <ige2uvsjk0bfi54at...@4ax.com>
Despite overwhelming evidence Sara "The Fist" will keep repeating
her lies and remain in denial.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sara Salzman aka Sara "The Fist" Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> did post:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: ssch...@infinet.com
Newsgroups: alt.sex.bondage
Subject: Re: Fist fucking (1)
Message-ID: <sschwartz-110...@p14.infinet.com>
Date: 11 Feb 95 13:19:07 GMT
References: <3hf46h$p...@nyx10.cs.du.edu> <3hg9a1$i...@newsbf02.news.aol.com>
Organization: InfiNet
Lines: 19
NNTP-Posting-Host: p14.infinet.com
In article <3hg9a1$i...@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, lant...@aol.com (L
Antoniou) wrote:
> Perhaps you should read the messages before responding. If you read all
> of mine, you will see that eventually I do suggest the "duck" position -
> all fingers together. What I (and Elf) was responding to was the
> suggestion that one *begin* fisting in that position. Of course, you go
> on to say *exactly that*.
>
In fact, Laura, I did NOT say you should begin in the "duck" position. I
just stated that it was the eventual position to achieve.
I'm sorry if I did not make that clear in my post. I *did* state that fist
fucking was not something I had done very often, and merely wanted to
impart my own (limited) experience. <END>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Imagine the person in these photos assuming the "duck" position
and "fisting" herself!
http://www.westword.com/issues/11209/2/image.gif
http://www.westword.com/issues/11209/4/image.gif
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=0ap6uv43dm8uefmm3...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Is Sara "The Whipped" Salzman Still Being Whipped by Her Husband's
Electric Whipping Machine?
Message-ID: <0ap6uv43dm8uefmm3...@4ax.com>
Date: 19 Dec 2003 22:00:00 GMT
Sara "The Fist" Salzman Elaborates on Safe Torture
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sara Salzman aka Sara "The Fist" Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> did post:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: ssch...@infinet.com
Newsgroups: alt.sex.bondage
Subject: Re: What is power? (was Re: Power Imbalance v. Power Exchange)
Date: Sun, 05 Feb 1995 18:00:29 -0500
Organization: InfiNet
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <sschwartz-050...@p55.infinet.com>
References: <1995Jan27.2...@tantalus.clark.net>
<3gha46$p...@panix3.panix.com> <1995Jan30....@tantalus.clark.net>
<3gj06b$n...@crl9.crl.com> <3gv6bm$4...@crl9.crl.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: p55.infinet.com
In article <3gv6bm$4...@crl9.crl.com>, ver...@crl.com (Janet W. Hardy) wrote:
> Quick straw poll here: How many people have ever felt totally,
> completely safe during any S/M scene -- safeword or no, light or heavy,
> D/S or sensation-only?
Verdant:
I hate to muddle the semantics further, but... safe? You mean safe that my
Master won't break my leg or suffocate me to the point of death in a scene?
100%. Period. I know my Master would never cause tha kind of damage.
Safe, as in not getting hurt, or not getting hurt MORE thn I'd LIKE to accept?
Certianly not 100%. Mastercat is always pushing limits, and pushing me to
the edge or slightly farther.
But safe in terms of not getting killed or left in bondage to die alone?
Absolutely 100%. And not only with my own Master, but I feel equally safe
with those other Dom(mes) he has had me play with. Perrrfect <END>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=s70dcvgs3eucqd31n81gqo5e21uj7vvg67%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Sara "The Fist" Salzman - A Compilation of Her Better Known Literary
Works and Opinions
Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 13:35:49 -0500
Message-ID: <s70dcvgs3eucqd31n...@4ax.com>
NO WONDER WHY THE WORLD PERCEIVES YOUR KIND AS WORTHLESS SHIT!!
Joebruno
Judge Bruno: Sara and Yale, I find you guilty on all counts. I
sentence both of you to 10 lashes with a wet noodle. (You can keep all
your clothes on)
Sara Salzman
Hash: SHA1
In article <bf3896a1.0402...@posting.google.com>,
br...@indystart.com (Joebruno) wrote:
> > Yep. I know Yale sent you a POEM in the mail.
That's more than Bradbury's Sheriff sentenced us to! He thought it
was pretty hysterical that Bradbury wanted to file charges against
Yale for sending him a letter!
As for RICO, he's STILL giggling about that.
Sara
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3 - not licensed for commercial use: www.pgp.com
iQA/AwUBQDqPCydySwjCuT94EQLvKACggUIH79tMouXAmSJUQ9IyV8/K/u4AoOAS
3ZWn6HUsrO6BY+H8GhSIabet
=acaa
Dedicated to Yale F. Edeiken
<catamont-EF8F1A...@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>> Judge Bruno: Sara and Yale, I find you guilty on all counts. I
>> sentence both of you to 10 lashes with a wet noodle. (You can keep
>> all your clothes on)
>
>That's more than Bradbury's Sheriff sentenced us to! He thought it
>was pretty hysterical that Bradbury wanted to file charges against
>Yale for sending him a letter!
You wish! The implied threat was the issue!
>As for RICO, he's STILL giggling about that.
Never mentioned it to him thus once again you are proven to be a fat stupid
lying pig!
Looks like someone is getting paranoid and attempting some damage control!
>Sara
Tavish
Sara Salzman
Hash: SHA1
In article <cq7l30tdl1un7nfs0...@4ax.com>,
Dedicated to Yale F. Edeiken <F...@NO-REPLIES-PLEASE.NET> wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Feb 2004 16:38:55 -0700,
> <catamont-EF8F1A...@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>
> >> Judge Bruno: Sara and Yale, I find you guilty on all counts. I
> >> sentence both of you to 10 lashes with a wet noodle. (You can
> >> keep all your clothes on)
> >
> >That's more than Bradbury's Sheriff sentenced us to! He thought it
> >was pretty hysterical that Bradbury wanted to file charges against
> >Yale for sending him a letter!
>
> You wish! The implied threat was the issue!
>
Except there was no implied threat. In fact, the ONLY reason yale
sent me copies of the letters he sent you was to m ake sure you
didn't try to LIE about them, as you're now doing.
Sorry, Mr. Bradbury. You've been caught lying again, and law
enforcement isn't doing ANYTHING to Yale.
When the Sheriff told you the case was being transferred to the State
AG's office, he meant MY case, not YOURS.
Try again.
Sara
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3 - not licensed for commercial use: www.pgp.com
iQA/AwUBQDqxECdySwjCuT94EQIDjgCffstJZLb0kFTBDPWCmukbgpG+2cgAn0RG
S4szUSqz7DUWCAL8wsTRZoiV
=mYaf
Dedicated to Yale F. Edeiken
<catamont-392781...@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>In article <cq7l30tdl1un7nfs0...@4ax.com>,
> Dedicated to Yale F. Edeiken <F...@NO-REPLIES-PLEASE.NET> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 23 Feb 2004 16:38:55 -0700,
>> <catamont-EF8F1A...@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
>> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>>
>> >> Judge Bruno: Sara and Yale, I find you guilty on all counts. I
>> >> sentence both of you to 10 lashes with a wet noodle. (You can
>> >> keep all your clothes on)
>> >
>> >That's more than Bradbury's Sheriff sentenced us to! He thought it
>> >was pretty hysterical that Bradbury wanted to file charges against
>> >Yale for sending him a letter!
>>
>> You wish! The implied threat was the issue!
>>
>
>Except there was no implied threat.
What do you call this?
"To Scotty Bradshit: I wanted to remind you that Purim is approaching. Some
people will play nasty tricks on scum like you at this time of year..."
I seem to recall that Yale submitted this in his failed lawsuit against me:
55. Said threats were intended and designed to alarm, harass,
intimidate, annoy, distress, and inflict emotional distress upon Plaintiff
and that such damages actually occurred.
56. As a result of which Plaintiff suffered great distress and
mental anguish and was deprived of he enjoyment of life's pleasures.
What was the message's intent? What is the motive of Yale sending me numerous
insulting letters via the United States Parcel Service other than to do what he
accused me of above!?
Yale has no business whatsoever to be sending me such insulting mail and for a
fact he is getting reported to people who take seriously the conduct of
attorneys in his state! I don't think they will be so cavalier about his
mailings and his obvious intent!
>In fact, the ONLY reason yale sent me copies of the letters he sent you
>was to m ake sure you didn't try to LIE about them, as you're now doing.
Poor dodge and how did I lie!? I quoted the threat and you're in denial as
usual!
>Sorry, Mr. Bradbury. You've been caught lying again,
You're the one caught lying and more than once in this post!
>and law enforcement isn't doing ANYTHING to Yale.
That is what you want to believe!
>When the Sheriff told you the case was being transferred to the State
>AG's office,
He told me no such thing! Care to show where I made such a claim you lying pig?
>he meant MY case, not YOURS.
Another lie from the fat pig. The Sheriff told me to my face last Friday that it
was a Sgt Lou Soucey of the State Attorney General's office who contacted them
and not the other way around! Neither agency considers any of my activity as
being criminal and once again- the next time one of your thugs posts where I
live then I will post where you and Yale live!! YOU CAN COUNT ON IT YOU STUPID
LYING PIG!!
My Sheriff made NO statement and I made no claim that my local Sheriff was
sending my complaint to the AG's office! Care to show where I made such a claim
you fat stupid lying psychotic pig? How many lies have I caught you in this
time?
It is going to be an immense satisfaction to know I was the one who gets Edeiken
disbarred and his license revoked! I haven't mentioned the other forms of
harassment that mentally disturbed bastard is waging against me either BUT that
will surely be more icing on the cake and as Yale even admitted about his own
mental state:
Special Note: Yale F. Edeiken Esq. of Allentown, Pennsylvania- Supreme Court
ID# 40290 has falsely asserted he was associated with the two law firms
mentioned below-- Todd Miller & Associates and Trainor Law Offices. Both law
firms told me first hand that Yale F. Edeiken was never an attorney at their
firms!! That is fact!
(Archived locally as: YaleTheNut)
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=SH9g7.634%247d....@newshog.newsread.com&lr=&hl=en
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Subject: Re: The Common Thread To All These Cancel Announcements...
Message-ID: <SH9g7.634$7d.2...@newshog.newsread.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 15:06:26 GMT
Defendant Bradshit <rdoc_...@my-deja.cpm, tavi...@ix.netcom,com> wrote
in message news:7lp1otkrsh37k7ioi...@4ax.com...
[...]
> Care to tell all of us why both Todd Miller and Paul Trainor distanced
> themselves from you
Because they were dealing with someone who was "mentally unstable"
(their dscription) and a "crazy man" (again, their description) who they
wanted to go away as quckly as possible.
~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~
THAT IS ONE FAT HOG WHO SHOULD BE BROUGHT IN FOR ROUTINE QUESTIONING AND THEN
PUT INTO PROTECTIVE CUSTODY TO PROTECT SOCIETY FROM SHIT LIKE HIM!
You and Yale are quite a pair!
>Try again.
>
>Sara
I don't need to try again you fat disgusting lying pig! Now return to your mire
and wallow in it!
Sara "The Fist" Salzman: Quintessential homeliness in the flesh:
http://www.westword.com/issues/11209/2/image.gif <Sitting and authoring S&M<
Everyone just look at the size of those hands and wrist! Sara must be a real
power fister!
http://www.westword.com/issues/11209/4/image.gif <Standing Medusa look<
Looks like your face has been fisted too many times too!
Has "THE MASTER" given you too many beatings or have you
stayed too long under his electric fan turned whipping machine
too long?
Tavish
Sara Salzman
Hash: SHA1
In article <n7jl301m9tfu4fcr0...@4ax.com>,
Dedicated to Yale F. Edeiken <F...@NO-REPLIES-PLEASE.NET> wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Feb 2004 19:04:03 -0700,
> <catamont-392781...@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>
> >In article <cq7l30tdl1un7nfs0...@4ax.com>,
> > Dedicated to Yale F. Edeiken <F...@NO-REPLIES-PLEASE.NET> wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 23 Feb 2004 16:38:55 -0700,
> >> <catamont-EF8F1A...@news-60.giganews.com> Sara
> >> Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> >> Judge Bruno: Sara and Yale, I find you guilty on all counts.
> >> >> I sentence both of you to 10 lashes with a wet noodle. (You
> >> >> can keep all your clothes on)
> >> >
> >> >That's more than Bradbury's Sheriff sentenced us to! He thought
> >> >it was pretty hysterical that Bradbury wanted to file charges
> >> >against Yale for sending him a letter!
> >>
> >> You wish! The implied threat was the issue!
> >>
> >
> >Except there was no implied threat.
>
> What do you call this?
>
> "To Scotty Bradshit: I wanted to remind you that Purim is
> approaching. Some people will play nasty tricks on scum like you at
> this time of year..."
I call it a statement of fact. 1) Purim is approaching. 2) Some
people play tricks on each other at Purim."
>
> I seem to recall that Yale submitted this in his failed lawsuit
> against me:
>
> 55. Said threats were intended and designed to alarm,
> harass, intimidate, annoy, distress, and inflict emotional distress
> upon Plaintiff and that such damages actually occurred.
> 56. As a result of which Plaintiff suffered great distress
> and mental anguish and was deprived of he enjoyment of life's
> pleasures.
There's quite a difference between sending a letter that tells you
when Purim is, and making statements about "standing behind" someone
with a loaded gun. There is a great distance between someone sending
you a letter, and someone calling in a bomb threat at an women's
health clinic and blaming it on Yale.
>
> What was the message's intent? What is the motive of Yale sending
> me numerous insulting letters via the United States Parcel Service
> other than to do what he
> accused me of above!?
I believe Yale may be trying to keep things between the TWO of you
instead of your slandering him on Usenet.
>
> Yale has no business whatsoever to be sending me such insulting
> mail and for a
> fact he is getting reported to people who take seriously the
> conduct of attorneys in his state! I don't think they will be so
> cavalier about his mailings and his obvious intent!
>
You've been yammering about this for years: "I'm gonna get yale
disbarred, I'm gonna get yale arrested, law enforcement takes me
really seriously." It's all a fantasy, Mr Bradbury. No one in law
enforcement thinks you're a sane human being. No one at the FBI
believed a word you said. You couldn't even get Montel Williams to
care about your pathetic story.
> >In fact, the ONLY reason yale sent me copies of the letters he
> >sent you was to m ake sure you didn't try to LIE about them, as
> >you're now doing.
>
> Poor dodge and how did I lie!? I quoted the threat and you're in
> denial as usual!
As YOU love to howl, you quoted "OUT OF CONTEXT." I added the
complete quote.
>
> >Sorry, Mr. Bradbury. You've been caught lying again,
>
> You're the one caught lying and more than once in this post!
>
> >and law enforcement isn't doing ANYTHING to Yale.
>
> That is what you want to believe!
Nope. That is what LAW ENFORCEMENT told me.
>
> >When the Sheriff told you the case was being transferred to the
> >State AG's office,
>
> He told me no such thing! Care to show where I made such a claim
> you lying pig?
I never said you said it, Asshole. I said HE said it. So you are now
calling Sheriff Burger a LIAR?! He told me quite clearly.
>
> >he meant MY case, not YOURS.
>
> Another lie from the fat pig. The Sheriff told me to my face last
> Friday that it
> was a Sgt Lou Soucey of the State Attorney General's office who
> contacted them
> and not the other way around!
That's very funny. Sheriff Burger gave ME Lou Soucy's name and told
me that HIS OWN sargeant called Mr. Soucy.
> Neither agency considers any of my activity as
> being criminal and once again- the next time one of your thugs
> posts where I live then I will post where you and Yale live!! YOU
> CAN COUNT ON IT YOU STUPID
> LYING PIG!!
And I will continue to quote your own words back at you.
>
> It is going to be an immense satisfaction to know I was the one who
> gets Edeiken
> disbarred and his license revoked! I haven't mentioned the other
> forms of harassment that mentally disturbed bastard is waging
> against me either BUT that
> will surely be more icing on the cake
Dream on. Dream on.
>
> You and Yale are quite a pair!
>
> >Try again.
> >
> >Sara
>
> I don't need to try again you fat disgusting lying pig! Now return
> to your mire
> and wallow in it!
>
FORGED ALTERED CRAP DELETED
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3 - not licensed for commercial use: www.pgp.com
iQA/AwUBQDrj/ydySwjCuT94EQLYnACg0rV6KHFmX/RIlQoP/tgpJhpnaloAoLLh
gORJWzbU1VO97vMR9D0ZomsN
=MERO
Dedicated to Yale F. Edeiken
<catamont-F2E756...@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>> "To Scotty Bradshit: I wanted to remind you that Purim is
>> approaching. Some people will play nasty tricks on scum like you at
>> this time of year..."
>
>I call it a statement of fact. 1) Purim is approaching. 2) Some
>people play tricks on each other at Purim."
I am not a Jew and you know it and Yale knows it! The letter was meant to be a
threat and harassment and nothing more! Keep trying to do damage control you fat
slob because you only show how you Jooos haven't changed your evil devilish
designs in 2000 years!
Yale F. Edeiken has no business whatsoever to be sending me anything! The fact
he keeps "bothering" me proves he has mental problems just as you have mental
problems and as Yale even said in his own words:
(Archived locally as: YaleTheNut)
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=SH9g7.634%247d....@newshog.newsread.com&lr=&hl=en
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Subject: Re: The Common Thread To All These Cancel Announcements...
Message-ID: <SH9g7.634$7d.2...@newshog.newsread.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 15:06:26 GMT
Defendant Bradshit <rdoc_...@my-deja.cpm, tavi...@ix.netcom,com> wrote
in message news:7lp1otkrsh37k7ioi...@4ax.com...
[...]
> Care to tell all of us why both Todd Miller and Paul Trainor distanced
> themselves from you
Because they were dealing with someone who was "mentally unstable"
(their dscription) and a "crazy man" (again, their description) who they
wanted to go away as quckly as possible.
~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~
--Devilish Satanic Children of the Devil and Anti-Christs Identified--
CHILDREN OF THE DEVIL (BELIAL) IDENTIFIED:
John 8:
42 Jesus said to them, "If God were your Father, you would love me, for I came
from God and now am here. I have not come on my own; but he sent me.
43 Why is my language not clear to you? Because you are unable to hear what I
say.
44 You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father's
desire. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for
there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is
a liar and the father of lies.
45 Yet because I tell the truth, you do not believe me!
46 Can any of you prove me guilty of sin? If I am telling the truth, why don't
you believe me?
47 He who belongs to God hears what God says. The reason you do not hear is that
you do not belong to God."
48 The Jews answered him, "Aren't we right in saying that you are a Samaritan
and demon-possessed?"
49 "I am not possessed by a demon," said Jesus, "but I honor my Father and you
dishonor me..
ANTI-CHRISTS IDENTIFIED:
1 John 2: 18 "Young children, it is the last hour, and, just as you have heard
that antichrist is coming, even now there have come to be many antichrists."
1 John 2: 22,23 "Who is the liar if it is not the one that denies that Jesus is
the Christ [or Messiah]? These things I write you about those who are trying to
mislead you!"
1 John 4: 2,3 "You gain knowledge of the inspired expression from God by this:
Every inspired expression that confesses Jesus Christ as having come in the
flesh originates with God, but every inspired expression that does not confess
Jesus does not originate with God, Furthermore this is the antichrist's inspired
expression which you have heard was coming, and now it is already in the world."
2 John 7,10,11 "For many deceivers have gone forth into the world, persons not
confessing Jesus Christ as coming in the flesh. This is the deceiver and the
antichrist. If anyone comes to you and does not bring this teaching, never
receive him into your homes or say a greeting to him. For he that says a
greeting to him is a sharer in his wicked works."
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Having any sympathy for the anti-Christ offspring of Belial (aka Lucifer) is
having SYMPATHY FOR THE DEVIL (who is their proud father who inspires them)-
which is at its core demonic and un-Christian!
Judges 20:13 "Now therefore deliver us the men, the children of Belial, which
are in Gibeah, that we may put them to death, and put away evil from Israel."
2 Corinthians 6:15 "What harmony is there between Christ and Belial? What does
a believer have in common with an unbeliever?"
http://www.belial.org/enbib/whois.htm (Archived locally as: belial_whois)
"...the ruler of all these newly-made demons was the Prince of Evil, known as
(among other things) Satan, Lucifer, Leviathan and Belial. The fallen angels,
who earlier had worked hard for God, became pure, independent and the foremost
enemies of the Christians."
Tavish
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=5rhktv483m9oofgqt8goir93o4pm08ht49%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: 3 Major Jewish Organizations Engage in Holocaust Denial...
Message-ID: <5rhktv483m9oofgqt...@4ax.com>
Date: 12 Dec 2003 22:57:48 GMT
If Jews are allowed to call a historic event a "Holocaust" based on Jews being
tortured, imprisoned, and executed by Nazis then why can't Christians claim Jews
had "Holocausts" against non-Jews/Christians seeing how the 1st Century
Pharisees and the 20th Century Jewish led Bolshevists tortured, imprisoned, and
executed Christians/non-Jews. Jews also deny these other "Holocausts" so going
by their standards they are "Holocaust Deniers" and should be prosecuted for
Holocaust Denial"and "Minimalizing the Holocaust[s])" as well!
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=1i7810p7itigphaaq...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Post-Soviet Religion (What Communists did to Christians) V2.0a S_0125
Message-ID: <1i7810p7itigphaaq...@4ax.com>
Date: 25 Jan 2004 19:53:30 GMT
Sara Salzman
Hash: SHA1
In article <epim305avqa9tauh1...@4ax.com>,
Dedicated to Yale F. Edeiken <F...@NO-REPLIES-PLEASE.NET> wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Feb 2004 22:41:23 -0700,
> <catamont-F2E756...@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>
> >> "To Scotty Bradshit: I wanted to remind you that Purim is
> >> approaching. Some people will play nasty tricks on scum like you
> >> at this time of year..."
> >
> >I call it a statement of fact. 1) Purim is approaching. 2) Some
> >people play tricks on each other at Purim."
>
> I am not a Jew and you know it and Yale knows it!
Well, of course, everyone knows that. No one ever said you were a
Jew.
> The letter was meant to be
> a
> threat and harassment and nothing more! Keep trying to do damage
> control you fat
> slob because you only show how you Jooos haven't changed your evil
> devilish designs in 2000 years!
No damage control, Mr. Bradbury. A strane little thing called facts.
You might try them sometime.
>
> Yale F. Edeiken has no business whatsoever to be sending me
> anything!
And you have no business posting his address. Or, for that matter,
mine.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3 - not licensed for commercial use: www.pgp.com
iQA/AwUBQDtN1ydySwjCuT94EQJezQCgwatRhPtcbbM1rikJEj7Nep34tq8AoJp9
aIE1K43Y7IgS8djRTbttNY/p
=HOsT
Dedicated to Yale F. Edeiken
<catamont-8B0208...@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>
>In article <epim305avqa9tauh1...@4ax.com>,
> Dedicated to Yale F. Edeiken <F...@NO-REPLIES-PLEASE.NET> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 23 Feb 2004 22:41:23 -0700,
>> <catamont-F2E756...@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
>> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>>
>> >> "To Scotty Bradshit: I wanted to remind you that Purim is
>> >> approaching. Some people will play nasty tricks on scum like you
>> >> at this time of year..."
>> >
>> >I call it a statement of fact. 1) Purim is approaching. 2) Some
>> >people play tricks on each other at Purim."
>>
>> I am not a Jew and you know it and Yale knows it!
>
>Well, of course, everyone knows that. No one ever said you were a
>Jew.
>
>
>> The letter was meant to be a threat and harassment and nothing more! Keep
>> trying to do damage control you fat slob because you only show how you Jooos
>> haven't changed your evil devilish designs in 2000 years!
>
>No damage control, Mr. Bradbury. A strane little thing called facts.
>You might try them sometime.
I always do0 BUT you two don';t and for a fact you two perjured yourselves!
I.E.
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=0neq10177ekocu899...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Sara Salzman Won't Comment on These Forgeries - I Wonder Why!.. V2.0
Message-ID: <0neq10177ekocu899...@4ax.com>
Date: 1 Feb 2004 18:21:27 GMT
>> Yale F. Edeiken has no business whatsoever to be sending me
>> anything!
>
>And you have no business posting his address. Or, for that matter,
>mine.
Oh yes I do! Your thugs keep posting where I live and they only know so because
of Yale and YOU! As long as where I live gets posted then I will post where the
two shits live who made my address etc. known in the first place and you can
count on it you fat stupid pig!
Tavish