info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: Did Fat Fani Willis Conspire With Biden's White House? We May Find Out Soon.
5 views
Skip to first unread message
Lock Her Up !!!!!!!
Jan 26, 2024, 6:02:25 PMJan 26
to
On 13 Feb 2022, Lefty Lundquist <lefty_l...@ggmail.com> posted some
news:suc3hp$4ev$1...@dont-email.me:
> The shit is hitting the fan for fat Fani.
The judge presiding over former President Donald Trump's "election
conspiracy" case in Georgia has scheduled a hearing for Thursday to
consider a request for discovery from one of Trump's alleged "co-
conspirators," who is seeking access to any records that potentially catch
Fulton County prosecutors conspiring with President Joe Biden's White
House.
Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee issued a one-page order on
January 17 summoning attorneys for ex-Trump DOJ official Jeffrey B. Clark
and Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis to appear in his Atlanta
courtroom at 2 p.m. Thursday.
Clark's motion to compel—dated January 12—asked the court to order Willis
to turn over any evidence documenting any contact she may have had, citing
travel receipts billing the Democrat D.A.'s office a total of $4,000 for
two eight-hour meetings (costing $2,000 each) with White House officials.
One was a late May 2022 conference in Athens and the other a D.C.
"interview" in mid-November of 2022. Both financial statements were filed
away under the project title: "Anti-Corruption Special Prosecutor."
https://media.townhall.com/cdn/hodl/images/up/2024/25/9269c42f-fdf1-4ed7-
a875-02a22347c007.png
In the court filing, Clark's lawyers said they had previously written to
Willis back on December 12, 2023, requesting "copies of all
communications" with any agency or office of the federal government
pertaining to Trump's prosecution or prior investigation.
When Willis didn't answer, Clark's attorneys sent a follow-up letter on
January 9, adding to the inquiry. The defense team additionally asked for
receipts of correspondence with the White House counsel's office,
including individuals referenced on invoices from the law firm of lead
prosecutor and Willis' alleged lover Nathan Wade showing an entry for May
23, 2022, titled "Travel to Athens: Conf with White House Counsel," and an
entry for November 18, 2022, titled "Interview with DC/White House."
https://media.townhall.com/cdn/hodl/images/up/2024/25/09577301-6823-496b-
8a46-e76c70ca7a8f.png
The paper trail was unearthed in Trump co-defendant Michael Roman's
bombshell motion to disqualify the D.A. where he accused Willis of having
an "improper" and "clandestine" affair with Wade at the time she had hired
him to prosecute Trump.
Both meet-ups happened well before Trump's August 2023 indictment by a
Georgia grand jury, but after Willis had asked the court in January 2022
to impanel a special-purpose grand jury to assist in her investigation of
2020 "election interference."
"In your response, please identify all persons present or participating in
the referenced conference and interview, and all documents or information
provided or received by your office in such meetings," Clark's legal
counsel prompted Willis.
Then, on January 10, Executive District Attorney Daysha Young responded on
behalf of Willis and declined to provide the requested material, claiming
that the state has fully complied with all of its statutory discovery-and-
disclosure obligations.
The proof of contact "may be material to the outcome of the case or
helpful to the defense, if it supports an argument that the prosecution of
this case is tainted with partisan political objectives coordinated with,
suggested or directed by the White House," Clark's lawyers contended in
their motion to compel production of documentation. "The political bene?t
of this prosecution to President Biden and his political party are obvious
and a current fact of political life," the Trump co-defendant's attorneys
added.
"All defendants should know the nature of the State’s communications with
the White House Counsel’s O?ce to assess whether they can mount a defense
based on selective or political prosecution in violation of their rights
to due process and the equal protection of the laws," Clark's counsel
continued, concluding: "There is a plausible basis for suspicion on that
score, and therefore su?cient justi?cation to require production of the
requested information that might support a defense motion."
Another invoice from the "Law Offices of Nathan J. Wade" shows that he
also met with the Democrat-led House Select January 6 Committee in the
spring of 2022. Wade's crew traveled to Washington and documented the
April 18, 2022, to April 21, 2022, in-person conference as "Team meeting;
Conf w/Jan 6; Research legal issues to prep interv" for 24 hours of work
totaling $6,000.
https://media.townhall.com/cdn/hodl/images/up/2024/25/edb7334f-5c1d-4beb-
81c7-2171d9704925.png
Wade labeled a separate $2,000 invoice statement "Team meeting: Conf w/Jan
6; SPGJ witness prep" for an eight-hour conference on May 31, 2022. And
there was a third day-long January 6 meeting charged at $250/hour on
November 16, 2022.
J6 committee staff reportedly gave Willis an "early boost," helping
"guide" the infantile days of the Georgia Trump probe. The extent of the
panel's assistance included helping Fulton County prosecutors prep for
interviews with star witnesses and discussing topics that were "later
featured prominently" in the indictment against Trump and his associates
(via Politico):
Committee staff quietly met with lawyers and agents working for Fulton
County District Attorney Fani Willis in mid-April 2022, just as she
prepared to convene a special grand jury investigation. In the previously
unreported meeting, the Jan. 6 committee aides let the district attorney’s
team review — but not keep — a limited set of evidence they had gathered.
Over the next few months, committee staff also had a series of phone calls
with Willis’ team. They answered the prosecutors’ questions and shared
insight on matters like Trump’s false electors gambit and his efforts to
pressure Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger. Both of those
ploys ultimately featured prominently in the criminal charges that Willis
brought against Trump and his allies last summer.
The contacts between the [January 6] committee and Willis’ team also
helped [Fulton County] prosecutors prepare for interviews with key
witnesses.
The content of the meetings and calls was described by two former
committee officials familiar with the outreach, who were granted anonymity
to speak candidly about the contacts. The timing was corroborated by
exhibits attached to new court filings in Willis’ ongoing prosecution of
Trump and 14 co-defendants for their efforts to overturn the 2020
election.
[...]
The two former committee officials confirmed to POLITICO that Willis’ team
met with committee staff in Washington in April 2022. Some of Willis’ top
prosecutors attended, including Wade and Donald Wakeford, as well as
investigators on her team.
The prosecutors had made headway, one former official said, but the panel
had done more work than they had on some topics.
On December 17, 2021, Willis wrote a letter to J6 committee chairman Rep.
Bennie Thompson (D-MS) officially asking for help with her Trump probe and
suggesting that they convene, noting that they're able to trek to the
nation's capital at the committee's convenience. "It may well be most
efficient for your staff and effective for our understanding of my staff
and me to meet with your investigators in person. We are able to travel to
Washington..." Willis wrote in the memo, requesting access to
congressional records, such as recordings, transcripts of witness
interviews and depositions, communications, and travel documents.
https://media.townhall.com/cdn/hodl/images/up/2024/25/f4a2dfe2-1775-435d-
95ea-8173c756669e.png
The J6 committee's collaboration "helped jumpstart a criminal case that
would ultimately imperil Trump," Politico assessed.
House Republicans recently called on Willis to disclose her crew's
contacts with the J6 committee. Willis refused, claiming the request
"violates well-established principles of federalism and separation of
powers." She told House Judiciary Committee chairman Rep. Jim Jordan (R-
OH): "You cannot—and will not—be provided access to any non-public
information about this."
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/miacathell/2024/01/25/fani-willis-hearing-
jan-25-preview-n2634127
news:suc3hp$4ev$1...@dont-email.me:
> The shit is hitting the fan for fat Fani.
The judge presiding over former President Donald Trump's "election
conspiracy" case in Georgia has scheduled a hearing for Thursday to
consider a request for discovery from one of Trump's alleged "co-
conspirators," who is seeking access to any records that potentially catch
Fulton County prosecutors conspiring with President Joe Biden's White
House.
Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee issued a one-page order on
January 17 summoning attorneys for ex-Trump DOJ official Jeffrey B. Clark
and Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis to appear in his Atlanta
courtroom at 2 p.m. Thursday.
Clark's motion to compel—dated January 12—asked the court to order Willis
to turn over any evidence documenting any contact she may have had, citing
travel receipts billing the Democrat D.A.'s office a total of $4,000 for
two eight-hour meetings (costing $2,000 each) with White House officials.
One was a late May 2022 conference in Athens and the other a D.C.
"interview" in mid-November of 2022. Both financial statements were filed
away under the project title: "Anti-Corruption Special Prosecutor."
https://media.townhall.com/cdn/hodl/images/up/2024/25/9269c42f-fdf1-4ed7-
a875-02a22347c007.png
In the court filing, Clark's lawyers said they had previously written to
Willis back on December 12, 2023, requesting "copies of all
communications" with any agency or office of the federal government
pertaining to Trump's prosecution or prior investigation.
When Willis didn't answer, Clark's attorneys sent a follow-up letter on
January 9, adding to the inquiry. The defense team additionally asked for
receipts of correspondence with the White House counsel's office,
including individuals referenced on invoices from the law firm of lead
prosecutor and Willis' alleged lover Nathan Wade showing an entry for May
23, 2022, titled "Travel to Athens: Conf with White House Counsel," and an
entry for November 18, 2022, titled "Interview with DC/White House."
https://media.townhall.com/cdn/hodl/images/up/2024/25/09577301-6823-496b-
8a46-e76c70ca7a8f.png
The paper trail was unearthed in Trump co-defendant Michael Roman's
bombshell motion to disqualify the D.A. where he accused Willis of having
an "improper" and "clandestine" affair with Wade at the time she had hired
him to prosecute Trump.
Both meet-ups happened well before Trump's August 2023 indictment by a
Georgia grand jury, but after Willis had asked the court in January 2022
to impanel a special-purpose grand jury to assist in her investigation of
2020 "election interference."
"In your response, please identify all persons present or participating in
the referenced conference and interview, and all documents or information
provided or received by your office in such meetings," Clark's legal
counsel prompted Willis.
Then, on January 10, Executive District Attorney Daysha Young responded on
behalf of Willis and declined to provide the requested material, claiming
that the state has fully complied with all of its statutory discovery-and-
disclosure obligations.
The proof of contact "may be material to the outcome of the case or
helpful to the defense, if it supports an argument that the prosecution of
this case is tainted with partisan political objectives coordinated with,
suggested or directed by the White House," Clark's lawyers contended in
their motion to compel production of documentation. "The political bene?t
of this prosecution to President Biden and his political party are obvious
and a current fact of political life," the Trump co-defendant's attorneys
added.
"All defendants should know the nature of the State’s communications with
the White House Counsel’s O?ce to assess whether they can mount a defense
based on selective or political prosecution in violation of their rights
to due process and the equal protection of the laws," Clark's counsel
continued, concluding: "There is a plausible basis for suspicion on that
score, and therefore su?cient justi?cation to require production of the
requested information that might support a defense motion."
Another invoice from the "Law Offices of Nathan J. Wade" shows that he
also met with the Democrat-led House Select January 6 Committee in the
spring of 2022. Wade's crew traveled to Washington and documented the
April 18, 2022, to April 21, 2022, in-person conference as "Team meeting;
Conf w/Jan 6; Research legal issues to prep interv" for 24 hours of work
totaling $6,000.
https://media.townhall.com/cdn/hodl/images/up/2024/25/edb7334f-5c1d-4beb-
81c7-2171d9704925.png
Wade labeled a separate $2,000 invoice statement "Team meeting: Conf w/Jan
6; SPGJ witness prep" for an eight-hour conference on May 31, 2022. And
there was a third day-long January 6 meeting charged at $250/hour on
November 16, 2022.
J6 committee staff reportedly gave Willis an "early boost," helping
"guide" the infantile days of the Georgia Trump probe. The extent of the
panel's assistance included helping Fulton County prosecutors prep for
interviews with star witnesses and discussing topics that were "later
featured prominently" in the indictment against Trump and his associates
(via Politico):
Committee staff quietly met with lawyers and agents working for Fulton
County District Attorney Fani Willis in mid-April 2022, just as she
prepared to convene a special grand jury investigation. In the previously
unreported meeting, the Jan. 6 committee aides let the district attorney’s
team review — but not keep — a limited set of evidence they had gathered.
Over the next few months, committee staff also had a series of phone calls
with Willis’ team. They answered the prosecutors’ questions and shared
insight on matters like Trump’s false electors gambit and his efforts to
pressure Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger. Both of those
ploys ultimately featured prominently in the criminal charges that Willis
brought against Trump and his allies last summer.
The contacts between the [January 6] committee and Willis’ team also
helped [Fulton County] prosecutors prepare for interviews with key
witnesses.
The content of the meetings and calls was described by two former
committee officials familiar with the outreach, who were granted anonymity
to speak candidly about the contacts. The timing was corroborated by
exhibits attached to new court filings in Willis’ ongoing prosecution of
Trump and 14 co-defendants for their efforts to overturn the 2020
election.
[...]
The two former committee officials confirmed to POLITICO that Willis’ team
met with committee staff in Washington in April 2022. Some of Willis’ top
prosecutors attended, including Wade and Donald Wakeford, as well as
investigators on her team.
The prosecutors had made headway, one former official said, but the panel
had done more work than they had on some topics.
On December 17, 2021, Willis wrote a letter to J6 committee chairman Rep.
Bennie Thompson (D-MS) officially asking for help with her Trump probe and
suggesting that they convene, noting that they're able to trek to the
nation's capital at the committee's convenience. "It may well be most
efficient for your staff and effective for our understanding of my staff
and me to meet with your investigators in person. We are able to travel to
Washington..." Willis wrote in the memo, requesting access to
congressional records, such as recordings, transcripts of witness
interviews and depositions, communications, and travel documents.
https://media.townhall.com/cdn/hodl/images/up/2024/25/f4a2dfe2-1775-435d-
95ea-8173c756669e.png
The J6 committee's collaboration "helped jumpstart a criminal case that
would ultimately imperil Trump," Politico assessed.
House Republicans recently called on Willis to disclose her crew's
contacts with the J6 committee. Willis refused, claiming the request
"violates well-established principles of federalism and separation of
powers." She told House Judiciary Committee chairman Rep. Jim Jordan (R-
OH): "You cannot—and will not—be provided access to any non-public
information about this."
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/miacathell/2024/01/25/fani-willis-hearing-
jan-25-preview-n2634127
0 new messages